• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

US PoliGAF 2012 | The Romney VeepStakes: Waiting for Chris Christie to Sing…

Status
Not open for further replies.
At this point I'm not so convinced Obama should laugh away the possibility of Gingrich in the GE.

Coulter's a weird wingnut. She hated McCain, even to the point of saying that she's vote for Hillary instead, and was one of the far right nimrods who insisted that they only lost the election cause they didn't nominate a "real" conservative. Yet here she is supporting Mitt the Massachusetts moderate Mormon. Wtf?

WGRXq.jpg
 
How? Independents are not voting for Newt Gingrich. To anyone but Republicans he's one of the most hated figures in modern politics.

He is not Mormon so Evangelicals will vote for him. He might refresh the Evangelical base like Bush did in 2004. All he has to do is talk about Abortion, gay marriage and other stuff that religious care about and he gets the religious´vote i recon. I know it´s the economy stupid phrase, but one must never underestimate religious vote, or one´s opponent. I am not thinking that independents will flock to Obama like they did in 2008. If the economy did not improve or got even worse than Obama is in deep shit.

And independents? His favorability ratings are inline with Palin. Southern conservatives want a candidate to insult Obama in a debate. They believe this act alone will make him electable. It's just willful ignorance mixed with a small touch of old school racism.
Is there not a big disillusionment in Obama from both democrats and independents? Some of the independent base might vote for Gingrich, as a protest vote against Obama. There are many variables that you cannot dismiss.
 
An independent study not funded by TransCanada estimated that between 500 and 1400 temporary construction jobs would be created with a negative economic impact in the long term due to rising gas prices and environmental costs.

Construction jobs that are temporary?! No way. I thought they would hang around and polish the pipe after they constructed it.

That's what an independent report looks like? hahah. It reads more like a takedown piece than an actual unbiased report. No mention about how much tax revenues this project could produce for local and state governments? Or recommendations that additional money should be taxed on this construction to offset any future environmental problems? Shouldn't that at least get a mention in a comprehensive 'independent' study?


Anyways, it's pretty clear that TransCanada inflated their job reports and probably wouldn't meet all the goals they set forth. But that's no different than the 100's of other companies that submit bids and make plans before a project goes forth. That's not to excuse them, but just to remind people about reality.
 
An independent study not funded by TransCanada estimated that between 500 and 1400 temporary construction jobs would be created with a negative economic impact in the long term due to rising gas prices and environmental costs.

Completely independent and nonpartisan!

But probably still closer to the truth than the industry-provided figures, I reckon. Still, where was all this concern and denigration of the temporary nature of construction jobs with stimulus infrastructure projects? And other non-job jobs like researching monkeys smoking crack or whatever?

And when you've got everyone except the environmental groups and their allies on the left saying it's a no-brainer, it's probably a no-brainer.
 
He is not Mormon so Evangelicals will vote for him. He might refresh the Evangelical base like Bush did in 2004. All he has to do is talk about Abortion, gay marriage and other stuff that religious care about and he gets the religious´vote i recon. I know it´s the economy stupid phrase, but one must never underestimate religious vote, or one´s opponent. I am not thinking that independents will flock to Obama like they did in 2008. If the economy did not improve or got even worse than Obama is in deep shit.

I remember how a lot of women that were for Hillary Clinton voted against Obama or claimed to. I wonder how the Paulites will vote when he bows out. Who will his fanbase blame? The republican who beat him or the big government president that no one believed he'd be able to beat.

Hmm...

Just stirring things around in my head. Don't count Gingrich out in the GE out of hand.
 
Even TransCanada only projected 20k jobs.

Well, if the repubs are anything like Hollywood in the way they inflate jobs numbers, then they're probably counting every gas station worker that a pipeline worker fills up at and every diner worker that serves them a burger...
 
He is not Mormon so Evangelicals will vote for him. He might refresh the Evangelical base like Bush did in 2004. All he has to do is talk about Abortion, gay marriage and other stuff that religious care about and he gets the religious´vote i recon. I know it´s the economy stupid phrase, but one must never underestimate religious vote, or one´s opponent. I am not thinking that independents will flock to Obama like they did in 2008. If the economy did not improve or got even worse than Obama is in deep shit.

But George Bush WAS an evangelical so it's easy for him to convince those types of voters to get out and vote for him just by pimping those issues. It's a little harder for a Catholic who outright asked his wife to give up monogamy to go around preaching the sanctity of marriage.
 
Well, if the repubs are anything like Hollywood in the way they inflate jobs numbers, then they're probably counting every gas station worker that a pipeline worker fills up at and every diner worker that serves them a burger...


They are using Romney Math


But George Bush WAS an evangelical so it's easy for him to convince those types of voters to get out and vote for him. It's a little harder for a Catholic who outright asked his wife to give up monogamy to go around preaching the sanctity of marriage.


Bush also had appeal to independents (Bush and Kerry essentially split the independent vote). You don't win a presidency without independents.
 
But Joe Romm's Climate Progress is pretty good. In fact they completely tore the silly wired article apart:
Wired Pulls a Charlie Sheen on Clean Energy: Experts Easily Debunk Absurd Hit-Job on Solar and Wind Power

Joe Romm is so completely out in left field, it's ridiculous. Here's a guy who has his fingers on the pulse of new energy.


Outsourcing – another New Energy Economy trend – is starting to change this. Soon it may revolutionize corporate energy efficiency investments…. Some companies have turned over their entire power supply needs to outside contractors. In March 1999, Ocean Spray announced a $100 million deal with the energy services division of Enron, a major natural gas and utility company based in Houston. Enron will use its own capital to improve lighting, heating, cooling and motors and to invest in cogeneration (the simultaneous generation of electricity and steam onsite, which is highly efficient). Ocean Spray will save millions of dollars in energy costs, have more reliable power and cut pollution, without putting up any of its own capital. In September 1999, Owens Corning, the fiberglass insulation manufacturer, announced a similar $1 billion deal with Enron.”

- Joe Romm, Testimony before the Committee on Commerce of the U.S. Senate (September 21, 2000).
 
But George Bush WAS an evangelical so it's easy for him to convince those types of voters to get out and vote for him just by pimping those issues. It's a little harder for a Catholic who outright asked his wife to give up monogamy to go around preaching the sanctity of marriage.

He's already really watered down that criticism. I have a feeling that if he was in the GE he'd just make a big show of rolling his eyes and saying "Here they go again" and the audience will laugh and the dems will look like mudslingers.

Damn you John King.
 
Joe Romm is so completely out in left field, it's ridiculous. Here's a guy who has his fingers on the pulse of new energy.

He is in left-field because he got duped by a company of right-wing crooks back in 2000?

You should be mad at the right-wing crooks. They are the ones that lied.
 
He is in left-field because he got duped by a company of right-wing crooks back in 2000?

You should be mad at the right-wing crooks. They are the ones that lied.

What does it matter what their political leaning is? The focus is on Romm and his complete, decades-long obsession with 'non-traditional' technology that isn't market ready yet.
 
An independent study not funded by TransCanada estimated that between 500 and 1400 temporary construction jobs would be created with a negative economic impact in the long term due to rising gas prices and environmental costs.

stupid question but what is the point of this pipe line. Other then temporary jobs what will it do in the long run? And why is this a better infrastructure project then high speed rail network in Florida and California?
 
stupid question but what is the point of this pipe line. Other then temporary jobs what will it do in the long run? And why is this a better infrastructure project then high speed rail network in Florida and California?
Bring Oil to Southern refineries, with it's products being shipped overseas through the Gulf of Mexico.
 
Coulter's a weird wingnut. She hated McCain, even to the point of saying that she's vote for Hillary instead, and was one of the far right nimrods who insisted that they only lost the election cause they didn't nominate a "real" conservative. Yet here she is supporting Mitt the Massachusetts moderate Mormon. Wtf?

She basically got out-flanked by the Tea Party, and can't even fathom how to move right of Michelle Bachman. Her brand of neocon crazy is soooo 2003.
 
stupid question but what is the point of this pipe line. Other then temporary jobs what will it do in the long run? And why is this a better infrastructure project then high speed rail network in Florida and California?

Move Canadian oil to the Gulf of Mexico to be refined and sold, possibly to foreign nations.
 
aren't Conservatives the ones advocating for States rights?

so if some States did not like the design of the TransCanada pipeline, it was the State's right to object to the Stephen Harper poo poo pipes
 
I think Romney will win FL, but it'll be a squeaker. The Bushies don't like Newt, and Jeb will be doing everything he can to help Romney. Bush = Power = Money.
 
I think Romney will win FL, but it'll be a squeaker. The Bushies don't like Newt, and Jeb will be doing everything he can to help Romney. Bush = Power = Money.

Jeb already said he's not endorsing anyone, so obviously he won't be doing everything he can to help Romney when he won't even do the easiest thing.
 
Crazy that the polls in Florida swung so much, so fast. I imagine that they're about to be/are currently being bombarded by anti-Gingrich ads that would make the Iowa campaign look like nothing. Only now Gingrich has some cash and support to fight back a bit.

This is gonna be nuts.
 
Jeb already said he's not endorsing anyone, so obviously he won't be doing everything he can to help Romney when he won't even do the easiest thing.

Doesn't that just whiff of BS? Doesn't want to take even the slightest chance he'd back a loser so he doesn't back anyone. It bugs me that people are tossing his name around for VP or for the top spot in 2016.
 
Completely independent and nonpartisan!

But probably still closer to the truth than the industry-provided figures, I reckon. Still, where was all this concern and denigration of the temporary nature of construction jobs with stimulus infrastructure projects? And other non-job jobs like researching monkeys smoking crack or whatever?

And when you've got everyone except the environmental groups and their allies on the left saying it's a no-brainer, it's probably a no-brainer.

Actually, I just did some checking with a friend who works on offshore rigs in the Gulf and knows a bit about the oil biz...he says that a 1700 mile pipeline is going to take tens of thousands of workers to construct (including support) and thousands to maintain. So, a good number of both temporary and permanent jobs, though not as high as my earlier figure.

Did some checking on that Cornell outfit, is pretty much your standard lefty think tank/advocacy sort of place. Wouldn't trust them any more than I'd trust transcanada.
 
aren't Conservatives the ones advocating for States rights?

so if some States did not like the design of the TransCanada pipeline, it was the State's right to object to the Stephen Harper poo poo pipes

Indeed. If Nebraska wants an alternate route and TransCanada is willing to oblige them, then we wait for that. This is such a non-issue. It will be approved in the end, just not on the terms of Washington politicians who could give a flying shit about the middle-class jobs and families it will help in the short-run.
 
aren't Conservatives the ones advocating for States rights?

so if some States did not like the design of the TransCanada pipeline, it was the State's right to object to the Stephen Harper poo poo pipes

10th Amendment said:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

And one of the powers given to Congress under

Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution said:
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes

If a transnational pipeline doesn't fall under interstate commerce, I don't know what would. Especially since just about everything else you could possibly think of (including PPACA) does.
 
Well, if the repubs are anything like Hollywood in the way they inflate jobs numbers, then they're probably counting every gas station worker that a pipeline worker fills up at and every diner worker that serves them a burger...

Maybe they should switch to "created or saved".
 
Anyone else terrified of Gingrich being the nominee? He could actually be President.

I am. Just the mere fact that he's even this close sends a shiver down my spine. I swear I'm going to be in a corner, shaking, drunk off my ass on election night if he actually wins. I think I'll be doing that in fear already if he's even on the ballot.
 
Hey, so what is up with that Republican political operative getting arrested for stealing a Democratic politician's identity in order to frame him for ethics violations? That sounds like something that would be generating more buzz.
 
I honestly believe there tons of sensible republicans out there that would vote for Obama if Gingrich got the nom.

I don't think that will happen. Obama is going to be branding their core beliefs, regardless of who runs, as far-right extremism, since going negative and getting voters to fear the Republican candidate more than the current state of the economy is the only viable strategy for him. Thus, Republicans will be less likely to vote for him as they were when he was Mr. Hopenchange Centrist.

Stay home? Sure.
 
I honestly believe there tons of sensible republicans out there that would vote for Obama if Gingrich got the nom.

You can count me as one. I actually like that Obama is a centrist. I think a lot of the stuff he does is "business as usual" and partisan as hell, but he has done a fair job considering most presidents don't do anything right.

Newt, however, would be disastrous on any scale. He is a piece of dog excrement. The fact that people taking down Romney for being exorbitantly wealthy, while forgetting the fact that he seems pretty reasonable in his personal life, while also forgetting the fact that Newt has cheated multiple times, took 1.6 million from Freddie Mac (consulting my ass...called lobbying, son), has a million dollar line of credit at Tiffanys, got fined hundreds of thousands of dollars by his own party, kicked out of office, etc.

Romney is out of touch with the common man, but he seems uncomfortable with being sleazy. Newt vomits, rolls around in it, and licks it clean, with a big shit-eating grin on his face.
 
Key part of that poll:

Q31 If you are 18 to 29 years old, press 1. If 30 to
45, press 2. If 46 to 65, press 3. If you are
older than 65, press 4.
18 to 29........................................................... 8%
30 to 45........................................................... 22%
46 to 65........................................................... 43%
Older than 65.................................................. 27%

70 percent over the age of 45.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom