Mass Effect 3 SPOILER THREAD: LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don´t think Bioware can pull "this was just a dream" argument, mainly because if the "true" ending is coming in some form of DLC, the fan outcry would make this ending rage look like a small bump in the road.

"Pay for DLC to get the true ending", how fucked up would that be? to ship an incomplete game and then force the players to pay more to finish it.

I don´t believe it is at all possible.
 
I'm surprised BioWare didn't go with the dark energy thing. It's still fairly baseless, but works better than the synthesis theme, and was at the very least established in the previous game. Portraying the Reapers as desperate 'problem solvers' would have been nice, and the 'galaxy trying to solve the dark energy problem, reapers destroyed' would have laid foundations for the rest of the franchise.

I blame Walters, because I like blaming him for everything.

The dark energy-thing would've been better than what we got. It wouldn't have come out of the left field. They could've foreshadowed it even more by having some stars blow up because of it. It would've worked.

What we got now was just...

LzJW0.jpg


Also, that Reddit post seems to be a bit off on the current motivations of the Reapers. The technological singularity is a point where organics and technology become one, as far as I know. It's the 'green' ending. The Reapers aren't working to prevent it, they're working to make sure all organic life isn't wiped out by synthetics by harvesting civilizations advanced enough to create artificial intelligences.
 
But there's no difference for someone with no previous ME saves..which is kinda disappointing
He said numbers because what the choice effects are assets. Sparing the real Rachni queen (yeah, I'm annoyed enough with this cop out to refer to them as "real" and "fake") will increase war assets as the Rachni help in development of the Crucible, whereas the fake Rachni queen is indoctrinated, will start attacking the Alliance, and need to be put down, thus lowering the number.

Well, you also spare Grunt if he's there by killing it. So, seriously, kill it.

I don´t think Bioware can pull "this was just a dream" argument, mainly because if the "true" ending is coming in some form of DLC, the fan outcry would make this ending rage look like a small bump in the road.

"Pay for DLC to get the true ending", how fucked up would that be? to ship an incomplete game and then force the players to pay more to finish it.

I don´t believe it is at all possible.
Enough people are saying they will buy DLC that replaces the ending, but this may be a case where the silent majority DOESN'T agree. Nevermind the people uninterested in ME being angry at how it could effect the rest of the industry.
 
I think he means control. You sacrifice yourself to control the Reapers and they leave, leaving the rest of the galaxy alone. Nobody else dies. I'm just saying this because it's the 'blue'-colored one, though.

The only one you get the "Shep is alive" ending is the destroy ending tho.
 
But there's no difference for someone with no previous ME saves..which is kinda disappointing

Not really. At the end of the day, none of the choices have ever really had much impact outside of a few choice sentences from time to time reminding you what you did. The differences are there, but they're so negligible/subtle that without playing through the other games, they hardly matter. Other than starting at level 30 (a great bonus IMO) the main thing you gain from playing the previous games and importing is context, which is extremely valuable.
 
The only one you get the "Shep is alive" ending is the destroy ending tho.

Yeah, but I don't think that's what he means with a 'Paragon'-ending. Shep selflessly sacrifices himself to stop the Reapers, and only himself. In the Destroy-ending he potentially dies, but sacrifices the geth and every other synthetic life form in the galaxy to stop the Reapers. That feels more Renegade to me.
 
Yeah, but I don't think that's what he means with a 'Paragon'-ending. Shep selflessly sacrifices himself to stop the Reapers, and only himself. In the Destroy-ending he potentially dies, but sacrifices the geth and every other synthetic life form in the galaxy to stop the Reapers. That feels more Renegade to me.

I think none of the 3 choices is inherently good or evil, then again i think the ending was pulled out of someone´s ass with an emergency induction port :D
 
Thinking on it longer, while I do like the indoctrination theory, it would mean that we would actually see the Real Ending as dlc, since there is no reason, artistic or otherwise, for that to be the end of the game.
 
While that Dark Energy ending would have been better than the one we got, I don't think the Reapers needed some galaxy saving motive. I always thought the Reapers were just a super advanced race that viewed other races being reaperized as the ultimate form of those races. That's the impression I got from Harbinger and the other Reapers anyway.
 
whoever wrote the ending(s) of this game is the kind of person who thinks the series finale of Battlestar Galactica was genius.
 
But there's no difference for someone with no previous ME saves..which is kinda disappointing
If you killed the queen (which is default for if you didn't import that decision), they also get into a spiel about how the reapers created it and it being a false queen iirc. But yeah, there's no functional difference.
 
Probably, but I can't help but feel there's a reason Shepard is still alive in the Destroy ending. No fucking way Shepard could have survived a fall from that height.

I'm probably being overly-optimistic, which is odd since I'm normally a pessimist, but I have a feeling there's more to the ending (or will be... maybe) than I first thought.

Who says he fell? Maybe he's still in orbit on the citadel wreck.
 
You know, I didnt read much about ME3 before playing it, so I didn't really know much of the features in the game.

Needless to say, the ending was a huge dissappointment. First of all, when introduced to 'War Assets' I was thinking, oh cool, this will be like in ME3 where the upgrades you buy for the Normandy will have an effect in the final battle. I had hoped that some of the assets that you find, mostly for the Citadel, would actually be referenced in at least in a cutscene during the final battle.

And then there is the ending which answers nothing. What a pile of crap.

They ARE referenced in the cutscenes. The major groups you grabbed are all there in that final awesome space battle. There are a great many ending haters that just didn't seem to pay attention for the last 30 minutes.
 
Drunk Tali is best Tali.

For...many reasons.
 
They ARE referenced in the cutscenes. The major groups you grabbed are all there in that final awesome space battle. There are a great many ending haters that just didn't seem to pay attention for the last 30 minutes.

I secretly hoped I'd see some Elcor kicking ass and verbally prefacing responses with emotive states... at the same time.
 
So that's where Vent God was hiding all those years.

EDIT: Hahaha, holy shit, you can buy equipment packs with MS points in this game? Are you fucking kidding me? :lol

Welcome to the microtransaction future. Besides its not that big of a deal since its not competitive. Not even score since everyone gets the same experience total.
 
They ARE referenced in the cutscenes. The major groups you grabbed are all there in that final awesome space battle. There are a great many ending haters that just didn't seem to pay attention for the last 30 minutes.

Was disappointing Quarian and Geth ships are not specifically shown in the space battles, unless i missed it somewhere... i mean, outside shots of those ship´s in battle.

Also where are the salarians? I think i missed those as well, unless their ship design´s are similar to turian/human/asari.

Would have been nice for some shots of the Volus bomber´s or the Hanar ships.
 
"Here's to Miranda."

"You geneticially modified, Cerberus cheerleader bosh'tet, Keelah se'lai."

Her drunk call to Javik's also hilarious.

"You liiiiiike her. And you like meeeeeeeeeeee"

I consider dead tali to be best tali. Legion and the Geth are far more interesting anyways :P

I have both. Shame Tali and Garrus hook up. I would have liked some sweaty, angry genocidal android alien sex between Tali and Legion. Maybe in DLC.
 
Welcome to the microtransaction future. Besides its not that big of a deal since its not competitive. Not even score since everyone gets the same experience total.

Yeah, I have to say I actually quite like the store system in the multi. It's like getting booster packs for cards or something.
 
I just watched Javik talk about Geth..... ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?! That would of help understand the Magic Child's "solution"..But gotta pay for it
 
But in all endings the Mass Relays get destroyed.

If it's indoctrination/hallucination, then no - they weren't destroyed. That is the beauty of that theory: it's entirely possible that the destruction of the relays is a fabrication of Shepard's thoughts, an imagined scenario based on what the Catalyst tells him/her (but as I've said before, why are we so inclined to believe the Catalyst?).

I know it's more fun to shit on Bioware, and surely some of their decisions deserve it, but for those who want to keep the game based in literal-mindedness, the indoctrination/dream idea is the only one that makes sense. If it's indoctrination, then there is nothing philosophical going on, it is simply Harbinger manipulating a battered Shepard's mental insecurities. It's no different, really, from the mental degradation efforts seen in ME1 or ME2, only that here we receive a change in perspective: the process is first-hand, rather than something merely communicated to us.

All Bioware needs to do in order to capitalize on this idea is release an "Epilogue DLC" that closes up what happens "after" Shepard wakes up on Earth (granted, that only happens in the "Destroy" ending if you were sufficiently prepared, which might raise problems for those that didn't have the resolve to stick to their guns. :P).
 
If it's indoctrination/hallucination, then no - they weren't destroyed. That is the beauty of that theory: it's entirely possible that the destruction of the relays is a fabrication of Shepard's thoughts, an imagined scenario based on what the Catalyst tells him/her (but as I've said before, why are we so inclined to believe the Catalyst?).

I know it's more fun to shit on Bioware, and surely some of their decisions deserve it, but for those who want to keep the game based in literal-mindedness, the indoctrination/dream idea is the only one that makes sense. If it's indoctrination, then there is nothing philosophical going on, it is simply Harbinger manipulating a battered Shepard's mental insecurities. It's no different, really, from the mental degradation efforts seen in ME1 or ME2, only that here we receive a change in perspective: the process is first-hand, rather than something merely communicated to us.

None of the endings were quite happy but the indoctrination theory is the most depressing one of all
 
A few other things that bothered me with the ending.

No matter what the outcome, we condemned hundreds of thousands of Turians to a slow death on earth by destroying the mass relay, being extro-amino acid based, they can´t eat our food.

I ended up killing a significant portion of the Quarian people after i just got them their home world back :(

Same with the survivors of the Normandy crash, either the humans or levo-amino acid based species survive or the turian/quarian crew survive.

One last thing, on my play through, after the Normandy crashed, i had Javik walk out, along with Tali and Joker. how the fuck is that decided by the game? who comes out or not. Seeing as Javik was with me in the final assault...
 
None of the endings were quite happy but the indoctrination theory is the most depressing one of all

How so? If you resisted the Catalyst's mental games, and choose Destroy, then supposedly, you win. If you choose Control or Synthesize, well, you were tricked and probably reaperized, which admittedly sucks hard. But if the theory is sound, then this is a final boss fight based on resolve rather than power. If you lack resolve, you lose, whereas in other games, if you lack power, you lose. Same difference, really.

Side note, just experienced drunk Tali last night in my second playthrough, and it was glorious. Although now I'm sad I apparently missed the Javik exchange! *goes to find old save file*
 
I think people claiming the dark energy ending would be better are in denial upset about this ending grasping at straws. That would have been just as bad if not worse with the same people raging about it. What precedence or great foreshadowing for it was there beyond a quick glaze over in one mission in ME2? At least with the whole rogue AI thing we've been dealing with since ME1 at every turn between the geth, murderous VI's and the whole is EDI going to turn on us and kill us all. The groundwork is right there I'm not understanding why people are claiming that was out of nowhere yet the dark energy thing had precedence? Really!?

Not trying to defend this ending either just saying lets not get too crazy here. I'm not really sure if they could have came up with an ending to totally satisfy everyone. Make it to convulated and mindblowing and people poke holes in it and you turn off all the dudebros you just got on board with ME2 and adding MP in ME3. Could have been worse though, they could have had Dietz write it with no editor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom