Not really relevant even if the race of the victim has something to do with why the victim is presently deceased?Fixed?
Not really relevant even if the race of the victim has something to do with why the victim is presently deceased?
Not at all. Just that if the crime was racially motivated that could influence the charges levied against the man.You're saying the guy should only be locked up is the shooting was racially motivated?
Fixed?
Cell phone records should prove this one out. Pretty damning if true.Update, a new witness:
http://gma.yahoo.com/trayvon-martin...-teen-death-recounts-063243901--abc-news.html
ABC News was there exclusively as the 16-year-old girl told Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump about the last moments of the teenager's life.
"He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man," Martin's friend said. "I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run but he said he was not going to run."
Eventually he would run, said the girl, thinking that he'd managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.
"Trayvon said, 'What, are you following me for,' and the man said, 'What are you doing here.' Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. I called him again and he didn't answer the phone."
nope meant what I said
Hint: the shooter should be taken to the station, checked for intoxication, and a proper investigation should begin.So what do you think should happen if the shooting was not racially motivated?
Hint: the shooter should be taken to the station, checked for intoxication, and a proper investigation should begin.
Cell phone records should prove this one out. Pretty damning if true.
Probably much quicker, considering the DOJ/FBI intervention...so how long would it take to get the cellphone records?
Even more, about his role as a neighborhood watch "captain."Trayvon's phone logs, also obtained exclusively by ABC News, show the conversation occurred five minutes before police first arrived on scene.
Zimmerman violated major principles of the Neighborhood Watch manual, ABC News has learned. The manual from the Neighborhood Watch program states: "It should be emphasized to members that they do not possess police powers. And they shall not carry weapons or pursue vehicles."
According to Chris Tutko, the director of the National Neighborhood Watch program, there are about 22,000 registered watch groups nationwide, and Zimmerman was not part of a registered group, which police were not aware of at the time of the incident.
That's normally how it works with self-defense... defenses. Florida's self-defense law is something different, though... an NRA wet-dream kind of different... and it doesn't work like that under Florida's self-defense law.
There is every reason to be outraged and sickened about every aspect of this thing, but people in this thread at least seem to want to ignore, over and over, how fucked-up THE LAW ITSELF is here. ALL THIS OTHER BULLSHIT is happening under a legal umbrella that couldn't be more accommodating of it.
776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
The cops responsible for not investigating the shooter should be fired, but more likely nothing will happen to them and they can continue to be shitheads and not care about black males being shot.
The idea that "probable cause" for arrest = "beyond a reasonable doubt" is absurd, but it seems to have been applied here.I agree with you that Florida's self-defense law was intended to be and is very favorable to vigilantes. Its existence is the best explanation for the non-arrest, in the sense that this is the spirit of the Florida law that protects trigger-happy vigilantes. (Reasonable people objected to its enactment to prevent this very thing.) But the new vigilante law still presents no real obstacle to an arrest and criminal charges based on the evidence. Florida law precludes police from arresting somebody claiming justifiable use of force "unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful." Police have said this is why they cannot arrest Zimmerman. It isn't true. The police have probable cause to believe that the force used was unlawful. This is a low standard that the police are applying with unusual rigor. Essentially, it means there is enough evidence for a reasonable person to believe that Zimmerman's use of force was not unlawful. If you've ever heard the phrase that a district attorney could indict a ham sandwich, then you get a feel for it. The burden for indicting somebody is the same as arresting him: probable cause.
I would say that most people in this thread are quite reasonable. And there is no reason to believe that the police have evidence that undermines any of the known evidence so much as to negate that.
If it hasn't been posted, and for those interested, here is the provision that bars aggressors from justifiably using force:
The idea that "probable cause" for arrest = "beyond a reasonable doubt" is absurd, but it seems to have been applied here.
Probably much quicker, considering the DOJ/FBI intervention...
If this pans out, I hope it makes a case for murder.
edit: Actually, they have the logs. The conversation occurred 5 minutes before the police arrived. From the same article:
Even more, about his role as a neighborhood watch "captain."
Holy shit.
What's blowing my damned mind is that the police knew the victim had a cell phone, most likely knew that he made a call just before dying, and seemingly never contacted the person he called (or did and decided it wasn't relevant)so he not even a legal neighborhood watch person and the new cell phone info enforces the fact that he's a stalker.
So what do you think should happen if the shooting was not racially motivated?
Depends on the evidence.
But the evidence points clearly to a raically motivated shooting...
Wtf, so if both of them had been of the same race you'd have had no issue with this? The evidence points clearly to a shooting that is not in self defense. If it is is racially motivated it clearly affects the severity of the crime, but the crime is murder, not racism.
What's blowing my damned mind is that the police knew the victim had a cell phone, most likely knew that he made a call just before dying, and seemingly never contacted the person he called (or did and decided it wasn't relevant)
wow
I don't agree with how you went about it, but I do partially see your point.Wtf, so if both of them had been of the same race you'd have had no issue with this? The evidence points clearly to a shooting that is not in self defense. If it is is racially motivated it clearly affects the severity of the crime, but the crime is murder, not racism.
As far as the police are concerned I'm inclined to think they are lazy and incompetent rather than racist. But who knows.
looking at this guys photo and the weight stats, there is no fucking way in hell that the kid was able to beat the shit out of zimmerman to the point that he had to shoot him. Just look at the size of the dude.
There was a picture of the victim earlier and the kid looked like he couldn't even hurt a fly. Poor kid was underweight for his age and could only pose a threat to an adult male if he was carrying but I guess the police feel carrying a can of ice tea and skittles is the same as a gun. Those Arizona ice tea cans are mighty big and place people in constant fear.
There was a picture of the victim earlier and the kid looked like he couldn't even hurt a fly.
Wtf, so if both of them had been of the same race you'd have had no issue with this? The evidence points clearly to a shooting that is not in self defense. If it is is racially motivated it clearly affects the severity of the crime, but the crime is murder, not racism.
so he not even a legal neighborhood watch person and the new cell phone info enforces the fact that he's a stalker.
I mean, lets just say that the kid somehow preemptively struck him(which we already know isn't true) and got on top of him. The guys got 100 pounds on him and is pretty damn huge. There's no way a guy like that wouldn't be able to push some 100 pound kid off him, let alone get himself in a situation where he feels that he's being overpowered to the point he has to use lethal force. It's just not happening.
The dudes defending this guy....It really says a lot about yourself.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is what you call an "orgy" of evidence.Update, a new witness:
http://gma.yahoo.com/trayvon-martin...-teen-death-recounts-063243901--abc-news.html
ABC News was there exclusively as the 16-year-old girl told Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump about the last moments of the teenager's life.
"He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man," Martin's friend said. "I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run but he said he was not going to run."
Eventually he would run, said the girl, thinking that he'd managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.
"Trayvon said, 'What, are you following me for,' and the man said, 'What are you doing here.' Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. I called him again and he didn't answer the phone."
I'm genuinely surprised no one tried to play the "The indistinct object looked like a weapon" card yet.
Both the picture and the description of the kid make this one hit a little closer to home for me. He looks like an older version of my neighbors son, who is an almost absurdly polite and friendly kid.
Just sad.
You really shouldn't go toe to toe with Blackace man. Bad idea.
Except you aren't defending anyone. At that point it's just revenge.
So? Who cares? I'd be doing the world a favor.
Your brand of street justice is why we were lynched a few decades ago
"The police wont arrest that coon even though my daughter said she saw him steal from our store! My daughter dont lie, AND we're missing a bag of chips! Let's get 'em!"
He's going down now, higher powers are involved, and the evidence is all there.
It wouldn't even be ruled a crime of passion for a direct family member this late after it happened
the 'I have enough evidence, screw the system, I'll kill him myself' kinduh... What?
uh... What?
Enron got nothing on Harvey. He's arguing for Zimmerman even with the tapes out there. long after Harvey bailed. Very impressive.
lol.
You know what really makes it hit home for me? He looks just like me.
Randy803
My friend came home to find a black man stealing from his garage. He shot him square in the chest with an 8mm Mauser while the perk had his hands full of loot. No charges filed and the criminal was dealt with.
Another guy I know (Jack) of mine was at a local store that a black kid robbed. The kid ran out and into a field. Jack looked at the cop and said "shoot him". The cop said cant shoot him in the back, so Jack pulled his pistol and shot the kid on the run, it was a HELL OF A SHOT!
I myself was robbed at gunpoint in 1990 by some young blacks, they made a big mistake, I shot all 4 of them DEAD.
But this case is different. Even with all my experience around shooting criminals I will say this was unjustified.
Wow, just wow. Besides how fucked up the stuff he is saying (that sounds like bullshit anyway), even hardcore racists think zimmerman was in the wrong. No coming back from that.Just saw this this comment on the CNN site had to lol/smh