Family of Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch seeks arrest

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone not angry about this story of Trayvon Once owning a baggie with marijuana "residue" in it is a racist. There I said it.
 
Random questions: Don't gated communities usually have guards at the gate, perhaps even with 'patrol cars'? Why is Zimmerman even bothering with this patrolling... Where does he find the time? Does he work from home?

Not necessarily--it was probably just a keypad/RF gate. Guards are more common for the million dollar communities.
 
Trayvon Martin. 27 feet tall, 4000 pounds, his skin hardened into a thick 2-inch-thick carapace of pure crack cocaine.

He rampages down the streets, picking up houses and pouring their TVs and jewelry into his mouth. All the while purple clouds of pure marijuana issue from his snorting nostrils, making him look like a mighty weed-dragon. No school or prison or school bus can contain him.

Enter expert marksman George Zimmerman, proud Mayan warrior. Attempting to peacefully stop the dark goliath from his pillaging with vis-a-vis discourse, Zimmerman is grabbed and squeezed to within an inch of his life. Spying a crack in the... crack (like the hole in the armor of the fiendish wyrm Smaug), Zimmerman takes aim and enters history.

Stand your ground George!
 
ctabtl.jpg


That's current.

nice.

This is one of those cases where voting demographic trends are made clear.
 
Anyone not angry about this story of Trayvon Once owning a baggie with marijuana "residue" in it is a racist. There I said it.

Yea, it's amazing that some are trying there best to find SOME blemish on the dead black kid to tarnish his character. As if smoking a joint in high-school and getting suspended justifies being murdered....

I guess the logic is "Well, if he had character flaws then it's very well possible that he DID assault Good Ole George first!" What really pisses me off is those same people completely fucking ignore George's 80+ calls to the police, the restraining order for domestic violence his ex-fiance placed on him, and his expunged assault on an officer charge.

But black kid smoking a joint and getting in trouble at school...that's all the evidence needed to say Zimmerman was acting in self defense....
 
Oh wow.

I have lived in a gated condo comunity $200k a unit and there were gaurds at the entrance.

Do you just make these facts up?

I'm just speaking from experience. The $200k community across the street from me does not have a guard, and neither have any of the other comparable ones I've been to. The fancy shmancy one out in the hills 15 minutes from me definitely does though.
 
Random questions: Don't gated communities usually have guards at the gate, perhaps even with 'patrol cars'? Why is Zimmerman even bothering with this patrolling... Where does he find the time? Does he work from home?

No, they typically just have a key-coded electronic gate.
 
1. Prominent conservative websites published fake photos of Martin. Twitchy, a new website run by prominent conservative blogger Michelle Malkin, promoted a photo — purportedly from Martin’s Facebook page — that shows Martin in saggy pants and flipping the bird. The photo, which spread quickly on conservative websites and Twitter, is intended to paint Martin as a thug. As Twitchy later acknowledged, it is not a photo of Trayvon Martin. [Examiner]

Got to love how they only acknowledge it's not him after it's already taken hold and spread.

You have to wonder at the aim of any news organisation who still uses that picture.
 
Got to love how they only acknowledge it's not him after it's already taken hold and spread.

You have to wonder at the aim of any news organisation who still uses that picture.

This story has really made rebulicans prejudices come out of the woodwork. And they wonder why they don't have much support from minorities.
 
This story has really made rebulicans prejudices come out of the woodwork. And they wonder why they don't have much support from minorities.
i would rather their prejudices be out in the open for people to see than see them hiding it.
 
Oh wow.

I have lived in a gated condo comunity $200k a unit and there were gaurds at the entrance.

Do you just make these facts up?

The gated community I lived in a decade ago in Boca Raton consisted of million dollar homes and our front and rear gates were key-card activated. Guards did patrol the neighborhood though. It's not unusual for there to not be one at the gate.
 
http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/Mass...mmerman-and-trayvon-martin-what-we-dont-know/

Indicates that the weapon failed to cycle, stating that it was possible due to a struggle for the weapon and someone else's hand being on the slide that prevented the weapon from cycling.

I have a PF9. You need an iron grip on that gun to make sure it cycles. Limp wristing it would also cause it to fail to cycle. Speer +p short barrel rounds help with the cycling a bit and that's what I load it with.
 
Thanks for the replies on the guards and gated communities. I'm still confused on what Zimmerman does... I mean those are a lot of calls, no? Has he ever gotten a successful report or reward for any of his 'neighborhood watch' activities? Is he on a first name basis with anyone in the police department—I'm assuming they know him from all the calls right—or even friends with any of them? Is Zimmerman affiliated with the Sanford police department in any way?
 
I'm completely disgusted by little "oh well hmmm look at this! well wadawee have here....." quotes and tidbits in favor of the shooter in the media. Now there's some stupid statement released about the kid going for the gun during the altercation.

HELLO. Some guy comes up to you who you don't know, with a gun, and picks a fight with you. WHY DOESN'T THIS KID HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND HIMSELF? This guy has no authority over you, there's no identification shown, and the kid is supposed to just put his hands up to some stranger and go back to his car if Zimmerman asked?

Fucking hell the racism that still presides in America is as clear as day in this case right here. Every lunatic is looking for any reason to try to act like the kid brought it on or deserved it, trying to desperately find a link so the killer can be vindicated. Fuck this country and anyone that tries to pull the same shit.

If the kid punched Zimmerman THAT'S A GOOD THING. He defended himself as best he could from a stranger who brought on a physical confrontation. HOW can Zimmerman get off on 'self defense' if he STARTED the whole thing. I don't understand it. How anyone can be in favor of Zimmerman or try to bring up irrelavent shit to try to boost his defense. The facts are clear. The kid committed no crime, he walked down the street with a hoody some skittles and was black. For that Zimmerman thought he was suspicious and ended his life. And people want to shit on the kid for trying to defend himself as if that justifies anything. Fucking shameful. I hope Zimmerman gets the book thrown at him as well as the police involved in explaining away/covering up everything.

I fucking agree on everything you said broski.

I don't care what anyone says, that guy stalked and provoked a confrontation with the kid.

And fuck people for trying to bring Trayvon Martin's rep down. Who the fuck cares if he wasn't the model student, what does that have to do with anything?
 
Life threatening injuries that require him to murder a guy, can be put off till tomorrow.

If someone has a knife and tries to stab you, but doesn't succeed and you shoot him out of self-defense, does that mean your life wasn't in danger?


And no, I'm not a Zimmerman apologist.
 
If someone has a knife and tries to stab you, but doesn't succeed and you shoot him out of self-defense, does that mean your life wasn't in danger?


And no, I'm not a Zimmerman apologist.

But if he doesn't succeed, then there are no "life threatening injuries?" How does this relate?

Also, see post below me...
 
If someone has a knife and tries to stab you, but doesn't succeed and you shoot him out of self-defense, does that mean your life wasn't in danger?


And no, I'm not a Zimmerman apologist.

Good point, except that TRAYVON DID NOT HAVE ANY WEAPONS.

His claim is basically that Trayvon was giving him such a massive beating that he feared for his life. If the beating was so massive, i.e. like getting his head smashed into the ground, you'd think they would have liked to have observed for a concusion, at the very least.
 
If someone has a knife and tries to stab you, but doesn't succeed and you shoot him out of self-defense, does that mean your life wasn't in danger?


And no, I'm not a Zimmerman apologist.
don't you mean if you start a fight with somebody with a knife? which treyvon did not have.
 
Hopefully this cop gets a lot of extra training or fired, I would not trust him on the streets after this (hopefully they will look into the previoous incident a lot more carefully now as well):

The New Orleans Police Department has suspended a police officer, who was involved in the recent fatal shooting of young black man, for commenting on an online news story that Trayvon Martin deserved to die because he acted "like a thug," the Times-Picayune reports.

Officer Jason Giroir had posted the comment on Sunday below a story on the WWL-TV website about a local rally in support of Trayvon, the 17-year-old Florida boy who was killed by a neighborhood watch captain.

Giroir's comment: "Act like a Thug Die Like one!"

Here's how the Times-Picayune describes a further exchange in the comments section:

...(A)fter a commenter named Eddie Johnson criticized Giroir's initial comments as racist and questioned whether a hooded sweatshirt makes someone a thug, Giroir responded: "Eddie come on down to our town with a 'Hoodie' and you can join Martin in HELL and talk about your racist stories!" He ended the sentence with an emoticon that depicts a tongue wagging.

Police Superintendent Ronal Serpas tells reporters that Giroir has been indefinitely suspended without pay.

"To say I'm angry is an understatement. I'm furious," Serpas says, according to the newspaper.

Giroir's lawyer, Eric Hessler, says the officer admitted to writing the post, but he didn't mean it as a racial or offensive: "It was a boneheaded comment. He admits so."

Giroir, 35, was recently cleared and reassigned to regular duty following an investigation of his role in a fatal shootout earlier this month in the Mid-City area of New Orleans, Hessler says, according to the newspaper.

The Times-Picayune notes that the NOPD has not suggested that the shooting was unjustified.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/03/new-orleans-cop-suspended-over-thug-remark-on-trayvon-case/1#.T3HxOtlLfmg
 
If someone has a knife and tries to stab you, but doesn't succeed and you shoot him out of self-defense, does that mean your life wasn't in danger?


And no, I'm not a Zimmerman apologist.

Are you equating the potential harm a knife can do to the potential harm a kid 11 years younger and 100 pounds lighter than than Georgie could do to him? A kid with no advanced fighting knowledge and no weapons on him?

Because apparently all that kid did to him was bloody his nose. I think a knife can do worse.
 
But if he doesn't succeed, then there are no "life threatening injuries?" How does this relate?

You want someone to have the life threatening injuries before they commits the act of self-defense? That's not how it works.


Good point, except that TRAYVON DID NOT HAVE ANY WEAPONS.

His claim is basically that Trayvon was giving him such a massive beating that he feared for his life. If the beating was so massive, i.e. like getting his head smashed into the ground, you'd think they would have liked to have observed for a concusion, at the very least.

You're right. They should have taken him to the hospital. It's all very fishy and I don't believe Zimmerman, however the law doesn't expect someone in the heat of the act to judiciously decide whether or not their injuries are life-threatening *enough* for the discretion of law enforcement before defending themselves, so it doesn't matter.
 
Hopefully this cop gets a lot of extra training or fired, I would not trust him on the streets after this (hopefully they will look into the previoous incident a lot more carefully now as well):

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/03/new-orleans-cop-suspended-over-thug-remark-on-trayvon-case/1#.T3HxOtlLfmg

So a cop threatened a citizen that he was going to kill him for wearing a hoodie. Can't say I'm terribly surprised. Extra training? No, he must be fired.
 
You want someone to have the life threatening injuries before they commits the act of self-defense? That's not how it works.




You're right. They should have taken him to the hospital. It's all very fishy and I don't believe Zimmerman, however the law doesn't expect someone in the heat of the act to judiciously decide whether or not their injuries are life-threatening *enough* for the discretion of law enforcement before defending themselves, so it doesn't matter.

Bud, the dude you were quoting was making the point that Zimmerman was taking a beating that was sooo "life threatening" that he had to shoot him, YET not so bad that he'd go to the hospital for said "near fatal" injuries...understand how that joke works? Word...
 
I still can't believe how big of assholes conservatives are being about this. Why? What the fuck do they have to gain from being hateful about something that has caused this big of an outrage?

I said it before in this thread - if it's possible to come down on the worst side of any controversy, Republicans will find a way. Their mindset is beyond disgusting on social issues.
 
Great points by Robert Wright at The Atlantic

http://www.theatlantic.com/national...rge-zimmerman-is-the-case-against-him/255090/

1) A man with a gun pursued an unarmed teenager who had done nothing wrong.

2) The man with the gun initiated a confrontation with the teenager. I realize that we don't know exactly how any fight between Zimmerman and Martin started. And we never will, because only Zimmerman knows the details, and he's not exactly unbiased. But by my lights, if you pursue an innocent, law-abiding citizen, thereby giving him or her reason to believe that you mean them harm -- and reason to conclude that their self-defense may require fighting--you have initiated a confrontation. Zimmerman will presumably depict his role in the encounter as passive. That testimony should count for roughly nothing, but in any event I'd say that even if it's true, he still initiated a confrontation just by pursuing a guy in the dark until he caught up with him. (And he did that even though he knew he was violating the rules of the Neighborhood Watch game and in fact had just been reminded of that by a 911 dispatcher!)

Basically, the confrontation began the moment Zimmerman began stalking Treyvon Martin.
 
Are you equating the potential harm a knife can do to the potential harm a kid 11 years younger and 100 pounds lighter than than Georgie could do to him? A kid with no advanced fighting knowledge and no weapons on him?

Because apparently all that kid did to him was bloody his nose. I think a knife can do worse.

No, I'm not. I was just addressing the logic that self-defense spurned from uncertainties between two individuals can be tricky to analyze using certainties after the fact.
 
Bud, the dude you were quoting was making the point that Zimmerman was taking a beating that was sooo "life threatening" that he had to shoot him, YET not so bad that he'd go to the hospital for said "near fatal" injuries...understand how that joke works? Word...

Right. And I was saying that self-defense and the injuries you sustain have a somewhat tenuous legal link, despite popular belief. At what state of injury do you draw the line and say it's okay to kill someone?
 
No, I'm not. I was just addressing the logic that self-defense spurned from uncertainties between two individuals can be tricky to analyze using certainties after the fact.

Don't worry, I get what you're saying at least bro - you don't need to wait until you are injured to feel as though your life is threatened. But you don't personally think there is much evidence corroborating that in this particular situation Zimmerman's 'head bashing' and 'face smashing' story, ergo, life probably wasn't in danger.

If it comes out Trayvon is actually a super saiyjen or something, maybe I'll give his story more pause - but right now the idea of a 250lb man with (probably) some defensive training getting held down and beaten by a 140lb 17 year old... seems... how does that even work?
 
Right. And I was saying that self-defense and the injuries you sustain have a somewhat tenuous legal link, despite popular belief.

I wouldn't exactly call it tenuous, but yes, injuries are not dispositive. The question is whether the person reasonably believed he was in the danger required by statute to permit the amount of force used. One's injuries, of course, are relevant to the reasonableness of a person's beliefs about the danger the person was in. As well, if Zimmerman is deemed the aggressor, then the reasonableness of his beliefs about the danger he was in (including a reasonable fear of death) are insufficient in and of themselves to permit his use of lethal force.
 
Right. And I was saying that self-defense and the injuries you sustain have a somewhat tenuous legal link, despite popular belief. At what state of injury do you draw the line and say it's okay to kill someone?

You know what? You win. I'll never carry a gun, so I have no way of measuring. I'm sure he was well within his rights. Just like the right to refuse a ride to the hospital from that beating that almost took his life.
 
Don't worry, I get what you're saying at least bro - you don't need to wait until you are injured to feel as though your life is threatened. But you don't personally think there is much evidence corroborating that in this particular situation Zimmerman's 'head bashing' and 'face smashing' story, ergo, life probably wasn't in danger.

If it comes out Trayvon is actually a super saiyjen or something, maybe I'll give his story more pause - but right now the idea of a 250lb man with (probably) some defensive training getting held down and beaten by a 140lb 17 year old... seems... how does that even work?

I think Zimmerman should be tried. The story doesn't fit. I have a lot of doubt that he killed strictly out of self-defense, but it's tricky to argue that because he wasn't hurt *enough* that he wasn't entitled to defend himself. I think there might be other evidence that would prove that the shooting was unjustified (like his propensity for confrontation with his police call history, etc). If Trayvon managed to break Zimmerman's arm as a final act of desperation to break free or do anything more injurious to Zimmerman that what was done, that doesn't make Zimmerman's murder *more* justified.
 
Good point, except that TRAYVON DID NOT HAVE ANY WEAPONS.

His claim is basically that Trayvon was giving him such a massive beating that he feared for his life. If the beating was so massive, i.e. like getting his head smashed into the ground, you'd think they would have liked to have observed for a concusion, at the very least.

Fear for your life even without weapons involved has been used before as justification in a self defense shooting. But yes if Zimmerman had no major injuries or could not prove he was getting his ass beat, it really makes him look like a liar here. Various reports have said he was bloodied and such but why didn't he go to the hospital at least? Did paramedics actually tream him at least and determine he was fine? Many of the reports also seem to make it out that there were no injuries on Zimmerman either. This will surely be a big point of the trial for the defense to try and get him off.

Course Zimmerman was responsible to try and escape, especially if he was an aggressor here since standing ones ground really seems hard to pin down here. We are to believe that Zimmerman couldn't simply disengage from the fight which he probbly caused? Kid seems pretty small.
 
I wouldn't exactly call it tenuous, but yes, injuries are not dispositive. The question is whether the person reasonably believed he was in the danger required by statute to permit the amount of force used. One's injuries, of course, are relevant to the reasonableness of a person's beliefs about the danger the person was in. As well, if Zimmerman is deemed the aggressor, then the reasonableness of his beliefs about the danger he was in (including a reasonable fear of death) are insufficient in and of themselves to permit his use of lethal force.

You're right. There's a measure of subjectivity that *someone* has to exercise in figuring out if what was done was reasonable. It has to come down to subjectivity - but strictly speaking, his injuries are enough to credit his alibi of self-defense as reasonable. There's not a lot you can argue when it comes to his own subjective standard of safety, if the man has visible injuries and claims his life was in danger. There has to be another angle people can look at besides his own individual sense of danger, given what he has already claimed about Trayvon and what some witnesses have claimed.


Someone posted a link that explains how the conflict started when Zimmerman became the aggressor in disregarding the police's instructions to stop following him. I think this is the angle the prosecution should argue.
 
Conservatives are showing just how disgusting they can be. Trying to smear the victim's character, as if that is even relevant. Doesn't matter if the victim had been suspended from school or anything like that -- Zimmerman wouldn't have known those facts, and therefor wouldn't be able to base his actions on those facts.
 
That's what I thought when I just went there.



Is it a big US thing? I've lived in Illinois, Texas, California, and Maryland and I haven't really heard about it. Admittedly, the people that read such nonsense aren't the types that I willingly associate with.

It's a big conservative blog site. Drudge culls together the most hateful news stories he can find and puts them all in one easily accessible place for conservatives to find and click on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom