CrazyDogg77
Member
Meanwhile, punishing an incompetent vigilante through incompetent vigilantism backfires: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/spike-lee-zimmerman-tweet-567891
Dude what's the point of this?
Meanwhile, punishing an incompetent vigilante through incompetent vigilantism backfires: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/spike-lee-zimmerman-tweet-567891
Dude what's the point of this?
Who the fuck is this guy making the media rounds and defending Zimmerman? I find it hard believing a single word he says.
I wouldn't even term Zimmerman as a vigilante. Vigilantes are using out fighting actual crimes, not starting fights with innocent children.
What Spike did was horrible BTW, even if Zimmerman really lived there. Mob justice is not going to help this situation.
Zimmerman's "black friend" is a fucking nutjob.
http://newsone.com/nation/nomul6/trayvon-martin-case-2/
My mind is blown.
Oh, agreed, absolutely. But motion pictures aren't what's perpetuating it now.
Poorly chosen words on my part.
His actions may have been the proximate cause of his own death.
I don't understand it, man. "coonass" is a term of endearment, anywhere in the world? and we should use that position to conclude that Zimmerman isn't a racist for saying it (if that's what he said)?
I gon ly dow now
.Starting to really hate this story now. I'm interested in seeing Zimmerman tried, fairly, which I thought was the whole point. People on both sides are making idiots of themselves and more people are going to end up hurt.
Actually it is here. I'm from Louisiana, and the country/backwoods/cajun whites refer to themselves as coon asses. Quite common.
well shit. going to ly dow at the very notion.
(though still, it's not something said here in Florida. It was an epic stretch.)
Joe Oliver getting destroyed on msnbc right now. Pretty hilarious.
Actually it is here. I'm from Louisiana, and the country/backwoods/cajun whites refer to themselves as coon asses. Quite common.
Trayvon was also on a phone call at the time and if the reports are to be believed his girlfriend on the other end of the call heard Zimmerman confront him.(Did Zimmerman spot Martin and give chase again or did Martin double back and approach Zimmerman)?
Starting to really hate this story now. I'm interested in seeing Zimmerman tried, fairly, which I thought was the whole point. People on both sides are making idiots of themselves and more people are going to end up hurt.
to be completely objective (as much as I can be in this story): I think it's more likely than not that this dude is found not guilty if it goes to trial. Not because I think he's innocent, but because the burden of proof is high and the police fucked this investigation from the very beginning. The more we find out about what the police refused to do, the sadder it becomes. I truly feel like critical due dilligence wasn't done, and that will be used to create just enough "reasonable doubt" to get him to walk.I've got a couple of issues with this case I'm hoping can get cleared up. Mainly Zimmerman's initial call to report Martin.
About 2 mins into the recording, Zimmerman says "he's running"(referring to Martin). Zimmerman stops his car and begins following Martin. The operator asks Zimmerman if he is following Martin. Zimmerman says "yes". The dispatcher tells Zimmerman "We don't need you to do that", to which Zimmerman replies "Ok". Now, to my ears, it sounds like Zimmerman breaks off his pursuit. His breathing steadies and he continues giving the dispatcher his personal info and a description of his location. I don't see him being able to run and talk steadily at the same time as I can't do that. Zimmerman states that he is returning to his SUV and requests the dispatcher have the patrolmen meet him there. Now, as he is walking back to his SUV, the dispatcher asks him his address. Zimmerman starts to give the dispatcher his address and suddenly stops, stating "Oh crap, I don't want to give it all out. I don't know where this kid is."
Zimmerman hangs up the phone shortly after that exchange. Was that the only call Zimmerman made to the police that night? I've looked around and it seems the next call in the sequence of events is the neighbor reporting the screaming outside and the gunshot that followed. If so, do we know how much time elapsed between the end of Zimmerman's call and the beginning of the neighbor's call?
From Zimmerman's call, it sounds like he lost Martin and began returning to his vehicle. If that is the case, how did they end up running into each other again? Where did they encounter each other the second time? Were there any witnesses to the second encounter, if indeed there were 2 separate encounters, that saw what transpired prior to the scuffle that allegedly left Zimmerman with a bloody nose and the lacerations to the back of his head?(Did Zimmerman spot Martin and give chase again or did Martin double back and approach Zimmerman)?
Sorry, I have alot of questions and haven't been able to find any difinitive answers.
I see politicians have gotten involved for God knows what reason, but most here aren't pushing an agenda or making a bigger argument. People here are frustrated that with all the shadiness and misconduct surrounding this investigation, an injustice is happening. Outrage is warranted on account of misconduct alone.So many people pushing their own agenda's upon this story, looking for an opportunity to make a bigger argument, even when it has nothing to do with this situation that unfolded in Florida. So irritating to watch, and it makes the rational part of my brain hurt badly.
Trayvon was also on a phone call at the time and if the reports are to be believed his girlfriend on the other end of the call heard Zimmerman confront him.
Now for my question. Why in the world would a scared 17 year-old in an unfamiliar neighborhood being chased by a strange man who was following him in an SUV do this?
No, white people are. If you understand that what causes blacks to commit crimes disproportionately to whites is systemic in nature, and you also recognize that whites have the power within that system, then you must understand that it is whites who perpetuate black stereotypes. You can't have it both ways. Either blacks are responsible for their collective lot, including the higher rate at which they commit crimes, or they are not. If they are not, you cannot point your finger at black "culture" when trying to affix responsibility for white stereotypes about blacks. You are blaming the victim of white racism for white racism itself. Point your figure in the direction of American conservatives who steadfastly refuse to fix, and even promote, a system that victimizes people based on race.
to be completely objective (as much as I can be in this story): I think it's more likely than not that this dude is found not guilty if it goes to trial. Not because I think he's innocent, but because the burden of proof is high and the police fucked this investigation from the very beginning. The more we find out about what the police refused to do, the sadder it becomes. I truly feel like critical due dilligence wasn't done, and that will be used to create just enough "reasonable doubt" to get him to walk.
This is where I'm at with it.
So many people pushing their own agenda's upon this story, looking for an opportunity to make a bigger argument, even when it has nothing to do with this situation that unfolded in Florida. So irritating to watch, and it makes the rational part of my brain hurt badly.
We must live in vastly different realities. I'm 6'6', weigh 250lbs and consider myself to be very brave but there's no way I'd do something like that in my own neighborhood, much less some place I wasn't familiar with.To find out why he was being followed?
to be completely objective (as much as I can be in this story): I think it's more likely than not that this dude is found not guilty if it goes to trial. Not because I think he's innocent, but because the burden of proof is high and the police fucked this investigation from the very beginning. The more we find out about what the police refused to do, the sadder it becomes. I truly feel like critical due dilligence wasn't done, and that will be used to create just enough "reasonable doubt" to get him to walk.
We won't get definitive answers to your questions because there are no witnesses that saw the entire drama unfold. Just people who saw bits and pieces. Even though I feel like we can reasonably assemble a timeline that infers guilt, there's enough reason for doubt for him to walk.
That's been my opinion since the first day we talked about this case. When you think back to how significant police misconduct was in the OJ Simpson case (and many others, certainly)...and how much more significant it was here...I think there is going to be a very sad outcome in this case. That's what my objective side tells me.
I see politicians have gotten involved for God knows what reason, but most here aren't pushing an agenda or making a bigger argument. People here are frustrated that with all the shadiness and misconduct surrounding this investigation, an injustice is happening. Outrage is warranted on account of misconduct alone.
Which one?
1) Walking home alone
2) Wearing a hoodie
3) Carrying skittles
I dunno, man - but perhaps you need to check with a shrink if you think any of these actions might or might not be justifiable in Zimmerman shooting him.
Or perhaps you should just cut the B.S. and just state that being black might or might not be justifiable in your twisted bigot mindset that someone deserves to be shot because of it.
From Zimmerman's call, it sounds like he lost Martin and began returning to his vehicle. If that is the case, how did they end up running into each other again? Where did they encounter each other the second time? Were there any witnesses to the second encounter, if indeed there were 2 separate encounters, that saw what transpired prior to the scuffle that allegedly left Zimmerman with a bloody nose and the lacerations to the back of his head?(Did Zimmerman spot Martin and give chase again or did Martin double back and approach Zimmerman)?
Sorry, I have alot of questions and haven't been able to find any difinitive answers.
to be completely objective (as much as I can be in this story): I think it's more likely than not that this dude is found not guilty if it goes to trial. Not because I think he's innocent, but because the burden of proof is high and the police fucked this investigation from the very beginning.
This all got really ugly and political after President Obama decided to weigh in on the case. He's definitely my guy but I really wish sometimes that he would think these things through before getting involved. He had to know that the moment he said anything other than "we should step back and let the authorities handle this situation" Trayvon was going to become a politcal football and get his name dragged through the mud just like every unfortunate person he connects himself to... ever.
God I hate modern politics
We must live in vastly different realities. I'm 6'6', weigh 250lbs and consider myself to be very brave but there's no way I'd do something like that in my own neighborhood, much less some place I wasn't familiar with.
We must live in vastly different realities. I'm 6'6', weigh 250lbs and consider myself to be very brave but there's no way I'd do something like that in my own neighborhood, much less some place I wasn't familiar with.
Here's the Youtube clip. You can tell that he really cares about the case and when I was watching it live I knew that things were suddenly going to get a whole lot worse :/what did he say that was ill advised i only heard the snippet of him saying that if he had a son he'd look like trayvon and that we had to let the authorities do their job. There a new clip?
Is there any evidence that Trayvon turned around? It sounds like, again if the account his families' lawyer says is true, that he was on the phone until he was confronted. Even if you don't believe his girlfriend I'm sure that the cell records will show if he doubled back while on his call.I'm 6'6" 290 and when I was 17 and impetuous, I might have said to myself, in a moment where irritation got the better of prudence, "What the fuck is this guy's problem? I'm going to ask him."
Why do you think Martin decided to turn around (assuming he actually did)?
Whoa! What?!?!?!Trayvon didn't just hang up with his girlfriend and confront Zimmerman. He also called 911. Why has that call not been released?
what did he say that was ill advised i only heard the snippet of him saying that if he had a son he'd look like trayvon and that we had to let the authorities do their job. There a new clip?
![]()
"If I had a son he'd look like Trayvon Martin"
Zimmerman almost certainly went looking for Martin after the call. He initially agreed to meet police officers by the mailboxes at the request of the operator, but soon changes his mind and instead asks that the police call him when he gets there. This is because he had formed an intent to look for Martin and so did not know where he would be when police arrived.
Zimmerman almost certainly went looking for Martin after the call. He initially agreed to meet police officers by the mailboxes at the request of the operator, but soon changes his mind and instead asks that the police call him when he gets there. This is because he had formed an intent to look for Martin and so did not know where he would be when police arrived.
Exactly.BruiserBear said:Regardless, none of us really knows the true explanation at this point.
It's not necessarily one or the other. There are many ethnic groups that suffer disproportionately large poverty rates but that don't have the same violent crime rates and that don't have the pervasive "thug" subculture.
At the same time, any group that was displaced and enslaved is going to have a hard time of things even generations later, so I certainly understand that factor. I'm certainly not saying that white racism and institutional racism against blacks don't exist - they have diminished but have not been eradicated yet.
I don't think it's helpful, though, to attribute racism as a motive in this case until the facts come out in an investigation and potential court case. The eagerness to do so is, I think, counterproductive, especially when it turns out not to be true, as in the Duke lacrosse case.
Is there any evidence that Trayvon turned around? It sounds like, again if the account his families' lawyer say is true, that he was on the phone until he was confronted. Even if you don't believe his girlfriend I'm sure that the cell records will show if he doubled back while on his call.
That may well be true.
However, if Zimmerman ended up with a gash on the back of his head, it's also possible he was jumped from behind after that phone call ended.
Regardless, none of us really knows the true explanation at this point.
No need to apologize, I must have misunderstood you too.I thought you were saying he did and questioning why, not stating it was implausible that he would. My mistake.
I keep asking this and I still haven't seen a reasonable answer. Why would Trayvon do this? What motivation would he have to not simply get back to his family as soon as possible?
We already know based on his 911 calls that Zimmerman is a paranoid wackjob so why is his account more credible than common sense?
That's just fucked up in too many ways to count... the fact that this is how the kids death is being dealt with by the media...
So a single cartoon artist's depiction represents the "media's" opinion of this case? That's a weird way of looking at it.
Why would he do this? I don't know, but a lot of young guys might think "I'm gonna teach this guy a lesson for staring me down".
If I had to bet on it, I'd bet Zimmerman chased him down, but I don't feel confident enough to say that for sure, so I'm simply stating that we really don't know at this point.
Zimmerman almost certainly went looking for Martin after the call. He initially agreed to meet police officers by the mailboxes at the request of the operator, but soon changes his mind and instead asks that the police call him when he gets there. This is because he had formed an intent to look for Martin and so did not know where he would be when police arrived.
Which one?
1) Walking home alone
2) Wearing a hoodie
3) Carrying skittles
I am so sick of hearing this bullshit... It took the news at least a week to mention that Zimmerman and Trayvon got into an altercation. Wearing a hoodie and walking in a gated community were reasons why he was being followed but it WAS NOT WHY HE WAS SHOT! For some reason many at NeoGAF had no problem with important details being left out of the media coverage for the first week or so. I would say that many of the outraged were completely ignorant of the complete details of the case. Hell my wife came home and said " Did you hear about the boy who got shot for holding Skittles?" After I gave her more details,she was surprised because from what she heard on the news it seemed like the shooter mistook Skittles for a gun. wtf.
I know most here don't care but Ill give my take on it any way.
1. When you carry a gun you have a certain responsibility for bringing lethal force into a situation. Zimmerman needs to be held accountable for this.
2. I believe this tragic result of two people who mistook the other intentions. Trayvon getting away from some creepy guy following him was misread as a criminal trying to escape.
3. We will never know what really happened between the two people.
4. A young man was robbed of his life and deserved more respect and diligence from the local police. The fact that Zimmerman was bloodied and called 911 in the first place may have been a factor but it should be a matter of policy to bring the shooter into the station.
5. Instead of actually learning anything from this people are going to gravitate to ignorant positions that ignore many facts from the case.
That's all it took
![]()
How did Martin misinterpret Zimmerman's intentions?
That's what his lawyer says the girlfriend said. Is there some significance to that?Wasn't Martin suspicious of Zimmerman before Zimmerman had a chance to get out of the car?
I'm curious about this too. Isn't the purpose of a neighborhood watch to observe and report? Since when did that involve chasing and detaining people? I've read several statements on other sites that made it sound as if Trayvon had some duty to respect him as the neighborhood watch captian. Since when did that come with arrest rights?
Is that what your quoting me on, because I didn't specify what type of media I was talking about?
I'm not that worried of offending an entire organization paid to reflect the news in whatever stroke they want and to whatever cause they wish....
I'm really not directing this at you, but one of the many troubling things to come out of this tragedy is I'm starting to realize that there's a fair segment of my caucasian bretheren who are walking around thinking that the average black person wants nothing more than to open a can of whoopass on whatever white person they happen to come across alone.
How did Martin misinterpret Zimmerman's intentions?