Zoe
Member
Do we even know if he knew Zimmerman was part of the neighborhood watch? If he did why would he be trying to get away?
Considering he was just a visitor, that's very unlikely unless Zimmerman marked his car.
Do we even know if he knew Zimmerman was part of the neighborhood watch? If he did why would he be trying to get away?
This has nothing to do with race. I would be saying the exact same thing if it was a white kid who was shot here. Young men will sometimes let their emotions get the best of them, myself included, so I could relate to someone wanting to know what this dude's problem was. Everyone is different.
Do whe even know if he knew Zimmerman was part of the neighborhood watch? If he did why would he be trying to get away?
This brings up another question I have, and I'm really not trying to be funny here. Is it normal for the neighborhood watch to be patroling the neighborhood in a car? I think the story now is that he was on his way to the grocery store when he spotted Trayvon but why did he feel that he had a right to follow him instead of just reporting it to the police and letting them handle the situation?Considering he was just a visitor, that's very unlikely unless Zimmerman marked his car.
I keep asking this and I still haven't seen a reasonable answer. Why would Trayvon do this? What motivation would he have to not simply get back to his family as soon as possible?
We already know based on his 911 calls that Zimmerman is a paranoid wackjob so why is his account more credible than common sense?
No need to apologize, I must have misunderstood you too.
Wasn't Martin suspicious of Zimmerman before Zimmerman had a chance to get out of the car?
Got a citation for that? Or are you going to try to tell me that, e.g., there is no "thug" Latino subculture.
They have diminished? So what fraction of the disproportionate black crime rate is due to the inherent criminality of blacks? What fraction of the disproportionate black poverty rate is due to the inherent laziness of blacks?
Do whe even know if he knew Zimmerman was part of the neighborhood watch? If he did why would he be trying to get away?
I'm 6'6" 290 and when I was 17 and impetuous, I might have said to myself, in a moment where irritation got the better of prudence, "What the fuck is this guy's problem? I'm going to ask him."
Why do you think Martin decided to turn around (assuming he actually did)?
Do we know anything about Trayvon? Everyone is using Zimmerman's past offenses to paint a character portrait. Trayvon's past seems to be off limits or non-existent. Does he seem like the type of person that would double back to confront a stalker? I've read rumors of pictures with firearms and such, but I haven't seen any of them(And wouldn't know what to make of them if they were real. Kids do stupid shit on facebook that doesn't necessarily reflect who they are). I haven't seen anything regarding Trayvon other than the circumstances of his death.
Also, unrelated, if Zimmerman did succeed in catching up to Trayvon a second time; why wouldn't Trayvon run away a second time? What changed?
the shooting took place on a pass through between houses, there is no vehicle access.Is there evidence to support this? In the tape, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher to have the patrolmen "go past the mail boxes and look for his truck" then he asks to have them call him when they get there. I took it as Zimmerman wanting to walk the patrolmen through finding his location, not that he wouldn't be where he said he would be. I very well could be wrong though. Do we have a layout of the neighborhood?(would the directions be something that he would want to give out in real time? I do that sometimes when trying to direct people to my house so they don't have to memorize a bunch of turns)
Do we know if Zimmerman got back in his SUV and continued the search or was searching on foot? Zimmerman states that it is raining in the beginning of the call so I don't see him going on foot, but I could be wrong. Also, does anyone know where exactly the shooting took place with regards to the original location that Zimmerman gave the dispatcher?(I want to know where Zimmerman initially stopped, got out of his vehicle and began following Trayvon before losing him and where that relates to the location of the shooting. That could give us some insight as to whether Zimmerman did renew his search or not.)Also, when did the altercation take place(time of day)? Has that been in any of the articles and I'm just glossing over it?
Just like I don't see that cartoon as anything more than one jackasses cartoon.
We actually do know a lot about Trayvon, at least as much as you can know about a 17 year-old and he had no history of violence on record and no one has come forward (yet) to say otherwise. He was tall but very skinny so unless he was super strong I'm not sure why he would confront a strange 28 year-old man, regardless of how hyped he was on puberty juice.Do we know anything about Trayvon? Everyone is using Zimmerman's past offenses to paint a character portrait. Trayvon's past seems to be off limits or non-existent. Does he seem like the type of person that would double back to confront a stalker? I've read rumors of pictures with firearms and such, but I haven't seen any of them(And wouldn't know what to make of them if they were real. Kids do stupid shit on facebook that doesn't necessarily reflect who they are). I haven't seen anything regarding Trayvon other than the circumstances of his death.
Also, unrelated, if Zimmerman did succeed in catching up to Trayvon a second time; why wouldn't Trayvon run away a second time? What changed?
I didn't know about this. If true how does Zimmerman explain this while saying he was attacked heading back to his car?the shooting took place on a pass through between houses, there is no vehicle access.
I just had an argument about this. The person was saying that he thought Trayvon had to have attacked Zimmerman. I said I wouldn't allow myself to be stalked by someone either. Who the fuck would? You either run or you, heh, you "stand your ground".
He didn't live there so I doubt it. Why should he allow himself to be followed some strange man anyway?
That was my point of mentioning why Martin misinterpret Zimmerman's intentions. But I was trying to make sense of the situation by trying to understand what may have been going through their minds. So its reasonable to say if Martin felt threatened his actions to get away from Zimmerman could be perceived as suspicious by Zimmerman.
We also don't have any evidence that he ran away other than Zimmerman telling the 911 operator that he was running. Trayvon's girlfriend said that he told her he was going to walk faster which may have seemed like running if you're a paranoid wackjob (maybe).
That was my point of mentioning why Martin misinterpret Zimmerman's intentions. But I was trying to make sense of the situation by trying to understand what may have been going through their minds. So its reasonable to say if Martin felt threatened his actions to get away from Zimmerman could be perceived as suspicious by Zimmerman.
But Zimmerman reported Martin as suspicious before he tried to get away.
But Zimmerman reported Martin as suspicious before he tried to get away.
If this really happened in between house that would make it very plausible that Trayvon was trying to lose him. None of that should be held against Trayvon though since Zimmerman had no right to be pursuing him in the first place, regardless of whether or not he found him to be suspicious.It could have been "running" in the sense of "trying to lose him."
No, what's pointless is you trying to find a justification here. Zimmerman was not a police officer and had no right to track or be concerned about Trayvon other than his paranoid 911 call.I think this is pointless... people only want to see this from one point of view.
AND, it made it more suspicious when he ran away.
I think this is pointless... people only want to see this from one point of view.
Does any of that matter? I don't think Zimmerman knew Trayvon before the shooting. If Martin was a dangerous person why would Zimmerman get out of his car and confront him?
As has been pointed out many times. Zimmerman thought he was suspicious when he saw him walking down the street, talking on the phone and looking at house. Certainly something you should never do in a strange neighborhood I guess.
If this really happened in between house that would make it very plausible that Trayvon was trying to lose him. None of that should be held against Trayvon though since Zimmerman had no right to be pursuing him in the first place, regardless of whether or not he found him to be suspicious.
No, what's pointless is you trying to find a justification here. Zimmerman was not a police officer and had no right to track or be concerned about Trayvon other than his paranoid 911 call.
AND, it made it more suspicious when he ran away.
I think this is pointless... people only want to see this from one point of view.
Well, that non specificity is one of the things that bothers me most when stories like this start stirring up people's emotions. They start making generalizations.
Such as people and the media saying things like "What kind of an unjust country do we live in where a man can be shot for no reason, and the shooter is not charged".
My thoughts go something like this. "Man, what a fucked up police department they must have in that town this happened in".
I don't jump to massive conclusions about an entire country full of 300 million people, and thousands of police departments over one case. Those giant generalizations irk me to no end.
I'm very confident that if this exact situation played out in 10 different locations in America, 9 of those times the shooter would have been immediately charged with a crime. It just so happened this occurred at just the right place, with the wrong people in charge, and it's turned into a mess. I do not see this as some sort of statement about the entire United States of America. Just like I don't see that cartoon as anything more than one jackasses cartoon.
Was Zimmerman going for confrontation or surveillance? Zimmerman got out of his car to follow him. We don't really know what happened in the minute or two after Zimmerman hung up the phone the first time. We have one side saying Trayvon ambushed Zimmerman on the way back to his SUV(Zimmerman's testimony) and Martin's girlfriend saying she heard Zimmerman say "what are you doing here?" before the call was ended. This could be Zimmerman catching up to Martin or Martin approaching Zimmerman. I don't know which scenario is more plausible. Given the location, how far was Zimmerman's SUV from the scene(Did he see him from the truck and make chase on foot again?) and do we believe Zimmerman could catch Martin on foot?
Zimmerman called it in because Martin was standing on the sidewalk in the rain looking at the houses("casing" according to the tape). Martin then turned to look at him before approaching his vehicle. Then Martin ran.
Also, not directed at you, is it illegal to follow someone? I have no idea.
Pretty sure that the hood went up after he noticed that he was being followed. But please, continue...As far as the hoodie thing goes, hiding your face make you look more menacing. Its a fact. Maybe its its the fact that I grew up on the city but hiding your face is a huge red flag.
One point of view?
Going from what your saying...
Zimmerman found Martin suspicious(based on his "clothing", his "walk" ... not his skin colour though of course), Martin decides to run away from the stranger following him, Zimmermans baseless, nonexistent suspicions are proven (to him) because the kid runs away...
His suspicions are still baseless and nonexistent. What could possibly justify the actions he took after he called the police?
It was raining though. And having your hoodie up doesn't make you a criminal.
The fact that there have been a rash of robberies in the area. At least I have a feeling it was a strong motivation. As someone who has a family I can say one of the biggest fears is having a your wife or kids home when this happens and something happening to them. It may not be justification but it sure is motivation.
As far as the hoodie thing goes, hiding your face make you look more menacing. Its a fact. Maybe its its the fact that I grew up on the city but hiding your face is a huge red flag.
Walking in the rain with hood on shouldn't be an issue. Read in this very thread that walking in the rain is some sort of "red flag" as well, very confusing.
Same police that asked him not to pursue...There being a string of burglaries in the area doesn't give a glorified rent a cop the right to confront someone, that's what the police are for.
The fact that there have been a rash of robberies in the area. At least I have a feeling it was a strong motivation. As someone who has a family I can say one of the biggest fears is having a your wife or kids home when this happens and something happening to them. It may not be justification but it sure is motivation.
As far as the hoodie thing goes, hiding your face makes you look more menacing. Its a fact. Maybe its its the fact that I grew up on the city but hiding your face is a huge red flag.
edit... Also there is no law against following someone.
It's kind of depressing to see people like yourself make these excuses for why Zimmerman was just in stalking and harassing a kid yet the kid is not allowed to do the simplest things like walk down the street, wear a fucking hoodie in the rain, or act "suspicious" when he notices a stranger in an SUV is following him.
There being a string of burglaries in the area doesn't give a glorified rent a cop the right to confront someone, that's what the police are for.
Should I find it strange that so many of the Zimmerman defenders are putting themselves into roles of the frightened homeowner instead of the role of the frightened teenager being stalked? Probably not.
It's kind of depressing to see people like yourself make these excuses for why Zimmerman was just in stalking and harassing a kid yet the kid is not allowed to do the simplest things like walk down the street, wear a fucking hoodie in the rain, or act "suspicious" when he notices a stranger in an SUV is following him.
There being a string of burglaries in the area doesn't give a glorified rent a cop the right to confront someone, that's what the police are for.
And he wasn't even that. He was a volunteer for the neighborhood watch. A security guard would have at least had a uniform and some authority.
Should I find it strange that so many of the Zimmerman defenders are putting themselves into roles of the frightened homeowner instead of the role of the frightened teenager being stalked? Probably not.
Also the fact that Zimmerman had a bloody nose and was bleeding from the back of his head shows that more went down than just a kid getting shot over skittles. But people seem to keep forgetting that fact.
Did I excuse him? I said I understand his motivation. I also am trying to point out that both people misunderstood the others intention.
Also the fact that Zimmerman had a bloody nose and was bleeding from the back of his head shows that more went down than just a kid getting shot over skittles. But people seem to keep forgetting that fact. Yes I know that profiling is what started the events to take place. But it is not why the boy was shot. Something else happened which is all I was responding to. But sure, we should just ignore the facts of this case because you want this to be about a bigger issue of racial profiling problems in this country. Yes it is a problem but there is more to this case than just that.
Zimmerman called it in because Martin was standing on the sidewalk in the rain looking at the houses("casing" according to the tape). Martin then turned to look at him before approaching his vehicle. Then Martin ran.
Also, not directed at you, is it illegal to follow someone? I have no idea.
Did I excuse him? I said I understand his motivation. I also am trying to point out that both people misunderstood the others intention.
Also the fact that Zimmerman had a bloody nose and was bleeding from the back of his head shows that more went down than just a kid getting shot over skittles. But people seem to keep forgetting that fact. Yes I know that profiling is what started the events to take place. But it is not why the boy was shot. Something else happened which is all I was responding to. But sure, we should just ignore the facts of this case because you want this to be about a bigger issue of racial profiling problems in this country. Yes it is a problem but there is more to this case than just that.
I don't give a fuck about racial profiling.
And those wounds were so severe he didn't even require a hospital visit. AFAIK they also didn't even include them in the police report. Just more things we hear about after the fact, as people try to cover their tracks.
If you're going to put a bullet into a kid you'd better be about an inch away from losing your life. Not upset your nose is bleeding.
I don't give a fuck about racial profiling.
And those wounds were so severe he didn't even require a hospital visit. AFAIK they also didn't even include them in the police report. Just more things we hear about after the fact, as people try to cover their tracks.
If you're going to put a bullet into a kid you'd better be about an inch away from losing your life. Not upset your nose is bleeding.
I never said I thought the shooting was justified. But it's a far cry from "He shot a kid for wearing a hoodie and holding skittles" that was first presented to the public.
The fact that there have been a rash of robberies in the area. At least I have a feeling it was a strong motivation. As someone who has a family I can say one of the biggest fears is having a your wife or kids home when this happens and something happening to them. It may not be justification but it sure is motivation.
As far as the hoodie thing goes, hiding your face makes you look more menacing. Its a fact. Maybe its its the fact that I grew up on the city but hiding your face is a huge red flag.
edit... Also there is no law against following someone.
I never said I thought the shooting was justified. But it's a far cry from "He shot a kid for wearing a hoodie and holding skittles" that was first presented to the public.
L O FUCKING L
I've seen some of your work, Xenon. Your reputation precedes you.
Why wear a hoodie when it's rainin' tho.