GI.biz: "Wii U less powerful than PS3, Xbox 360, developers say"

More cinematic... yes.
Better graphics ? No.

You're blind.


"Count the polys" in the GoW scene vs the Zelda demo.

The framerate is higher, the lighting is excellent, it has great MB, etc etc.


And it is a playable game on last gen hardware going up against a tech demonstration for supposed next generation hardware.

Why are we still even discussing this?
 
Hoo-doo, I didn't make a thread out of this for a reason.

This place is a shit tip of nonsense and ill-founded hatred.

The only pro of all this is the amount of people that'll be proven wrong come E3.
 
This just in: My Magic 8 ball tells me that it's likely that all the next game consoles will be go karts.

If true, graphics will move in MPH instead of the inferior FPS.

Viva next-gen!
 
So now we are comparing frame rates of a game made for a system years after it comes out to a tech demo made on early unreleased hardware.
No, I'm just saying it doesn't even run at locked 30fps. Imagine what SSM could do if they went for 30fps and empty room with one spider tech demo? :O
 
God of War 3 has a uber smooth framerate and really kickas AA solution. I cant wait to see what Santa Monica has prepared for the sequel.

With that kind of graphics, i really dont have a strong need for nextgen. I can come in late 2013, and untill then we are gonna have a ton of kickass games, especially from Sony.
 
But really folks. Stop using the god damn Zelda demo for your arguments, it's not a particularily amazing tech demo, save for the lighting.

Use this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OHUwDShrD4. Sure it's pretty much a pretty cinematic and no gameplay but I'll be damned if it isn't doing a better job at pimping the Wii U than the Zelda demo is.
 
If it could run it at 30 fps constantly with v-sync, that would be something.

Sort of!
Given that it's a current-gen game, I'd hope the Wii U version had slightly-better performance

but that would likely need Wii U to be the lead platform, which would never happen. Even when the next generation consoles are released! :(
 
The Zelda tech demo was really early on not even final hardware. The PS3 has been out for years.
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.
 
Nintendo is going to have to release this system with some outstanding software for me to even consider picking it up now.

I love Nintendo games, but below PS3/360? In 2012? Are you kidding me?
 
I beat GOW III and honestly I wasn't that impressed visually. There were a few moments that were impressive but overall the textures were atrocious and everything just felt so flat. I'm much more impressed and excited by the Zelda demo since the demo actually will be less impressive than the actual game if previous Zelda tech demos are anything to go by. Plus the art direction.

we're back to these words again Cloving?

God of war 3 has terrible IQ at times and some really bad textures and even some dogy lighting, It has some very nice models but the landscapes look fairly mediocre. Its comparable to The witcher 2 console port, It may no be exclusive, but its exclusive to the 360 (for now)


look like I said in my other post, show me a youtube clip where it looks as bad as you say it does, to the point where it bothers you enough to ignore all the crazy advanced things its doing....just because of a bad rock texture by a tree.

show me a game that is more visually consistent, which looks as advanced as GOW3.
 
I don't know where the commentary on God of War 3 destroying the Zelda tech demo comes from - both look awesome, and God of War's impressiveness comes from scope and cinematography (and being in development for a billion years) so obviously it has more wowness than something cobbled together for an E3 console unveiling. But technically speaking it's not really head and shoulders above the WiiU running demo.
 
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.






You'll be surprised to see what you can fit in smaller boxes than Xbox360 or PS3... with a far more powerfull hardware.
 
Damn son...

Zelda tech demo

zelda-wii-u1.jpg


GOW III

108grhv_5.jpg


You may think Zelda demo looks better than these, but it doesn't. No, even if its off screen. Do I have to mention that GOW III avg. frame rate is ~40 fps while Zelda was 30 locked?

This post sort of backfires, because there's some really nice effects going on in that tech demo that aren't in that GoW3 screen.

I mean, you might like the artistic direction of GoW more, but that zelda screen has self-shadowing, depth of field, reflective floor for world and character models and some nice particle effects going on the fires.

you can state opinion as fact all you want, but that zelda tech demo doesn't look 'bad' on any sort of technical level.
 
Sadly, E3 won't change many things...

Wii U: More details, playable demos, tease of Zelda, Mario, Smash... the usual suspects will like and fap to it, the other usual suspects will "lol" and talk about how is not next gen enough while claiming to be huge Nintendo fans that are going to abandon Nintendo "now". Not during the 480p Wii games that looked horrible on their TVs, not during the GameCube/N64 days were developers were abandoning Nintendo consoles and the PlayStation was getting stronger while Nintendo promoting GBA connectivity and Pac-man Vs. as the next big thing.....but .. "now".

Next Xbox/PS4 teaser: Will quickly be compared to Wii U games, as evidence that the Wii U is not powerful, "lol poor Nintendo". Hairs and shaders will be counted, resolutions will be measured and 20fps YouTube videos will be used as evidence of said demos running at 60fps and 1080p.

Of course, people will continue bringing possible Xbox and PS4 specs during that time, while neglecting or forgetting the "anti-used games rumors", the "always online requirements", the "no disc drives", the "lack of backward compatibility"...stuff that at the moment, hasn't been mentioned about the Wii U, since those sources are obviously lying, unlike the sources in this article.

:p
Nintendo could give an awesome presentation with Wii-U but anti-Nintendo fanboys will shit on specs till their blue in the face... you can't please everybody.
 
All developers need to do is lower the resolution from PS360 counterparts, I'm sure lot of you Nintendo guys won't notice it. :P
 
But really folks. Stop using the god damn Zelda demo for your arguments, it's not a particularily amazing tech demo, save for the lighting.

Use this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OHUwDShrD4. Sure it's pretty much a pretty cinematic and no gameplay but I'll be damned if it isn't doing a better job at pimping the Wii U than the Zelda demo is.
Was just about to post that.

Unseen in this footage is the Wii U controller, which is displaying another camera angle of the scene, controlled by the motion sensors.
 
I guess Wii U getting Arkham City or Ninja Gaiden or Assassin's Creed won't do anything to illustrate what it's actually capable of D:

Ninja Gaiden looks crappy, that's not a big deal to port it for WiiU (I guess the WiiU version will be canceled, if the 360/PS3 versions bomb).
But AC III will be surely technical ambitious, so there won't be a port if WiiU can't stand against PS3/360. Developing for a new hardware is always more difficult than developing for a hardware you are used to since seven years.
 
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.

Yep every since the pictures of the wiiu were released. No way this thing is power as people been saying. Its wayyy too small.

I been saying this the whole time and I still stand by this.

But really the gfx of the wiiu are not its selling point compared to the other consoles. ps4 and maybe nextbox are really going to be pushing gfx. At least the ps4 since the nextbox may be stuck on this nongamer bs. We will have to see....
 
The GOW3/Zelda demo war is just useless. What is relevant to this new rumor is to be able to say, with the Zelda demo if there is something that wouldn't be technically possible, in the same type of context on PS3.
 
bullshots vs a bad screenshot that came from an old build of a demo.

Goes to show you haven't played GoW3. The game has very good anti aliasing. In fact it was one of the few games which when I played had hard time finding jaggies.

I am not going to sit and debate whether one blows another out of water clearly since WiiU hasn't even launched yet. Perhaps devs will push WiiU to new heights later in its life span. However, people should know when the argument is invalid. Then again, biases have a way of warping perception.

That's because the Tri Ace demo and GoW is using the optimised setting "Shade Of Brown Only".

Classy. Topics like these really bring out the trolls.
 
As much as I think God of War is kinda off topic, kinda bankrupt in gameplay. I respect it. And it's a bit of a shame that some people can't even acknowledge what a technical marvel it was, the shear ambition and craftsmanship that went into making it- just to defend a game that uses animated textures for eyes still.
 
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.

robertdowney_junior.jpg
 
All developers need to do is lower the resolution from PS360 counterparts, I'm sure lot of you Nintendo guys won't notice it. :P
Here's one thing people are kind of forgetting, even if WiiU games are identical on the main screen to their PS360 counterparts, they have to render a whole second screen. Indeed, it's lower resolution, but it's still a performance draw. Just to hit par, it needs to be notably more powerful.
 
The OP story isn't plausible. The cost of something 3x this generation is probably about the same as 1x. You would have to not give a shit about profits to select components that are weaker. Not only because of reduced capabilities making things look worse, but also because it discourages even 360/PS3 ports to Wii U.
 
I beat GOW III and honestly I wasn't that impressed visually. There were a few moments that were impressive but overall the textures were atrocious and everything just felt so flat. I'm much more impressed and excited by the Zelda demo since the demo actually will be less impressive than the actual game if previous Zelda tech demos are anything to go by. Plus the art direction.



lol no. This will cost $250 minimum but will most likely cost $300 because contrary to what this article says -- if someone were to just go based on logic alone, not to mention the many developers, publishers that disagree with the OP -- the Wii U will be more powerful.

GOW3 is probably the most impressive game out this gen. I don't know which game you played, but most of the textures are phenomenal and Kratos has to be the most detailed model to date on consoles, with the best IQ to boot. Per-object blur, MLAA, massive dynamic enviroments, outstanding geometry detail,etc all at a variably high framerate. You'd be hard-pressed to find a game more impressive.
 
Damn son...

Zelda tech demo

zelda-wii-u1.jpg


Tri Ace tech demo

tech_shot_5.jpg


GOW III

108grhv_5.jpg




You may think Zelda demo looks better than these, but it doesn't. No, even if its off screen. Do I have to mention that GOW III avg. frame rate is ~40 fps while Zelda was 30 locked?
No dude. Just... no. The tri-Ace demo looks nice, but it's a joke compared to even the Zelda demo. Even when it comes to lighting, which is what the tri-Ace demo was all about. Some very, very obvious objects in the tri-Ace demo don't even cast shadows, even thought they should. But surprisingly enough, people didn't even notice, so I guess we already hit the ceiling.
 
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.

Interesting point.

iphone-4s_infinity_blade2.jpg
 
Top Bottom