GhostTrick
Banned
About GI article... Just a late joke. Only fools could trust it.
More cinematic... yes.
Better graphics ? No.
No, I'm just saying it doesn't even run at locked 30fps. Imagine what SSM could do if they went for 30fps and empty room with one spider tech demo? :OSo now we are comparing frame rates of a game made for a system years after it comes out to a tech demo made on early unreleased hardware.
I guess Wii U getting Arkham City or Ninja Gaiden or Assassin's Creed won't do anything to illustrate what it's actually capable of D:
You're blind.
Count the polys in the GoW scene vs the Zelda demo.
I'm seeing a correlation in avatars/outage here.
Given that it's a current-gen game, I'd hope the Wii U version had slightly-better performanceIf it could run it at 30 fps constantly with v-sync, that would be something.
Sort of!
You're joking right?
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.The Zelda tech demo was really early on not even final hardware. The PS3 has been out for years.
Yes, I imagine everybody would want to spend 500+ bucks instead of half that priceAlso from the article:
I beat GOW III and honestly I wasn't that impressed visually. There were a few moments that were impressive but overall the textures were atrocious and everything just felt so flat. I'm much more impressed and excited by the Zelda demo since the demo actually will be less impressive than the actual game if previous Zelda tech demos are anything to go by. Plus the art direction.
God of war 3 has terrible IQ at times and some really bad textures and even some dogy lighting, It has some very nice models but the landscapes look fairly mediocre. Its comparable to The witcher 2 console port, It may no be exclusive, but its exclusive to the 360 (for now)
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.
Damn son...
Zelda tech demo
![]()
GOW III
![]()
You may think Zelda demo looks better than these, but it doesn't. No, even if its off screen. Do I have to mention that GOW III avg. frame rate is ~40 fps while Zelda was 30 locked?
That God of War screen is quite ugly, to be honest.
Nintendo could give an awesome presentation with Wii-U but anti-Nintendo fanboys will shit on specs till their blue in the face... you can't please everybody.Sadly, E3 won't change many things...
Wii U: More details, playable demos, tease of Zelda, Mario, Smash... the usual suspects will like and fap to it, the other usual suspects will "lol" and talk about how is not next gen enough while claiming to be huge Nintendo fans that are going to abandon Nintendo "now". Not during the 480p Wii games that looked horrible on their TVs, not during the GameCube/N64 days were developers were abandoning Nintendo consoles and the PlayStation was getting stronger while Nintendo promoting GBA connectivity and Pac-man Vs. as the next big thing.....but .. "now".
Next Xbox/PS4 teaser: Will quickly be compared to Wii U games, as evidence that the Wii U is not powerful, "lol poor Nintendo". Hairs and shaders will be counted, resolutions will be measured and 20fps YouTube videos will be used as evidence of said demos running at 60fps and 1080p.
Of course, people will continue bringing possible Xbox and PS4 specs during that time, while neglecting or forgetting the "anti-used games rumors", the "always online requirements", the "no disc drives", the "lack of backward compatibility"...stuff that at the moment, hasn't been mentioned about the Wii U, since those sources are obviously lying, unlike the sources in this article.
![]()
Was just about to post that.But really folks. Stop using the god damn Zelda demo for your arguments, it's not a particularily amazing tech demo, save for the lighting.
Use this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OHUwDShrD4. Sure it's pretty much a pretty cinematic and no gameplay but I'll be damned if it isn't doing a better job at pimping the Wii U than the Zelda demo is.
so can Stevie Wonder
I guess Wii U getting Arkham City or Ninja Gaiden or Assassin's Creed won't do anything to illustrate what it's actually capable of D:
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.
It's 720p with no AA. It looks very bad on an image quality technical level.you can state opinion as fact all you want, but that zelda tech demo doesn't look 'bad' on any sort of technical level.
Someone should post that shot with Kratos flying a bit up in the air and all the ember/ash is around. That is one of my favorite GoW3 screenshotsFar from the best shot I've seen of it.
So is the muppeteer's hand inside the toilet?
bullshots vs a bad screenshot that came from an old build of a demo.
That's because the Tri Ace demo and GoW is using the optimised setting "Shade Of Brown Only".
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.
Here's one thing people are kind of forgetting, even if WiiU games are identical on the main screen to their PS360 counterparts, they have to render a whole second screen. Indeed, it's lower resolution, but it's still a performance draw. Just to hit par, it needs to be notably more powerful.All developers need to do is lower the resolution from PS360 counterparts, I'm sure lot of you Nintendo guys won't notice it.![]()
It's 720p with no AA. It looks very bad on an image quality technical level.
I beat GOW III and honestly I wasn't that impressed visually. There were a few moments that were impressive but overall the textures were atrocious and everything just felt so flat. I'm much more impressed and excited by the Zelda demo since the demo actually will be less impressive than the actual game if previous Zelda tech demos are anything to go by. Plus the art direction.
lol no. This will cost $250 minimum but will most likely cost $300 because contrary to what this article says -- if someone were to just go based on logic alone, not to mention the many developers, publishers that disagree with the OP -- the Wii U will be more powerful.
No dude. Just... no. The tri-Ace demo looks nice, but it's a joke compared to even the Zelda demo. Even when it comes to lighting, which is what the tri-Ace demo was all about. Some very, very obvious objects in the tri-Ace demo don't even cast shadows, even thought they should. But surprisingly enough, people didn't even notice, so I guess we already hit the ceiling.Damn son...
Zelda tech demo
![]()
Tri Ace tech demo
![]()
GOW III
![]()
You may think Zelda demo looks better than these, but it doesn't. No, even if its off screen. Do I have to mention that GOW III avg. frame rate is ~40 fps while Zelda was 30 locked?
A next gen console is capable of getting current gen games.I guess Wii U getting Arkham City or Ninja Gaiden or Assassin's Creed won't do anything to illustrate what it's actually capable of D:
Far from the best shot I've seen of it.
It's 720p with no AA. It looks very bad on an image quality technical level.
But, IGN had you guys fooled it was 2-5x times the current HD consoles. Than came Ideamans posts, than new dev kits, people even talked about 2 gigs of ram. Lol! You CAN'T fit shoes in your wallet, you need shoebox. WiiU is so damn small that even being close to PS360 should be a miracle. If it was 2x and more powerful they could make tech demo looking much better than what is achievable in current generation games.