Support NeoGAF

[XiaNaphryz]

Baby security breach closes NJ airport terminal:

(04-27) 18:29 PDT Newark, N.J. (AP) -- A terminal at Newark Liberty International Airport was shut down for over an hour Friday after officials discovered that a baby hadn't been properly screened, Transportation Security Administration officials said.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which operates the airport, described the incident as a security breach that occurred at around 1:15 p.m. at a security checkpoint. Terminal C was evacuated and passengers had to go through security screening again.

TSA spokeswoman Lisa Farbstein said a mother and baby went through a metal detector when the machine sounded an alarm. The mother handed the child to the father, who had already been screened. The mother was cleared, but the baby hadn't been properly screened. The parents and baby left the checkpoint and headed to their gate, Farbstein said.

TSA officers searched for the family in the secure area of the terminal and notified Port Authority police as per protocol, but they emphasized that it was a low-risk situation, Farbstein said.

A TSA official said they had explained the circumstances of the breach to the Port Authority police and recommended against evacuating the terminal since it was a low-risk situation.

Steve Coleman, a Port Authority spokesman, said that it took the TSA more than 30 minutes to notify police of the lapse and that officers "took immediate action to make sure the breach did not endanger passengers or our facility."

"We're not going to second-guess a real-time decision made by our police department to err on the side of caution and protect passenger safety," he said.

The terminal and checkpoint were closed from 1:30 p.m. to 2:50 p.m.

Passenger Jennifer Pallanich said she was on a Houston-bound flight scheduled to depart at about 2 p.m. and boarding had been completed, but because of the breach, the passengers had to evacuate and go through security screening again.

 

[Devolution]

C4 in the diaper.

 

[TAJ]

lol... /sigh
I'm almost glad that I haven't been on a flight since 9/11.
Everyone got fuckin' crazy.

 

[Escape Goat]

There were bombs in the baby's diaper. Smelly bombs.


I think you missed a line of unbolded text though.

 

[Sadsic]

There were bombs in the baby's diaper. Smelly bombs.


I think you missed a line of unbolded text though.

SIR IS THIS A POOP JOKE

 

[butter_stick]

Great job.

 

[XiaNaphryz]

I think you missed a line of unbolded text though.

You caught it before the stealth edit!

 

[Raxus]

I see they finally caught the nefarious baby terrorist.

 

[antonz]

I see they finally caught the nefarious baby terrorist.

it all makes sense now

 

[Smellycat]

OP, why even bother highlighting stuff if you are going to highlight 99% of the article?

 

[phosphor112]

Seriously, they should not exist. They should have never existed. Fuck them. A supervisor called my mom and sister "rag heads" and told the underlings to pull them to the side even though they subjected themselves to the invasive full body scans.

 

[outunderthestars]

I like how you bolded everything except for the important part:

""We're not going to second-guess a real-time decision made by our police department to err on the side of caution and protect passenger safety," he said."

Once you get past the "HA HA it's all because of a baby" you realize that it was really the only thing that could be done. The point of a screening process is that everyone gets screened. Once someone or something gets through, it raises the threat level. While it sucks, it had to be done.

 

[Dai101]

That baby was clearly a terrorist, i hope he got send to Gitmo

 

[Marty Chinn]

Surprised at how many people who think there was no reason for them to shut it down.

 

[antonz]

I like how you bolded everything except for the important part:

""We're not going to second-guess a real-time decision made by our police department to err on the side of caution and protect passenger safety," he said."

Once you get past the "HA HA it's all because of a baby" you realize that it was really the only thing that could be done. The point of a screening process is that everyone gets screened. Once someone or something gets through, it raises the threat level. While it sucks, it had to be done.

No this isnt true at all. We just need to stop pretending and do what other countries do. 93 year old grandmas in wheel chairs arent seeking to blow up planes and babies in diapers besides a stink bomb arent a threat either

 

[Yagharek]

The baby was charged, I assume?

 

[Marty Chinn]

No this isnt true at all. We just need to stop pretending and do what other countries do. 93 year old grandmas in wheel chairs arent seeking to blow up planes and babies in diapers besides a stink bomb arent a threat either

So what's to stop someone from hiding something among a baby or an old person knowing full well they won't be searched?

 

[outunderthestars]

No this isnt true at all. We just need to stop pretending and do what other countries do. 93 year old grandmas in wheel chairs arent seeking to blow up planes and babies in diapers besides a stink bomb arent a threat either

Ok, so once you start profiling people , how do you make it effective yet able to withstand judicial review?

Also, once you announce that a certain group won't be searched, they will be used to carry bombs. It's not like a terrorist is going to say "oh man, we'd have to kill a child, old lady, etc. Jihad canceled!"

 

[antonz]

Ok, so once you start profiling people , how do you make it effective yet able to withstand judicial review?

Thats the hard part Judicial review can change one judge to the next. We know countries around the world are quite effective at behavioural profiling etc and function quite well

 

[outunderthestars]

Thats the hard part Judicial review can change one judge to the next. We know countries around the world are quite effective at behavioural profiling etc and function quite well

They are most likely not restricted by the Constitutional obligations that the U.S. has.

 

[Buzzati]

Was the baby white?

 

[Lamel]

I remember when my baby cousin was stopped at the airport (6 months old) because his name was similar to some guy on a "terrorist list" or some type of "high risk" list. The entire family had to go through separate screening for over an hour; yes, Mom, dad, 3 year old and 6 month old.

 

[hateradio]

it all makes sense now

That's adorably racist.

 

[outunderthestars]

I remember when my baby cousin was stopped at the airport (6 months old) because his name was similar to some guy on a "terrorist list" or some type of "high risk" list. The entire family had to go through separate screening for over an hour; yes, Mom, dad, 3 year old and 6 month old.

Once again, while that sucks, is a requirement for effective screening. Once you start letting TSA lackeys exercise judgement as to who get screened the system collapses.

 

[antonz]

That's adorably racist.

apparently knitted baby beards are a big thing. Etsy and companies sell them was quite surprised on google

 

[Lamel]

Once again, while that sucks, is a requirement for effective screening. Once you start letting TSA lackeys exercise judgement as to who get screened the system collapses.

Uh this wasn't any regular screening. It was being pulled over to the side and sat in a room for further questioning. Because a 6 month old baby's name was the same as some terrorist. Lesson learned, don't name your babies arabic names.

 

[outunderthestars]

Uh this wasn't any regular screening. It was being pulled over to the side and sat in a room for further questioning. Because a 6 month old baby's name was the same as some terrorist. Lesson learned, don't name your babies arabic names.

the type of screening doesn't matter. The system relies on total compliance by TSA screeners. If they let one person slide, regardless of age, it opens to the door to other people trying to argue their way past screening.

 

[antonz]

Uh this wasn't any regular screening. It was being pulled over to the side and sat in a room for further questioning. Because a 6 month old baby's name was the same as some terrorist. Lesson learned, don't name your babies arabic names.

The name list was one of the worst thought out things ever. At the very least they could have developed a database that has the suspects photo present.

 

[outunderthestars]

The name list was one of the worst thought out things ever. At the very least they could have developed a database that has the suspects photo present.

Agreed. Secondary screening is a bad idea. It implies that somehow the primary screening process is incapable of detecting threats. If that is the case then the primary screening system needs to be improved or simply removed all together.

 

[Plywood]

OP, why even bother highlighting stuff if you are going to highlight 99% of the article?

Because people will read the bolded and thus read the entire article.

 

[dark_chris]

lol... /sigh
I'm almost glad that I haven't been on a flight since 9/11.
Everyone got fuckin' crazy.

Same here. I haven't been on a plane since before 9/11 and things got out of hand.

 

[PuppetSlave]

the type of screening doesn't matter. The system relies on total compliance by TSA screeners. If they let one person slide, regardless of age, it opens to the door to other people trying to argue their way past screening.

Oh yeah, the other terrorist 6 month old babies would have a field day arguing their way past.

Or wait, you mean those sneaky 8 to 9 month old babies who try to look 6 months old. Those are a real problem.

It's ridiculous and their is no fucking reason for not having a cut-off age that includes freaking babies. It does not open any fucking doors!

 

[outunderthestars]

Oh yeah, the other terrorist 6 month old babies would have a field day arguing their way past.

Or wait, you mean those sneaky 8 to 9 month old babies who try to look 6 months old. Those are a real problem.

It's ridiculous and their is no fucking reason for not having a cut-off age that includes freaking babies. It does not open any fucking doors!

Yea, because nobody could use a baby's diaper, clothing, or bag to smuggle a weapon or drugs through a checkpoint.

 

[EnderWiggles]

Give baby Skittles. Shoot baby. Threat down.

 

[NEO0MJ]

Yea, because nobody could use a baby's diaper, clothing, or bag to smuggle a weapon or drugs through a checkpoint.

What does that have to do with the baby's name?

 

[outunderthestars]

What does that have to do with the baby's name?

He said there was no reason that a child could be a list for extra screening. This shows people who were using children to smuggle illegal items onto planes using a baby. Now if authorities know that a family is planning on using a baby to smuggle something onto a plane, but are unsure as to who would be taking the baby, they could flag the baby itself.

 

[low-G]

While they were tracking down the babby a terrorist waltzed in and installed bombs on all the planes because the TSA is a dumb and completely worthless waste of an organization whose every iota of effort is completely misguided if not corrupt and even destructive.

 

[RiccochetJ]

Do people honestly think that there aren't people out there who would use infants as bombs?

Wake the fuck up.

 

[HK-47]

Do people honestly think that there aren't people out there who would use infants as bombs?

Wake the fuck up.

something something slippery slope something something paranoia

 

[thetechkid]

Do people honestly think that there aren't people out there who would use infants as bombs?

Wake the fuck up.

I heard people who fly like to blow up things, therefore all airplane passengers are terrorists.

 

[dejay]

They have a procedure, they should follow it. Second guessing shit and letting things slide leads to uncertainty and exploitation. They did the right thing, they just should have done it earlier.

 

[Marty Chinn]

I heard people who fly like to blow up things, therefore all airplane passengers are terrorists.

So we shouldn't screen anyone?

 

[thetechkid]

So we shouldn't screen anyone?

Yes and also people who drive and walk because terrorists also walk and drive.

 

[Marty Chinn]

Yes and also people who drive and walk because terrorists also walk and drive.

Can't take someone seriously if you're honestly advocating that we shouldn't screen anyone at an airport.

 

[antonz]

Can't take someone seriously if you're honestly advocating that we shouldn't screen anyone at an airport.

I am all for screening but lets screen the proper demographics.

 

[jaxword]

Do people honestly think that there aren't people out there who would use infants as bombs?

Wake the fuck up.

Yeah, wake up, you sheeple, the terrorists are using babies now.

 

[thetechkid]

Can't take someone seriously if you're honestly advocating that we shouldn't screen anyone at an airport.

I'm not saying screen no one, screening everyone is stupid and a huge waste.

 

[TAJ]

the type of screening doesn't matter. The system relies on total compliance by TSA screeners. If they let one person slide, regardless of age, it opens to the door to other people trying to argue their way past screening.

This is probably the thinking behind carding 80yos for alcohol, lol.
I was wrong. We didn't go crazy. We went d-u-m, dum.

So what's to stop someone from hiding something among a baby or an old person knowing full well they won't be searched?

Yes, the one baby out of millions who wasn't scanned will be the one with a bomb on it. And it makes so much sense that two people brought the baby-bomb on, when it only takes one.

 

[Dead Man]

Can't take someone seriously if you're honestly advocating that we shouldn't screen anyone at an airport.

Depends what you mean by screen. Current xray shit that misses things as a panacea? Yeah, I'm all for no one doing that.

 

[Marty Chinn]

I'm not saying screen no one, screening everyone is stupid and a huge waste.

But the second you say we're not going to screen certain people, you don't think anyone who is trying to do harm won't try to use that hole in order to accomplish their goal?

Yes, the one baby out of millions who wasn't scanned will be the one with a bomb on it. And it makes so much sense that two people brought the baby-bomb on, when it only takes one.

Are we ignoring the fact that this baby set off a metal detector alarm and then wasn't checked?