It's better to watch them by release date anyway. Chronological order isn't really important here.
Yet, I'm sure someone will create the 12 hour fan edit of them all as one movie one day.
I think somebody already did, lol.
Sure, and you can make the argument that it can be watched after Thor due to the mythical elements in it, but I was thinking specifically about the Cap shield in IM2. :lol Though you're right, Cap should be last.Captain America is the last one. Just most of it is a flash back.
My only disappointment with the movie would be how generic and unexciting the alien army at the end looked. It is as seen in the trailers - an uninspired almost-Skrull design which is not quite as imaginative or cool. Still, they managed to get quite a bit of mileage out of that simply because the heroes are so fun to watch in action. Kids will probably enjoy these sequences way more, and if they sell a bunch of toys because of that, they probably deserve to.
Do go on.
That's really my one gripe with the whole movie. I mean,this is the alien invasion that they were trying to prevent? They're not exactly very dangerous or very efficient. Why are they jumping into office buildings and shooting civilians one by one? Do they know how long it's going to take to kill everyone in the city that way? One modern bomber could do more damager to the city than their entire advanced army from out of space.
Honestly, if you know about all heroes, only Cap's movie provides with new info (how the Tesseract works). I'd suggest watching them all, but only Cap is "needed"Sure, and you can make the argument that it can be watched after Thor due to the mythical elements in it, but I was thinking specifically about the Cap shield in IM2. :lol Though you're right, Cap should be last.
I can't say more that it'd spoil the movie, but Jex basically touched upon one of the problems. I just found the movie hilarious in how many things were just like, why would that happen, why would you do that, what was that, etc. It's not a bad movie, like I said before I had a good time with it, it's just lacking in sense in it's writing.
I didn't think that was a problem. Superhero plots in comics have never made sense. Why do supervillains like Lex Luthor rob banks when they could just be Steve Jobs
Well to be fairThat's really my one gripe with the whole movie. I mean,this is the alien invasion that they were trying to prevent? They're not exactly very dangerous or very efficient. Why are they jumping into office buildings and shooting civilians one by one? Do they know how long it's going to take to kill everyone in the city that way? One modern bomber could do more damager to the city than their entire advanced army from out of space.
Nah, Thor is the most vital thing to watch before Avengers, imo, since Loki plays a big part and all. Though in reality, of course, none of the previous films are necessary to still understand it all.Honestly, if you know about all heroes, only Cap's movie provides with new info (how the Tesseract works). I'd suggest watching them all, but only Cap is "needed"
So, now that Marvel figured out that people prefer to see hero stories than monster stories, The Hulk might get a 3rd chance at box office gold.
I didn't think that was a problem. Superhero plots in comics have never made sense. Why do supervillains like Lex Luthor rob banks when they could just be Steve Jobs? Why do they keep building evil robots and stuff? It doesn't make sense except superheroes need something they can punch.
The point where the planes with the nukes are taking off. Fury comes out with a bazooka and shoots one before it takes off and then takes out his pistol to deal with the other. Now this is just fucking moronic for an incredible number of reasons but let's just deal with the biggest one. THERE IS A NUKE INSIDE THE PLANE YOU ARE SHOOTING A ROCKET AT. How in the fuck is that a good idea in any sense of the word especially when you are 20 fucking feet away from the damn thing. I found the scene hilariously stupid which to top off had Fury make the attempt to shoot down a fighter jet with a pistol. I couldn't stop laughing at that part, what he didn't shoot because the jet had gotten out of range? Hahahaha.
My complaint isn't the same as Jex's though he does raise a valid point. It's just a bunch of other stuff happened that was inherently stupid that made no sense to me. I'll just say one of the ones that stuck out in my mind the most:
MOVIE SPOILER AHEAD
The point where the planes with the nukes are taking off. Fury comes out with a bazooka and shoots one before it takes off and then takes out his pistol to deal with the other. Now this is just fucking moronic for an incredible number of reasons but let's just deal with the biggest one. THERE IS A NUKE INSIDE THE PLANE YOU ARE SHOOTING A ROCKET AT. How in the fuck is that a good idea in any sense of the word especially when you are 20 fucking feet away from the damn thing. I found the scene hilariously stupid which to top off had Fury make the attempt to shoot down a fighter jet with a pistol. I couldn't stop laughing at that part, what he didn't shoot because the jet had gotten out of range? Hahahaha.
I know this is a superhero movie and whatevs, but...actual nukes are nearly impossible to detonate by external forces.
I'll concede this point to me being ignorant of launching and detonations of nukes, but if he had hit it with the rocket it surely would have exploded as well.
So I'm taking my dad to see this, he's seen everything but Ironman 2, do I need to have him watch it or will he be fine assuming I explain who Scarlett Johansson is (eye candy)?
He'll be fine.
Dat box office. Damn.
Do people still think Dark Knight Rises is gonna beat Avengers this summer?
I'll concede this point to me being ignorant of the particulars pertaining to launching and detonations of nukes, but if he had hit it with the rocket it surely would have exploded as well.
Yes, on all fronts.
The one thing that set Marvel Studios apart from all previous comic movie adaptations is that this wasn't a case of a Hollywood studio licensing properties to make profitable movies out of them. This was a case of an actual comic company wanting to invest into a movie comic universe continuity and to build on this universe through multiple movies each featuring individual comic properties
I had Avengers at around $145 million opening and $350 million domestic take. $850-$900 million WW. I think my OW number is now low.
Modern nukes have plenty of safeguards to prevent a nuclear reaction from starting. So even if you blew it up with another explosive, it will likely not cause a nuclear detonation. At worse, the standard explosive material in it would also go off, but not in such a way to cause the nuclear reaction to start up.
Not really.The US Army actually lost a few of them in aerial accidents and nothing happened (besides nuclear contamination, which kind of sucks anyway). The conventional explosives of the bomb may detonate, but it takes more than that to create a nuclear explosion.
So, now that Marvel figured out that people prefer to see hero stories than monster stories, The Hulk might get a 3rd chance at box office gold.
Extremely effective. Not every character has "equal screen time" in runtime, but they all get different types of screen time, effective for the given character. They did a marvelous job imo.
Hawkeye kills Thor by punching him. Really good portrayal of power levels!Sounds good. I'm curious how they did stuff like portray the Avengers' various power levels. I'm not Mr. Superhero Comic Book, admittedly, so I could just plain be wrong about this... but it seems like Thor - as an actual god of sorts - should be quite a bit more powerful than the others save for maybe the Hulk. Do they get power differences across at all in that manner?
Your avatar bet is in the bag. Make it as annoying an avatar as possible.
Sounds good. I'm curious how they did stuff like portray the Avengers' various power levels. I'm not Mr. Superhero Comic Book, admittedly, so I could just plain be wrong about this... but it seems like Thor - as an actual god of sorts - should be quite a bit more powerful than the others save for maybe the Hulk. Do they get power differences across at all in that manner?
Yes, each character has their weaknesses and strengths weaved into all their scenes. You won't be seeing more vulnerable characters taking direct hits and surviving. Instead they will have to put more effort into avoiding hits or improvising with their special skills. The only ones who are seen trading endless blows without a hint of fatigue are Thor and Hulk. The action scenes are really well thought out.
....and MAKE MONEY. Come on, ducky son.
Some Armond White wannabe named Cole Smithey dropped in a negative review. Lol.
Current RT tally: 70 fresh, 3 rotten. 96%
I never suggested it's a charity. But the important thing is that Marvel is doing what no one else did before them, and it is a very impressive feat.
Yet as much as I enjoyed The Avengers, I still say that what they've done is at the expense of their standalone films. Looking forward to Iron Man 3 not being a slave to Avengers stuff.
I disagree completely. But I guess you're not much of a comic book fan.
Yeah, I mean Thor and Cappy A weren't the greatest movies out there, but neither are what I'd call bad.I disagree completely. But I guess you're not much of a comic book fan.