Microsoft Surface Tablet announced

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Zune nor any other major Microsoft device of late hasn't been available outside the US.

I'm hoping its available in Australia in some form, I really like the look of the device and wouldn't mind picking the Pro up.

The Zune was a completely different situation, imo. They never intended to launch it internationally.

What other major Microsoft device was there after the Zune? The KIN, a CDMA-only device?
 
It's an Ultrabook in form of a tablet. Nothing we haven't seen at Computex this month.

Forget Computex, a clone of the Pro has been on sale for like a year!

http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/pd/Samsung-Series-7-Slate/productID.241554200/vip.true

en-US_Samsung_Series_7_Slate_CVF-00178.jpg
 
OK maybe that's a little hyperbolic, but this is an entirely plausible scenario: you bring the Surface into the office, connect it to your monitor and desktop mouse/keyboard and you're good to go for work, without skipping a beat.

I think this will be a niche usage case. Most people who work in offices are provided desktops, and their companies impose severe restrictions on what can be installed.

Some IT departments are becoming less strict and allowing people to bring their own iPads, but iPads are pretty locked down, and you don't need to worry about a stupid employee getting a virus. Windows 8 desktop is going to be less restricted than iPads.
 
My brother has the Samsung Slate, its alright for a tablet but it doesn't make you wet your pants like this product does.

The Zune was a completely different situation, imo. They never intended to launch it internationally.

What other major Microsoft device was there after the Zune? The KIN, a CDMA-only device?

KIN and the original Surfaces also were USA only.
 
This is exactly what I was waiting for. I barely play on my laptop and most of the stuff that I have for Steam will run on the Pro as well as the software that I use. I was just looking for the right device to jump to Windows 8 and tablets.

the pro looks amazing. the hard keyboard looks like it should tick all the boxes.

That thing + group policies/domain enterprise stuff, very viable laptop replacement at the corporate level.

Published apps for while in enterprise + heading out with your tablet. Board members and system admins should eat this shit up.
 
This will be remembered as one of MS´s biggest commercial fails. The device is simply too expensive to be appealing to non enterprise markets.
 
the pro looks amazing. the hard keyboard looks like it should tick all the boxes.

I think it fails to check a pretty major box. Using it in your lap. I don't think the kickstand will work very well on anything over than a flat surface.

Also you won't be able to adjust the tilt of the screen.
 
Radeon moniker also covers their IGP solutions, which are similar to Intel's GPUs. Just because it's AMD and nVidia doesn't automatically mean more powerful than Intel GPUs. They both make low power IGP solutions.

I don't keep up with the mobile market very well -- after shopping for laptops I ultimately got a desktop anyway. There was no HD4000 at the time I was shopping around, so I pretty much considered any ATI/nVidia chip to be superior to the HD3000, which was probably 5-8 generations behind anything else. Even the Radeon IGP stuff rated higher than Intel's (then current) offering.

What are the lowest level ATI/nVidia chips that count as a discrete GPU? When I was looking there were plenty of laptops with Geforce 520/525/540 below the $1000 threshold. Newegg had an Acer with a 540M for around $650, though it's out of stock now.
 
Im definitely getting this as my next tablet, this is what portable computing should be and I'm typing this from my iPad. Microsoft is really on top of their game since releasing windows 7!
 
As they say: The Devil is in the details.

And details is what MS nailed with this, not only is beautifully crafted, the little touches like the sound of the stand, that Vapor thing construction, the simple yet awesome idea of the cover, the 22 grades of inclination of the cameras, that venting solution and many more makes this really a premium product than not a single OEM has even been close to match.
 
The RT version will probably comparatively priced with the iPad (500-600 US dollars). How is that too expensive?

How many people do you know that would buy a 600$ MS windows tablet for non professional use.

How many IOS or Android leisure users would switch or invest in this as their next device? These people don´t want a mobile fully fledged windows operating system, they want ease of use, simplicity and stability.

If this was priced at 399$ and have the screen quality to compete with the Prime or the Ipad, then it might be a choice, for the prices people are referring, i would never touch it.

Edit: regarding prices, people are speculating that the top of the line will reach ultra book price ranges, with the low end version being around 500-600.
 
I think it fails to check a pretty major box. Using it in your lap. I don't think the kickstand will work very well on anything over than a flat surface.

I think the notion is that if you're using it on your lap or informally, you're probably consuming, and you can use the on-screen touch keyboard.

And if you're trying to get work done, you're probably sitting at a table or a desk, where it's ok to pull out the cover keyboard and the kick stand.
 
I don't keep up with the mobile market very well -- after shopping for laptops I ultimately got a desktop anyway. There was no HD4000 at the time I was shopping around, so I pretty much considered any ATI/nVidia chip to be superior to the HD3000, which was probably 5-8 generations behind anything else. Even the Radeon IGP stuff rated higher than Intel's (then current) offering.

What are the lowest level ATI/nVidia chips that count as a discrete GPU? When I was looking there were plenty of laptops with Geforce 520/525/540 below the $1000 threshold. Newegg had an Acer with a 540M for around $650, though it's out of stock now.

Anything that's not part of the CPU or Northbridge would be considered "discrete" GPU, but some are barely worth calling it that. The 540M is definitely faster than Intel HD series.
 
The "But all of that W8 stuff isn't news" guys in the thread need to realize that's just not true. One of the things MS has always sucked (and Apple excelled) at is getting people to give a shit. To see this level of hype is frankly stunning, and in the process people will always be excited about things that aren't actually all that new. Happens with Apple products all the time.
 
It's an Ultrabook in form of a tablet. Nothing we haven't seen at Computex this month.
Wild conjecture on my part, but if people were to choose between the 2 form factors while sizing up a potential PC purchase I'd wager most would take the more convenient one. Especially considering both will be running the same OS.
 
The "But all of that W8 stuff isn't news" guys in the thread need to realize that's just not true. One of the things MS has always sucked (and Apple excelled) at is getting people to give a shit. To see this level of hype is frankly stunning, and in the process people will always be excited about things that aren't actually all that new. Happens with Apple products all the time.

zune2.png


02-15-10winphone2.jpg


Not exactly sales chart toppers, no matter how good the hardware was/is. People seem to under estimate how much of a hold Apple has on the mobile market and how much of a bad rep MS has overall.
 
I think the notion is that if you're using it on your lap or informally, you're probably consuming, and you can use the on-screen touch keyboard.

And if you're trying to get work done, you're probably sitting at a table or a desk, where it's ok to pull out the cover keyboard and the kick stand.

But if you're in transit a table might not be available. And since you can't adjust the tilt the ergonomics are in peril.

This seems a lot more compelling for visual creative types than keyboard-centric users.

Not exactly sales chart toppers, no matter how good the hardware was/is. People seem to under estimate how much of a hold Apple has on the mobile market and how much of a bad rep MS has overall.

You're kinda proving his point there. The tech world was pretty stonefaced for those efforts, this is a new level for a MS product.
 
How many people do you know that would buy a 600$ MS windows tablet for non professional use.

How many IOS or Android leisure users would switch or invest in this as their next device? These people don´t want a mobile fully fledged windows operating system, they want ease of use, simplicity and stability.

If this was priced at 399$ and have the screen quality to compete with the Prime or the Ipad, then it might be a choice, for the prices people are referring, i would never touch it.

Edit: regarding prices, people are speculating that the top of the line will reach ultra book price ranges, with the low end version being around 500-600.

The same people that are interested in iOS and Android tablets are interested in this. It will be comparably priced to those devices and Windows 8 is arguably easier to use, faster, and just as stable as iOS and Android along with features like MS Office that the others don't have.
 
The same people that are interested in iOS and Android tablets are interested in this. It will be comparably priced to those devices and Windows 8 is arguably easier to use, faster, and just as stable as iOS and Android along with features like MS Office that the others don't have.

I think the RT tablet has a long way to go to prove itself before people are going to drop Android and iOS. There's no app availability yet, the hardware is completely unproven and we don't know the price. It could go either way.

The Pro model is where most of this board's excitement is aimed towards I feel, but I don't see it selling to the masses if it's actually priced like ultrabooks, and I don't think people are really that interested in a full W8 desktop on a tablet device, except for a small minority. Full tablet PC's and Modbooks like that have existed for years, and they simply don't sell.

Love to be proven wrong though, if only to see what Apple does next.
 
The same people that are interested in iOS and Android tablets are interested in this. It will be comparably priced to those devices and Windows 8 is arguably easier to use, faster, and just as stable as iOS and Android along with features like MS Office that the others don't have.

Matter of opinion i guess. Guess we will have to disagree on how easy Windows 8 is to use compared to iOS.


And isn´t the cheaper comparably priced (to the ipad) version won´t offer a full windows experience. They run an ARM processor do they not? that means any software that currently runs on Windows 7 wont be able to run on surface RT, except for office.

So you have a tablet, that can´t be used as a standard PC, with less apps than their competitors.

I dunno but that doesn´t sound too promising. Maybe the display will be as good or comparable to Retina, maybe MS will find a magic way to make the ARM CPU play nice with actual windows programs.

Guess we will have to just wait and see.
 
but WinRT still has the Desktop UI App or?
Maybe some Programs will get ported to ARM for WinRT

If an App on a ARM Tablet can simulate the whole Desktop UI there should be no limits for other Apps xD
Judging by a lot of confused people in this thread, I think Microsoft will have a big consumer education problem on its hand. They really should've gone all Metro for ARM.
 
The same people that are interested in iOS and Android tablets are interested in this. It will be comparably priced to those devices and Windows 8 is arguably easier to use, faster, and just as stable as iOS and Android

Except that the devices that are "comparably priced" won't be running Windows 8. I think the confusion between the Surface Windows RT model and the Surface Windows 8 Pro model is a pretty major hurdle for Microsoft to overcome. To say that Windows 8 is faster and as stable as its competitors seems like a little bit of a stretch, seeing as how the OS is months away from release.

Oh cool, what's the price? I wasn't aware that they'd released that information.

Microsoft has said that the Pro will be comparably priced to Ultrabooks. Which puts it in a range between (very optimistically) $800 and (very pessimistically) $1200. Probably more than most people want to spend on a tablet, though it remains to be seen how much this will change people's value perception of tablets.

The Windows RT version will be comparably priced to ARM tablets.....but since ARM tablets go for anywhere between $200 and $600 I don't really know how to interpret that.
 
"It's a nice device, until the fan kicks in" is all I hear about the Slate 7.

The surface pro has a generation newer i5 cpu (die shrink) and hopefully better ventilation so it won't be as loud. Not that a lot of other ultrabooks aren't loud either. My macbook air at work sounds like a jet engine anytime i compile a small bit of code on it.
 
Wow, I just watched the conference and I am sold on Surface. It's everything I've wanted in a tablet. If the pricing is right I will get it on launch day.
 
Can someone explain to me why they want to be able to access the desktop on their tablet? I've used remote desktop apps on my ipad and trying to click on tiny, fiddly menus was an irritating experience. Stuff like Photoshop was unusable. Maybe I'm missing something here, but the desktop mode doesn't interest me much at all.
 
Can someone explain to me why they want to be able to access the desktop on their tablet? I've used remote desktop apps on my ipad and trying to click on tiny, fiddly menus was an irritating experience. Stuff like Photoshop was unusable. Maybe I'm missing something here, but the desktop mode doesn't interest me much at all.
the keyboard has a touch pad
 
I really like the idea of the Pro version, I just can't see it being in a price range that will make it a must buy.
 
Watched the press video and saw back of the pen erasing ink marks. That pretty much means it's Wacom. IIRC, N-Trig pens don't have "eraser" on the back
 
Another i5 convertible tablet device for me to consider. I'm really excited about the direction they're going - not so much the RT devices, but the "real" windows experience in a tablet that you can quickly snap a keyboard onto is a device I'll find impossible to resist. It's going to be hard for me not to buy on day one, but I'll force myself to do it.
 
Can someone explain to me why they want to be able to access the desktop on their tablet? I've used remote desktop apps on my ipad and trying to click on tiny, fiddly menus was an irritating experience. Stuff like Photoshop was unusable. Maybe I'm missing something here, but the desktop mode doesn't interest me much at all.

You can connect it to your screen and use it like a PC. It also mean you can run desktop sofware, which means fuck your closed garden app store. Besides, does the iPad even has some sort of file browser yet? Because that's something I hate mobile OSs for lacking.
 
You can connect it to your screen and use it like a PC. It also mean you can run desktop sofware, which means fuck your closed garden app store.
Having access to a Desktop doesn't necessarily mean all those things. The Desktop on Windows RT is even more of a closed garden experience than iOS.
 
On the Surface at least you can just unfold the cover, pop out the kickstand, pull out your bluetooth mouse and whaddya know, instant desktop.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom