outunderthestars
Banned
No offense but looks horrible.
I actually quite like the simplicity of it. (it just needs widgets)
No offense but looks horrible.
I get that. But defaults are also the most important thing in a UI that you intend millions to use. The lack of visual choices in iOS is one of the best thing about it from a consumer market standpoint, it's that simple and it stays that way, making it marketable and iconic (no pun). Choice is great but most people won't ever even bother tbh.Well guess what? You get a choice in that. Want square icons with rounded corners? Then get square icons with rounded corners. What metro-looking tiles? Then get metro looking tiles. Hell, the iOS clone is more customizable than iOS.
Go to the android customization thread and within just a couple of pages you can see the varying degrees of customizations you can do.
Obviously, but how can that be applied linearly when the method of interaction is completely different across mobile and desktop. With a mouse cursor you know where you want to click, as there's a visual target. Gridding doesn't really matter as much. With unique/inconsistent shapes on a mobile UI, your finger is going to intrinsically go for the element of that shape which is most prominent against the backdrop. For example even though a triangular shaped app icon still sits in a square box (albeit invisible) you wouldn't tap on the empty space in a corner even though that is within the invisible hit frame, you would go for the center of the triangle. Problem is this varies across different icons since each hold a different shape within the same hit point. Not as pleasing as all the hit points being plainly/consistently visible as circles or squares. Another thing is that it becomes harder to differentiate a static (visual) element that has a unique shape with a interact-able element that also has a unique shape. Drop shadow isn't enough imo, and it can get ugly. But of course i'm taking about mobile app shapes in general and not strictly android since that's so visually customizable anyway.I love that you said mobile device because I was just going to point you to look at the OS X Dock
Other than that, it has been established that shapes are very good for recognition and are equally as important as colors when designing good UX, so Android 1, Apple 0 in this regard.
Edit2: This one. I understand that people want more customization but this would solve almost all of the issues I have with iOS.
Obviously, but how can that be applied linearly when the method of interaction is completely different across mobile and desktop. With a mouse cursor you know where you want to click, as there's a visual target. Gridding doesn't really matter as much. With unique/inconsistent shapes on a mobile UI, your finger is going to intrinsically go for the element of that shape which is most prominent against the backdrop. For example even though a triangular shaped app icon still sits in a square box (albeit invisible) you wouldn't tap on the empty space in a corner even though that is within the invisible hit frame, you would go for the center of the triangle. Problem is this varies across different icons since each hold a different shape within the same hit point. Not as pleasing as all the hit points being plainly/consistently visible as circles or squares. Another thing is that it becomes harder to differentiate a static (visual) element that has a unique shape with a interact-able element that also has a unique shape. Drop shadow isn't enough imo, and it can get ugly. But of course i'm taking about mobile app shapes in general and not strictly android since that's so visually customizable anyway.
You mention the dock, but the launchpad is literally an iOS home page for OS X apps, but it's nicer because everything is so large. Unique shapes on the dock aren't a big deal since they're visually fixated so there's a natural grid anyway even when the dock is small.
Everyone in here talks like a hot shot UI designer
Sure, iOS has to rely more on the app text than android for recognizability but I guess i'm anal about the symmetry which is why small wildly different shapes as icons bugs me.I am not talking about interaction, but simply about quickly and efficiently recognising different elements. Shapes help. Also, the natural grid is persistent throughout all interfaces discussed here.
I am fairly happy with the icons on iOS as they are now, but the ones on Android are objectively still better -- if not necessarily prettier.
The interface was one of the reasons I left for Android.
I like a clean homescreen. Frequently used apps are in folders, regular phone functions are in the dock and everything else is in the app draw.
http://i.minus.com/idIwz2k3FZcVU.png
Sure, iOS has to rely more on the app text than android for recognizability but I guess i'm anal about the symmetry which is why small wildly different shapes as icons bugs me.![]()
Everyone in here talks like a hot shot UI designer but I bet if they did design a UI the only person that would like it would be themselves. That's why the UI is so good with apple it serves everyone, its easy to use. The icons are generally nice. And if u use folders the pages are generally manageable.
Android UI isn't as slick as the iOS UI, it feels great to swipe the page of icons, it doesn't have the same feeling on the android. It's close but not as nice.
What is this wallpaper? Please let me know, I'm intrigued!
He is right. That looks awful.
If my girlfriend's Lumia ends up looking like that I will take it from her and throw it from the 8th floor balcony and buy her a dumbphone. Also I will leave her because why date a designer if you don't care what your shit looks like. Do you want me to return that BMW too?
I think they just went overboard with the small tiles. For basic missed call/message notifications, the small tile with a number is fine. but you'd probably only need one group of four, with the rest being the normal sized or wide tiles.
I think it is even sillier on a tablet:
ipad:
![]()
competition:
![]()
I've said it before and I will say it again. Widgets are mostly useless. The useful widgets are probably only calendar and to do list.
I hate it. One of the main reasons I went with Android.
widgets + the ability to fully customize my homescreen really make a big difference.
edit: should also add that this is coming from a guy who barely has any flare on his homescreen
![]()
Kid works at Apple now.
Chameleon launcher is not out yet. Isn't that just a concept?
As for ios, the biggest thing that they need is live icons.
I've said it before and I will say it again. Widgets are mostly useless. The useful widgets are probably only calendar and to do list.

My Galaxy Note home screen.
![]()
My point is I have the freedom to make the screen whatever I like but mine is very similar to the iPhone launcher. It's a good and ergonomic hone screen.
Since we're all posting our home screens;
I just use Emoji icons for the folder titles (no JB tweak). I do use a JB tweak to turn the newsstand into something useful, an actual bookstand for quick access to books i'm reading etc.
As well as changing the background of NC. Other than that i'm pretty pure, don't use JB for visual tweaks and whatnot much at all.
How does one use Emoji icons? Where are they found?
My homescreen looks like this (NSFW). Nice & clean, everything in it's right place. Page 2 has a similar layout but with folders.
It's not quite what you want, but you can get most of that exact same information with a simple swipe down from the top of the screen to show notification center. There's a weather and stocks widget, can get a preview of your recent emails, text messages, see calendar stuff, etc..
![]()
I'm really liking those icons. Shame YouTube has to mess it all up with their smaller square icon.
Could you find an older picture of iPhone OS?
Since we're all posting our home screens;
'Cause they look so different amirite lolol
Interface change is definitely why I went to Android. ICS is very nice to use.
My home screen/iOS looks like a total revamp to you? I never said they shouldn't do widgets or live icons or whatever. All I said is they shouldn't ditch the gridded app icons as it's become too accustomed.so on the one hand, you say they shouldn't do a total revamp, yet on the other hand, you Jailbreak and change notification center to add direct access to convenient things - kind of how some of us are suggesting could be done in the official iOS with widgets or whatever?
No offense but looks horrible.
Chameleon launcher is not out yet. Isn't that just a concept?
As for ios, the biggest thing that they need is live icons.
I've said it before and I will say it again. Widgets are mostly useless. The useful widgets are probably only calendar and to do list.
The application is finished and ready to be deployed, they're just trying to secure their money bags by kick starting it since android users are too cheap to pay for it.
Speaking of customizability though, it keeps being brought up as such a pro in terms of Android, which is fair, but what's stopping someone from doing the same on iOS?
Jailbreaking is super easy and can grant crazy levels of customizability if that's your thing. Just doesn't seem like enough to sway someone to use Android over iOS imo.
It might be based on the difficulty to do it. Android is completely open sourced, so you can do anything if you have the right programming skills. iOS on the other hand is completely closed source, so you can only do so much without having the source code.
None taken my man, it takes all sorts. I just like my phone to be as clean as possible, none of this widget nonsense or having the date written out 3 times in different ways.