ZiZ
Member
THAT'S NOT WHAT THE CENSUS SAYS :'( I've been filling out applications wrong this entire time!
that's because Jesus was middle eastern, and they can't have Jesus checking anything other than caucasian on his census when he comes back.
THAT'S NOT WHAT THE CENSUS SAYS :'( I've been filling out applications wrong this entire time!
Discrimination based on smarts and or athletic abilities? Really? What am I reading.
You are treated well, but will you ever be considered Japanese and not foreigner? He said that the problem is that Asians in America are viewed as outsiders.
It seems to me that in every society the majority can be considered “privileged”. What’s the point of making a campaign to say that this is unfair? Why not make other campaigns against people who are really intelligent or good looking or athletic.
One guy in the video says “our silence keeps it in place”. What do they want, to give white people a handicap because they’re the majority?
If you are an ugly stupid person with no charisma or talents, your life will be harder than average. Why isn't something being done about this?
It isn't racist, or even wrong. But one thing that I think is not made clear is that their conception of privilege does not mean any sort of overall advantage. Without that clarity, it sounds like they are making massive, unfounded generalizations about groups of people based on nothing more than their race, which is just a single factor of a person's life. They may be well intentioned, but I don't think their message is clear.The only reason this ad is even seen as incendiary (by some) is because white people have been taught that any talk of "race" or "racial disparity" is strictly taboo (or, in itself "racist").
It isn't racist, or even wrong. But one thing that I think is not made clear is that their conception of privilege does not mean any sort of overall advantage. Without that clarity, it sounds like they are making massive, unfounded generalizations about groups of people based on nothing more than their race, which is just a single factor of a person's life. They may be well intentioned, but I don't think their message is clear.
The only solution, ultimately, is treating people like individuals, and acknowledging that within any group that there are massive differences between it's members. Overall trends may exist, and gereralizations can be made, but there's a limit to how much you can assume about an individual based on their membership of a racial group. Any campaign that seems to assert otherwise is problematic.
It isn't racist, or even wrong. But one thing that I think is not made clear is that their conception of privilege does not mean any sort of overall advantage. Without that clarity, it sounds like they are making massive, unfounded generalizations about groups of people based on nothing more than their race, which is just a single factor of a person's life. They may be well intentioned, but I don't think their message is clear.
The only solution, ultimately, is treating people like individuals, and acknowledging that within any group that there are massive differences between it's members. Overall trends may exist, and gereralizations can be made, but there's a limit to how much you can assume about an individual based on their membership of a racial group. Any campaign that seems to assert otherwise is problematic.
This campaign might be seen to do that. I don't think that was their intent, but that's what people heard.
Which brings us back to the same problem: there is unfortunately little room for nuance in widespread public education campaigns like this one, because people simply aren't willing to sit through a well-reasoned, empirically-supported argument about white privilege.
I agree that maybe some people were turned off by the video who otherwise might be receptive, but reactionaries gon' react.
Eh at least provocative stuff gets the discussion going. How many people just ignore straight up statistics and generally unemotional appeals because it's "boring."
More likely, I think they want to combat specifically this type of ignorance.
Would you react so defensively if a PSA were made highlighting this phenomenon? Probably not. Drop the red herrings, dude.
I wouldnt react defensively because that type of PSA announcement wouldnt target me specifically while ignoring other people who are in the same position as me. The PSA announcement in the original post talks about whites being privileged in a country that is majority white, but I cant see how thats any different from other examples like Japanese people in their Japanese majority society, or any other group of people in their societies.
However, I would react defensively if someone comes up to a group of people that are equal to me in terms of intelligence/looks/etc , but starts singling me out and saying that my life has been easy for me and that it is unfair.
Being the majority is a privilege, just so happens Whites are the majority in America. If Blacks, Asians, or Latinos were the majority, they would have a privilege-- neither side is more or less moral than the other. Make no mistake, most people are naturally biased towards their own race and whatever group is the majority will have some sort of advantage because of it.
Being the majority is a privilege, just so happens Whites are the majority in America. If Blacks, Asians, or Latinos were the majority, they would have a privilege-- neither side is more or less moral than the other. Make no mistake, most people are naturally biased towards their own race and whatever group is the majority will have some sort of advantage because of it.
So, uhh, you just, like, missed Apartheid and all that, huh?
come on guys, Obama is president. So all your fancy stats and figures and sociological chicanery doodads don't mean anything, and I'm gonna ignore them in favor of my anecdotal experiences.
Then after I ignore it, if you make an ad that is even remotely angry about people ignoring it, I'm gonna complain about how I need to see fancy stats and figures and sociological chicanery doodads before I take you seriously.
am I doing this right?
Guess that's why women have all the power in America...oh wai..
Guess that's why women have all the power in America...oh wai..
You don't think most people are naturally biased toward their own race?
They're the majority in America and suffer from being a minority. Outnumbering people isn't the only factor at play, far from it.Women are a race now?
Women are a race now?
come on guys, Obama is president. So all your fancy stats and figures and sociological chicanery doodads don't mean anything, and I'm gonna ignore them in favor of my anecdotal experiences.
Then after I ignore it, if you make an ad that is even remotely angry about people ignoring it, I'm gonna complain about how I need to see fancy stats and figures and sociological chicanery doodads before I take you seriously.
am I doing this right?
Of course they are. That's the problem.
His point that you seemed to miss is that a majority doesn't mean shit if the system is stacked against a group. You do know that slaves outnumbered whites in the south right?
Never said it wasn't, just saying everyone is, not just the White population. If roles were reversed, you would see discrimination from whomever is in the majority. There is no moral difference between us, humans are equally flawed is my point.
Never said it wasn't, just saying everyone is, not just the White population. If roles were reversed, you would see discrimination from whomever is in the majority. There is no moral difference between us, humans are equally flawed is my point.
Never said it wasn't, just saying everyone is, not just the White population. If roles were reversed, you would see discrimination from whomever is in the majority. There is no moral difference between us, humans are equally flawed is my point.
Where do you think we disagree? I don't see any contradictions between your post and mine.There are no assumptions being made. As a white person I don't get followed around stores, I don't get my transfer double checked, I'm always assumed to be a paying customer, I'm given the benefit of the doubt, etc. Then there is the institutionalized racism which means black people will be overlooked despite their qualifications for a job, more likely to be incarcerated for the same crime as a white person and are highly likely to be convicted of a crime they had nothing to do with.
There is a clear advantage in life to being white and those who would deny it are being willfully ignorant.
How would you go about stopping it from being a privlege?
His point that you seemed to miss is that a majority doesn't mean shit if the system is stacked against a group. You do know that slaves outnumbered whites in the south right?
I am assuming when we talk about the majority, we are talking about the group of people who have the most political control, the ones who make the rules that we all follow to an extent. The number of slaves and whites doesn't matter when speaking about who control the population. I was assuming GAF was talking about the lawmakers when speaking about the majority, not the pure numbers necessarily.
And why shouldn't the shortcoming arising from those flaws be challenged?
You're assuming that if it's another group in power, people wouldn't or shouldn't challenge inequalities that arise from that power structure.
Yes, they should, everyone should and would. My point is that being White isn't the main factor here, being the controlling majority is. Even with that said, these this PSA is titled "being White is a privilege" when in fact it should be titled "being the Majority is a privilege". If you can't see the racism in singling out only Whites when talking about these moral issues, then I don't know what else to say. The White population is no less moral than any other under the same circumstances.
"White people are privileged and .... <blank>"
And what? Judging by peoples reactions, many are assuming "and they should feel bad", or even "and they should have it taken away". But that's not really the goal of this, right? No one wants people to feel guilty or to tear white people down in the name of equality. What we really want to build up minorities so they aren't starting life with such a shitty hand. So why isn't that part of the message?
I'm sure people want to spread awareness of the situation. But awareness to what end, exactly? All it does is try to create awareness of what the problem is. But no were is even the seed of an idea of how to fix the problem. Instead the assumptions listed above fill in the missing space. Even if I accept white privilege, I wouldn't know what to do except shrug and say "that sucks, bro"
1. "Being white is a privilege!"
2. ???
3.Profit!Racism is over!
Yes, they should, everyone should and would. My point is that being White isn't the main factor here, being the controlling majority is. Even with that said, these this PSA is titled "being White is a privilege" when in fact it should be titled "being the Majority is a privilege". If you can't see the racism in singling out only Whites when talking about these moral issues, then I don't know what else to say. The White population is no less moral than any other under the same circumstances.
Yes, they should, everyone should and would. My point is that being White isn't the main factor here, being the controlling majority is. Even with that said, these this PSA is titled "being White is a privilege" when in fact it should be titled "being the Majority is a privilege". If you can't see the racism in singling out only Whites when talking about these moral issues, then I don't know what else to say. The White population is no less moral than any other under the same circumstances.
What are white people's thoughts on having a privilege?
What are white people's thoughts on having a privilege?
that's because Jesus was middle eastern, and they can't have Jesus checking anything other than caucasian on his census when he comes back.
What are white people's thoughts on having a privilege?
What are white people's thoughts on having a privilege?
The problem is that so many people choose to willfully ignore that there is a problem. This thread and the comments on that YouTube video are evidence of that. Forget Step 2, the first step is proving to be a major mental stumbling block for many whites.
What discussion has this thread put forward? That personal life experience is secondary to buzzwords?Eh at least provocative stuff gets the discussion going. How many people just ignore straight up statistics and generally unemotional appeals because it's "boring."
Then we need a better PSA.
Which is really the problem. White people have it too good? Or minorities have it too bad? The PSA thinks arguing the former is the same as advocating awareness of the later. It's not.
Until this thread I didn't even realize all these things were something called "white privilege". Now that I'm thinking about it, it definitely exists. I don't know what I can do about it except for treat people as individuals and try and give them the benefit of the doubt.
I think the best way to try and "combat" this type of thing is to generally just raise awareness about the issue. The more people realize that what they're doing is wrong and the more they can be aware that they need to change their behavior, the more likely that behavior will change.
Personally I'd show a white person going about their day, like I do. Then I'd show a minority doing the same. Like say a white person goes to walgreens to shop. Show the employees in the store just staying at the register. Then show a minority, suddenly the same people who watched the white person shop are following that person around the store.
You could do this with all kinds of things really and it'd be more a compare/contrast. That's how I learned about it first hand. I'd do whatever I pleased but I'd notice my friends getting a raw deal.