The Dark Knight Rises |OT| The Legend Ends (Warning: Unmarked Spoilers Within)

Status
Not open for further replies.
The only problem with Joker being in prison is that they would have made him take off his make up. He would have looked odd.
joker-without-makeup-2040091c5d.jpg
 
While this would have been nice to have (plus... y'know having Heath alive would be amazing), I'm glad that, creatively, the Joker didn't dominate this film series the way he could have. Bane takes this thing in a different direction.

One scene would have been fantastic, then the breakout at Blackgate/Arkham and an empty Joker cell. Would have been top fucking notch.
 
Mr. Reese
Mysteries

Nah, I'm not trying to be silly.

I'm just saying a little easter egg. Like maybe Lucious finds the LoS's network is encrypted and it's going to take some time and he sees that the username of the sysadmin is "edwardn" or something. Just for fun, but nothing ridiculous.
 
http://images.ados.fr/bd-manga/photo/4505309450/batman-joker/joker-without-makeup-2040091c5d.jpg[/mg][/QUOTE]

I always found it mad though, that with the make up on I can't see Ledger at all. There he looks like him but when he puts the make up on he disappears. I don't think he looks like Heath with it on at all.

So a whole scene like that would be odd. Not bad, just odd.
 
One scene would have been fantastic, then the breakout at Blackgate/Arkham and an empty Joker cell. Would have been top fucking notch.

Exactly. Give Joker one Hannibal Lecter type monologue, then an empty cell. Don't have him steal the show; let him enhance it.
 
I don't see Nolan doing that. If he's going to introduce a character, he'll do it because they have an arc to run throughout the movie. He tends to make relatively standalone movies. There's a reason why Two-Face wasn't saved for a third film or why he wasn't resurrected for a sequel.

EDIT: Don't get me wrong; it would have been sweet, but I don't think the alternate "Ledger lives" universe would have panned out this way.
 
I don't see Nolan doing that. If he's going to introduce a character, he'll do it because they have an arc to run throughout the movie. He tends to make relatively standalone movies. There's a reason why Two-Face wasn't saved for a third film or why he wasn't resurrected for a sequel.

EDIT: Don't get me wrong; it would have been sweet, but I don't think the alternate "Ledger lives" universe would have panned out this way.

Ledger's last lines in TDK seemed too good to let go to waste. Even just acknowledging his existence in the universe would have been nice, but I understand why Nolan's decided not to.
 
I don't see Nolan doing that. If he's going to introduce a character, he'll do it because they have an arc to run throughout the movie. He tends to make relatively standalone movies. There's a reason why Two-Face wasn't saved for a third film or why he wasn't resurrected for a sequel.

EDIT: Don't get me wrong; it would have been sweet, but I don't think the alternate "Ledger lives" universe would have panned out this way.

I agree. I don't think the Joker would have been a major part of the next movie, but I do think he would have made an appearance SLIGHTLY longer than Scarecrow's in TDK, and that would have been perfect.

I still think we'll get SOMETHING about the Joker in TDKR though.
 
I agree. I don't think the Joker would have been a major part of the next movie, but I do think he would have made an appearance SLIGHTLY longer than Scarecrow's in TDK, and that would have been perfect.

I still think we'll get SOMETHING about the Joker in TDKR though.

Nolan said no mention, as to be respectful to Ledger.
 
TDK Scarecrow didn't have an arc, and he's not even remotely iconic as Ledger's Joker.

That's a good point. But I feel like a character such as Joker, if reintroduced midway through a film, tears the focus away from whatever that particular film's threat is. His presence is a massive distraction, in a way Scarecrow's tucked-away-in-the-beginning-to-wrap-up-loose-ends cameo isn't.
 
They didn't start writing TDKR until after TDK came out. Heath died before TDK came out. Don't know how you can say that.

They had an idea before writing TDK to make it Joker-centric and only introduce Harvey; in the sequel, during Joker's trial, he'd scar Dent and make him Two-Face, with Joker hovering in the background, Hannibal Lecter-esque.

They scrapped that though and compressed Dent's arc.
 
They had an idea before writing TDK to make it Joker-centric and only introduce Harvey; in the sequel, during Joker's trial, he'd scar Dent and make him Two-Face.

They scrapped that though and compressed Dent's arc.

Where did you get that from? Everyone involved in this said there was no plan for a movie after tdk until after release
 
Nevermind. Here it is: http://www.superherohype.com/features/articles/88561-premiere-features-batman-begins
"The next one would have Batman enlisting the aid of Gordon and [Harvey] Dent [aka Two-Face] in bringing down the Joker... but not killing him, which is a mistake they made in the first one." The article then says that "In the third, the Joker would go on trial, scarring Dent in the process."

As for the claims that they "never thought about sequels," it's more like they said in other interviews: "put all of our good ideas in this one, and not hold back." They've had ideas about sequels from the start, but the success of these movies was never guaranteed. That's why they made them good individual, standalone films first.
 
I'm recovering from a surgery that's going to keep me from seeing this in theater, no way I can sit for anywhere near 160 minutes. I don't know if I'll be able to make it through the release period without losing my mind. This fucking thread. This fucking movie.
 
Looks like they had a small idea for a 2 movie feature but ended up making just one, two face's creation in tdk was much better than the trial stuff goyer seems to convey

Yeah, I think what they went with was much better myself. I don't think Two-Face, at least as portrayed in Nolan's films, would have been compelling enough villain for a two hours. The tragic hero route, in the background of some other drama, worked much better.

Though I know some people will disagree with the execution of it.
 
Didnt even know abt this thread. Was wondering why the old one got locked.

What did I miss?

A major spoiler (which might be false).
Major rage.
I was banned (richisawesome too).
I returned (richisawesome too).
GIFs.
Rankings.
Off-topic chat.

Just another BatGAF thread! Honestly, thread is totally worth a read :lol
 
Yeah, I think what they went with was much better myself. I don't think Two-Face, at least as portrayed in Nolan's films, would have been compelling enough villain for a two hours. The tragic hero route, in the background of some other drama, worked much better.

Though I know some people will disagree with the execution of it.

I thought Eckhart was incredible. On rewatch potentially the best thing about TDK for me.
 
Hmm, as big a fan of the joker as I am I still think Neesons character in BB was better, such a good performance
 
Hmm, as big a fan of the joker as I am I still think Neesons character in BB was better, such a good performance

I see Ra's appreciation has gone up quite a bit since the BB days. Don't know if it's a result of Neeson's career renaissance starting with Taken or people just getting reacquainted with BB, but it makes me happy.
 
I see Ra's appreciation has gone up quite a bit since the BB days. Don't know if it's a result of Neeson's career renaissance starting with Taken or people just getting reacquainted with BB, but it makes me happy.

Batman begins, in my opinion, was always the better film, structurally, tonally and much better paced than TDK which didnt have the best third act. I really cant think of a glaring flaw with BB.
 
I see Ra's appreciation has gone up quite a bit since the BB days. Don't know if it's a result of Neeson's career renaissance starting with Taken or people just getting reacquainted with BB, but it makes me happy.

I remember thinking in 2004 that the casting of Liam as Ducard was great, and that Ra's as the villain was awesome yet risky since it was an origin story.
 
Batman begins, in my opinion, was always the better film, structurally, tonally and much better paced than TDK which didnt have the best third act. I really cant think of a glaring flaw with BB.

Yeah the end of TDK is quite long with two-face and the Joker final plan, but the moment where Jim Gordon define who is Batman is just great.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom