Marvel had nothing to do with Spider Man 3.
That would be incorrect. Avi Arad was the producer on the film.
Marvel had nothing to do with Spider Man 3.
Need to remember that one when I make my second account![]()
Did you prefer BB to TDK by any chance? Just curious.
BB > TDK
That would be incorrect. Avi Arad was the producer on the film.
BB > TDK
Avi Arad left Marvel in 2006.
Going by some of Nolan's other films, it's probably pretty high up on the list of likely problems.lulz.... people complaining it to long lolololololololololol
BB and TDK are honestly interchangeable for me. I love them both.
I think you need to lighten up. We know that tdkr links to both movies. The Ras and Dent arc conclusions might affect your opinions.I honestly cant see how its the other way around with anyone, BB is so much more engaging from an atmospheric and emotional point of view, while also having some good action. TDK if anything was overshadowed slightly by the jokers performance and a last third which dragged on.
No. CHOOSE ONE OR FALL FOREVER!
You can't like both equally for different reasons?
No. CHOOSE ONE OR FALL FOREVER!
It just so happened that a few rotten reviews got posted at once which bombed the meter. It'll go back up (not that it changes the film we all get to see on Friday either way).
No. CHOOSE ONE OR FALL FOREVER!
But how else will I be able to prove its better than the avengers?
Yeah, cause it's entirely impossible for someone not to like these films without having an agenda.They're the usual suspects for me. Faraci didn't like Spider-man, okay whatever. But he didn't like Spider-man or Batman? Maybe a bit of an agenda there? Naw, couldn't be.
NO. THIS IS NEOGAF. BLACK OR WHITE. BB OR TDK.
GO!
Yeah, cause it's entirely impossible for someone not to like these films without having an agenda.
I think you need to lighten up. We know that tdkr links to both movies. The Ras and Dent arc conclusions might affect your opinions.
The spidey 3 talk has me wondering.
Why do studios continue to interfere in productions? Has there ever been a case of studio interference actually improving a film?
Well maybe he doesn't like superhero films in general because he finds them too shallow, and he doesn't like shallow films?I figured someone may say this, but Faraci has gone on record himself as to having an agenda, so it's not entirely unreasonable.
That would be incorrect. Avi Arad was the producer on the film.
Nah, it's way more probable that the guy just wants to WATCH THE FANBOYS BURN.
Well maybe he doesn't like superhero films in general because he finds them too shallow, and he doesn't like shallow films?
Nah, it's way more probable that the guy just wants to WATCH THE FANBOYS BURN.
Well maybe he doesn't like superhero films in general because he finds them too shallow, and he doesn't like shallow films?
Nah, it's way more probable that the guy just wants to WATCH THE FANBOYS BURN.
NO. THIS IS NEOGAF. BLACK OR WHITE. BB OR TDK.
GO!
Going by some of Nolan's other films, it's probably pretty high up on the list of likely problems.
Marvel doesn't call the final shot in the licensed movies. They are even more divorced now with the establishment of Marvel Studios.
Courtesy Nolan Fans forum
POSITIVE (42)
ABC News Radio (4.5/5) http://www.670kboi.com/rssItem.asp?feedid=115&itemid=29878569
Access Hollywood http://www.accesshollywood.com/the-dark-knight-rises-review-moviemantz_article_67256
Awards Circuit (4/4) http://www.awardscircuit.com/2012/07/16/the-dark-knight-rises/
Basingstoke Gazette (positive) http://www.basingstokegazette.co.uk/leisure/9819856.REVIEW__The_Dark_Knight_Rises__12A_/
Batman-On-Film (A+) http://www.batman-on-film.com/TDKRises_review_byJett_7-16-12.html
BoxOffice.com (3.5/5) http://www.boxoffice.com/reviews/2012-07-the-dark-knight-rises
ComingSoon (8/10) http://www.comingsoon.net/news/reviewsnews.php?id=92563
Digital Spy (5/5) http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/...eview-batman-finale-delivers-on-the-hype.html
Emanuel Levy (A-) http://www.emanuellevy.com/review/dark-knight-rises/
Empire (5/5) http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/review.asp?FID=137000
GQ UK (positive) http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/entertainment/articles/2012-07/16/the-dark-knight-rises-review
Herald Sun (4.5/5) http://www.heraldsun.com.au/enterta...o-batman-trilogy/story-e6frf9hf-1226427517830
HitFix (A) http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captur...es-out-nolans-trilogy-with-brains-and-bombast
IGN (9/10) http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/07/16/the-dark-knight-rises-review
IndieWire (B) http://www.indiewire.com/article/re...tly-satisfying-conclusion?page=2#.UAPFDjx5mc0
Irish Independent (5/5) http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/film-cinema/review-batman-the-dark-knight-rises-3171418.html
LFPress (5/5) http://www.lfpress.com/entertainment/movies/2012/07/15/19990151.html
Movie City News (positive) http://moviecitynews.com/2012/07/review-ish-the-dark-knight-rises-spoiler-free/
Movie Hole (positive) http://moviehole.net/201255715drews-review-of-the-dark-knight-rises
Movies.com (positive) http://www.movies.com/movie-news/the-dark-knight-rises-review/8781
MSN Movies (5/5) http://movies.uk.msn.com/dark-knight/review-the-dark-knight-rises
NYC Movie Guru (9.85/10) http://nycmovieguru.com/july20th12.html#darkknightrises
OttawaSun (5/5) http://www.ottawasun.com/2012/07/15/dark-knight-rises-to-perfect-ending
Rolling Stone (3.5/4) http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/the-dark-knight-rises-20120716
Scotsman.com (4/5) http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/film/film-review-the-dark-knight-rises-12a-1-2414946
ScreenDaily (positive) http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/...icle?blocktitle=Latest-Reviews&contentID=1479
The Guardian (4/5) http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2012/jul/16/the-dark-knight-rises-first-review
The Hollywood Reporter (positive) http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/dark-knight-rises-movie-review-batman-349354
The List (5/5) http://film.list.co.uk/article/43445-the-dark-knight-rises/
The Mirror (5/5) http://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/going-out/film/batman-the-dark-knight-rises-review-1144754
The Playlist (A) http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplayl...igorating-batman-finale-20120715#.UAO79s14VaE
The Sydney Morning Herald (4/5) http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/the-dark-knight-rises-20120717-228lc.html
The Telegraph (5/5) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...atman-The-Dark-Knight-Rises-first-review.html
The Times UK (4/5) http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/film/reviews/article3477171.ece
The Wall Street Journal (positive) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303754904577530792153262270.html
Time Magazine (positive) http://entertainment.time.com/2012/...rk-knight-rises-to-the-depths-to-the-heights/
Time Out London (4/5) http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/90477/the-dark-knight-rises.html
Toronto Sun (positive) http://www.torontosun.com/2012/07/15/dark-knight-rises-to-perfect-ending
Total Film (5/5) http://www.totalfilm.com/reviews/cinema/the-dark-knight-rises
Variety (positive) http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117947904/
Wired UK (8.5/10) http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-07/17/dark-knight-rises-review
Wales Online 9/10 http://www.walesonline.co.uk/showbi...ght-rises-review-and-pictures-91466-31413070/
NEGATIVE (7)
Associated Press (2/4) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...tdown_n_1677247.html?utm_hp_ref=entertainment
Badass Digest (negative) http://badassdigest.com/2012/07/17/movie-review-the-dark-knight-rises/
Hollywood & Fine (negative) http://hollywoodandfine.com/reviews/?p=5141
The Daily Mail (negative) http://www.*****************/tvshow...ight-Rises-film-review.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Time Out New York (3/5) http://www.timeout.com/us/film/the-dark-knight-rises
Urban Cinefile Review 1(negative) http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=18849&s=Reviews
Urban Cinefile Review 2 (negative) http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=18849&s=Reviews
Well maybe he doesn't like superhero films in general because he finds them too shallow, and he doesn't like shallow films?
Nah, it's way more probable that the guy just wants to WATCH THE FANBOYS BURN.
He liked Avengers, nay loved it. So his problem is not superhero movies.
Daily Mail is banned?
And 3/5 is negative?
So then what's his agenda against? Superhero films with Christian Bale OR Andrew Garfield? I don't have to explain his rationale, YOU'RE the ones who think he's on an agenda because he didn't like your favorite movie that you haven't fucking seen yet.Loved the Avengers, so there's that laughing at your argument.
According to rt yes
Daily Mail is banned?
And 3/5 is negative?
Not necessarily true. A 3/5 is considered positive by RT unless specified otherwise
See Movies.com review.
I don't have to explain his rationale, YOU'RE the ones who think he's on an agenda.
NYC Movie Guru (9.85/10)
i wonder why they didn't went with 9.84, review sounded a lot like a 9.84
So then what's his agenda against? Superhero films with Christian Bale OR Andrew Garfield?