FlashbladeGAF
Member
Wouldn't be very hard IMO.
Nolan's Batman isn't anywhere close to being the detective the books are and thats just one out of several aspects of the character they didnt delve into.
[Dat useless utility belt]
Wouldn't be very hard IMO.
Expectations. Like the other poster said, let you down. And I'm not questioning your intentions as I'm well aware (and appreciate) that you are a part of Bat-GAF.
Thank you! I don't get the Alfred criticism either. Alfred is going to be in the know about all of Batman's stuff. And some people laughing when he's explaining the Ra's training, really? You don't think that in the 10 years that have passed, Bruce NEVER talked to Alfred about his training with Ra's and what he went through? C'mon people.
Hm, I know some people mentioned how boring the first half at minimum was (such as BruceLeeroy), but really, at never point did I feel bored. The 2 hours and 40 minutes did actually fly by and I thought the action scenes were a large improvement over TDK. I just wish all the pieces came fully together, it just never quite did. I still enjoyed it though, I'm not really 'hating', but it has plenty of issues.
Batpod looks like it's moving super slow a lot of the time, even in the Dark Knight.
Yeah, as much as I didn't enjoy it, I don't think I'd call it boring. I guess for people who wanted more Batman, I see why they'd say that. It was how everything pieced together that ruined the movie for me, not boredom.
There isnt a perfect film and there wont be, there will always be critiques
The problem for me with it isn't that Alfred knows it, it's that it's something that I'd more have enjoyed if Batman was doing. The only "detecting" Batman really does in this movie is figuring out who stole his mother's necklace, and that's because it basically happens in front of him.
More or less, yeah. There's a good deal of fair criticism of this movie. "It's not the one I imagined," is...an unusual perspective, to say the least. Like, what's the response to that? It's not that I don't understand, but it's something you can't really refute.
And I like the return of the Jedi analogy, even if it doesn't entirely line up (and I never cared for rotj).
Was it my imagination or did they use a lot more cities to stand in for Gotham this time? I think I saw the US Bank Tower (LA) in one scene and in one of the aerial shots the new World Trade Center was very prominent, which seemed weird considering how famous it is.
Does anyone have a link to the piano piece that plays when they first show Selina Kyle as her "Cat" self?
"That's a beautiful voice."
Haven't seen it yet but I'm curious, is the movie pro or anti occupy? Apparently it's used as a theme.
Neither. It's used as a sham for those in power.Haven't seen it yet but I'm curious, is the movie pro or anti occupy? Apparently it's used as a theme.
There isnt a perfect film and there wont be, there will always be critiques
This dude started chuckling uncontrollably when he said that (people were already giggling during the National Anthem for whatever reason)
As a singer, I noticed the kid got off-pitch at certain points.
It was also kinda corny.
This isn't a big fucking deal so please don't mischaracterize this post as being some damning criticism.
Pretty good, not great. Bane is no Joker, although they did as much as they could with him. Utterly predictable from start to finish, telegraphs all its punches, didn't surprise me once, which disappointed me. TDK had some nice twists and turns, but TDKR felt like waiting for the plot points to arrive once they were set up earlier in the film. The Good Will Hunting story from Alfred was such an obvious last shot setup that it practically landed with a "CLUNK!" on the theater floor.
I'd put it on par with Begins, maybe a little above it. Begins is a much tighter film but TDKR has more meat to it. I will forever wonder what TDKR would have been had Ledger not drugged himself to death like an idiot.
Was it my imagination or did they use a lot more cities to stand in for Gotham this time? I think I saw the US Bank Tower (LA) in one scene and in one of the aerial shots the new World Trade Center was very prominent, which seemed weird considering how famous it is.
Maybe. TBH I think they managed to keep the city in line with the previous two films, even though it wasn't Chicago. It still looked like Nolan's Gotham.
I dont know about you guys but the film is great. Better than TDK.
Ending was justified.
And for all we know Alfred might have just been hallucinating. Nolan doing an Inception thing.
![]()
- Bruce's entire journey after his back is broken. There should have been some meditation scenes where Bruce learns to accept the darkness, just like Bane does and come out on the other side stronger and better for it. There could have been some cool callbacks to Begins and ninja training scenes. Instead he just works out a bunch and suddenly has the ability to defeat Bane in a one-on-one.
That was all missing.
There was also a shot where you actually saw Modine's character get mowed over by the Tumbler, but it wasn't used. Instead, they just awkward cut to his dead, bloodless body.
I went to the midnight showing where the coked out 15 year olds are looking for any excuse to clap, or yell out with their Batman masks on. Outside of Scarecrow's cameo(Which was excellent) and the ending brilliance. I can't recall any other times that the audience really got into it.
Fuck yeah!Does anyone have a link to the piano piece that plays when they first show Selina Kyle as her "Cat" self?
This is a total strawman. I don't think anybody's even said that.
This movie has writing, pacing, tonal, directing, and even acting problems. There have been lengthy posts devoted to it.
uh what? Bruce had already "accepted the darkness" way back in BB. The problem wasn't that Bane knew something that Bruce didn't, it's that they both had the same training and Bane was simply better than him at it.
errr, I think you're getting ahead of yourself, mate. I said that as a criticism, it is unusual. If you took it personally, well, that's on you. Was he responding to one of your posts? I was speaking in generalities. So, I apologize if you mistook it as an
I agree the movie has writing, pacing, et al. problems. I haven't had time to read through this thread yet. Those are totally valid criticisms that can be discussed and provide interesting discourse. Which is why I said the expectation criticism isn't really worthwhile criticism--in general. There's no basis to criticism with it.
What part of any of this trilogy can be labeled as "unpredictable"? Such a nonsensical complaint given the context.
I thought the second fight was weak, mostly becasue I didn't really buy him physically beating Bane. Training montage in prison or not, I was expecting Batman to have to outsmart Bane, not out muscle him.
The first fight in the sewers was brilliant though.
The absolute worst thing about the movie is how they redubbed Bane's lines during the plane sequence. Holy FUCK I can't get over how terrible he sounded. Even his intonations were completely different and just weird. What a terrible introduction for Bane.
What part of any of this trilogy can be labeled as "unpredictable"? Such a nonsensical complaint given the context.
The point when Bane goes berserk after getting his mask broken is brutal. It could feel all of his swings, even though he keeps missing. Felt great.
The absolute worst thing about the movie is how they redubbed Bane's lines during the plane sequence. Holy FUCK I can't get over how terrible he sounded. Even his intonations were completely different and just weird. What a terrible introduction for Bane.
The absolute worst thing about the movie is how they redubbed Bane's lines during the plane sequence. Holy FUCK I can't get over how terrible he sounded. Even his intonations were completely different and just weird. What a terrible introduction for Bane.
I went to the midnight showing where the coked out 15 year olds are looking for any excuse to clap, or yell out with their Batman masks on. Outside of Scarecrow's cameo(Which was excellent) and the ending brilliance. I can't recall any other times that the audience really got into it.
the name 'robin' wasnt needed at all.
Just got back from my viewing.
Initially, "fuck I can't understand a word Bane is saying, and he sounds odd". Quickly got used to that.
Think I need a 2nd watch, and I'm sure this has already been mentioned, but I'm pretty sure batman is dead; and the final Alfred scene is just his imagination ... what he would've wanted, he just seemed so devastated at the cemetary.
Anywho, enjoyed it.
- Bruce's entire journey after his back is broken. There should have been some meditation scenes where Bruce learns to accept the darkness, just like Bane does and come out on the other side stronger and better for it. There could have been some cool callbacks to Begins and ninja training scenes. Instead he just works out a bunch and suddenly has the ability to defeat Bane in a one-on-one.
uh what? Bruce had already "accepted the darkness" way back in BB. The problem wasn't that Bane knew something that Bruce didn't, it's that they both had the same training and Bane was simply better than him at it.
I don't buy him beating Bane physically either. If it were a video game, Bane's mask would be flashing red.
From what I could tell, the difference in the fight is that Batman blocked and dodged more. In the first fight he was cocky and kept taking hits and fighting back in desperation. It's what Alfred was talking about; he kept treating it "I'm Batman; of course I'll win!" and got royally trashed. And in the second fight, he was afraid of Bane, knew he was weaker, and didn't try to match strength like before.
Basically, it's Rocky 3.