SonicMegaDrive
Member
So why didn't Bane and Talia just blow up the city once they got the bomb? What was the point of holding Gotham hostage for five months?
To make Bruce Wayne suffer.
So why didn't Bane and Talia just blow up the city once they got the bomb? What was the point of holding Gotham hostage for five months?
His real first name is Robin, John is his middle name. As is my understanding
She said that he should use his real name, which is Robin, to which he gave an eye roll to.
Yeah, Alfred and Bruce's relationship was really the heart of this movie. Alfred is basically Bruce's surrogate father, and I felt so happy for him when he finally got to see Bruce living a life free from pain, suffering and Batman. Just living.
So why didn't Bane and Talia just blow up the city once they got the bomb? What was the point of holding Gotham hostage for five months?
So why didn't Bane and Talia just blow up the city once they got the bomb? What was the point of holding Gotham hostage for five months?
One scene that no one is talking about that gave me chills, the unveiling of the Batman statue, that was a scene that was amazing for me
Disappointed Nolan didn't introduce the secret Batman orbital space laser station that Fox secretly funded and builtI thought when Bruce said 'not everything. Not yet' and then just stared into space was incredible. Chills
It was obvious Batman wasn't going to die because of his no killing rule. He cannot self-terminate.
We must lower him into the steel.
"So, that's what it feels like."
PFFFFFTLOL.
My theory is that after Ra's was saved by Bruce, and before he showed up at the mansion to execute his plan, he came into contact with Talia who then told Bane. So both Talia and Bane knew the whole time.
So why didn't Bane and Talia just blow up the city once they got the bomb? What was the point of holding Gotham hostage for five months?
So Bruce could watch in despair and to give Gotham hope where there was none. Bane basically laid out the reasoning behind the whole plan when he was in the prison. Hence his whole light up above/faith analogy.So why didn't Bane and Talia just blow up the city once they got the bomb? What was the point of holding Gotham hostage for five months?
I was constantly amazed at just how fucking dark this film was. There really was a constant feel of terror, dread and hopelessness throughout - far, far more so than BB and TDK.
Just got back from watching DKR. For me, the absence of the Joker really loomed large in the film. He's such a huge part of the Batman mythos and in The Dark Knight and no references to his character was really a huge void. Ras al Ghul and Two Face serve important roles in the plot, hell even Scarecrow got an appearance. My guess is that had Heath Ledger not killed himself, he would be in this film. He'd most likely team up with Bane, he'd be the one who reveals the truth about Harvey Dent to the public, and playing a role in causing chaos in Gotham once Bane takes over.
"Exile or Death?"
"I guess we'll take death."
"The sentence is death. By exile."
I don't understand the ending with John Blake; his real name is Robin? And is he going to take the mantle of the new Batman?
So why didn't Bane and Talia just blow up the city once they got the bomb? What was the point of holding Gotham hostage for five months?
I don't understand the ending with John Blake; his real name is Robin? And is he going to take the mantle of the new Batman?
I did like how unrelenting Bane's violence and menace was. I mean, he literally killed everyone who stood in his way or failed him. How great would it have been for this to be R?I was constantly amazed at just how fucking dark this film was. There really was a constant feel of terror, dread and hopelessness throughout - far, far more so than BB and TDK.
I was constantly amazed at just how fucking dark this film was. There really was a constant feel of terror, dread and hopelessness throughout - far, far more so than BB and TDK.
I don't understand the ending with John Blake; his real name is Robin? And is he going to take the mantle of the new Batman?
No sequels please.
Also I loathed the Robin reference. I thought Nolan said he would never do that crap. A lot of the fanservice just felt superfluous and dragged the movie down. I could have done without the entire Scarecrow scene.
Wasn't there some footage of Heath that they were saving for this film, but the family said 'no', so they couldn't use it? Or was that a rumor?
I don't understand the ending with John Blake; his real name is Robin? And is he going to take the mantle of the new Batman?
Also, while its still shot in Nolan's usual flat manner, TDKR had EASILY the best fight scenes in the series. Multiple lengthy steadicam shots of Batman whooping ass w/o spastic editing or shakey-cam.
John Robin Blake apparently, again he'll probably be something like Batman if not Batman himself. Remember it's a symbol..
Yeah, Sculli told me outside that one scene, it was mostly the same Nolan action, but IDK, maybe he should watch Batman Begins again, because it's like night and day.
Just got back from watching DKR. For me, the absence of the Joker really loomed large in the film. He's such a huge part of the Batman mythos and in The Dark Knight and no references to his character was really a huge void. Ras al Ghul and Two Face serve important roles in the plot, hell even Scarecrow got an appearance. My guess is that had Heath Ledger not killed himself, he would be in this film. He'd most likely team up with Bane, he'd be the one who reveals the truth about Harvey Dent to the public, and playing a role in causing chaos in Gotham once Bane takes over.
Journey bro, not destination
I just can't believe how some people think the end is a dream :/
I meant it as a good thing though. I was overjoyed. Like, obviously I knew they wouldn't kill Bruce. But I love that they give you pause at first, and how you only know for sure when Lucious discovers that The Bat's autopilot was fixed 6 months ago by Bruce. Then it all crescendos into the scene with Alfred in Florence. Predictable? Maybe. Sappy? Yes. Beautiful and poignant? Undoubtedly.
My theory for Bane knowing who he is.
Bane knew directly from Ra's
When Bruce saved Ra's from the burning house and travelled back to Gotham, Ra's recovered - formed a new LoS and could of said vaguely "I'm going back to destroy Gotham, if I somehow don't succeed, you need to do it. Also, watch out for Bruce Wayne" Obviously Ra's didn't succeed, so years past and there's Bane, in Gotham, as the "LoS leader" below Talia of course. You can even argue if that even was the LoS or just Bane's version if it, since he was excommunicated.
Theory though, it probably sounds dumb lol
I think Casting Bane and Joker together would not work.
The Joker would be too strong a presence and would take over the movie.
You wouldn't care about Bane and his scheme.
The Joker dominates everything he would have to be in charge.
Wasn't it? I noticed too.Talia's death scene, like the actual closing the eyes now I'm dead was laughably bad.
I agree with the sentiment. It's nice to tie a lot of the films together, but it's ultimately unnecessary and distracting.
I thought the first Bane confrontation was the best the series has been in action. The opening plane scene was cool too. But everything else was largely boring in the action department.
unfortunately Bane was excommunicated from the League
I figured Talia heard thru the grapevine that her father died by the hands of his best disciple
With her being Ra's daughter I cant imagine her not being connected with the league in some fashion.
She hears her Dad died trying to destroy gotham so she tries to continue his work but gets roadblocked for several years when Wayne disappears and pulls funding for her clean energy BS front
John Robin Blake (Robin John Blake?) apparently, again he'll probably be something like Batman if not Batman himself. Remember it's a symbol..