Microsoft Surface Tablet announced

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Asus CEO has a point i.e. if the Surface sucks it'll result in negative user feelings to all Win RT tablets. Microsoft better not fuck this up with a buggy hardware release.
 
I know nothing about hardware specs, but why is it something they're not good at? Isn't the Surface hardware supposed to be good?

Microsoft's recent track record on high end electronics is not so good. After the Xbox 360 I'd be a little iffy about buying a first generation Surface.
 
"It is not something you are good at so please think twice."
This quote was hilarious because acer is soooo much better at making hardware....

Also ironic since acer just started making android tablets and didn't show any loyalty to ms and now that surface beat them all of the sudden they are worried.

Lol that is hilarious because the reason they made it is because OEMs keep "mailing it in" with shitty products.
 
Acer is specialized in making $200 craptablets and crapbooks. Although I don't know anything Acer can do to move the market to the non-MS direction, there is no any non-MS alternative laptop OS Acer can use. ChromeOS is not an answer.
 

iRtqcQYBGZX5M.jpg


Acer is specialized in making $200 craptablets and crapbooks.

Actually, Acer has made one of the better mid-range Winbox laptop lines for some time now. Let's not go crazy.
 
"Hey guyz you know that thing you've been working on for a long time and will be better than our stuff? Yeah, don't do that thing, because you don't know how to make hardware"
 
Forget Surface, it's all about Surface 2!

The Surface Team focuses on lighting up Microsoft experiences with touch first computing. A fundamental part of our strategy is having desirable and powerful devices that enable the experiences people want, and elicit their excitement. Creating these devices involves a close partnership between hardware and software engineers, designers, and manufacturing. We are currently building the next generation and Surface needs you!
 
Microsoft's recent track record on high end electronics is not so good. After the Xbox 360 I'd be a little iffy about buying a first generation Surface.
lol, the Xbox 360 is part of Microsoft's "recent" track record? The last 360's that broke were manufactured in 2006 bro. Get over it.
 
The Asus CEO has a point i.e. if the Surface sucks it'll result in negative user feelings to all Win RT tablets. Microsoft better not fuck this up with a buggy hardware release.

Have you ever used an acer product ? Its not the surface we have to worry about embarrasing others.

Microsoft's recent track record on high end electronics is not so good. After the Xbox 360 I'd be a little iffy about buying a first generation Surface.

Sure , the xbox 360 had problems , but when was the last time you heard of them.

MS makes a slew or physical products all with great track records.
 
lol, the Xbox 360 is part of Microsoft's "recent" track record? The last 360's that broke were manufactured in 2006 bro. Get over it.

It's the most recent example of Microsoft designing and manufacturing an expensive consumer electronics product, yes. And MS didn't even acknowledge the problem until July 2007. They were still selling faulty systems with the Xenon motherboard up until the Zephyr revision in mid-2007 - nearly 2 years of a busted, doomed-to-fail system.

The 360 didn't become reliable until after a hardware revision. Which is why I said I'd be wary of a first generation Surace. After revisions I would not be as concerned.
 
Microsoft didn't even acknowledge the problem until July 2007. They were still selling faulty systems with the Xenon motherboard up until the Zephyr revision in mid-2007 - nearly 2 years of a busted, doomed-to-fail system.

The hardware didn't become reliable until after a hardware revision. Which is why I said I'd be wary of a first generation Surace. After revisions I would not be as concerned.

Pretty much every first generation device sucks for one reason or another.
 
It's the most recent example of Microsoft designing and manufacturing an expensive consumer electronics product, yes. And MS didn't even acknowledge the problem until July 2007. They were still selling faulty systems with the Xenon motherboard up until the Zephyr revision in mid-2007 - nearly 2 years of a busted, doomed-to-fail system.

The hardware didn't become reliable until after a hardware revision. Which is why I said I'd be wary of a first generation Surace. After revisions I would not be as concerned.

It's still one product of several hundred from the Microsoft hardware division.
If there’s one company that sure won’t make the same mistake it is Microsoft.
 
Oh jebus, Surface Pro won't be below 1K. Let's face facts. I'll throw a goddamn celebratory party if it comes out @ $999 w 128GB SSD ffs...
 
I know it will be tainted with Atom CPU and all, but with an EMR pen in tow, I'm thinking you are about $100 too optimistic.

I just don't really see them increasing the entry price 200 dollars over the previous thinkpad tablet. If they were going to, I'd imagine they'd call it something else. I could totally be wrong though.
 
I just don't really see them increasing the entry price 200 dollars over the previous thinkpad tablet. If they were going to, I'd imagine they'd call it something else. I could totally be wrong though.

You don't see them increasing the price by $200 over a failed Android Tegra 2 tablet to a Windows 8 X86 CPU tablet? Come on dude, it's not even in the same class anymore.

The SSD space for this thing will probably start @ 64GB because of Win8/86, which will be same as the highest cost version of the older one, which goes for $659 right now.
 
You don't see them increasing the price by $200 over a failed Android Tegra 2 tablet to a Windows 8 X86 CPU tablet? Come on dude, it's not even in the same class anymore.

The SSD space for this thing will probably start @ 64GB for one, which will be same as the highest cost version of the older one.

Well you're comparing it to a product released a year ago. Tablets in that price range today are quite different, just look at the note 10.1. But if it starts with a 64gb SSD, then yeah you're probably right about the price.
 
You don't see them increasing the price by $200 over a failed Android Tegra 2 tablet to a Windows 8 X86 CPU tablet? Come on dude, it's not even in the same class anymore.

The SSD space for this thing will probably start @ 64GB because of Win8/86, which will be same as the highest cost version of the older one, which goes for $659 right now.

ssd's aren't expensive anymore. 120 gig are going as low as $60 and 120 gigs are in the low $100 range.

The second digitilizer wont affect costs much either.
 
ssd's aren't expensive anymore. 120 gig are going as low as $60 and 120 gigs are in the low $100 range.

The second digitilizer wont affect costs much either.

In a world where Lenovo doesn't want to make any profit on the thing, what you say may make sense but in this world, you are on crack.
 
The world I live in , OEMs buying hundreds of thousands if not millions of a part like an ssd wouldn't pay retail prices.

No shit. They deal in quantities of 10K. Never the less, you are high if the Wacom Penabled digitizer (~$50) and more SSD chips on the mobo won't make impact on pricing.
 
No shit. They deal in quantities of 10K. Never the less, you are high if the Wacom Penabled digitizer (~$50) and more SSD chips on the mobo won't make impact on pricing.

I'm sure it will cost more , but i'm sane and believe an atom solution would have to hit the market under the surface and the surface I believe will be at $800
 
by the time time this thing comes out computers will cost 800 dollars for a dozen. There's nothing innovative about selling a computer with a floppy keyboard for a thousand bucks.
That part is true, but is still don't see it hitting below 650 form the lowest feature set.
 
just buy a 2740p people. 5 hour battery life, it's like $400 on ebay and has multitouch + pen. also faster than the lenovo. only thing is that it's a laptop. (tablet)
 
You call it hotshot. ;)

I'd do a 30 day.


I believe it will be $800 for the low end Surface pro with no wacom pen (sold seperately) and ivy bridge.


If an announcement comes out that it will be using haswell then I will agree with you on the $850 + price point.

Ban will be the day the announce the price or the day it releases ?
 
Well whats the point then? Just to put some oems noses out of joint?

I think they are publically aiming low, but expect it to do well... otherwise why? Is it like the 'nexus' stuff that is an attempt to steer their oems devices in a direction they like?

I mean, outside of the keyboard screen cover... it doesnt do anything special, its a tablet... and it looks like most of thw windows tablets were going to look like. (Rectangles with a windows button)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom