Proves the point. The writers are more concerned with fitting important events into whatever specific episode they thematically need to appear in with very little regard to plausibility. You can make an arguement that they should be doing this, in any case: fuck AMC.
Because it wouldn't be a shameless attempt at moving forward a plot point they've just been heavily stalling for the last seven episodes.
Was everyone waiting from the start of the show for this event? Was it nearly avoided multiple times in order to stall it for the season 2 finale?
If it's not ok to just blurt out Sopranos or Wire spoilers here (which are older than RDR) then games should be taken as seriously.
That's the point. That context is more important than the details. This doesn't need to be the case.
That's a great way to make an argument, by defamation.
Or that every criminal slips up at some point, as Hank said about Mike.
What show have you been watching?
It's hard to call the coincidences purposefully "tantalizing" when there are clear examples of straight up contrivance like the S3 cousins shootout or Walt's plan in the S4 finale.
Seriously, what show have you been watching? Hank himself put Walt down as a pathetic old man who has reached his limit in life when Marie brought up the second cellphone/affair.
