I cant wait for the debates
Obama is gonna trounce Romney
Schattenjäger;42266671 said:This will blow over well before the debates
Relax GAF
There's a remote chance it will ignite more support for him
If any. this will reignite support for Obama's 2008 supporters who were sitting out the election
That depends, what are the better options available to the person? How much are they being paid? What were they doing before? What were they being paid for that? You want to propose a situation and then express moral outrage but you don't want to think about the actual reason for the person doing the job. You also seem unaware historically what happens to poor countries with cheap labor bases.
Romney will get manhandled in the foreign policy debate and probably will get flustered and say something stupid.
Romney will get manhandled in the foreign policy debate and probably will get flustered and say something stupid.
Depends on how the economy is doing in November and if there is a better jobs report - id say those not planning to vote for Obama are those that have still not found a jobIf any. this will reignite support for Obama's 2008 supporters who were sitting out the election
Bingo.If any. this will reignite support for Obama's 2008 supporters who were sitting out the election
I've already accepted that, but it's a reality with no other option for them at that moment. If you were in their head and they only knew what they saw from birth then it may be in their eyes a good option but from the US we know alternatives. And I wouldn't even buy for a minute that they think their position is good, they know it's a necessary evil too. People know what it's like to be slaves especially when they see others in power or managerial positions who do less than they do but make more. They know something is wrong otherwise there wouldn't be people threatening to suicide or forming unions.
Again, picking the better of 2 really bad options does not make the better one a moral good. It doesn't make it something we should aspire to. It makes it a necessary evil (and only necessary because this system requires it, while people don't seem to give a shit about thinking of other more ethical systems). Being able to become educated in a field you enjoy and can make a living on is a moral good, being able to control your work surroundings democratically with others is even better and so on.
Schattenjäger;42266864 said:Depends on how the economy is doing in November and if there is a better jobs report - id say those not planning to vote for Obama are those that have still not found a job
I'm not sure anyone has come up with a better system for economic mobility.
My parent would agree.And my grandmother just said, "And he's right, too!"
D:
Love my grandma to death, but her politics are terrible.
Nobody is encouraged to think outside of the box because you're called a crazy commie if you do, it's been dogmatically taught that capitalism is the only thing that works and none can be tried without massive revolution which is rarely done because people are unwilling to destroy and rebuild.
Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity say stuff like this every day and their listeners dream of a candidate that would campaign with this messaging.
Now that this Romney audio has leaked out and the fallout has been so dramatic, it will be interesting to see if those voices will be humbled to any extent.
Eeek... Capitalism is not corrupt? Or is it that we are given just enough carrot to keep us moving? I disagree with this line of thinking.*Shrug* Capitalism tends to work. Communism has tended to be corrupted. Maybe one day someone will build a better mouse trap.
Eeek... Capitalism is not corrupt? Or is it that we are given just enough carrot to keep us moving? I disagree with this line of thinking.
More than one-fifth of Romney's moocher 47% are elderly: people who pay no income taxes because their income takes the form of Social Security - many of those people are Republican voters (even if they don't understand "dependency" to apply to them).
Among today's elderly, the great majority will receive more in Medicare benefits than they ever paid in taxes - dependency again. You can do the math for yourself and your parents right here:
(Those who retired prior to 1967 received full Medicare benefits without ever paying into Medicare at all.)
And as Ezra Klein pointed out yesterday, more than 60% of the 47% pay payroll taxes. At 15.3%, the payroll tax rate represents a higher rate of tax than that paid by Mitt Romney himself.
Only about one-fifth of taxpayers are non-elderly people who pay no tax at all, and they are paying no tax mostly because they are unemployed in the worst economic crisis since the 1930s, a crisis that candidate Romney blames on the president and promises to correct. It seems a hard saying to call these promised beneficiaries of a Romney recovery people who don't take responsibility for their lives.
My parent would agree.
Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity say stuff like this every day and their listeners dream of a candidate that would campaign with this messaging.
Now that this Romney audio has leaked out and the fallout has been so dramatic, it will be interesting to see if those voices will be humbled to any extent.
Nope. This is actually why it's such a problem and why Romney didn't walk it back -- his base thinks exactly this and wants him to say it louder and more often. He can't get away from it.
Of course, the thing about the GOP base is that it's 20% of a country that thinks it's 80%.
exactly, poor low income blue collar conservatives who continuously vote Republican no matter what even if it is against their better interests.Not sure if this has been posted? Didn't see it.
Mitt Romney's 47 Percent Disproportionately Live In Republican States
![]()
Out of the 10 states with the highest percentage of filers with no liability, all but one — Florida — are reliable Republican stalwarts.
This map, however, only measures Americans who file tax returns without liability. Millions of others have some income, but not enough to file a return. Those people, combined with the 52 million who make up this map, comprise the 47 percent.
Of course, just because people don't pay income taxes doesn't mean they don't pay any taxes at all. Here's another breakdown of the 47 percent, which shows how nearly two-thirds of that 47 percent pay payroll taxes. Most of the last third are comprised of the elderly (who also tend to vote reliably Republican) and people who make less than $20,000 (big Obama supporters).
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/mitt...ap-red-republican-states-2012-9#ixzz26peEY1cF
Yeah, basically.That's true. Seems like all of the gaffes republicans make are just things they actually believe without the layer of bullshit they usually smother it with to ensure some moderates will vote for them
So in a single week Romney has
1. Alienated 47% of the likely voters
2. Alienated Latinos
3. Alienated African Americans
4. Alienated Muslim Voters
5. Disengaged from Elderly Government Check dependent voters
Of course, the thing about the GOP base is that it's 20% of a country that thinks it's 80%.
I don't know how 'moderates' or independents can exist though, what do they want? If it's someone who's a green party person or socialist then that label is okay but I don't understand independents who plan on choosing either romney or obama? And have no interest in green/socialist/confederate/constitution party stuff. What middle of the line tone do they expect? Do they not see that romney and obama have dramatic sharp differences? Even if democrats and republicans were similar then how would you even know who to vote for besides based on personality? The moderate term just seems like such a weird empty concept.
Not sure if this has been posted? Didn't see it.
Mitt Romney's 47 Percent Disproportionately Live In Republican States
*Shrug* Capitalism tends to work. Communism has tended to be corrupted. Maybe one day someone will build a better mouse trap.
If you're reasonably intelligent AND in the extreme right wing, you have to agree with Romney. I've had these discussions with my uncle who is a strong Republican supporter, and he knows that most of the populace will always vote Democrat. I said, that sounds like you don't want every person to have a vote. He said "Of course. One man, one vote is completely absurd." He was saying it with the knowledge that it went against the spirit of the constitution, and knowing nothing can be done about it, but he still believes it's silly that someone who doesn't understand economics by his definition has the same vote as his.My parent would agree.
Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity say stuff like this every day and their listeners dream of a candidate that would campaign with this messaging.
Now that this Romney audio has leaked out and the fallout has been so dramatic, it will be interesting to see if those voices will be humbled to any extent.
Is this really derailing into a discussion of morals regarding third world capitalist exploitation? It is wrong to drive rural communities into ruin by tempting the youth to run to the cities and factories for a wage living.
The labor shifts to the city, leaving subsistence farming to fail, and subsequently creating a system of dependency upon which the capitalists know they can abuse the system through long hours and poor salaries.
The unnatural rapid progression from agricultural to export-based industrial is unhealthy for the entire planet outside of the few who obscenely profit from the violent imbalance of power.
How can anyone defend this?
It was a real eye opener for me. I had never considered before that there is a sizeable portion of people who lament others' voting power.