US Town Hall Debate |OT| When is the election? What are the names of the candidates?

Status
Not open for further replies.
NlpN2.jpg

http://www.giantbomb.com/profile/fistfulofmetal/
 
I'm pretty sure he is talking about Democrats who aren't going to vote for him because they have a clear inclination to either see the President in the best possible light or him in the worst possible light. Again, I admit that he didn't phrase it the best way, but it's pretty clear that was the message he was getting at.

And its pretty clear to us that he was saying that the 47% of Americans who don't pay federal income taxes feel entitled to food and shelter and aren't self-responsible. Because that's what he actually said.
 
That binders full of women things is ridiculous. I am an Obama guy but its clear Romney was talking about a binder of resumes. It didnt feel like a gaff at the time and it doesnt now either.

There are many other things Romney did during that debate which are mockworthy, that one isnt.
 
So you'd rather he just write them off with no explanation? Or lying? When did he say they were leeches? What do you call them? He said they believe they are entitled. Why? There's a lot of things I'd like too be entitled to, but I'm not.

I'd rather he not write them off at all, because that's basically a level of arrogance that we haven't seen in an ostensible democracy since Oliver Cromwell, but let that pass.

I call them "people." And, frankly, if you don't think people are entitled to food and shelter, then I'm not sure what I'd call you. Except "out of touch with reality." That one's kind of a gimme.
 
46% to 39% CNN poll for Obama. NICELY DONE!

Wow. That's impressive, even for dickless CNN. I would've assumed they just went for the standard "draw" (with the polling base leaning republican for no reason whatsoever) as always.
 
Yes. Its one thing to say that you can't reach them for your vote.

Its an entirely different universe to then say those 47% are victims, entitled, and cannot be convinced to take personal responsibility for their lives.

His words, nobody else's. No spin. The entire tape is available.

This election should have been over the day these words rang out. Its been a shameful farce every day since.

It is basically going to be his "Read my lips" downfall comment.
 
That binders full of women things is ridiculous. I am an Obama guy but its clear Romney was talking about a binder of resumes. It didnt feel like a gaff at the time and it doesnt now either.

There are many other things Romney did during that debate which are mockworthy, that one isnt.

Doesn't matter. It's hilarious.
 
Maybe a fair point outside of this forum, but holy shit, don't say this on GAF.

Well, off course I'm talking in stereotypes here, and yes, Poligaf is a pro-Obama bubble. But the numbers seem to suggest it's right though. When Obama loses, everyone admits he lost. If Romney loses, half of the population will deny the light of the sun and delude themselves or lie through their teeth that Romney won anyway. Even on Poligaf this was the case.
 
That binders full of women things is ridiculous. I am an Obama guy but its clear Romney was talking about a binder of resumes. It didnt feel like a gaff at the time and it doesnt now either.

There are many other things Romney did during that debate which are mockworthy, that one isnt.

He was so incredibly condescending and his view on women specifically is so backwards and just plain wrong that I don't mind the binders of women thing. It's hilarious and about how he feels about women and their role in society.
 
It is basically going to be his "Read my lips" downfall comment.
As it always needed to be. What a perfect way to end that debate.

Only in actuality its far worse. Its not a slip-up. Its not a promise attempted but not kept. Its derision and judgement laid down upon the people he speaks of helping. Its disgusting. Its vile.

It wasn't an attempt to understand or empathize. It was to cast those people aside. No skin in the game, right?
 
That binders full of women things is ridiculous. I am an Obama guy but its clear Romney was talking about a binder of resumes. It didnt feel like a gaff at the time and it doesnt now either.

There are many other things Romney did during that debate which are mockworthy, that one isnt.

It's just an incredibly awkward turn of phrase that exemplifies Romney
 
She did add the context though, with her also confirming the whole 14 (? I forget how many it was) days thing literally right after she made that remark. Romney was just completely flustered and fucked up the one sure bet he had.

No, but here's the thing, with Obama invoking that he did indeed refer to the incident as 'terror', he is stating that it was an act of terrorism, and he said it was the day after. But in the following days, e.g. on the View, he refused to term it as such. At the UN, he spoke of the YouTube video several times giving the impression that the consulate was attacked by a mob rather than a group of terrorists. Only after 14 days did it then start to be exclusively referred to as a 'terrorist attack'.

Personally, I don't even see why this is an issue but if you were going to make an issue out of it, then you certainly have valid criticisms to make in what was said to the public.
 
Woman: "Mister Romney, how do you feel about women inequality?"

Mitt: "I love women. I send them home early to make dinner."

Me: "Uhh..."
 
I just wanna say that Romney's Voucher tax plan is the best one ever.

Of the deductions you are qualified, you automatically get to pick the biggest deductions to keep and lose the rest!

Marvelous plan! What a choice!
 
So people who work in the public sector aren't considered having a job?

'Pretty much'. As in, the government doesn't have total control over the economy. But Romney's campaign would make you think employment would be back to normal if Obama was not president.
 
He was so incredibly condescending and his view on women specifically is so backwards and just plain wrong that I don't mind the binders of women thing. It's hilarious and about how he feels about women and their role in society.

Ya, it boiled down to "We'll let them go home to make dinner and look after the kids".
 
'Pretty much'. As in, the government doesn't have total control over the economy. But Romney's campaign would make you think employment would be back to normal if Obama was not president.

GOVERNMENT DOES NOT CREATE JOBS
GOVERNMENT DOES NOT. CREATE. JOBS.
 
'Pretty much'. As in, the government doesn't have total control over the economy. But Romney's campaign would make you think employment would be back to normal if Obama was not president.

I don't understand how people can think that the President has control over the amount of jobs or the price of gas.
 
I'd rather he not write them off at all, because that's basically a level of arrogance that we haven't seen in an ostensible democracy since Oliver Cromwell, but let that pass.

I call them "people." And, frankly, if you don't think people are entitled to food and shelter, then I'm not sure what I'd call you. Except "out of touch with reality." That one's kind of a gimme.

It would be fiscally irresponsible if he were trying his hardest to win the election to spend money trying to win those people over. The 47% don't need to rely on the government for food and shelter. There are some, yeah, who need more help than others. But not 47%.

Everyone is trying to make this about his domestic policies. The statement was made about the campaign.

EDIT -- Anyway, fun night fellas. I hope everyone enjoyed the show as much as I did. I got to hit the hay. Maybe I'll see you guys again another time in PoliGAF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom