• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Live Action 'Akira' Storyboards Surface

Status
Not open for further replies.
Chronicle was great. I tried showing it to my sister, brother-in-law, and cousin at a family gathering, but they made me turn it off after about 25 minutes, saying it was too slow. They did the same thing to me on Inception and Watchmen. They only watch shit like The Avengers. Stuff has to be exploding and guys have to be sent flying backwards crashing into walls every 2 minutes or they lose interest. There can't be any lulls in a movie to build tension or suspense.
 

Ridley327

Member
Chronicle was great. I tried showing it to my sister, brother-in-law, and cousin at a family gathering, but they made me turn it off after about 25 minutes, saying it was too slow. They did the same thing to me on Inception and Watchmen. They only watch shit like The Avengers. Stuff has to be exploding and guys have to be sent flying backwards crashing into walls every 2 minutes or they lose interest. There can't be any lulls in a movie to build tension or suspense.

So why do they like The Avengers? :p
 

cheststrongwell

my cake, fuck off
s6PWW.jpg
 
Chronicle was great. I tried showing it to my sister, brother-in-law, and cousin at a family gathering, but they made me turn it off after about 25 minutes, saying it was too slow. They did the same thing to me on Inception and Watchmen. They only watch shit like The Avengers. Stuff has to be exploding and guys have to be sent flying backwards crashing into walls every 2 minutes or they lose interest. There can't be any lulls in a movie to build tension or suspense.

There's a pretty easy reason for this. Avengers is easy escapist entertainment, I wouldn't say Inception/Chronicle/Watchmen come under that kind of type of breezy watch. They're not paced like action movies. They have busy lives, they probably watch movies for a different reason than you. I'm not even defending Avengers, didn't like it but can totally see why they prefer that.
 
It's so weird to see how many people who love Akira actually loved Chronicle and/or thought it was better than Akira.

I mean, fuck, I enjoyed Chronicle but it's not even a decent poor man's Akira. If people thought Chronicle was excellent then why the hell was everyone so opposed to an Americanized, live-action Akira? Based on the storyboards it would have at least been a ton better than Emo Supernatural Teenage Pranks vol 1. Or is it just the fact that it would be called Akira so distasteful that it'd render any quality it may have null and void?

Again, I liked Chronicle but really guys?

Really?

Are they still calling the movie "Akira", even with its westernized cast?

Nah, they'd probably call it "DWAYNE"
 
I loved the hate for the idea of an "Americanized" Akira. An American adaptation taking Japanese source material and adapting it to American culture/audience/etc? Unheard of! That's not what "adapt" means! It means being just like the original!

Not saying I think it would have been / would be good, mind you. People just chose a dumb reason to hate the idea of it.
 
As someone who watched Akira and other anime for the first time this year, and having watched it after Chronicle, Akira is the most nonsensical movie ever.
My first 2 anime movies were Akira followed by ghost in the shell and I honestly though people who recommended Akira were crazy, but Ghost in the shell totally redeemed some trust in anime fans.
 
As someone who watched Akira and other anime for the first time this year, and having watched it after Chronicle, Akira is the most nonsensical movie ever.
My first 2 anime movies were Akira followed by ghost in the shell and I honestly though people who recommended Akira were crazy, but Ghost in the shell totally redeemed some trust in anime fans.

Akira got by because of its mindblowing animation, but yeah the story and pacing are bad although hard to adapt from a thousand-plus page manga. Ghost in the Shell was when I found legitimacy with anime and thought, "ok I'll stick with this". Then the tv shows came, and then Satoshi Kon (RIP), and now Mamoru Hosoda and Makoto Shinkai.
 

Takao

Banned
Dragon Ball Evolution had a very film accurate story board as well.
Piccolo's death sequence was pretty much shot for shot.
As was the design for Shenron. End product took an alternate approach.
 

UrbanRats

Member
Akira + whitewashing + no Geinoh Yamashirogumi = Trash.
No thank you.

Akira got by because of its mindblowing animation, but yeah the story and pacing are bad although hard to adapt from a thousand-plus page manga. Ghost in the Shell was when I found legitimacy with anime and thought, "ok I'll stick with this". Then the tv shows came, and then Satoshi Kon (RIP), and now Mamoru Hosoda and Makoto Shinkai.
The Manga is not that great in terms of story, i think the movie is superior.
Its cripticness is, infact, an advantage in this case.

Also the pacing is shit in the Manga, too.
 
I loved the hate for the idea of an "Americanized" Akira. An American adaptation taking Japanese source material and adapting it to American culture/audience/etc? Unheard of! That's not what "adapt" means! It means being just like the original!

Not saying I think it would have been / would be good, mind you. People just chose a dumb reason to hate the idea of it.

Then why title the film Akira? To please fans? Why rewrite the main characters (namely the protagonist and antagonist) as White American males and yet strangely keep the title and the storyline roughly the same? American audiences can and will identify with characters who have different backgrounds than them.
 
I loved the hate for the idea of an "Americanized" Akira. An American adaptation taking Japanese source material and adapting it to American culture/audience/etc? Unheard of! That's not what "adapt" means! It means being just like the original!

Not saying I think it would have been / would be good, mind you. People just chose a dumb reason to hate the idea of it.

I would agree with you on a lot of other films, but AKIRA's themes are very much informed by Japan's history imo. You can't really start a film by dropping an atomic bomb on Manhattan and have it resonate nearly as strongly.
 
The Hollywood adaptation still going to be made?

It's been stuck in development hell. It was looking likely at one point, canned, brought back, canned.

WB basically keep trying to lower the budget.

Just give the fucking movie to The Wachowkis and let them do their independent funding thing again with WB distributing since they're obviously never going to cough up another $200 for those siblings.

I realize that they've paid for the licence, but doing something with it is better than sitting on your ass wasting money. You think they would have learned from Superman.
 

Zoe

Member
Then why title the film Akira? To please fans? Why rewrite the main characters (namely the protagonist and antagonist) as White American males and yet strangely keep the title and the storyline roughly the same? American audiences can and will identify with characters who have different backgrounds than them.

Akira isn't named after the two main characters.
 
I enjoyed Akira and Chronicle, not gonna say one was better than the other, but to deny the similarities is asinine. No, Chronicle is not a direct translation of Akira but it's as close to an Akira-like live-action movie as we're ever going to get.
 

Ban Puncher

Member
Hurry up and fart this adaptation out Hollywood so it can be the worst thing ever and everyone can be all like "we told you so" and you won't try again.


Until four years later, then reboot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom