Doritoshat?Instead of moneyhat, it's the Doritoshat
Come Back Shawn Elliott!
![]()
Lol last thing for the night, just wanted to see how it would look
Pretty shitty but hey.
I'm still here. It's interesting listening to that and thinking on how out of my element I felt at first on that show. I played soft, knowing at the time that listeners -- especially those on GAF in that era -- loved Shane's style in large part because it put the enthusiasm in professional enthusiasm. I was aware that everything I said was something in the way of those on this site who only wanted the breathless sales pitch without interruption. In fact, if we were to find the original thread on that episode I suspect we'd see something along those lines.
I know this is old but I just wanted to see this part in particular quoted:
http://www.vg247.com/2012/10/31/doritosgate-after-the-storm-lets-clean-ourselves-up/
A very good response, and the kind of tack I want to see more sites take. Well done VG247!
It was fuel for the console war/NPD nonsense during the early years of this current generation.Yes, Shane and his style were greatly celebrated by the bulk of GAF at that time. Most listeners here of the 1Up Show ate it all up.
I'm still here. It's interesting listening to that and thinking on how out of my element I felt at first on that show. I played soft, knowing at the time that listeners -- especially those on GAF in that era -- loved Shane's style in large part because it put the enthusiasm in professional enthusiasm. I was aware that everything I said was something in the way of those on this site who only wanted the breathless sales pitch without interruption. In fact, if we were to find the original thread on that episode I suspect we'd see something along those lines.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10508470&postcount=77
give me a break...Yes, Shane and his style were greatly celebrated by the bulk of GAF at that time. Most listeners here of the 1Up Show ate it all up.
I remember the big roundtable discussion on the 1UP Show. That was and probably still is cringe worthy.One of my favorite episodes of GFW was when you talked about GTA IV and pointed out the hyperbole that surrounded the reviews that came out for that game. I always thought it was cool that you guys avoided looking at games through the lens of hype.
And that all goes back to another large problem... us, the audience. If we (collective we) weren't so willing to give ourselves over to hype and the tribalism commonly called 'fanboyism,' real games criticism/journalism might be able to more often rise to the surface. "Why so low?"I'm still here. It's interesting listening to that and thinking on how out of my element I felt at first on that show. I played soft, knowing at the time that listeners -- especially those on GAF in that era -- loved Shane's style in large part because it put the enthusiasm in professional enthusiasm. I was aware that everything I said was something in the way of those on this site who only wanted the breathless sales pitch without interruption. In fact, if we were to find the original thread on that episode I suspect we'd see something along those lines.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10508470&postcount=77
Well yeah, I wanted to know about humor and hidden gags, about POV implementation, about storytelling, and such. But some kids seemingly can't take an even slightly critical question from who people who are supposedly critics.
You got the main stuff. At this point we're just having a bit of fun.This thread and this controversy appears to be moving too fast for my feeble mind to keep up. I got everything up to roughly page 60 of this thread, and besides the stuff outlined up until that point, I also caught the laughable Polygon press release posting, as well as Amazon Tony's unfortunate timing.
Any other developments since then? Any bigwigs weighing in on the matter? I know the newest Bombcast discusses it a bit.
Yeah well it doesn't affect them. They're just... this great membrane, through which all things video-game go through. It is what it is. And they're friends with PRs and industry people, but they're professionals god dammit. Like adults and shit. Some are friends, come over for dinner, their wives hang out and stuff, some have good friends in the industry who got mad at them for reviews they did, which.... affected them emotionally, but well... it... didn't really affect them for realzies cause, you know... we have, like, we've earned it, yeah? We're more intelligent, we're above that shit. I mean, swag is... that just makes me laugh, right? Swag comes in, I'm like "OH FUCK ME MORE CRAP" *rolls eyes* *LOLOLOL*, "SOMEONE WANTS THIS STATUE? Cause ... I ain't got more room on my desk for more statues cause it's full of statues already BUT I NEVER LOOK AT THEM CAUSE I'M A PROFESSIONAL." And, you know, I already think about that crap all the time, so don't you dare ask me to take a critical look at me and my peers' practices, cause it is what it is, take it or leave it.An insider. A VIP.
The more interesting 'Game Journalism' articles will rarely net more than a few pages of discussion.And that all goes back to another large problem... us, the audience. If we (collective we) weren't so willing to give ourselves over to hype and the tribalism commonly called 'fanboyism,' real games criticism/journalism might be able to more often rise to the surface. "Why so low?"
Yes, Shane and his style were greatly celebrated by the bulk of GAF at that time. Most listeners here of the 1Up Show ate it all up.
lol only a 4 out of 5http://www.abload.de/img/geoffking5ikci.png[img]
[img]http://www.abload.de/img/geoffkingsm2xkbw.png![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Jesus Christ, what the fuck happened here?
I'm still here. It's interesting listening to that and thinking on how out of my element I felt at first on that show. I played soft, knowing at the time that listeners -- especially those on GAF in that era -- loved Shane's style in large part because it put the enthusiasm in professional enthusiasm. I was aware that everything I said was something in the way of those on this site who only wanted the breathless sales pitch without interruption. In fact, if we were to find the original thread on that episode I suspect we'd see something along those lines.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10508470&postcount=77
A very difficult stance to take.Patrick Garratt of VG24/7 said:"The truth is that if one performs as part of sponsored trips, one cannot, no matter what anyone says on the matter, remain completely objective. No matter how well intentioned, you are not independent if you operate this way. If you’re not independent, then it seems logical that the content you create under these circumstances can’t be absolutely trusted."
"I think that, honestly, we have all been professional in an unprofessional situation for far, far too long."
"“You have to trust us,” after Doritosgate, is no longer enough."
Source:
http://http://www.vg247.com/2012/10/31/doritosgate-after-the-storm-lets-clean-ourselves-up/
Secondly, I was invited to the Microsoft Spring Showcase in San Francisco in February. California is a long way away from Europe. The costs really were high, and I wanted to go. There are some trips, I told myself, that its important to attend in order to foster a decent relationship with UK PR. Conveniently, it fell just before GDC; Microsoft was flexible about the flight, so I was able to travel from Paris then stay on for the show. Microsoft paid for the premium economy ticket and several nights in the Mark Hopkins hotel. We spent the days at the event working, and the evenings at mass dinners, which were always paid for by Microsoft.
We got a lot out of it. I worked hard. We had content live for the Halo 4 reveal, and we got the first look at Forza Horizon. Given what VG247 is, we should absolutely have been there. Whether or not I should have been there personally is a different matter. And if I should have been there, then I should have just flown myself there and paid for a hotel. It would have cost thousands, but this is my business. This is how we make money. I was ignoring the fact that I could have sent Steph, our US editor, instead. This is what I should have done. And we should have paid for it ourselves.
Yeah, guy comes out of this ocean of shit smelling like roses. Good on him. Hope they stick with it.Solid introspection and big balls on the mea culpa.
Could someone summarize what happened in this thread. I don't have enough time to read all 151 pages and find out...
Could someone summarize what happened in this thread. I don't have enough time to read all 151 pages and find out...
Update: Added Giant Bombcast, Weekend Confirmed 3, Guardian funny thing, 1up Yours, Christian Spicer, VG247, Video Games Interactive, MaxwellGT2000, Kotaku, Dave Long
Current articles/videos/podcasts
Wings over Sealand (Stuart Campbell) articles (second article has early summary) 1 2 3
John Walker's (Rock Paper Shotgun) blog (start with Games Journalists, And The Perception Of Corruption, includes guest post by Rab Florence)
TotalBiscuit
Jim Sterling
Penny-Arcade 1 2
Gamasutra
Forbes
Worthplaying
GiantBomb
Jason Lauritzen editorial and GAF post
RPGCodex writes an excellent summary
Destructoid
BoingBoing
TheSixthAxis
EDGE article that was written a few weeks ago
PlayerOne Podcast
Eurogamer's Tom Bramwell (editor who edited Rab's column) about the last few days
Rock Paper Shotgun official stance
The Guardian and a funny thing related to the article
Giant Bombcast
VG247 on their new ethics statement
Video Games Interactive
Kotaku
Old (but still relevant) articles/videos/podcasts
Rab Florence (the guy who started all this) criticizing games writing since 2008
An old episode of CGW Radio discussing Gerstmann-gate
Old Gamasutra article on the influence of PR
Old GFW radio bits
1up YoursShawn Elliot and Shane Bettenhausen
Comments from the industry
Shawn Elliot - 1 (aegies is Arthur Gies of polygon.com) 2 3 4 5 6 on the psychology of PR etc
and some more Arthur Gies - 1 2 3 4 5 and some replies 1 2 3
Jeff Green on the way it actually works, and another post, an another
ShockingAlberto on his view as a former games writer
Jason Schreier (Kotaku) - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and many more
N'Gai Croal initial reaction on Twitter
Chris Schilling (freelance) likes both people involved and so doesn't want to write about it
Danny O'Dwyer (Gamespot UK) on why his site won't cover this (audience is not interested) - 1 2 3
pastapadre on being shunned by the industry
Stephen Totilo (Kotaku)doesn't think this is an important story(has changed his mind about that part, read post 9). Wants to focus on good games journalism, this prompted a pretty funny picture and a comment about it, then Stephen Totilo enters the thread 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (ignore the comment on 18, couldn't find a direct link to Totilo's comment) 19
Weekend Confirmed 1 2 3
Syriel on his experiences of PR
Jeff Gerstmann short comment on swag
Christian Donlan and Simon Parkin of Eurogamer want to change how they do things
Nert on his experience as PR in the tech industry 1 2
John Walker (RPS) onwhy the site won't cover it(they did anyway) like his blog did
Rab Florence tweets
Jeff Gerstmann 1 (1 is from Tumblr) 2 (2 via EternalGamer, highlights some other stuff) 3 4 5 (3-5 are comments by Jeff in this thread)
Christian Spicer
MaxwellGT2000 talks about his experiences as a writer for a small site that got bigger
Dave Long 1 2
Comments from others
GillianSeed79 and firehawk12 on how journalist do criticize their peers
voodoopanda highlights that the issue is not in any way black or white
Snowden's Secret comments on gaming press reactions
Zissou weighs in
Other relevant/interesting links and examples of PR
Examples of various press kits
The 3DS comes to GiantBomb
Letter sent to reviewers from UbiSoft along with their press copy of Assassin's Creed 3
How Rockstar handled the reviews for GTA4
Battlefield 3 review questionnarie
give me a break...
there was bias on all sides and we all had a blast arguing about it
shane just catches shit because he was far less subtle about it
HABEMUS DORITEM
HABEMUS DORITEM