So that makes it OK? This past Saturday when I was grocery shopping with the wife we were finishing up and got in line behind a lady with a cart full of what I would consider "non essential" foods. Snacks, candy, etc. I don't care much about other people's eating habits since anyone is free to munch on whatever they want. I noted to the wife that she was yapping on her new iPhone 5 (yep, I'm a tech geek so I know these things) which I thought was rude since she was yapping during checkout and didn't say "hello" or "thank you" to the person checking out or bagging her groceries. I usually stay off the phone, but heh, whatevs. The wife noted she was wearing Uggs, which the wife apparently thought were nice.
At the end of it all she whips out her LINK card to pay.
I was fairly stunned. New iPhone, Uggs, junkfood, etc... but she's on a Government handout?
So she can buy a new iPhone, Uggs, junkfood, etc - but she needs Government assistance?
This happens more than you think and just because there's a 5 year maximum handout does not make it any better that we have leechers on the system.
That money could go to people who ACTUALLY fucking need it - which I am more than happy to help out. But people who abuse the system? Fuck that.
But, according to your logic, let's waste money because "5 years herp derp!"