But the rating goes up when you filter to top critics.Ah, an aggregate. Let's see some of the top critics
But the rating goes up when you filter to top critics.Ah, an aggregate. Let's see some of the top critics
Assuming you have played the game extensively, just how boring is it?
It's a shame what graphics whoring and scripted movie-games have done to games reviews. This is why cinema critics will always be more respected. You won't see them prioritize a movie's oh so sweet cgi over the rest of its elements. If the script, directing and acting sucks, no vfx studio in California will save it.
The same applies here, gameplay will always be king, graphics should be an integral part of the experience, not the main focus. But reviewers are so keen to compare all games to the latest 300 million budget movie-game, that they relegate the gameplay experience to a sad spot in the back corner. What's worse, I'm willing to bet most of the critics of 'style' couldn't draw a butt-penis themselves. But because they played many movie-games, now they're art directors.
Luckily most people just want to have fun playing a game, not run a silly feature checklist against games that have nothing to do with it.
damnit feep. if your opinions of a game you played don't start aligning with my opinions of a game i haven't played, i'm going to boycott g4 altogether.
Well, if you are attempting to show me, as a potential customer, the cons / pro of a game, yes, I expect you to play it extensively. But I don't think all of us rely on media reviews to spend our money.So I must play this game extensively in order to explain the mentality of someone bored by it?
You're kinda proving my point here.
You quoted a post where I say graphics are an integral part of the experience, just not the main focus.Yeah, visuals are completely irrelevant in a visual medium. No film critic brings up things like cinematography or visuals.
So I must play this game extensively in order to explain (rather generally) the mentality of someone bored by it?
You're kinda proving my point here.
Okay, this one got me.damnit feep. if your opinions of a game you played don't start aligning with my opinions of a game i haven't played, i'm going to boycott g4 altogether.
damnit feep. if your opinions of a game you played don't start aligning with my opinions of a game i haven't played, i'm going to boycott g4 altogether.
Well, if you are attempting to show me, as a potential customer, the cons / pro of a game, yes, I expect you to play it extensively. But I don't think all of us rely on media reviews to spend our money.
Wait, I don't either, I wasn't even addressing feep originally, I didn't even know he was a reviewer.I'm really not sure what you're arguing anymore. You do realize that I'm not a reviewer or Feep specifically, right? I'm just defending his right to be completely numbed by the tepidness of NSMBU's initial stages, in spite of other factors including presentation.
Only that no one's angry, and if anything, going by what some think of it, I have played this game! On the DS and Wii. Some reviewers are saying it's the best nsmb yet, having played the previous ones, it's safe to say I'm gonna love it. But I'm no reviewer, just a hobbyist in the review thread, where, you know, we talk reviews?Well now you know and now you can consider not getting angry about a review for a game you havent played yet.
Sadly these people are -_- there are real reasons to be upset with these reviews, like that game informer link saying that they can't get all the features, thus any reviews out right now have not reviewed the whole package, that's a legit complaint that no one is addressing. Being defensive without a real ground to be defensive on leaves people looking desperate and those of us with legit issues with said reviews are grouped in with the people who just want to defend something they haven't played because of a label on the package.
I just think - short of blatant exaggeration or outright errors - it's difficult in general to criticize reviews until we have copies of the games in our hands.
Reminds me of Eurogamer (?) and Uncharted 3, where everybody got all up in arms over a score that in retrospect a good portion of GAF seems to agree with.
I dont know, randomly ranting about movies, graphics whores and cinematic games seems like something an angry person would do.Only that no one's angry, and if anything, going by what some think of it, I have played this game! On the DS and Wii. Some reviewers are saying it's the best nsmb yet, having played the previous ones, it's safe to say I'm gonna love it.
Oh be afraid. Be very afraid.I dont know, randomly ranting about movies, graphics whores and cinematic games seems like something an angry person would do.
Great lavels.GameXplain Video Review
4/5 Stars: "The best in class [for NSMB]" Also: "Lifelessness has never looked better than in New Super Mario Bros U" lol
http://youtu.be/LqF2T1AkIek
This isn't EA or rockstar. Nintendo doesn't tie bonuses or even gives a damn about metacritic.The companies are probably tying bonuses to Metacritic and then hijacking the scores. Cheaper to skew the reviews downward then to pay out the bonuses.
I don't actually believe this
Has it been confirmed whether or not Yoshi can be taken between levels?
You can take Baby Yoshi with you anywhere as long as you don't lose him or die.
I don't think that's the case for grown up Yoshi.
Afaik, green Yoshi has its own levels so I'm not sure.
Although I have not followed the full debate about Feep's review (I have read the review) I wanted to make four points.
First, regarding the difficulty of early levels. People ought to go back and play the classic SMB, SMB3 and SMW games. The difficultly in those games, to my mind, has increased with nostalgia (although admittedly it is also hard for me to tell because I replay SMB/SMB3 not infrequently). The simple point it that it is not too hard to finish the first world of SMB3 with 20-30+ lives and without dropping any 1-ups.
Secondly, my girlfriend recently started playing New Super Mario Bros on my extra 3DS (post XL upgrade). Those early levels, which an experienced Mario player will breeze through, are not so easy for the first time player (or in this case a player who had not played 2d Mario since the original gameboy).
Thirdly, it is fantastic to see the game getting such great scores. Fans of 2D Mario (and the NSMB games) should be really excited.
Finally, [this is an edit] chill out people. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion.
... as reviewed by Napoleon Dynamite.GameXplain Video Review
4/5 Stars: "The best in class [for NSMB]" Also: "Lifelessness has never looked better than in New Super Mario Bros U" lol
http://youtu.be/LqF2T1AkIek
This review thread is surprisingly tame compared to some more infamous examples. I don't see how a 3.5/5 is an unfair mark for a 'New' Mario Bros game either.These last few pages... what an embarrassment. I think I'll try more to avoid review threads in the future because they're always the lowest point in anything related to gaming.
Feep, just read your review, very succinct and honest. I agree with a lot of your cons, though I guess they don't really apply to me since I don't mind the art style and bland music isn't that much of an issue to me. A shame about the difficulty though. Hopefully DLC brings some challenging levels.
Not sure if you're still under embargo, but can you comment on how it felt to play the game with the Gamepad for extended periods? The only thing that worries me at the moment.
The GamePad is fantastically comfortable, something you would *not* expect for so massive a device. I was annoyed when I had to switch to the regular Wiimote in co-op challenges if my partner wanted to lay down platforms.These last few pages... what an embarrassment. I think I'll try more to avoid review threads in the future because they're always the lowest point in anything related to gaming.
Feep, just read your review, very succinct and honest. I agree with a lot of your cons, though I guess they don't really apply to me since I don't mind the art style and bland music isn't that much of an issue to me. A shame about the difficulty though. Hopefully DLC brings some challenging levels.
Not sure if you're still under embargo, but can you comment on how it felt to play the game with the Gamepad for extended periods? The only thing that worries me at the moment.
The GamePad really is a marvel of engineering. Not sure if the concept is necessarily what Nintendo really needed, but the execution is perfect. I wouldn't worry about it at all.
The GamePad is fantastically comfortable, something you would *not* expect for so massive a device. I was annoyed when I had to switch to the regular Wiimote in co-op challenges if my partner wanted to lay down platforms.
The GamePad really is a marvel of engineering. Not sure if the concept is necessarily what Nintendo really needed, but the execution is perfect. I wouldn't worry about it at all.
So far it seems like the only must have game for me for wiU. And pikmin 3 ofcourse.
My biggest issue with the NSMB series is that it's the ultimate gaming misnomer. 4 games on and there's very little that hasn't been seen before in other Mario games.
Oh man I just watched this video on my galaxy s3 in HD and it looks beautiful, there are some unseen parts that look great...hype!
My biggest issue with the NSMB series is that it's the ultimate gaming misnomer. 4 games on and there's very little that hasn't been seen before in other Mario games.
Also, it feels very sluggish compared to its sprightly ancestors, and that the risk/reward mechanics err hugely on the side of reward with regard to running and jumping inertia. Everything's more or less cancellable and safe, you don't have to commit to strategy the way you do in SMB or SMB3, or even SM64.
I have to say though that, while I rarely take stock in EDGE reviews, that NSMBU writeup has bolstered my faith in the game a great deal.
84's; I'm sorry Devs, there'll be no Christmas this year.