michaelius
Banned
As I recall reading somewhere, the Wii U is a GPU with a CPU hanging off the side.
You don't need much CPU to animate 10 mushrooms and Mario on the screen.
As I recall reading somewhere, the Wii U is a GPU with a CPU hanging off the side.
But the Wii U is already HD.
Because when it become law to have energy ratings on everything people will see this on the WiiU
![]()
And G or something on the others people will just assume it's better. Because no one reads the little numbers, they just see the big A and go "that's the one!"
This is sarcasm, right?
Yeah, that's NEVER going to be able to handle multi-plats from Orbis/Durango. Nintendo has failed at delivering next gen hardware. Again. =/
Once again, the system is only worth buying for first party games.
Isn't power pc 750 the apple branded g3?
True indeed, but wasnt one the focuses on the WiiU to appeal more to the "hardcore" gamer? That is what i got from the very early WiiU announcements and interviews, hence the U in the name. "Some people had been asking, is the Wii really a console for me. Then we made the WiiU, a Wii that is for you", Reggie said something like that at least.Because the Wii's massive success convinced them that Average Joe Consumer really doesn't care that much about graphics/RAM/clock speed.
Which is a 1st party game in this caseAnd Bayonetta 2.
I can't think of any other name for the next iteration of Wii. WiiU+?
I think he means games that excist. If a game that excist sells one or 1 million copies, the game itself is unchanged. Sales affects sequels and new games being made by a specific developer/publisher.
Because when it become law to have energy ratings on everything people will see this on the WiiU
![]()
And G or something on the others people will just assume it's better. Because no one reads the little numbers, they just see the big A and go "that's the one!"
Isn't power pc 750 the apple branded g3?
Isn't power pc 750 the apple branded g3?
True indeed, but wasnt one the focuses on the WiiU to appeal more to the "hardcore" gamer? That is what i got from the very early WiiU announcements and interviews, hence the U in the name. "People had been asking, is the Wii a console for me. Then we made the WiiU, a Wii that is for you", Reggie said something like that at least.
Isn't power pc 750 the apple branded g3?
No, they really could not have had it all. Where Microsoft and Sony are so progressive in some areas, Nintendo just isn't. Nintendo excels at first party development, which the other two could only hope to come close to. As a Nintendo-only console owner, I never want to see Nintendo have one, all-dominant system ever again. It is too restrictive/hard-up in so many areas. Having three consoles battling it out can only mean good things for consumers as competition will hopefully bring out the best in each.The crazy thing is, Nintendo is the only company of the big 3 that could have really truly had it all.
They could have released a powerful "next-gen" machine, designed a strong OS and online system, won over third parties, won over the core AND offered all their big IPs like Mario etc too. A system truly for everyone, core gamers and casuals a like. The one-stop system.
Seems like a missed opportunity.
The western market doesn't care about itself.It just keeps getting worse and worse.
Clearly Nintendo didn't give a fuck about the West when they designed this system.
Isn't power pc 750 the apple branded g3?
True indeed, but wasnt one the focuses on the WiiU to appeal more to the "hardcore" gamer? That is what i got from the very early WiiU announcements and interviews, hence the U in the name. "Some people had been asking, is the Wii really a console for me. Then we made the WiiU, a Wii that is for you", Reggie said something like that at least.
The difference is, you can put any food in a fridge, you can put any bread in a toaster, you can connect any device to any television. But with a gaming console, the energy rating means squat if it doesn't play the games you want it to play.
The crazy thing is, Nintendo is the only company of the big 3 that could have really truly had it all.
They could have released a powerful "next-gen" machine, designed a strong OS and online system, won over third parties, won over the core AND offered all their big IPs like Mario etc too. A system truly for everyone, core gamers and casuals a like. The one-stop system.
Seems like a missed opportunity.
The crazy thing is, Nintendo is the only company of the big 3 that could have really truly had it all.
They could have released a powerful "next-gen" machine, designed a strong OS and online system, won over third parties, won over the core AND offered all their big IPs like Mario etc too. A system truly for everyone, core gamers and casuals a like. The one-stop system.
Seems like a missed opportunity.
Yes. But Marcan didn't say Espresso was a PPC750. Just that it is (or behaves) similar to Broadway. It has to, as it's designed to offer binary compatibility. And no current off-the-shelf PowerPC can run Broadway binaries.Isn't power pc 750 the apple branded g3?
And Bayonetta 2.
I hope so. Even kitchen appliances with the power rating slapped on their face gets little to no attention.
He got this information through Wii Mode in the Wii U?
Could be that the specs are different in Wii Mode and normal Wii U?
The Wii U CPU could also be in a lower clock when it is idle.
It is a pity that marcan don't offer more and more reliable information.
True indeed, but wasnt one the focuses on the WiiU to appeal more to the "hardcore" gamer? That is what i got from the very early WiiU announcements and interviews, hence the U in the name. "Some people had been asking, is the Wii really a console for me. Then we made the WiiU, a Wii that is for you", Reggie said something like that at least.
.
The upcoming games will be affected by the specs of the console, as has been mentioned (and ignored by you, apparently) by numerous posters in this thread. Just because the magnitude of that effect is exaggerated by some doesn't mean it isn't a valid observation.
I just want to know what Nintendo is thinking.
I want to be the fly on the wall during the long-term meetings regarding this console. So curious.
You're right that people sometimes put too much emphasis on numbers, but seeing those ports looking about as good as the PS3 versions of those games doesn't make me want to rush out and buy a Wii-U.If anything, this proves that clock speed isn't all that matter, or else ports like AC3, COD or ME3 would run much much worse than the other versions.
But again, people only look at numbers.
The problem is ultimately the market dictates that they continue to push for more power, better graphics etc. etc.I think that's the key, though. *Once* you assume existence, that argument becomes relevant - but assuming that is a mistake. it's wrong to fail to consider the effect of these factors in whether games get made, because that's potentially a relevant issue (and indeed was crucial to the Wii).
However, to present a counter-argument to the doom-and-gloom, it's also incorrect to operate on the assumption that the conclusion third parties came to after the last generation was that the pursuit of power was healthy for their business. Indeed, I'd argue that in many cases it caused them significant issues. I think that any third party other than those who have been making huge profits last gen (i.e. Activision) would be foolish to not at least take advantage of this console transition to think carefully about their future strategy and whether the continued push in that direction is financially secure for them.
Because when it become law to have energy ratings on everything people will see this on the WiiU
![]()
And G or something on the others people will just assume it's better. Because no one reads the little numbers, they just see the big A and go "that's the one!"
Not even worth it for that. Not with that pathetic hardware. Not going to pay $350 for $100 hardware with a $200 controller.
This is a Power 7 similar to what powers the Watson supercomputer.
I just want to know what Nintendo is thinking.
I want to be the fly on the wall during the long-term meetings regarding this console. So curious.
I would say both do, since both can and do prevent the vision of developers from being realized as well as stimulate certain paths of development/types of products.
True indeed, but wasnt one the focuses on the WiiU to appeal more to the "hardcore" gamer? That is what i got from the very early WiiU announcements and interviews, hence the U in the name. "Some people had been asking, is the Wii really a console for me. Then we made the WiiU, a Wii that is for you", Reggie said something like that at least.
When you turn on Revolution and see the graphics, you will say, "Wow."