College Football Week 14 - Conference Championship Games and Pseudo Championships

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow...

Yep, A&M gets the bowl no one watch, while UGA should get a good matchup if OU doesn't make it to a BCS game. Which is good.

Most projections for the last few weeks had Michigan in the Capital One, then I saw a comment that they can't pick them now. Anyone got a link to the bowl selection rules governing this?

Edit: Found a link. Mich is two games behind Neb, an since they're not going to the BCS, only the NU twins are eligible. Curse you Pelini!
 
Eh, true. But they aren't the first and won't be the last to lose money. Isn't it actually rare for any team to make money in the bigger bowls. Even established programs? Requirements for getting overpriced tickets through the bowls, hotels, etc.

Schools in general get raked over by the bowl system.

Oklahoma is one of the rare schools to make money on it. win-win ;) Just in terms of playing a game, OU-Florida and OU-Georgia isn't any sort of downgrade, but OU plays in the Cotton Bowl all the time.

And as much as everyone loves it when the little guy makes it in, no one will watch that game. Orange Bowl is now an awful game, which kind of sucks as a CFB fan
 
Most projections for the last few weeks had Michigan in the Capital One, then I saw a comment that they can't pick them now. Anyone got a link to the bowl selection rules governing this?

All I know is, with Wisconsin winning the B1G, it screwed it all up.

Think its between Nebraska and NW (or NU, whatever it is). I'd hope it's Nebraska, but really, not sure there's a B1G team this year that's is a good matchup for a good SEC team (besides Ohio State)


Also, about the Suplex gif, it kinda loads in, but it's at Gifulmination
http://gif.mocksession.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/SUPLEX3.gif
SUPLEX3.gif
 
And Oklahoma is one of the rare schools to make money on it. win-win. Just in terms of playing a game, OU-Florida and OU-Georgia isn't any sort of downgrade, but OU plays in the Cotton Bowl all the time.

And as much as everyone loves it when the little guy makes it in, no one will watch that game. Orange Bowl is now an awful game, which kind of sucks as a CFB fan

The Orange Bowl is usually an awful game regardless. Other good matchups will be prevented too. Everyone knows Oregon/Florida would be great. But do you think Fiesta is going to let that happen? They're going to take Oregon vs. K-State all day long.

Then you have the shittastic Rose Bowl this season too.

The BCS conferences along with their TV partners have fucked over so many teams and other conferences. My salt runs deep to the point I don't even care if some of these games get absolute shit matchups if it means them losing money and getting shit ratings.
 
Well it's all dependent on the Aggies getting picked for CapOne. They could still take UGA, so a Cotton Bowl match up with OU/Texas wouldn't be terrible. The OU game might actually be good, and crushing the sips is always cathartic.
 
All I know is, with Wisconsin winning the B1G, it screwed it all up.

Think its between Nebraska and NW (or NU, whatever it is). I'd hope it's Nebraska, but really, not sure there's a B1G team this year that's is a good matchup for a good SEC team (besides Ohio State)

I think it's going to be Nebraska, just on the travels-well status alone. And the fact that so many NW seats were sold to Nebraska fans for their game this year at home probably doesn't do them any favors in a tiebreaker.

If A&M goes to the Capital One then there's also the bonus buff of Nebraska playing against a former Big 12 opponent.
 
The huskers went from being able to compete with OU and Texas to being crushed by The OSU and the Badgers.

Guess that's what happens when you go from playing with boys to playing with men, huh?
 
I'm just hoping that NIU doesn't get a BCS bowl. Would screw basically everybody in the Big XII except for KSU if they did.
 
Well it's all dependent on the Aggies getting picked for CapOne. They could still take UGA, so a Cotton Bowl match up with OU/Texas wouldn't be terrible. The OU game might actually be good, and crushing the sips is always cathartic.

OU is a lock for the Cotton if they miss the BCS. Sucks for A&M if they have to play NW again, but then it's hard to get excited about them playing OU again. Playing Michigan would have been fun

@goldeneye the more you look at it, yeah there are lots of shitty games. I have no problem with KSU-Oregon but I understand that KSU doesn't really move the needle
 
Is there really a game this year called the Heart of Dallas Bowl? And I thought we couldn't get any worse than the Continental Tire or the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowls...

You really think that way? I think names like Heart of Dallas are a thousand times better than some random brand name. I'll take Heart of Dallas, Music City, Pinstripe, etc. over Continental Tire, Kraft, Meineke Car Care, Little Caesar's, etc. any day of the week.
 
The final regular season sagarin ratings (w/ change from last week). Unfortunately, I didn't get a snapshot for folks not in the top 25 BCS, so I don't have entries for some teams, the most important of which is NIU. They still won't get any points from Sagarin, but I don't know how much lower than 34th they were last week.

For those thinking Georgia could or should finish above Florida, it's not gonna happen. And IMO, it shouldn't happen. Yes, they won head to head and yes, they had an extra opportunity to lose, but when you look at their schedule, the Florida game was the ONLY good win they had. Otherwise, they have 0 quality wins and you have to consider the blowout against South Carolina even with the game they played last night.

1) ND (+0)
2) Florida (+0)
3) Alabama (+4)
4) KSU (+2)
5) Oregon (-2)
6) Stanford (-1)
7) LSU (+2)
8) South Carolina (+0)
9) Georgia (-5)
10) Ohio State (+0)
11) Oklahoma (-1)
12) Texas A&M (-1)
13) Oregon State (-1)
14) Texas (+0)
15) Michigan (+2)
16) Nebraska (-3)
17) UCLA (-1)
18) Southern Cal
19) Oklahoma State (-4)
20) Arizona
21) West Virginia
22) Florida State (-1)
23) Baylor
24) San Jose State (+1)
25) Washington
...
34) Northern Illinois (??
 
The final regular season sagarin ratings (w/ change from last week). Unfortunately, I didn't get a snapshot for folks not in the top 25 BCS, so I don't have entries for some teams, the most important of which is NIU. They still won't get any points from Sagarin, but I don't know how much lower than 34th they were last week.

For those thinking Georgia could or should finish above Florida, it's not gonna happen. And IMO, it shouldn't happen. Yes, they won head to head and yes, they had an extra opportunity to lose, but when you look at their schedule, the Florida game was the ONLY good win they had. Otherwise, they have 0 quality wins and you have to consider the blowout against South Carolina even with the game they played last night.

1) ND (+0)
2) Florida (+0)
3) Alabama (+4)
4) KSU (+2)
5) Oregon (-2)
6) Stanford (-1)
7) LSU (+2)
8) South Carolina (+0)
9) Georgia (-5)
10) Ohio State (+0)
11) Oklahoma (-1)
12) Texas A&M (-1)
13) Oregon State (-1)
14) Texas (+0)
15) Michigan (+2)
16) Nebraska (-3)
17) UCLA (-1)
18) Southern Cal
19) Oklahoma State (-4)
20) Arizona
21) West Virginia
22) Florida State (-1)
23) Baylor
24) San Jose State (+1)
25) Washington
...
34) Northern Illinois (??
Which poll is this?
 
You really think that way? I think names like Heart of Dallas are a thousand times better than some random brand name. I'll take Heart of Dallas, Music City, Pinstripe, etc. over Continental Tire, Kraft, Meineke Car Care, Little Caesar's, etc. any day of the week.

I call the Heart of Dallas Bowl the Real Cotton Bowl because it's actually played in the Cotton Bowl. The current Cotton Bowl should be called the Jerry's New Year Invitational Bowl.
 
Got home from the bars last night after the game and my roommate who is a UGA fan was still going crazy. It was 3:45 in the morning.

iIfTdqgNAZt5D.gif

His reaction.
 
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=8697981

Can't really blame the ref for that shit. Nobody expected that. Because it's a dumb move.

Cool that it worked out for him, though.

Did they just ignore the ref signalling the play down when they reviewed this? It's almost as bad as the Redskins game a few weeks ago when a ref blew the play dead and the receiver kept running for a TD, and the refs looked at it and essentially said "LOL whistle? What whistle?"
 
Did they just ignore the ref signalling the play down when they reviewed this? It's almost as bad as the Redskins game a few weeks ago when a ref blew the play dead and the receiver kept running for a TD, and the refs looked at it and essentially said "LOL whistle? What whistle?"

Fun fact. They didn't even review it! They didn't confer after either!
 
Dumb move on part of the ref or UCF.

I mean the play sucked immensely, but ultimately UCF had other chances and they blew it.

The player, man, the player! The reason you never see guys do that is because it's really risky--if he screws it up, that could easily be UCF ball.
 
Fun fact. They didn't even review it! They didn't confer after either!

Amazing. The "every play gets reviewed" mantra that we hear about every game continues to be complete nonsense. Meanwhile, we'll actually stop the game to review plays that are completely obvious calls, and not even look at plays like this. It's inexcusable and makes this replay system look like a sham.
 
The player, man, the player! The reason you never see guys do that is because it's really risky--if he screws it up, that could easily be UCF ball.

Yeah, definitely.

Edit: Looks like USF has fired Skip Holtz. Damnit, there was our shot to beat them finally! Then again, Holtz completely owned us when he was at ECU.
 
USA Today/Coaches

1 Notre Dame 12-0 1470 56 1
2 Alabama 12-1 1417 3 2
3 Oregon 11-1 1313 0 4
4 Florida 11-1 1287 0 5
5 Georgia 11-2 1216 0 3
6 Kansas St. 11-1 1190 0 7
7 LSU 10-2 1111 0 6
8 Stanford 11-2 1047 0 9
9 Texas A&M 10-2 1039 0 8
10 South Carolina 10-2 947 0 10
11 Oklahoma 10-2 890 0 11
12 Florida St. 11-2 853 0 12
13 Clemson 10-2 769 0 14
14 Oregon St. 9-3 663 0 17
15 Boise St. 10-2 569 0 15
16 Northern Illinois 12-1 495 0 18
17 Northwestern 9-3 444 0 20
18 Louisville 10-2 409 0 23
19 UCLA 9-4 408 0 16
20 Utah State 10-2 334 0 22
21 Nebraska 10-3 328 0 13
22 Michigan 8-4 278 0 24
23 Wisconsin 8-5 115 0 NR
24 San Jose St. 10-2 110 0 NR
25 Texas 8-4 97 0 21

AP

1 Notre Dame (60) 12-0 1,500 1
2 Alabama 12-1 1,424 2
3 Ohio State 12-0 1,302 4
4 Florida 11-1 1,279 5
5 Oregon 11-1 1,250 6
6 Georgia 11-2 1,213 3
7 Kansas State 11-1 1,129 7
8 Stanford 11-2 1,094 8
9 LSU 10-2 1,051 9
10 Texas A&M 10-2 1,025 10
11 South Carolina 10-2 907 11
12 Oklahoma 10-2 851 12
13 Florida State 11-2 789 13
14 Clemson 10-2 691 15
15 Oregon State 9-3 638 16
16 Northern Illinois 12-1 534 19
17 UCLA 9-4 440 17
18 Utah State 10-2 379 20
19 Michigan 8-4 306 21
20 Boise State 10-2 276 25
21 Northwestern 9-3 266 22
22 Louisville 10-2 248 NR
23 Nebraska 10-3 227 14
24 San Jose State 10-2 157 NR
25 Kent State 11-2 117 18
 
I only bring this up again as a salty Sooners fan, but NIU will lose millions by going to the game. Hopefully though those losses are offset by all the exposure and prestige a BCS bowl brings and their program gets a bounce in status like Connecticut did

The payout for the BCS games last year was $18 million... That vs say $1-1.5M for a bowl for a midmajor conference... It's split across the entire conference, but the school doesn't have to "promise" a certain turnout which is usually what sinks teams going to the bigger bowls.
 
USA Today/Coaches

1 Notre Dame 12-0 1470 56 1
2 Alabama 12-1 1417 3 2
3 Oregon 11-1 1313 0 4
4 Florida 11-1 1287 0 5
5 Georgia 11-2 1216 0 3
6 Kansas St. 11-1 1190 0 7
7 LSU 10-2 1111 0 6
8 Stanford 11-2 1047 0 9
9 Texas A&M 10-2 1039 0 8
10 South Carolina 10-2 947 0 10
11 Oklahoma 10-2 890 0 11
12 Florida St. 11-2 853 0 12
13 Clemson 10-2 769 0 14
14 Oregon St. 9-3 663 0 17
15 Boise St. 10-2 569 0 15
16 Northern Illinois 12-1 495 0 18
17 Northwestern 9-3 444 0 20
18 Louisville 10-2 409 0 23
19 UCLA 9-4 408 0 16
20 Utah State 10-2 334 0 22
21 Nebraska 10-3 328 0 13
22 Michigan 8-4 278 0 24
23 Wisconsin 8-5 115 0 NR
24 San Jose St. 10-2 110 0 NR
25 Texas 8-4 97 0 21

AP

1 Notre Dame (60) 12-0 1,500 1
2 Alabama 12-1 1,424 2
3 Ohio State 12-0 1,302 4
4 Florida 11-1 1,279 5
5 Oregon 11-1 1,250 6
6 Georgia 11-2 1,213 3
7 Kansas State 11-1 1,129 7
8 Stanford 11-2 1,094 8
9 LSU 10-2 1,051 9
10 Texas A&M 10-2 1,025 10
11 South Carolina 10-2 907 11
12 Oklahoma 10-2 851 12
13 Florida State 11-2 789 13
14 Clemson 10-2 691 15
15 Oregon State 9-3 638 16
16 Northern Illinois 12-1 534 19
17 UCLA 9-4 440 17
18 Utah State 10-2 379 20
19 Michigan 8-4 306 21
20 Boise State 10-2 276 25
21 Northwestern 9-3 266 22
22 Louisville 10-2 248 NR
23 Nebraska 10-3 227 14
24 San Jose State 10-2 157 NR
25 Kent State 11-2 117 18

HOLY SHIT did NEBRASKA CRASH!!!!!!!!

NIU is going bowling I think... Nebrask was 13th in both polls last week... Voters absolutely crushed them for that loss.
 
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/stewart_mandel/12/02/bowl-projections/index.html#ixzz2DuSqUjh9
Stewart Mandel's Bowl predictions.

Rose: Wisconsin (Big Ten champ) vs. Stanford (Pac-12 champ)
Jan. 1 Orange: Florida State (ACC champ) vs. Louisville (Big East champ)
Jan. 2 Sugar: Florida (BCS at-large) vs. Oklahoma (BCS at-large)
Jan. 3 Fiesta: Kansas State (Big 12 champ) vs. Oregon (BCS at-large)
Jan. 7 BCS championship: Notre Dame (BCS No. 1) vs. Alabama (BCS No. 2)



New Mexico: Nevada (MWC No. 4) vs. Arizona (Pac-12 No. 7)
Dec. 15 Idaho Potato: Utah State (WAC) vs. Toledo (MAC No. 3)
Dec. 20 Poinsettia: San Diego State (MWC No. 2) vs. BYU (BYU)
Dec. 21 Beef 'O' Brady's: UCF (C-USA) vs. Ball State (Big East*)
Dec. 22 New Orleans: Louisiana-Lafayette (Sun Belt No. 1) vs. East Carolina (C-USA)
Dec. 22 Maaco: Boise State (MWC No. 1) vs. Washington (Pac-12 No. 5)
Dec. 24 Hawaii: Fresno State (MWC) vs. SMU (C-USA)
Dec. 26 Little Caesars: Kent State (MAC) vs. Middle Tennessee (Big Ten No. 8*)
Dec. 27 Belk: Cincinnati (Big East No. 3) vs. Duke (ACC No. 5)
Dec. 27 Military: San Jose State (ACC No. 8*) vs. Ohio (Army)
Dec. 27 Holiday: UCLA (Pac-12 No. 3) vs. West Virginia (Big 12 No. 5)
Dec. 28 Independence: Bowling Green (ACC No. 7*) vs. Louisiana-Monroe (SEC No. 10*)
Dec. 28 Meineke Texas: Minnesota (Big Ten No. 6) vs. Baylor (Big 12 No. 6)
Dec. 28 Russell Athletic: Rutgers (Big East No. 2) vs. Virginia Tech (ACC No. 3)
Dec. 29 Pinstripe: Syracuse (Big East No. 4) vs. Texas Tech (Big 12 No. 7)
Dec. 29 Buffalo Wild Wings: TCU (Big 12 No. 4) vs. Michigan State (Big Ten No. 5)
Dec. 29 Alamo: Oregon State (Pac-12 No. 2) vs. Oklahoma State (Big 12 No. 3)
Dec. 29 Armed Forces: Rice (C-USA) vs. Air Force (MWC)
Dec. 29 Kraft Fight Hunger: Arizona State (Pac-12 No. 6) vs. Navy (Navy)
Dec. 31 Music City: NC State (ACC No. 6) vs. Mississippi State (SEC)
Dec. 31 Sun: Georgia Tech (ACC No. 4) vs. USC (Pac-12 No. 4)
Dec. 31 Liberty: Tulsa (C-USA No. 1) vs. Louisiana Tech (SEC No. 9*)
Dec. 31 Chick-fil-A: Clemson (ACC No. 2) vs. Vanderbilt (SEC No. 5)
Jan. 1 Heart of Dallas: Purdue (Big Ten No. 7) vs. Iowa State (Big 12 No. 8)
Jan. 1 Capital One: Texas A&M (SEC No. 2) vs. Northwestern (Big Ten No. 2)
Jan. 1 Outback: Nebraska (Big Ten No. 3) vs. LSU (SEC)
Jan. 1 Gator: Michigan (Big Ten No. 4) vs. South Carolina (SEC No. 6)
Jan. 4 Cotton: Texas (Big 12 No. 2) vs. Georgia (SEC)
Jan. 5 BBVA Compass: Pittsburgh (Big East) vs. Ole Miss (SEC No. 8)
Jan. 6 GoDaddy.com: Northern Illinois (MAC) vs. Arkansas State (Sun Belt No. 2)

Got some changes, involving USCe and LSU. LSU to the outback to face Nebraska, USCe to the Gator to face Michigan, and Vandy getting the Peach Bowl to face Clemson. Bad time to be a Vandy Plantation Commodore guy thing.
 
The player, man, the player! The reason you never see guys do that is because it's really risky--if he screws it up, that could easily be UCF ball.

Actually it was a brilliant move by the return man. When UCF touches the ball, it's an "illegal touching" penalty (for no yards). Whatever happens after that, the worst that could happen is getting the ball at that spot. It's along the same lines as taking a shot downfield when the defense jumps offside.
 
Actually it was a brilliant move by the return man. When UCF touches the ball, it's an "illegal touching" penalty (for no yards). Whatever happens after that, the worst that could happen is getting the ball at that spot. It's along the same lines as taking a shot downfield when the defense jumps offside.

Hm? The ball was live. The returner could have muffed it and UCF would have a chance at possession.
 
Actually it was a brilliant move by the return man. When UCF touches the ball, it's an "illegal touching" penalty (for no yards). Whatever happens after that, the worst that could happen is getting the ball at that spot. It's along the same lines as taking a shot downfield when the defense jumps offside.

Wait, really? I've never heard this before. So if he muffs it and UCF grabs it, it's still Tulsa ball?
 
No I believe aggie is correct. If Tulsa fucked that up they could have taken it at the place the UCF guy touched it.

Oh, not clear on the rule. The announcers were saying it was a live ball. But they really didn't expand on the what ifs. If so, good special teams coaching on Tulsa's part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom