College Football Week 14 - Conference Championship Games and Pseudo Championships

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if some people voted Florida down to prevent us from getting a BCS #2. I'd be OK with that, more than most of them thinking Oregon has a better resume/is better.
 
Because we may not have enough offense to beat you? :D

We would be able to run on Oregon. Same gameplan as LSU and FSU. Let the Defense do it's thing, and on Offense beat the shit out of them in the trenches for 3 quarters until they break and run it down their throats until we get the lead.
 
So, is it possible that all of this is Sirpopopopop's fault? Rutgers loses to Kent State, giving them false hype to rise up in rankings, and then when NIU beat Kent State, they vampired the essence of that Rutger's loss, and achieved their lofty 16th rank, and made Herbie mad?
 
But then he talks about Oregon, which is confusing. His comment would make sense to me if he talked about Florida being compared to Alabama.

Think he was saying people ranked Oregon over us to make sure we did not jump Bama with a #3 human rank and our #2 computer ranking.

I doubt it was even possible though.
 
Consider me confused. On the ESPN bowl schedule page, it has the AutoZone Liberty Bowl with "SEC vs. Tulsa", yet when I go to Iowa State's page it says Iowa State against Tulsa in the AutoZone Liberty Bowl. Wut?
 
Think he was saying people ranked Oregon over us to make sure we did not jump Bama with a #3 human rank and our #2 computer ranking.

I doubt it was even possible though.

Oh. There wasn't any worry about that. Computers are only worth 1/3 of the equation, and Bama was a solid 3 in the computers anyway.
 
Consider me confused. On the ESPN bowl schedule page, it has the AutoZone Liberty Bowl with "SEC vs. Tulsa", yet when I go to Iowa State's page it says Iowa State against Tulsa in the AutoZone Liberty Bowl. Wut?
CUSA vs. SEC is the normal tie in. SEC didn't have enough teams and the Liberty is one of the few bowls that has an at large option. They went after Iowa St.
 
chik.gif
 
CUSA vs. SEC is the normal tie in. SEC didn't have enough teams and the Liberty is one of the few bowls that has an at large option. They went after Iowa St.

Thanks. That would make sense. Considering Iowa State finished 9th in the conference and is bowl eligible and there isn't a bowl for the 9th team Big 12, they would have to be an at large team.
 
But then he talks about Oregon, which is confusing. His comment would make sense to me if he talked about Florida being compared to Alabama.

Oh. There wasn't any worry about that. Computers are only worth 1/3 of the equation, and Bama was a solid 3 in the computers anyway.

Just salty about Oregon being ahead of us in the human polls.

And the computers are weird, so I was just idly speculating that some voters may have done that. Not a concerted effort or anything.
 
Don't be so quick to throw them to the dogs, Their coach is taking the NCSU job. His chances of taking an undermanned team to beat FSU just tripled.

I think he's already abandoned NIU, however. I don't think he's coaching their bowl game.
 
darren rovell ‏@darrenrovell
CRAZY: Northern Illinois will have to buy more Orange Bowl tickets (17,500) than what they avg'd per game this season (15,670)
 
Kirk just said "Don't underestimate EJ Manuel and the offense's ability to keep the game close"

Of course, he said we had zero chance against FSU.
 
Sometimes the schools tell the coach to beat it. I don't know which it was in this case.

The one knock I have on Sumlin (so far) is that he interviewed with A&M in the week leading up to Houston's CCG. Did the interview process cause enough distractions to cost them a BCS bowl? I don't know, but it does make me nervous for what will happen in 3-4 years.
 
Just salty about Oregon being ahead of us in the human polls.

And the computers are weird, so I was just idly speculating that some voters may have done that. Not a concerted effort or anything.

You could also look at the narrow victories over Bowling Green, ULL, and Missouri.

Then see that Oregon had all but two of their games won by the third quarter. The other two, they beat USC by three scores (basically), and loss in OT to Stanford.

Florida has the best resume but Oregon has had a crazy season in terms of the 'eye test'.
 
You could also look at the narrow victories over Bowling Green, ULL, and Missouri.

Then see that Oregon had all but two of their games won by the third quarter. The other two, they beat USC by three scores (basically), and loss in OT to Stanford.

Florida has the best resume but Oregon has had a crazy season in terms of the 'eye test'.

I'll keep my O&B glasses on. Haha. But seriously, playoff is the only way.
 
The one knock I have on Sumlin (so far) is that he interviewed with A&M in the week leading up to Houston's CCG. Did the interview process cause enough distractions to cost them a BCS bowl? I don't know, but it does make me nervous for what will happen in 3-4 years.

There aren't too many jobs better than the one he has. Definitely not a top flight program but close to the top
 
Has anybody figured out what the BCS bowls would have looked like with OSU eligible? Would they have pushed NIU out? Or with OSU potentially in the title game, would the Rose Bowl be forced to take a non-AQ (don't they have to take one every few years)? B1G wouldn't have gotten two teams in, that's for sure.
 
Has anybody figured out what the BCS bowls would have looked like with OSU eligible? Would they have pushed NIU out? Or with OSU potentially in the title game, would the Rose Bowl be forced to take a non-AQ (don't they have to take one every few years)? B1G wouldn't have gotten two teams in, that's for sure.

Ohio State would have been in the title game had they not been banned. There was a big bias in the media poll to keep them down so we didnt have a split title again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom