Star Trek Into Darkness - Official poster revealed, teaser trailer now online

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just hit me that this will be the first time in Trek that Majel Barrett hasn't done the computer voice. :(

Unless they're clever with any possible computer lines and can reuse her voice from all the previous series and films.

Did she do it in the previous film? It wasn't as obvious that it was her in ST09 as it usually is if it was - I certainly didn't recognize her voice in the film.
 
Just hit me that this will be the first time in Trek that Majel Barrett hasn't done the computer voice. :(

Unless they're clever with any possible computer lines and can reuse her voice from all the previous series and films.

As sad as Majel Barrett's passing is, I'm ok with not having her try to do the ST:TOS computer voice again. That was grating.
 
I would find it hilarious if it was Mitchell, because that would make it two fucking movies in a row where the villain's motivations were only explained in the comic book.
 
Just hit me that this will be the first time in Trek that Majel Barrett hasn't done the computer voice. :(

Unless they're clever with any possible computer lines and can reuse her voice from all the previous series and films.

DS9 station didn't use her voice, but they had a good excuse.
 
I would find it hilarious if it was Mitchell, because that would make it two fucking movies in a row where the villain's motivations were only explained in the comic book.

Shouldn't we actually see the movie before discussing how character motivation is handled?
 
Don't worry, I'm sure at the mid-point of the movie Kurtzman and Orci will have the movie stop on a dime and they will have the characters walk us through each of their backstories. As has happened in every single film they've written.
 
Am I the only person tired of them still making every fucking Trek movie a revenge story? Seriously, they are still chasing the success of Wrath of Kahn. Enough is enough.
 
Am I the only person tired of them still making every fucking Trek movie a revenge story? Seriously, they are still chasing the success of Wrath of Kahn. Enough is enough.

Which is why I don't get why everyone shits on Soran. He was the last villain I could actually sympathize with, all he wanted was to get into the Nexus to be with his family. Sure, he killed just about everyone in his way, but at least it wasn't just blind hate.

And it wasn't the typical "save Earth" story, which Trek overuses way too much.
 
Which is why I don't get why everyone shits on Soran. He was the last villain I could actually sympathize with, all he wanted was to get into the Nexus to be with his family. Sure, he killed just about everyone in his way, but at least it wasn't just blind hate.

And it wasn't the typical "save Earth" story, which Trek overuses way too much.

Picard could go back in time to any moment to stop him. Picard chose to go back a few minutes to try to beat him in a fist fight instead of going back days or weeks and stop him easily with full knowledge of his plan and location.
 
Wait, I just saw that Japanese trailer. They really aren't going to
kill spock
AGAIN are they? Cause that was definitely looking like the scene from Wrath of Khan.
 
Picard could go back in time to any moment to stop him. Picard chose to go back a few minutes to try to beat him in a fist fight instead of going back days or weeks and stop him easily with full knowledge of his plan and location.

Correct. So why can't they put a non-revenge villain in a plot that makes sense?
 
Picard could go back in time to any moment to stop him. Picard chose to go back a few minutes to try to beat him in a fist fight instead of going back days or weeks and stop him easily with full knowledge of his plan and location.

Terrible film, but a good villain.
 
Wait, I just saw that Japanese trailer. They really aren't going to
kill spock
AGAIN are they? Cause that was definitely looking like the scene from Wrath of Khan.

'09 had the Kobayashi Maru scene to reference Wrath of Khan, but changed things around. This might be similar.
 
Terrible film, but a good villain.

I hate the vast majority of time travel plots in sci-fi because they create gaping loop holes. That said, I still liked Star Trek IV and City on the Edge of Forever because they weren't that serious and rather fun. Time travel plots have to be cheesy and fun because they don't make enough sense to be serious.
 
I hate the vast majority of time travel plots in sci-fi because they create gaping loop holes. That said, Star Trek IV was the most fun instance of time travel in all of Star Trek. Since time travel plots are always bad, the only way they can be forgiven is if they are fun.
<---- AHEM!
 
Well except the plot point where going back in time was the last ditch effort for skynet, making T2 and the rest a big ol' plot hole. Now Back to the future, that's a time travel plot.

No! You cannot travel to the future and see yourself, it's impossible using Back to the Future's time travel logic!
 
Only just saw the trailer.
It was...pretty poor looking frankly. Not what I expected them to do with the next film at all.

We'll see how it goes. I found the first film lacking but had good foundations (and if they took out the stupid plot contrivance wank that is 'just bumping into older Spock' then its actually quite strong).

This just looks like the building of the fundemenals was a time waste as their seemingly doing nothing of much interest with them. Just sticking around on Earth to protect it from a load of dangers.

I hate the vast majority of time travel plots in sci-fi because they create gaping loop holes. That said, I still liked Star Trek IV and City on the Edge of Forever because they weren't that serious and rather fun. Time travel plots have to be cheesy and fun because they don't make enough sense to be serious.

Watch Doctor Who The Pandorica Opens/The Big Bang; pretty much a mix of serious plot and then just rip roaring 'fuck the rules' time travel fun.
Its how it should be done. If you use time travel a lot it can be used seriously, but should be the shake of a wand not a character getting out spreadsheets or offering random 'time rules'.
 
I'm leaning towards Cumberbatch playing Garth Of Izar.

Guy was a highly respected Fleet Captain, got injured, got healed by aliens, gained superpowers but went nuts and the Feds locked him away in a space funny farm and was forgotten. His backstory would fit the movie's synopsis.
 
I just wish the guy was a new villain.

You have a whole new universe to play with, and you're just going to iterate on old Trek plots once every three years? Why?
 
Looks good so far, but for being a Star Trek movie did not see much action in space in that teaser. Hopefully we will get some space related previews in the next trailer.
 
I'm leaning towards Cumberbatch playing Garth Of Izar.

Guy was a highly respected Fleet Captain, got injured, got healed by aliens, gained superpowers but went nuts and the Feds locked him away in a space funny farm and was forgotten. His backstory would fit the movie's synopsis.

Garth was part of Pike's generation making Cumberbatch too young. Also doesn't explain how he's flying around with super strength and shit.
 
No Klingons? Actually that would be better this way. Shouldn't be about different aliens in each movie. Leave that to the next one.
 
Wait, I just saw that Japanese trailer. They really aren't going to
kill spock
AGAIN are they? Cause that was definitely looking like the scene from Wrath of Khan.

I've seen others suggest that it is
Kahn/Mitchell as he is also wearing that black top Kirk does in the first film.
 
Spoilers, some details from the 9 minute intro to the movie that they're going to show at IMAX viewings of The Hobbit

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=97913
Most intriguing about what was showcased, said to represent the first nine minutes of the film, is that it asks far more questions than it answers. By the time it's done, we still don't know the identity of Benedict Cumberbatch's mystery villain and we're left with the reveal that much of what we've already seen in the trailer is actually part of a separate adventure that joins the Enterprise crew in media res.

The footage opens with Noel Clarke and Kayla Hassan's characters living what appears to be a very ordinary life in the 23rd century. They wake up, make breakfast and drive to a hospital where a little girl, presumably their daughter, is unconscious in bed. The entire scene plays without dialogue, but with a surprisingly powerful Michael Giacchino score, somewhat reminiscent of the tear-inducing opening of Up.

Clearly troubled that he can't do anything to help her, Clarke is standing outside when he's approached by Cumberbatch, who tells him that he can help. Clarke asks who he is and we just get a mischievous Cumberbatch smile.

The rest of the footage finds the Enterprise in the middle of a mission to the same red-colored planet that we see in the trailer. Kirk and McCoy have been visiting the locals undercover and are now making a hasty escape. Hidden at the bottom of the planet's ocean, the Enterprise monitors the mission and, from a shuttle, Spock, Uhura and Sulu make their way inside a volcano. Spock has to head into the volcano to prevent it from erupting and, as lava waves build, it looks like he may not be getting out alive.

Abrams made the point in his introduction that fans have already assumed from the title and the first trailer that the sequel will be overly dark and he's hoping that this footage is going to counter that reaction. What's genuinely great about what happens onscreen is that we're seeing a fun "Star Trek" adventure that gives every single crew member a quick starring moment. We also get enough humor (particularly from Simon Pegg) that manages to make light of exactly the kind of fan over-analysis that the film is sure to generate (i.e. Can the Enterprise even operate underwater?)

It seems a lot of what is in the trailers will be in the first act of the movie. They also don't reveal who the villain is in the first 9 minutes and don't really give strong hints in any direction.
 
So the nine minute shit isn't going to reveal the villain. Well that's fucking annoying.

How long can they keep that under wraps?
 
Well I'm just going to assume that Karl Urban let it slip and that it's Mitchell.

If they keep playing coy for a long fucking time and it turns out to just be Mitchell that would be quite annoying.
 
Spoilers, some details from the 9 minute intro to the movie that they're going to show at IMAX viewings of The Hobbit

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=97913
Most intriguing about what was showcased, said to represent the first nine minutes of the film, is that it asks far more questions than it answers. By the time it's done, we still don't know the identity of Benedict Cumberbatch's mystery villain and we're left with the reveal that much of what we've already seen in the trailer is actually part of a separate adventure that joins the Enterprise crew in media res.

The footage opens with Noel Clarke and Kayla Hassan's characters living what appears to be a very ordinary life in the 23rd century. They wake up, make breakfast and drive to a hospital where a little girl, presumably their daughter, is unconscious in bed. The entire scene plays without dialogue, but with a surprisingly powerful Michael Giacchino score, somewhat reminiscent of the tear-inducing opening of Up.

Clearly troubled that he can't do anything to help her, Clarke is standing outside when he's approached by Cumberbatch, who tells him that he can help. Clarke asks who he is and we just get a mischievous Cumberbatch smile.

The rest of the footage finds the Enterprise in the middle of a mission to the same red-colored planet that we see in the trailer. Kirk and McCoy have been visiting the locals undercover and are now making a hasty escape. Hidden at the bottom of the planet's ocean, the Enterprise monitors the mission and, from a shuttle, Spock, Uhura and Sulu make their way inside a volcano. Spock has to head into the volcano to prevent it from erupting and, as lava waves build, it looks like he may not be getting out alive.

Abrams made the point in his introduction that fans have already assumed from the title and the first trailer that the sequel will be overly dark and he's hoping that this footage is going to counter that reaction. What's genuinely great about what happens onscreen is that we're seeing a fun "Star Trek" adventure that gives every single crew member a quick starring moment. We also get enough humor (particularly from Simon Pegg) that manages to make light of exactly the kind of fan over-analysis that the film is sure to generate (i.e. Can the Enterprise even operate underwater?)

It seems a lot of what is in the trailers will be in the first act of the movie. They also don't reveal who the villain is in the first 9 minutes and don't really give strong hints in any direction.

Man, that sounds pretty great. So the music's gonna make us tear up, huh?
 
I don't understand how him
helping or hurting a family with some sick kid
makes him Khan OR Mitchell, but they said they're doing a TOS S1 villain so it has to be one of them right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom