Would increased gun regulation have prevented Connecticut?

Status
Not open for further replies.
In many states there are more requirements to own and operate a car than having your own personal arsenal.

That should tell you everything.

This is what bothers me the most. People who support complete de-regulation of firearms would be outraged if we suggested the same about automobiles. No one wants to drive on the same road as a bunch of unlicensed drivers.
 
Who knows.

I am a strong supporter of gun control, but I also am a supporter of the const.

I think yearly psych evaluations should become common place for gun owners.

Psych evaluations for new gun owners.

No more being able to buy guns at gun shows without background checks and stuff.

There will always be these kind of tragedies sadly, but if one can be stopped because of a bit more stringent gun control. I think it is worth it
 
Quite the opposite, if more people were carrying a gun it would mean more people capable of killing the shooter before this could take place.
 
I think so. Again, I don't have all the facts with what's happened in CT, but it is far too easy to suit yourself up with a whole cache of weapons. The dude who shot up TDKR screening got all his stuff from the internet. It amazed me how cheaply and easily he was able to outfit himself. I get having a gun to protect yourself, but do people really need access to automatic machine guns and uzis, et al? It's getting ridiculous. We have a couple of these shootings a month now. There has to be an honest conversation about gun control in this country.
They dont
There has to be knowledge about what guns even ARE and what they DO before you can have a discussion

The liberals who think dudes are walking around with Uzi's and MG's are no better than the conservatives who think the body has way's of 'shutting down if it's rape'
 
Prevented? No, the stuff that happened in China today/yesterday happened without a gun. And IIRC the mass killing in Norway happened in a country with pretty strict gun control laws.

Mitigated by a huge amount? Yes, obviously nobody can deny the pure killing power of a gun/s is way superior than a kinfe.
 
Yep, I think we as a nation should be done not talking about how fucking stupid our lax gun laws are. If we wait for a mourning period after every tragedy before we talk, then we'll always just be mourning.

we'll get there eventually. enough kids will die.
 
Can't we start by stopping the manufacturing of guns? I know jobs and blah, blah but as I recall aren't a huge amount of all guns legal and illegal manufactured in the US? Or simply the sale. Still technically second amendment kosher since you can keep them but gun making is pretty high precision, I don't think southern drug lords are really going to start up their own foundries for black market cash and it'd be hard to hide them. Also unlike drugs which can be addictive and social making people spend fortunes on the stuff I think keeping guns highly priced will reduce the amount people have in general.

Most weapons used by the Mexican Narco come from America.
 
Who knows.

I am a strong supporter of gun control, but I also am a supporter of the const.

I think yearly psych evaluations should become common place for gun owners.

Psych evaluations for new gun owners.

No more being able to buy guns at gun shows without background checks and stuff.

There will always be these kind of tragedies sadly, but if one can be stopped because of a bit more stringent gun control. I think it is worth it

You can buy guns off Craigslist with no background check. People can fake psych evals and having met many shrinks...they're not very bright.

This country has a warped view of justice to begin with that seeps into the population...that's the main problem IMO.
 
Just straight up ban the fucking things.

Probability zero. I doubt there will be even a serious attempt to get anything done. Congress is deadlocked and by the time its not, the debate about it won't be particularly vigorous.
 
I don't think it'll happen here in the US, but I want to see a total ban on lethal weapons. That includes all guns, swords, etc. It's over for me. I can't think of a good argument for private ownership of guns anymore.

The only way to stop these massacres is to prevent them from happening in the first place, and that requires either every single person in this country to be good-natured and mentally stable, or a total ban on weapons. There will always be crazy people, so the former won't happen (even with a much better culture and health care; look at Norway for an example). Therefore, we should make the latter a reality.

That will never happen, people need knives and other potential deadly weapons for a variety of reasons such as work and cooking. Let's focus on guns and not be overreacting fools.
 
Stricter laws and bans would help, but it's only one part of any solution.

And really, fuck that argument about "oh, they'll still find a way", that's not a defense of anything. That's stupid, lazy, and doesn't counter-act the argument that guns should be really fucking hard to possess, even legally.
 
Sadly, it does not. It is actually easier to find weapons in the black market. No ID required, no background check, no 10-day waiting period.

Does everyone have black market contacts? I'm not from the US and I've have no idea where to even start if I wanted to get my hands on a gun. I appreciate that it's probably easier over there though.
 
why will the debate die down? this shit is happening continuously.

Democrats have lost the willpower to do anything meaningful on gun control because anything even neutral that is done is looked at as taking away people's precious guns. But honestly while I don't know if stricter gun laws would solve things, we have got to stop going towards looser and looser gun laws.
 
You cannot legislate psychos who don't care about their own lives. It doesn't matter what you do. If this man couldn't buy a gun, legally or illegally, the same harm could be done with a hunting knife. Do not allow the uncontrollable insane people dictate laws. Legal gun owners use their gun responsibly 99% of the time. Removing hat simply leaves you with the illegal gun owners who use guns for illegal purposes far more often.
 
I completely agree with the psychological evaluations, or getting a better handle on mental health on the whole.

How many times do we hear about the shooter causing concern in the weeks/months prior to the tragedy?
 
No, fuck this. Fuck guns. More guns will just mean more dead kids.
What do you mean by "fuck guns"? I feel terribly sad for murdered children as well, but such statement doesn't make any sense, why revoke the right to self-defense?
We have one of the strictest gun regulations in the world here in Brazil, but go ahead and take a look at our crime statistics.
 
from the main thread:

Sounds like the shooter was 20 years old so it was all likely legal firearm ownership. Early reports are a .223 rifle, so this is the resistance he had at acquiring the rifle in his state;

Quote:
Connecticuit Gun Laws for Rifles and Shotguns:
Permit to purchase rifles and shotguns? No
Registration of rifles and shotguns? No
Licensing of owners of rifles and shotguns? No
Permit to carry rifles and shotguns? No

So in other words, zero resistance. Walk in and buy, nothing else required other than to be 18. That doesn't strike even the most hardline gun advocates as a little fucking lax? Takes more effort to get a god damn fishing license in NYS.
 
You have to be insane to be against increased gun regulation that involves psychological checks and background checks, and that makes it harder to illegally purchase firearms. There should be very strict control on sales of weapons and who they are sold to. There needs to be more legislation targeted at straw purchasers as well.

That said, nonsensical things that Piers Morgan like to go on about, such as magazine size and assault weapons bans are really worthless. The < 5 second difference it takes to change a magazine in a modern firearm isn't really going to hamper the effectiveness of someone who wants to create this kind of carnage, and guns are no less deadly when they aren't "assault weapons". The smarter way to legislate this sort of stuff is to make penalties stiffer when such items are used in the perpetration of a violent crime, like they do with hollow points (which are safer to use for home defense than regular bullets).
 
The thing is, while gun control can obviously make a country a whole lot safer and more peaceful, reducing the number of incidents like these -- America is beyond saving.

The Constitution has absolutely screwed you guys over. Firstly, because of the Second Amendment. Secondly, because of federalism -- even if some states' tighten up their regulations, it won't mean much if others don't, because guns will still be plentiful and easy to come by. Thirdly, because thanks to the combination of the Second Amendment and 'constitution worship', gun rights is ingrained in American political culture.

It is the perfect case study of a codified constitution backfiring due to rigidity and age.
 
You cannot legislate psychos who don't care about their own lives. It doesn't matter what you do. If this man couldn't buy a gun, legally or illegally, the same harm could be done with a hunting knife. Do not allow the uncontrollable insane people dictate laws. Legal gun owners use their gun responsibly 99% of the time. Removing hat simply leaves you with the illegal gun owners who use guns for illegal purposes far more often.

A person would not have been able to kill 26 children with a knife. You can say stricter gun laws wouldn't prevent this person from getting the gun.
 
You cannot legislate psychos who don't care about their own lives. It doesn't matter what you do. If this man couldn't buy a gun, legally or illegally, the same harm could be done with a hunting knife. Do not allow the uncontrollable insane people dictate laws. Legal gun owners use their gun responsibly 99% of the time. Removing hat simply leaves you with the illegal gun owners who use guns for illegal purposes far more often.

Absolute rubbish. There's a reason why firearms are so popular, because of their relative ease of use and ability to target individuals over a distance.

Someone holding a knife could be disarmed much easier than someone running around firing rounds off.
 
What do people need to own weapons for, anyway? To go against the Government if their rights are violated? It doesn't matter how many guns you own, you stand no chance against a drone strike. Guns make no difference, American people can't win against their military.

You cannot legislate psychos who don't care about their own lives. It doesn't matter what you do. If this man couldn't buy a gun, legally or illegally, the same harm could be done with a hunting knife. Do not allow the uncontrollable insane people dictate laws. Legal gun owners use their gun responsibly 99% of the time. Removing hat simply leaves you with the illegal gun owners who use guns for illegal purposes far more often.

You genuinely believe he could have killed over 20 persons with a knife? Seriously?
 
You cannot legislate psychos who don't care about their own lives. It doesn't matter what you do. If this man couldn't buy a gun, legally or illegally, the same harm could be done with a hunting knife. Do not allow the uncontrollable insane people dictate laws. Legal gun owners use their gun responsibly 99% of the time. Removing hat simply leaves you with the illegal gun owners who use guns for illegal purposes far more often.

there's a world of difference between a knife and a fucking gun
 
Its no coincidence that these attacks correlate with the rise In anti depressants. Nobody seems to care about their psychotic side effects and just hand them out like candy
 
Well the guy is clearly mentally ill and I bet we'll find out he bought his gun legally.

Why should a person who's sick in the head be allowed to purchase this?

A-GJSUFCUAANr51.jpg


At the very least we need mental evaluations before folks can buy guns
 
why will the debate die down? this shit is happening continuously.

Because its impossible to pass anything meaningful beyond what we've already got due to Republican gun-rights people, so I have my doubts the Democrats are going to want to harp on an issue they can't get anywhere on.

Its practically a meaningless exercise to try and argue for banning all guns. It will never happen.
 
You cannot legislate psychos who don't care about their own lives. It doesn't matter what you do. If this man couldn't buy a gun, legally or illegally, the same harm could be done with a hunting knife. Do not allow the uncontrollable insane people dictate laws. Legal gun owners use their gun responsibly 99% of the time. Removing hat simply leaves you with the illegal gun owners who use guns for illegal purposes far more often.

You can't be serious. Why do you think military personnel carry guns rather than doing all their fighting with knives?
 
I completely agree with the psychological evaluations, or getting a better handle on mental health on the whole.

How many times do we hear about the shooter causing concern in the weeks/months prior to the tragedy?

Exactly. This and Aurora both involved some big mental issues. I have no problem with that at all. I think school should be treated like court houses are when it comes to security as well.
 
Sadly, it does not. It is actually easier to find weapons in the black market. No ID required, no background check, no 10-day waiting period.

Your link's broke but i'm gonna call bullshit. How would James Holmes know where to go to buy a gun on the black market? Or any Joe Schmoe know? And the fear of a sting would put MANY people off. I read an article saying James Holmes would have flagged up on the police radar if he had to buy guns illegally.

the same harm could be done with a hunting knife.

Not a chance in hell unless he's some master assassin
 
What do you mean by "fuck guns"? I feel terribly sad for murdered children as well, but such statement doesn't make any sense, why revoke the right to self-defense?
We have one of the strictest gun regulations in the world here in Brazil, but go ahead and take a look at our crime statistics.

Guns != self-defense.
 
Prevented? No, the stuff that happened in China today/yesterday happened without a gun. And IIRC the mass killing in Norway happened in a country with pretty strict gun control laws.

Mitigated by a huge amount? Yes, obviously nobody can deny the pure killing power of a gun/s is way superior than a kinfe.

But how many died in china? If they swapped a knife for a gun do you think the outcome would be the same?
 
A question: are mentally ill people unable to acquire / store / use guns legally in the US? and if so, would it be too much of a polemic thing to ban gun access to them? I mean, we can all agree that giving a firearm to a mentally unstable person is a horrible idea, yes?
 
Absolute rubbish. There's a reason why firearms are so popular, because of their relative ease of use and ability to target individuals over a distance.

Someone holding a knife could be disarmed much easier than someone running around firing rounds off.
Are you going to try and disarm a man with a 15" knife meant to chop animals apart? I'm not arguing that knives are as efficiently lethal. The point is that they are extremely lethal. The point is this person could have still created this kind of tragedy. Gun banning wouldn't have certainly stopped it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom