Its less of one when you consider Atlus was aware of the Endurance Run and Atlus USA linked to Quick Looks in their newsletters as Video Previews for the Persona PSP rereleases
The endurance run is why I 1. love giant bomb and 2. care about persona
Its less of one when you consider Atlus was aware of the Endurance Run and Atlus USA linked to Quick Looks in their newsletters as Video Previews for the Persona PSP rereleases
Nonono, "Vincent" and "Italian Stallion" are clearly GB terms founded in 2009.
there are weird freezes between scenes that kind of kill the atmosphere
Awwwwwwww. Best list of the year.
Nothing, just a biological imperative doing its thing. Use protection and get a surrogate pet if you don't want to submit to your purpose and accept your mortality yet.Dawwww, makes me want to have children.
What the fuck is wrong with me.
Haha, what a cute ending.
Syndicate is shit. A seriously bad, generic game. GB's dismissal of most FPS games and love for Syndicate casts serious doubt on their tastes.
The premium that they put on even a small unique feature in a game over the pillars of mechanics and presentation is just something that I can't agree with.
Was Diablo 3 even mentioned during GOTY? It was like it didn't exist. I don't think it would have won or even made top 10, but Brad gave it 5 stars. I'm pretty sure 10,000,000 and Space Team got more airtime this week than D3.
I get that the best games should probably stand the test of time, but this is really the case where if the same games came out later in the year they'd be all over them. Especially when stuff like Syndicate was on their top-10 list.
Three games that came out prior to Diablo III, including Syndicate, were on their top ten list. The other two are Journey and Mass Effect 3. Asura's Wrath was also released earlier in the year than Diablo III and it was mentioned all over the deliberations.
I think you're looking too much into the score, really. The five stars for Diablo III is essentially saying "Hey, if you like Diablo and want some more of it, then you need to get this game immediately." Those stars are not necessarily saying it's an amazing game for everyone. The stars they give out imply different things on a case by case basis. For me, being someone who was only somewhat interested in Diablo growing up, those five stars next to Diablo III mean very little. I'm sure it was a wonderful experience for people who are into that sort of thing, though.
I think you're looking too much into the score, really. The five stars for Diablo III is essentially saying "Hey, if you like Diablo and want some more of it, then you need to get this game immediately." Those stars are not necessarily saying it's an amazing game for everyone. The stars they give out imply different things on a case by case basis. For me, being someone who was only somewhat interested in Diablo growing up, those five stars next to Diablo III mean very little. I'm sure it was a wonderful experience for people who are into that sort of thing, though.
While I agree with your post, you could pretty much say the same for XCom right? Or did that title somehow go all blue-ocean and not "fans of the genre"-good like you say happened for Diablo? I mean both sequels had a very, very long gestation time.
PS. I loved the original XCom and the new one too so I don't know how well the game was received by newcomers.
While I agree with your post, you could pretty much say the same for XCom right? Or did that title somehow go all blue-ocean and not "fans of the genre"-good like you say happened for Diablo? I mean both sequels had a very, very long gestation time.
PS. I loved the original XCom and the new one too so I don't know how well the game was received by newcomers.
Thats exactly the case for Xcom. Several of the bombers clearly stated they didnt like Strategy games and yet XCOM managed to capture them.
XCOM managed to make a whole genre available to people. That is quiet a huge accomblishment.
Diablo III is not gonna change you if you hate hack n slash. It is simply a very good hack n slash. Nothing more nothing less.
What I do not understand is how Guild Wars 2 is not even in top 10. Especially with the reasoning behind ZombiU and Syndicate beeing there. Guild Wars 2 managed to reinvent the MMO genre. Much like WoW did 8 years ago.
As a fan of the original Guild Wars, like Jeff the sequel did nothing for me.
Then all MMOs are terrible and dull to me I guess. I played GW mainly for PvE, and it was great for getting a crew together to go on instanced quests without having to deal with the tedious overworld stuff too much. It also went much lighter on the story, letting you focus on the action. I also had a Warrior / Ranger build that was almost unstoppable, but the character stuff in GW2 does nothing for me.Yeah the first one was not even an MMO though. It was more of an online arena fighter. The most hardcore fans of the first dont really enjoy Guild Wars 2. As an MMO guild wars 2 is leaps and bounds better.
As an mmo... I'm not sure if GW2 has the proper non pvp hooks.
the gear grind just doesn't hook me... and having pretty much most of your main combat skills down early on the game is weeeirrrd.
but I lvl up toons in mmos for new skills over new gear and dps, so it might just be me.
Then all MMOs are terrible and dull to me I guess. I played GW mainly for PvE, and it was great for getting a crew together to go on instanced quests without having to deal with the tedious overworld stuff too much. It also went much lighter on the story, letting you focus on the action. I also had a Warrior / Ranger build that was almost unstoppable, but the character stuff in GW2 does nothing for me.
I'm not trying to say that Diablo 3 belongs on their top 10 list, but for the love of christ, you don't think it even deserved to be mentioned on the entire show?
Like I said above, it seems like the exact same situation as Little Big Planet 2 the previous year. Even if 5/5 doesn't mean "best game ever", you'd think all games scored so highly at least merit some discussion.
In fact, I think discussion about a 5/5 game that ultimately didn't make the cut at the end of the year could be hugely interesting.
That's the point though. It's to allow the user to see the process of how they made their choices first hand.tried for years to listen to their GOTY podcasts and couldn't sit through them and this year, its no different. The GOTY final list was hemm hawwing for ages - I think I gave up when they were like "but this has a star" about an hour into the podcast. It was pretty grueling to sit through.
what would have been better if they had worked out what it was, then talk about the game - and then the ones who didn't make it. Format wise, it would have saved me from listening to a lot of "um, yeah.. I like this. cross that off the list, don't cross it off the list".
that said, good pick for GOTY (I went to their website to look at it).
Just finished listening to all the podcasts. Cant say I disagree with them but man everyone seems to concede to anything Jeff says and Jeff seems to only concede on anything so not to look like a total asshole always getting his way. It's clear with Syndicate getting on the top ten list when he was the only one that played it (and maybe also Far Cry's being in the number 3 spot). Patrick is another one...he is so wishy-washy on his opinions anything he says should not even count.
And what the fuck at them totally overlooking Borderlands 2.