• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Movies You've Seen Recently III: The Third Chapter

Status
Not open for further replies.
Strange I was gonna recommend Zodiac when you said you liked Seven:)

I still get the feeling Seven was supposed to be the first of more movies. It feels like an origin story for Freeman's character. The guy is depressed and pretty much ready to kill himself until the events happen, and this turns around at the end after he finds a "purpose". But there never was a sequel.

Zodiac is good too, you should like it. You could watch Panic Room and The Game as well. Both good. Didn't like Benjamin Button (it's very well directed, but it's based on a book by the guy who wrote Forest Gump, and it really feels like self-plagiarism and aimless), and didn't see Social Network or dragon girl.

I'm wary of Fincher's idea of making 20,000 Leagues. Sounds like a bad idea, but better than all other movies he is currently planned to direct.

People here said Zodiac are his best best movie so I gonna watch that next. :D

I like how Freeman's character trying to keep his young partner in check far before the accident, but he ignore it and shit happens.. Everything in movie just connecting to the ending and that what make it powerful. So good..

I don't really feel the dragon girl movie, but its another well directed, smooth and beautifully shot by Fincher, I wish he get strong script again for his next work.
 
Holy Motors - It's pretty weird, despite this film having a reputation as being "crazy" or just plain "random' I found a good amount of it's individual sequences wouldn't actually be out-of-place if each one of them were made into their own individual film, the way all those sequences are framed together with the whole "oscar as a actor" motif is actually kind of genius in a way, and brings up some interesting thoughts about the nature of film, reality and acting, all that good stuff. Some real highlights of the film for me was the
whole transition from the dying uncle sequence, with the uncle ending it by saying "I have a appointment" the motion capture sex scene with it's whole cut to the LOL CG ALIENS LOL moment was also excellent and just plain awesome, I also found the father and daughter conversation in the car was surprisingly poignant despite the overall off-beat nature of the film
definitely had a great time with this, I easily see this making my Top 3 of last-year, unless I see something better in the next couple of days.:p

Red Desert - Man, this has some seriously amazing visuals in how it makes the ugly seem beautiful; but aside from that and the bedtime story sequence I found the whole film kind of a chore to sit through, and at worst it kind of boring, which is a bit of a shame, I can get what they were aiming for with the protagonist and how the visuals represented her own mental state, it sounds like something I'd connect to instantly, but I ultimately found the experience of seeing it play out on screen to be kind of hollow and uninteresting, it's something I'll definitely revisit it someday, but I'm pretty disappointed in it since I loved Blow-up so much. Wonder if I'll end up being one of those guys where the only antonioni film I like is Blow-up. On a another note - I'm pretty sure Ingmar Bergman was one of those guys.
 
I'm so here for those last two posts, not even gonna post my Holy Motors review because of how spot on that was...But I do have a Life of Pi one.
 
I'm so here for those last two posts, not even gonna post my Holy Motors review because of how spot on that was...But I do have a Life of Pi one.
Post your Life of Pi one because I might see it since I have to be in town for like 2-3 hours later this week for a appointment and need some time to kill.
 
The Searchers - The quintessential Western with Ford and Wayne at the peak of their artistry. Breath-taking cinematography and a story about a man coming to terms with himself make it a fond and well-deserved classic. 5/5
 
Take this journey with me Wilbury. Hold my hand into the light.

kiss.gif
 
The Searchers - The quintessential Western with Ford and Wayne at the peak of their artistry. Breath-taking cinematography and a story about a man coming to terms with himself make it a fond and well-deserved classic. 5/5

The Searchers is almost the quintessential anti-western western in terms of it's overarching themes, lost nationalist identity, and rupturing of the skewed American view of morality. It's a really complex film that also has a lot of interesting things to posit about gender roles during the era.
 
The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928)

To say the movie was great is an understatement, I'm speechless at the beauty of this film.

I didn't think a silent film could make me cry, I feel lucky to be able to see it since it was lost for so long. To think they rediscovered it in a mental institution is incredible. The soundtrack Criterion added was fantastic, that torture chamber scene was amazing with it. The characters were so convincing too, those judges/priests were great.
 
Watched Heat on the airplane ride back home, been meaning to watch it for some time.

I definitely liked the deliberately slower, more somber pace the film took as opposed to most other crime action movies, but can anyone explain that Eady chick? I just can't help but feel she's a pretty stupid character in an otherwise pretty good set of well-written ones. She just seemed accepting of DeNiro's bullshit for no real reason, and the whole time I thought she was going to just drive off at the hotel scene at the end. I figured she was going to be distraught at all the chaos going on, she'd realize it's DeNiro being an asshole despite explicitly making a big deal about how they were going to get away, she says "fuck this", abandons him with the car, DeNiro comes down to the parking lot, he goes "oh shit" as he finally realizes he pushed her too far, he runs away with Pacino in pursuit and they have the final showdown in the airport. Instead she just sticks around with an "omg" face as he abandons her. I know they were calling back the whole "walk away from what you love within 30 seconds" thing, but I think it was made at the expense of Eady's character. It just made her look like a total carpet to be walked on with no real character of her own.

Or maybe I'm stupid and I missed some important detail that made it all make sense.
 
Halfway through watching Apollo 13 for the first time(my Dad had to take a break to get up and walk around as his back/legs were aching) and I'm diggin' it so far.

I can feel a huge space-movie kick coming on, and the first item on the agenda is going to be to watch 2001, as I've never seen it before.
 
Jeff Who Lives At Home

It reminds me of one of those movies that makes you think "there is a reason for everything or everyone has a purpose." But unfortunately the movie doesn't follow through on that concept very well during the movie.

It's an okay movie with a very good cast, definitely worth a watch.

6/10
 
After mulling it over for a while (months, even) and allowing my own thoughts, together with various reviews and reactions, percolate in my brain, as I like to do with works in which I detect potential layers of experience waiting to be peeled away, I realized that my initial impression of Holy Motors was the one that stuck : I got nothing particularly meaningful about life or art from it, beyond very surface level observations, but enjoyed it so much for what it was - a kind of strange odyssey curated by the quintessential actor taking upon wildly different roles over the course of a day with no real rhyme or reason, as people will do when the situation befits it - that I feel like the movie could have gone on for eight hours without every really getting tiring. Fun stuff, and yet another good reason to adore the French.
A eight-hour cut of Holy Motors covering every single type of film genre, trope and scene under the sun would be pretty damn awesome, and would make for a even better homage to film than the film already was to begin with. I'd imagine the protagonist would also look pretty damn exhausted by the end of the film too. All those appointments! of course they could always employ multiple protagonists in the theoretical 8-hour cut of Holy Motors! :p
 
Les Miserables -
Some of it was very good to great other parts are poorly directed even boring, way too much quick cuts and shaky cam in the first half, 2nd half is handled much better. A few people clapped at the end, but like I said the 2nd half to the end is done well. Most dissapointing thing is this should have been a great movie they had the actors, story and music, it does have some great moments but it goes from great to almost bad. Joel Shuemacher's version of The Phantom of the Opera was done better imo, but I think I am in the minority in that view. Jackman and Crowe were very good, the actor playing Marius stood out, Eponine was good also. I give it about a 7.5 slightly higher than the critics 70% RT rating. I am a fan of the original music it is the only Broadway play I have seen twice, so I would still reccomend it especailly to fans.

The Bourne Legacy -
I liked this much more than I thought I would, not as good as any of the Matt Damon movies, but so many people told me how bad it was I was expecting a turd. It has good action and acting, was never really bored. I would see the next one if they continue doing them, maybe a cheap matinee showing though.
 
Two obscurities I somehow found on Netflix Instant!

Leo the Last (Boorman)

"Hey guys! Remember Zardoz? I found a film just like it!"

I have. Leo the Last must be Zardoz's older brother: a disorienting blending of Antonioni, Beckett, Polanski, and just a smidgen of Fellini to wrap it all up. The difference is that Leo the Last makes some kind of sense out of its weird content and conventions, though even that might be a stretch.

Take, for instance, the opening minutes of it. The movie opens to a wonderful song from the eclectic Fred Myrow (an associate of Jim Morrison) and Ram John Holder, the latter syncopating a funky tune about how Leo's seeing faces in the windows. I almost feel like Boorman set precedents for films like Fritz the Cat to follow by using this Kenneth Anger device not only to sell the movie, but also to provide opening exposition. Very quickly, however, the musicians themselves—Ram and the backing vocalists included—start narrating Leo's train of thought after the opening car ride. Every one of Leo's assistant happens to have unique quirks that define them as caricatures more so than characters. By the time Leo, prince of a struggling monarchy, gets into bed, I'm about as confused as he is!

Confusion works in this film as a device to sell a particular world-view known only to Leo, played perfectly by Marcello Mastroianni himself. One of the most interesting elements in the film is Peter Suschitsky's inventive iris-lens cinematography, used during sequences involving Leo using his little refractive telescope to bird-watch from his bedroom. It's not just a reference to Rear Window, but an excellent way to evoke both claustrophobia and a sense of wonder whenever prince Leo whips the device out. On the other hand: the way Boorman structures each long-take iris shot within the movie's structure is also the biggest flaw of the whole product. He drags many of the sequences on far too long, utilizing needless pan transitions to obscure plot information for as long as possible. I think Leo the Last absolutely relishes in great ideas, but the fact that this key element, fully developed by the last third of the film, feels poorly executed when all's said and done.

I'll say the same for a few other sequences in the movie that feel off and ruin the whole experience. First up: why include a royal orgy at all? The gist behind that sequence—for all of those who might now be wondering—is that Laszlo, the secret commander of Leo's estate, wants to bond each courtesan and attendant together in ultra-conservative fascist love. He does so by having them go through a particular brand of calisthenics—take a look at the film poster to see what I mean. But bobbing up and down and running one's fingers across the humerus in a large public bath is definitely different from outright sex. I think that, to sell the movie's theme of inarticulate communication when attacked by both the privileged and the non-privileged, Boorman should have cut out that orgy sequence and trimmed down the pool stuff. The latter fits best when kept brief and the former feels like a poor attempt to evoke Fellini without the subtlety of Buñuel.

In general, though, comparing Leo the Last's content and treatment of its characters to what's in Buñuel's and Fellini's films is like pitting apples against oranges. Boorman's sometimes-bore of a story focuses on Leo's second upbringing in a dream-like version of London (shot in Soho), where black-and-white caricatures of people live and fight each other inside black-and-white houses. By channeling visual elements from Rear Window, Red Desert, and Eisenstein's old films, Boorman clearly wants to show how a certain state of mind can drive a man to do incredible things.

Leo feels out of his realm even within his own mansion: he's considered a naïve, dog-whimpering fool by his nationalistic associates, and the confused African-English locals living in the surrounding ghetto don't trust his authority either. It's only once he realizes Laszlo and the rest are using him to keep the outsiders enthralled—primarily by endorsing the local pimps terrorizing the public and keeping Leo's estate afloat—that he, the ungainly prince of a foreign power, begins to emphasize with the people living out there. What ensues out of all this is an absurd comedy-drama that evokes post-war theater of the absurd and acts as European proto-blaxploitation.

There's a lot to like in Leo the Last, really. Boorman's daring adaptation of George Tabori's play takes the usual set-up of "lone man trying to reclaim reality by defeating id and super-ego" and transposes it into a hermetic world where the director sets up his own unique rules. Monochrome pigeons represent the kind of freedom Leo strives for, especially when they're unleashed in the midst of a convenience store. Powerless prostitutes become symbols of innocence and a kind of motivation for Mastroianni's character to, at the very least, replace his insane court with a more stable life on the streets. And, all throughout this surreal examination of how a weak instinct adapts to post-modern life, plenty of subversive humor, social commentary, and a story-selling performance by Mastroianni buttresses the whole shebang. Even the supporting cast, ridden with roles as black-and-white as the environment they live, provides great performances, especially the Peter Lorre-like Vladek Sheybal and excluding the ill-fitting Billie Whitelaw.

All that said: I wish Boorman edited this movie more succinctly. Hilarity and brilliant photography don't do too well when the film could use half an hour less! If he truly wanted the audience to empathize Leo through the film's exhaustive style, then he should have worked on his basic film-making first.

Joe Bob sez check it out!?

***

•

The Cow (Mehrjui)

Sometimes the simplest stories deserve the most straightforward renditions, and The Cow receives the talents of a great film-maker like Darius Mehrjui in equal doses all over.

I wanted a well-balanced introduction to Iranian cinema; The Cow, as it turns out, may very well have courted enough favor with the Ayatollah Khomeini to effectively save the eruptive Iranian New Wave from early destruction. This film effectively tells a story of one's loss of innocence that, perhaps, may have alerted the new theocratic government of potential anti-establishment symbolism. What I see in The Cow's tale of spiraling disaster isn't so much a political jab at the Ayatollah by a plucky young director and the story's original writer, but a tale of general disappointment in how the average Iranian lives his or her life lying and betraying their inner emotions. All-throughout The Cow, seemingly innocuous villagers hide their nightly activities from one another, and only a deeply-affected old man like Hassan shows his hand to everyone in a blunt manner. Inevitably, the village elders can do nothing but bear with his inexplicable loss and how he tries to stay sane because of it.

Much of the beauty of The Cow is how it circumvents a less-than-subtle dub track to showcase realistic performances by everyone involved. Entezami embodies Hassan not through perfunctory dialogue, but through increasingly expressive body language and a decline in facial expression. Because he has to act as the only normal man left in the village, an individual torn to pieces more by accidental village husbandry than by fate, the importance placed on his role requires having an excellent performance. Every other actors does a reasonable job themselves, from the man playing the village idiot to Eslam's actor, saddled with both the villagers' complaints and a need to protect Hassan. Unfortunately, and not without reason, I feel like the women actors didn't live up to the level presented by the primary cast; granted, they don't get much screen time and The Cow is definitely a story about how men destroy themselves over a man. There's only so much I can ask for in a lower-budget film like this!

In other respects, The Cow does suffer from more immediate issues, mostly related to cinematography. Director Mehrjui alternates between deeper staging in daytime and shallow spaces at night-time and, though much of the art direction and visuals succeed in depicting Hassan's environment, the camera movements and spare contrasts don't always work. Whenever used with more daring compositions and intense sequences like the theives' escape, I think the night cinematography doesn't just accentuate the most important parts of the village, but also stylizes a realistic story to the point that both believability and an unsettling mood pop out from the woodwork. Daytime feels a lot less ambitious, outside of some subtle, clever framing of shots involving a two-panel divide between the elders and lone individuals in the frame.

There's a clear inconsistency in the efficacy of some shots versus others; when it comes to the more free-camera moments, some sequences last longer than others, and usually not for the best. When Hassan's playing with his pregnant cow, for example, the length of those sequences feels appropriate in emphasizing his love for her. When he's doing crazy stuff like running scared at night, the editing becomes an issue again and the screen gets cluttered with repetitive imagery. The Cow's a movie where every image counts as a means of conveying a lot of information about a little story, and it suffers from the most easily-fixed editing struggles. One thing they didn't skimp on, at least, is the impressive musical score, with flute in the day and unsettling string arrangements at night. The sound accompaniment aids the film's editing most of all, and I think the soundtrack deserves an album release of some kind.

Ultimately, The Cow doesn't strive for the kind of ambition I most prefer in cinema. It's like a pearl that feels great and doesn't shine—but it's certainly not a waste of one's time. From the start, The Cow exudes both relaxed character interactions and tension in the plot itself. What seems carefree in the day, when everyone's chatting and village politics flow freely, soon turns angular and threatening when someone's making a run for the other village's chickens, or perhaps keeping watch on certain members of the group. This film opens with a memorable sequence: the kids and Saffar's son, equipped with torches, torture the village idiot for fun, not realizing their immoral behavior until the elders halt them. As a play on the eroding honesty of individuals and the frank horrors of living on the desolate plains, The Cow had me hooked from start to finish with a stripped-down story that constantly supplies speculation. While I could go into further detail on why this film so thoroughly works as a cornerstone in Iranian cinema, I'm sure this brief review tells enough already, just like the actual movie.

Joe Bob sez eat more chikin.

****
 

Thanks for this!

I've been meaning to watch 'Star of David: Beautiful Girl Hunter' for years because the director also made 'Sex and Fury' and 'School of the Holy Beast' which are both fantastic. It is also supposed to be the most extreme of the pinky violence films.


I'm a huge sucker for Gialli and I've only seen one of Bava's films, though I'm the biggest Argento fan, so thanks for this.

You will also want to watch 'The Girl Who Knew Too Much' then as it is credited as being the first giallo. This pales in comparison to the classic gialli, but it is always cool to see the roots.


As for Boorman, I love Excalibur! No Arthurian legend film comes close. I even own the soundtrack!
 
The Bourne Legacy -
I liked this much more than I thought I would, not as good as any of the Matt Damon movies, but so many people told me how bad it was I was expecting a turd. It has good action and acting, was never really bored. I would see the next one if they continue doing them, maybe a cheap matinee showing though.


Same here. It's a good movie, and has the same strong sides as the other Bournes (except Matt Damon)




I watched True Grit, which was a bit strange. I was expecting a totally serious movie, but it's kind of funny. Not great, but entertaining nontheless.
 
Here it is, my top ten films of 2012 (with honorable mentions), on the first page:

The Best Films of 2012



Now on to 2013.
Nice list man. Totally agree about Once Upon a Time in Anatolia. Thought it was fantastic. Can't wait to see Zero Dark Thirty.

Amour is an interesting one. Clearly a good movie, but a really tough watch for me. And not one I have any desire to revisit. Had some uh..dealings with the subject matter in recent years I'm afraid.
 
Mamma Mia!
Umm, so the music was good, but this was probably one of the silliest and hokiest movies I've ever seen. Who thought it was a good idea to let Pierce Brosnan sing, particularly on a song like "SOS?" Still though, I have to admit I actually had fun watching this. The soundtrack helped it out a lot.

Seven Samurai
One of my goals has been to watch more foreign films, and I figured Kurosawa was a good place to start. I really enjoyed the deliberate pace of this. When you take time to develop your main characters, such as the samurai here, you really raise the stakes to make me care very deeply what happens to them. Most films don't get this, but Kurosawa certainly does, and I really like his style- there are quite a few shots here that will stick out in my mind for a long time, especially the last one of the film. I enjoyed Yojimbo and it was fantastic watching Toshiro Mifune star in this one and be almost the complete opposite from his character there. I found this one to be way better than Yojimbo, though that may have something to do with me having seen A Fistful of Dollars before and it largely staying the same from a story perspective. Anyway, this is one I'd like to own at some point, and I'm really glad I finally watched it.

As far as Kurosawa goes, I have Ran and Rashomon on my list to watch. What else would you guys recommend?
 
tried watching karate-robo zabrogar last night and wasn't really feeling it. got 30 minutes in and while it was a fairly enjoyable send-up of those old live-action tv shows, it wasn't clever or funny enough to make it something special. maybe i'll give the rest of it a shot sometime.

still in the mood for live action japanese movie, so i'm gonna try the ruroni kenshin adaptation tonight.
 
Hey Cosmic, AU, swoon, count, or FnordChan have you guys seen any of these? Tatsumi Kumashiro’s Twisted Path of Love looks cool as does Angel Guts: Red Classroom.



Edit: Looks like the Angel Guts movie is the second in the series. Looks like I have me some trashy Japanese films to watch.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_Guts

i've seen high school co-ed and i'll say all pink violence movies should just be trailers. i can't dig that genre for 90 minutes or whatever. it's like all the worse parts of giallo movies meets all the worst parts of cat III nonsense.
 
A bout de souffle (Godard)

Aha! This is the Thunderbird film I've been dreaming to see!

It's a great one, for sure. But what makes it hinders it too. Breathless, as a film, is so giddy with its inventive editing that it jump-cuts in just some of the most inconvenient moments. I can understand why Godard liked using for travel shots and as a quick time-skip device, but there's no reason to chop up a shot's structure when barely any time's passing at all. There's a time when making a movie more self-aware and conveying humorous comments on film form to the audience works—but this didn't do anything for me. I also don't see why the story starts with Michel musing to the viewers: if I feel like I should listen in to his stream of consciousness, then I should hear it more often as a way to connect important sequences in the film and not as an excuse for Godard to say "this film's damn assured". Perhaps he's just such a subversive director and felt the need to convey that, but there's inventive recognition of a medium and then there's inventive, interconnecting tissue to bind it all together.

jump cuts aren't to progress time. just watch the sean with michael and jean in the car and he's telling her not to see the american guy. it has both match cuts and jump cuts - used for different reasons.

it's not stream of consciousness, as if godard cared enough of about michel's pov to want that to be expressed it's the films past - it's literally in the title. though if you don't understand the point of the loafing around and casual sex maybe you don't understand pacing at all.

Breathless does to do best when it's meandering through the plainly mixed streets of Paris, where both the best and the worst mingle with nonchalance all the same. The only act of the movie that drags—and not by much, I might add—is the second of four, wherein Michel and Patricia have a candid roundabout of child-like gaming and casual sex. For them, life flies by without a moment of fresh air to compose themselves. Belmondo's shifty shower-head of a man embraces the unpredictable; Seberg's cautious coastal woman seeks out security; the passive-aggressive couple find themselves separated by their own vanities more so than from physical distance. Godard's biggest success in Breathless isn't so much developing an interesting relationship as it is taking a unique couple and putting them into increasingly hectic scenarios across the city, inevitably ending in a tragic death that both see coming. Yet, for Michel and Patricia, a boring man might as well be a dead man, an observation brought up first by Melville's author character and then realized at the precipice of the two's relationship.

they aren't plainly shots streets of paris it was (and still is) a new way to see those streets - if you want more homework, try to find those streets in a film before breathless and report back on how he filmed them differently.

do you really think they have a passive-agressive relationship? what do you think agressive would be? actually forcing her to have an abortion?


As important as it is, Breathless often recognizes its own humbleness and, thankfully, doesn't put on too much of a cocky presentation. Martial Solal's excellent jazz score contextualizes and stylizes the couple's exploits with Western-influenced brassiness and a French romanticism that lingers in the piano's genteel walk. The venerable Raoul Coutard provides an excellent mix of shaky-but-not-too-shaky cinematography and restrained photography, putting the actors wherever in the frame they ought to be for the desired effect. Ultimately, every Jean in the movie carries his or her performance to its apotheosis; I still don't know any other film that has so many leading Jean roles, and for that I'm grateful. For Breathless in full, I'm quite grateful. It's an interesting take on a doomed pairing that most film-goers can find something of interest in, either as an important "classic" or as a undulating romance.

.[/QUOTE]

uh, breathless is one of the cocky, fuck you to film ever made. maybe watch less movies, but seek to understand movies. and i don't understand who these reviews are for, you seem to speaking to an audience that isn't there.
 
I got the impression that two of his more well-known films, Point Blank and Deliverance, showed more restraint or at least had less flaws to their name. Feel free to correct if I'm wrong, though. There's nothing wrong with interesting yet flawed films like Leo the Last. They give me more to talk about than normal.

We have Excalibur and Zardoz at the family house, so I'll give them a whirl when the time comes. His is a funky career; I think I'll look into Peter Hyams' movies as well, since both directors make excellent action stuffs.

Grab a copy of Projections #1 to read Boorman's early '90s journal. It's a really interesting to hear his thoughts on a number of these past films and the trials involved in getting them - and one passion project - made. He's a humble guy.


I've seen quite a few of these. Swoon is right: they're often better left in condensed form. That's not to say there aren't gems in the list (or the genre as a whole) but there's a reason they were titled and marketed in such bawdy, salacious ways. Still, I love watching pinky flicks despite the general lack of substance... or coherence.
 
Sherlock Holmes: Game of Shadows

I watched the first of these some time back not expecting a great deal and was pleasantly surprised, so I went into this expecting something and was disappointed. Not as funny, or as fun as the original - I picked up on references this time that I didn't originally (because I've read all of the books since) so those were nice touches, but the story seemed so vague to me.

That said, I'm not a fan of the books either so perhaps it's a fairly faithful (attempted humour aside) in that sense.

Also, I kept thinking Moriarty was being played by Richard Stilgoe.
 
Life of Pi - Now take in mind this is all coming from the mind of a former Buddhist turned atheist. I found the camera work in this film to be by far its most impressive aspect. The dynamic scope of the lens and its lush vibrant colors breathe life into its narrative by rendering a somewhat overly sappy tale into one that is highly evocative. The cinematography captures its subjects in the most intimate manner and also transitions at the most optimal times to capture the landscape's vivacity from an utmost wide arena. The turbulent waves double as the personification of the film's multiple climaxes and as the embodiment of the protagonist's shifting level of faith. The tiger as man at his most base level of of existence. Pi's most imaginative musings on existential connectivity and inter-dimensionality coincide with the camera work and the plot devices in the most harmonious fashion. It works even if it is accomplished by accident. However, the film's narrated format and sporadic focus on the trivial minutia of the narrator's themselves detracts from the magic contained in the otherwise engrossing fairytale that is Life of Pi. 7/10
 
Swoon what did you think of Holy Motors?

it's really good and sometimes moving statement on film and surprisingly love.

i don't like it more than pola x or even lovers on a bridge. but it's a lot more assured and focused film than those.

i like how he brings back a character from the otherwise dismal toyko! which makes me wish this was more of a statement about those city compilations, but i suspect he likes those things.
 
Grab a copy of Projections #1 to read Boorman's early '90s journal. It's a really interesting to hear his thoughts on a number of these past films and the trials involved in getting them - and one passion project - made. He's a humble guy.
Interesting. I'll add this to my queue of literature, then. Great recommendation!

uh, breathless is one of the cocky, fuck you to film ever made. maybe watch less movies, but seek to understand movies. and i don't understand who these reviews are for, you seem to speaking to an audience that isn't there.
I copied the review from my Letterboxd profile. To be honest, I think I'm going to just post snippets from the reviews I put up there. This one for Breathless is pretty flawed and I've done much better. I'll PM you about this conversation in just a bit.

Godard always ends up with blood on these threads.
So it seems. I'll watch a few more before bringing any one of them up in this thread.
 
it's really good and sometimes moving statement on film and surprisingly love.

i don't like it more than pola x or even lovers on a bridge. but it's a lot more assured and focused film than those.

i like how he brings back a character from the otherwise dismal toyko! which makes me wish this was more of a statement about those city compilations, but i suspect he likes those things.

Yes! Though there were moments where I wish it had lingered on for longer before devolving into another cinematic episode.
 
i mean calling it humble is just so dumb. and all those words for what.

i've only seen bad movies on airplanes for a month so maybe i'm just bitter.
Hey i don't have an opinion one way or the other, since i've only seen one Godard film so far. (and it wasn't Breathless)
I think he's out of my depth though, so i'm not dying to see more as of now.
i like how he brings back a character from the otherwise dismal toyko! which makes me wish this was more of a statement about those city compilations, but i suspect he likes those things.
What did you hate about it? I only found the third short genuinely awful (the Joon-Ho Bong one), and it didn't seem to be that cohesive as a whole (nor particularly striking as a picture of Tokyo), nonetheless i still enjoyed the first two shorts in and out of themselves.

So it seems. I'll watch a few more before bringing any one of them up in this thread.
Eh, i meant that as a good thing; discussions like these are the most interesting part of this thread, even as a lurker; too bad Snowman left.

I think the thematic and meta-communicative aspects of Contempt are rather easy to understand though equally if not more deeply layered if you ever feel provoked to watch another.
I'll get to that, when i decide to give him another shot, then.
So far i've only seen Vivre Sa Vie, but as i said i felt a bit taken aback, as it was kind of different from what i'm used to.
 
I think the thematic and meta-communicative aspects of Contempt are rather easy to understand though equally if not more deeply layered if you ever feel provoked to watch another.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom