• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Deadspin: (Notre Dame football player) Manti Te’o’s Dead Girlfriend is a hoax

Status
Not open for further replies.
So board lawyers if manti wishes can he sue the shit out of deadspin? It's obvious now to everyone that they did a hatchet job......what are his options?
oh, a joke character

Te'os constantly changing story is the real hatchet job. When did him and his "gf" meet? Seriously, there are like 3 different versions. Was it in 2009? Their first twitter interaction several years later seems to contradict that

Edit: yes, right above me. Originally, they meet at the Stanford game in 2009. In this interview with ESPN, "he didn't know Kekua until 2010". twitter contradicts both
 
So board lawyers if manti wishes can he sue the shit out of deadspin? It's obvious now to everyone that they did a hatchet job......what are his options?
Luckily for Manti, defamation suits by famous individuals have a significantly lower threshold relative to suits by members of the general public. Should be a shoo in, no problemo, slam dunk for the Heartbreaker from Honolulu.
 
Luckily for Manti, defamation suits by famous individuals have a significantly lower threshold relative to suits by members of the general public. Should be a shoo in, no problemo, slam dunk for the Heartbreaker from Honolulu.
Mighty Manti bout to make bank, between the suit and the fact that he'll probably be drafted one overall after overcoming all this adversity.
 
So board lawyers if manti wishes can he sue the shit out of deadspin? It's obvious now to everyone that they did a hatchet job......what are his options?

No. Truth is a defense to libel plus he's a public figureso he'd have to show actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth, which he would not be able to do. And of course he'd never want to have to publicly explain his embellishments and why he continued the charade after he knew it was a hoax.
 
So board lawyers if manti wishes can he sue the shit out of deadspin? It's obvious now to everyone that they did a hatchet job......what are his options?

tumblr_m21x55ie681r3xqdd.gif
 
No. Truth is a defense to libel plus he's a public figureso he'd have to show actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth, which he would not be able to do. And of course he'd never want to have to publicly explain his embellishments and why he continued the charade after he knew it was a hoax.
No, man. Te'o totally has this suit in the bag. Totally easy for public figures to win defamation suits, that's why it happens all day, every day. That's why all of those celebrity gossip rags have been put out of business.
 
No, man. Te'o totally has this suit in the bag. Totally easy for public figures to win defamation suits, that's why it happens all day, every day. That's why all of those celebrity gossip rags have been put out of business.

If I have learned anything from this thread, it is that this guy knows whats up. And I hear he has some quality lawyering skill, acquired from the great state of Florida. That is where the Championship game took place, too. So it is almost like he was on the scene as this developed.

Point being, I'm sure he is correct here.
 
It's amazing how much you can get away with if people think you're stupid.
He's not getting away with anything, all we're witnessing right now is how much juice ND has as an institution in the USA. If Te'o had been unfortunate enough to have attended USC he would be getting ripped to shreds right now instead of having the media attempt to help him rewrite history and restore his credibility. From the beginning this has been about protecting the school's reputation and not Te'o's.

I would imagine that the NRA is in total awe.
 
So board lawyers if manti wishes can he sue the shit out of deadspin? It's obvious now to everyone that they did a hatchet job......what are his options?

You are fighting a losing battle. Every day that goes on it becomes more obvious he was in on it.
 
Maybe because Deadspin told him or some people close to him that they were going to run the story on a particular day?

Didn't RT send the direct message 2 hours before the Deadspin story broke on their site? You don't think that was just by luck do you?

Of course the DM apology was motivated by the fact that he was about to be outed as Lennay on Deadspin. The issue in question is whether it was a legit confession/apology or one that was staged.

If we assume the latter, we have to believe that both of them would have been smart enough to come up with a plan of sending a fake apology DM, with the intent of using that as "proof" later that Te'o was not in on the hoax. And we also have to assume that Tuiasosopo would be okay with taking the fall for Te'o. What would be his motivation for doing that? Love? Money? Both?

The latter explanation, to me, requires too many assumptions and gets too deep into conspiracy territory for me. The simplest explanation is often the correct one.
 
Okay, also confused here. Isn't @lennykay a parody account by that time? "Her" Twitter account was changed to something else back in September. Unless I don't understand Twitter.

Also, I could be mistaken, but isn't one of those over 140 characters?
 
That read like a terrible tease.

Kept going on and on about forgiveness and how he will tell him everything and right before he does it cuts off.

If the hotel lobby story is true, where he and or his friends showed on the day of the BCS Championship game and then one of them called Manti and joked with him asking "we are in the lobby is Lennay with you in your room?" ... then what remorse and forgiveness is he talking about? They were laughing it up as recently as a few days ago.
 
So does he try to get a 0 on the wonderlic to prove his innocence? It is multiple choice, so if he is really dumb he may luck into some answers.
 
Schaap's roadside recap that went to air is embarrassing for all involved. There are cars zipping by in the background and Jeremy clearly looks drained from sitting with Te'o for two and a half hours.

This aired on the 1 am Sports Center? Ridiculous.....
 
So board lawyers if manti wishes can he sue the shit out of deadspin? It's obvious now to everyone that they did a hatchet job......what are his options?

There's a certain point where insane fandom descends into actual insanity.

You are well past that point.
 
He granted ESPN an interview. I am sure they set up parameters. Whether it was Schaap or any other interview personality they have, they weren't going to get away with just grilling the dude. He interviewed him for 2.5 hours with an attorney present. And Schaap still led of his report by saying there are inconsistencies and that its up to the viewers to decide. He didn't claim I BELIEVE MANTI 100%

He repeatedly stresses that Manti was very believable. He is full of shit and sold his journalistic integrity in this case for access. I expected better from him
 
He repeatedly stresses that Manti was very believable. He is full of shit and sold his journalistic integrity in this case for access. I expected better from him

or maybe...he actually thinks Manti came across as believable? Maybe he's a good liar (would explain a lot) but that doesn't mean that Schaap sold out. Everyone wants so bad for this to be what they want it to be that you guys are willing to paint the picture as much ND and Teo's people are.
 
Okay, also confused here. Isn't @lennykay a parody account by that time? "Her" Twitter account was changed to something else back in September. Unless I don't understand Twitter.

The parody account was created on 1/16, but I don't think any one knows the exact time. I think it is safe to assume it was AFTER the Deadspin story posted, which was at 4:10 PM EST. I don't know how Twitter time stamps their DMs, but if those are time stamped with EST, then these were sent prior to Deadspin's story. Which would mean it had to be from someone involved in the hoax, most likely Tuiasosopo.

ETA: ESPN has now made note of the correction they made to the article about the hoax affecting Te'o's play. They are chalking it up to a transcription error. Funnily enough, the Sportscenter app still has the original version of the story.
 
The parody account was created on 1/16, but I don't think any one knows the exact time. I think it is safe to assume it was AFTER the Deadspin story posted, which was at 4:10 PM EST. I don't know how Twitter time stamps their DMs, but if those are time stamped with EST, then these were sent prior to Deadspin's story. Which would mean it had to be from someone involved in the hoax, most likely Tuiasosopo.

ETA: ESPN has now made note of the correction they made to the article about the hoax affecting Te'o's play. They are chalking it up to a transcription error. Funnily enough, the Sportscenter app still has the original version of the story.
How exactly can a story about the hoaxers being at his hotel be a transcription error? And people are still making those that see this as a cover-up into crazy conspiracy theorists?
 
I'm not one to beg admins for favors, but I've noticed there's one special poster in this thread who really needs an avatar. He/she currently lacks one and I think it's really unfortunate for him/her.

And it's purely a coincidence, but I came across this lovely jpeg.

X7lDTpk.jpg


And wowzers, it just so happens to be the perfect dimensions - the perfect dimensions for some special domer who has gone out of his/her way to prove his/her devotion to a very special linebacker.

Just putting it out there.
 
How exactly can a story about the hoaxers being at his hotel be a transcription error? And people are still making those that see this as a cover-up into crazy conspiracy theorists?

No, the error was in whether or not it affected his play.

Due to a transcription error, how Manti Te'o felt he played in the BCS title game was misreprsented in an earlier version of this story. Te'o said he was not affected by the story surrounding a girlfriend hoax during the game.
 
The parody account was created on 1/16, but I don't think any one knows the exact time. I think it is safe to assume it was AFTER the Deadspin story posted, which was at 4:10 PM EST. I don't know how Twitter time stamps their DMs, but if those are time stamped with EST, then these were sent prior to Deadspin's story. Which would mean it had to be from someone involved in the hoax, most likely Tuiasosopo.

ETA: ESPN has now made note of the correction they made to the article about the hoax affecting Te'o's play. They are chalking it up to a transcription error. Funnily enough, the Sportscenter app still has the original version of the story.

Whoever posted the joke the next day on that account would have to be the same person - or a person with access to the same account - as whoever allegedly sent these direct messages. As I understand it, the user information is retained for thirty days after deactivation, and the current Lennay account was created on the 16th. The parody account couldnt have been created after if the explanation is that Tui deleted the account right after sending these and someone else swooped it up. That would also have to be some incredible timing if this person was not aware the story was released or hours away from it.

It's also my understanding that you can only get a DM from someone you are following, which means he would have had to start following someone using a name he should have recognized was part of the hoax.
 
No, the error was in whether or not it affected his play.
Ah, I thought that the entire account had been removed but I see now that it was just changed to reflect the difference.

Strange thing is that CNN/SI still has it in the timeline from Brian Hamilton but that was probaly taken from the original ESPN report.

You would think that considering the impact that ESPN would have been sure to get the context correct in that case before it was reported.
 
or maybe...he actually thinks Manti came across as believable? Maybe he's a good liar (would explain a lot) but that doesn't mean that Schaap sold out. Everyone wants so bad for this to be what they want it to be that you guys are willing to paint the picture as much ND and Teo's people are.

Thing is, I actually believe Te'o got catfished. I also believe he embellished his relationship to avoid ridicule and maybe earn some sympathy. Believing he was a victim while being incredulous at some parts of the story (talking on the phone for hours, not going to visit etc.) aren't mutually exclusive.

I just think it's not Schaap's place to give his opinion after the interview in this case (he got access in exchange for unusual restrictions). He and his audience would have been better served just playing the audio and letting people reach their own conclusions. Te'o doesn't need a stenographer if he wants to talk.

Ironically some in the media are uncritically parroting the latest sob story which is what started this fiasco in the first place...
 
The conspiracy theories cooked up in this thread are fun to read. People get so invested in these stories they can't just accept that their initial assumptions were wrong.

The dude has been embarrassed, and as soon as you realize that his explanation makes sense. Most people would lie a little to save some face.
If embarrassment somehow explains away all the incredible inconsistencies in not just Te'o's original story but in how the story has been reported over the last few days then I think you can apply the same reasoning of investment to youself.
 
He repeatedly stresses that Manti was very believable. He is full of shit and sold his journalistic integrity in this case for access. I expected better from him

And what is wrong with stating what he felt? You think they fed him the lines "believable"?

You sound like you made your mind up already anybody who even thinks he might be believable or makes a convincing case, and in this instance Schaap, sold their integrity.

They asked him of his opinion and Schaap answered. That is not considered selling out. Schaap also mentioned in the same report that its up to the audience to decide if they believe him or not.
 
And what is wrong with stating what he felt? You think they fed him the lines "believable"?

You sound like you made your mind up already anybody who even thinks he might be believable or makes a convincing case, and in this instance Schaap, sold their integrity.

They asked him of his opinion and Schaap answered. That is not considered selling out. Schaap also mentioned in the same report that its up to the audience to decide if they believe him or not.

Read my post after that
 
As for one of the big questions -- why didn't he at least Skype -- he says he tried to speak with Lennay through Skype or FaceTime several times, but the person on the other end was in a "black box" and couldn't be seen.

What does this even mean? Lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom