People need to stop preparing their purchasing decision around the perceived power of the system since they are likely going to be to close to call. Get excited for the games
That's for sure. Sony first party, Remedy and MS's secret games excite me.
People need to stop preparing their purchasing decision around the perceived power of the system since they are likely going to be to close to call. Get excited for the games
Very cool. Man this is going to be the craziest E3 ever.
Now that the entire world knows about Durango's 'magic sauce', what prevents Sony from using it too?
The ones who would really know and understand everything are also generally the ones who don't leak, at least not directly.
A really great explanation of how these systems work would identify the person as part of a decidedly small group of people.
Throwing a few tidbits through someone you know wouldn't.
On paper a 6950 outdoes a 7850 if you look at specs like teraflops etc. but would you want a 6950 or 7850?
If Microsoft has something really really special from the generation ahead, then maybe, it will compete and even suggesting that we are comparing apples to apples is misleading.
Someone posted this earlier but it really isn't saying much here. No flops don't mean everything but there are alot of other areas where PS4 seems to have an advantage. Bandwidth, latency, ROPS, etc.
I dont quite understand how people are adding ESRAM and DDR3 to get combined throughput... I mean you are still limited to DDR3 for that 8 GB for memory. And you cant use data from it faster than DDR3 runs.
Hey Karak ,aegies and others!
I have been wondering about something that I can not get an answer to. (That is where you guys come in)
Is it possible that Microsoft could release different SKU. By different I mean hardware wise.
Think of it like a mid and high end PC. Both can run and play Crysis 3 but it different settings.
One with ultra and one with high graphic performance.
The question is: Could MS do that? is it doable? Is it possible ?
I would appreciate your answer.
Pardon my English![]()
That's for sure. Sony first party, Remedy and MS's secret games excite me.
Not very. I'd guess 2 SKUs at $300 and $400 like the 360.All I can think about is how expensive these things are going to be.
That's for sure. Sony first party, Remedy and MS's secret games excite me.
Remedy for me as well. I am stoked to see what they can do with more power.
Hey Karak ,aegies and others!
I have been wondering about something that I can not get an answer to. (That is where you guys come in)
Is it possible that Microsoft could release different SKU. By different I mean hardware wise.
Think of it like a mid and high end PC. Both can run and play Crysis 3 but it different settings.
One with ultra and one with high graphic performance.
The question is: Could MS do that? is it doable? Is it possible ?
I would appreciate your answer.
Pardon my English![]()
Compared to 360 and PS3 at launch, these systems seem somewhat low-end.All I can think about is how expensive these things are going to be.
Now that the entire world knows about Durango's 'magic sauce', what prevents Sony from using it too?
Now that the entire world knows about Durango's 'magic sauce', what prevents Sony from using it too?
Allan Wake at launch would make me very happy. Weren't they said to be working on a new IP as well?
Allan Wake at launch would make me very happy. Weren't they said to be working on a new IP as well?
People need to stop preparing their purchasing decision around the perceived power of the system since they are likely going to be to close to call. Get excited for the games
Now that the entire world knows about Durango's 'magic sauce', what prevents Sony from using it too?
What were the FLOP ratings of the 360 and PS3 GPUs btw?
I think I know the answer, but especially on the PS3 side I'd prefer to ask people who followed that more closely.
People who base their purchasing decision on 'perceived power' had no interest in the 'other' system to begin with, their choice was made before any information was made available.
I don't recall reading anything but they may have been. It could have just been Alan Wake 2 as well. But I don't know why Alan Wake resonated with me so much but it did.
Hey Karak ,aegies and others!
I have been wondering about something that I can not get an answer to. (That is where you guys come in)
Is it possible that Microsoft could release different SKU. By different I mean hardware wise.
Think of it like a mid and high end PC. Both can run and play Crysis 3 but it different settings.
One with ultra and one with high graphic performance.
The question is: Could MS do that? is it doable? Is it possible ?
I would appreciate your answer.
Pardon my English![]()
Now that the entire world knows about Durango's 'magic sauce', what prevents Sony from using it too?
Should be 192 SP MADDs per clock in the pixel shaders, like G70. If we count each as two FLOPs (like seems to be the mode of the recent Durango quotes), that's 192GFLOPs/s. Plus whatever the vertex units contribute.What were the FLOP ratings of the 360 and PS3 GPUs btw?
I think I know the answer, but especially on the PS3 side I'd prefer to ask people who followed that more closely.
Now that the entire world knows about Durango's 'magic sauce', what prevents Sony from using it too?
I didn't miss it this time, lol.
Alan Wake 2 baby!
People who base their purchasing decision on 'perceived power' had no interest in the 'other' system to begin with, their choice was made before any information was made available.
Lawyers and they can't shoe horn something like that in without redesigning the whole system.
Nope, no amount of optimisation will bring you what you saw in those demos. Both Sony and especially MS have said goodbye to high end console gaming that would be on the same level the 360 was in 2005.
More excited for Black Tusk, MGS Victoria, and Rare's next gen games.
can't? didn't sony shoehorn the RSX?Lawyers and they can't shoe horn something like that in without redesigning the whole system.
You can't have such a low amount of GDDR5 with that bandwidth. Also, the cost of adding a separate external memory bus is far higher than adding embedded memory. Especially later on in the life of the system.Why ESRAM so slow? Wouldn't it be cheaper and faster to throw 256MB GDDR5? Or is it too big/complicated? Seems silly to complicate the architecture with 32MB only for it to be less than twice as fast as the large pool. $100 video cards have 1GB GDDR5 so it can't be that expensive
can't? didn't sony shoehorn the RSX?
What are those studios?
09/21/2012:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=42380331&postcount=158
I wish post history went back to 2011! You're welcome, though, Horse Armour
In regards to dev kits often showing more powerful components than their retail consoles, have a look at this post:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=39521583&highlight=#post39521583