Gears/Saga/Blade worlds merge into one.
Maybe what we're seeing is Lost Jerusalem

Gears/Saga/Blade worlds merge into one.
FUUUUUCK....
SorayaSaga just retweeted my Tweet °O°
I loove her soooo much
![]()
We just don't know for sure yet. I also have a feeling that we'll find out soon though.
FUUUUUCK....
SorayaSaga just retweeted my Tweet °O°
I loove her soooo much
![]()
"Monolith Soft is developing a game for Wii U, as well. Their title was not revealed during Nintendo Direct, but Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said Tetsuya Takahashi and the Xenoblade team are creating the game. This will be a new title not tied to an existing series."
Not Shulk.
"Monolith Soft is developing a game for Wii U, as well. Their title was not revealed during Nintendo Direct, but Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said Tetsuya Takahashi and the Xenoblade team are creating the game. This will be a new title not tied to an existing series."
Not Shulk.
I have a feeling that this game, along with Retro's offering, will be given a massive marketing push in the UK/US.
I mean, we all proved them wrong with Xenoblade. They know they have a series that's universally acclaimed which sold extremely well (was no.5 at release in the charts in the UK. Compare that to now when not a single Wii U game has been in the top FOURTY chart so far this year).
Nintendo know they are lacking the big games, the ones which can be called killer apps. Apart from the typical Mario and Zelda. X is really all they have right now and they need it to be a hit.
Anyone agree?
That's ridiculously cool! Awesome work man!
So, what's the consensus here on the red X at the end of the trailer?
1. It's the title. X.
2. It is related to Xenoblade, and fits with the Xenoblade typeface. Xenoblade 2.
3. None of the above. Title will be Xeno????. Unrelated to blade. Spiritual sequel.
4. Other possibility (you decide)
Lets take bets and see who's right when its revealed! I say its gonna be option 2.
"Monolith Soft is developing a game for Wii U, as well. Their title was not revealed during Nintendo Direct, but Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said Tetsuya Takahashi and the Xenoblade team are creating the game. This will be a new title not tied to an existing series."
Not Shulk.
Sorry, not buying it. Showing that face at the end of the trailer, is clearly meant to evoke some kind of (emotional) reaction with the viewer (us). Which makes no sense if the character is new and unknown, because who cares for a character he doesn't know? It clearly insinuates it is Shulk, and even if it turns out to be not Shulk, that means it is related to Xenoblade. Look at the battle system. At the very least this ties into the Xenoblade universe. Possibly Shulk ends up not being your game character (the guy from the trailer in the gameplay footage is clearly NOT Shulk). Maybe an entire new roster of characters will be introduced, maybe they need to bail out Shulk, maybe Shulk is the bad guy, who knows, but both the battle system and the game world indicate this is tied to Xenoblade in one way or another, which makes the only logical conclusion that the face at the end IS Shulk, or at the very least one of his offspring.
but both the battle system and the game world indicate this is tied to Xenoblade in one way or another
Gears/Saga/Blade worlds merge into one.
The Shulk-like figure is really the only thing that seems to connect the two, but it's been brought up plenty of times that alone isn't enough to say "okay, it's a Xenoblade sequel!"
I don't really agree with this. Building on Xenoblade's battle system doesn't mean the game has to be connected to Xenoblade somehow. Why reinvent the wheel when there are plenty of places you can just improve it.
Same goes for the environment designs. That was one thing that was clearly and widely lauded, so it makes sense for them to work off that in their next game.
The whole point in this trailer was to get people interested in the game, and what better way to get people who liked Xenoblade interested than show that game's influence. The Shulk-like figure is really the only thing that seems to connect the two, but it's been brought up plenty of times that alone isn't enough to say "okay, it's a Xenoblade sequel!"
Any of those things on its own may not be enough to tie this to Xenoblade, but adding them up, it certainly does, especially in combination with the dramatic showing of "Shulks" face. Otherwise it would be the same as saying that the next internally developed Nintendo adventure game directed by Aonuma, with a main character dressed in green, in a fantasy environment, playing like Zelda, has nothing to do with Zelda.
Pretty sure this game will be titled "Xenoblade ________."
FUUUUUCK....
SorayaSaga just retweeted my Tweet °O°
I loove her soooo much
![]()
I also made a Xenoblade drawing. ^^FUUUUUCK....
SorayaSaga just retweeted my Tweet °O°
I loove her soooo much
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l164/GOODESSCUBE/soraya_zps01d9aabf.png
I don't really think that's quite the same thing, especially when the developer is even saying it's not related to a previous game/series, and has also mentioned that they are pulling not only from Xenoblade but the other Xeno games and Baten Kaitos.
I'd rather wait until we have more information before writing things off and calling the developers liars. We still have people who think this is going to be a MMO or Monster Hunter clone because it only showed gameplay, this teaser is clearly not indicative of the entire game.
And the rest of your XB spoilers.
Shulk wasn't even holding Fiora's hand in the end on the beach. Now they have a kid? You should be a fan fiction writer.
"Monolith Soft is developing a game for Wii U, as well. Their title was not revealed during Nintendo Direct, but Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said Tetsuya Takahashi and the Xenoblade team are creating the game. This will be a new title not tied to an existing series."
Not Shulk.
Right, because a vague answer has never been wrongfully interpreted, or a Japanese comment has never been translated faulty. Or a combination of the two. It really doesn't even matter what they said in that comment. Showing thàt face at the end of the trailer is clearly meant to make us believe it's Shulk, even if it isn't him. And either way, it indicates it has ties with Xenoblade. You don't introduce a new IP by trolling your fanbase into thinking it's an other game.
Add to that the same battle system, the same open world, same-ish large monsters... By the same studio, the same director, as the first console game after the game that it shares all these things with. I could understand the sceptisism if this were a decade long forgotten IP. But this is their previously released, and critically acclaimed game. Edit: not to forget, it has an avid fanbase while the commercial potential of the first game was clearly underestimated and left uninvested.
FUUUUUCK....
SorayaSaga just retweeted my Tweet °O°
I loove her soooo much
![]()
"Monolith Soft is developing a game for Wii U, as well. Their title was not revealed during Nintendo Direct, but Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said Tetsuya Takahashi and the Xenoblade team are creating the game. This will be a new title not tied to an existing series."
Not Shulk.
That wasn't really a vague comment though. Iwata called it an "all new game," in a way that would be translated as something unrelated to previous games, unless multiple people interpreted that wrong. That came up during that ND when the comment was made, since some people had made the interpretation that Iwata just meant it wasn't a remake, and others chimed in and made the correction it should be that it's not related to a previous game. I don't know Japanese, so maybe nobody has any idea what they're talking about.
Can't seem to find that though, but I distinctly remember someone thinking Iwata saying "new game" referred to "not a remake" and not "is a new IP." Edit: All I've found is StreetsAhead mentioning Siliconera was wrong (which wouldn't be surprising), so maybe I have it backwards.
And whether or not is the case it also depends on whether people consider Xeno- to be an IP or multiple IPs. Because this game will almost certainly be Xenosomething even if it is entirely unrelated to Xenoblade.
I think the guy is clearly Shulk, or at least related to him.
They showed his face for a reason, but they didn't bother showing the main character seen through out most of the trailer (who isn't Shulk. Blonde hair, especially Shulk's which is bordering on white, doesn't look that black in any lighting, especially broad daylight, even more so when there's a another blonde character standing next to him in a few scenes)? It was obviously supposed to be impactful and trigger something for the viewer.
So, turns out my point wasn't that farfetched after all.
"R" postet a new pic about X as well.. would be nice if someone could post it. Just awesome.
A new screenshot?"R" postet a new pic about X as well.. would be nice if someone could post it. Just awesome.
Sounds like a Miiverse post.A new screenshot?
There was a Nintendo Direct that day, and Iwata made that comment. Siliconera seems to have been the one to write that specific comment that has been quoted, but there was also some brief discussion here on GAF about it.
Can't seem to find that though, but I distinctly remember someone thinking Iwata saying "new game" referred to "not a remake" and not "is a new IP." Edit: All I've found is StreetsAhead mentioning Siliconera was wrong (which wouldn't be surprising), so maybe I have it backwards.
And whether or not is the case it also depends on whether people consider Xeno- to be an IP or multiple IPs. Because this game will almost certainly be Xenosomething even if it is entirely unrelated to Xenoblade.
![]()
Rontrium at it again
does red blood matter to you guys?
I was watching the video again I've seen blue and purple blood but none of the animals it comes from look like they have blue or purple blood from look at the skins they have... I know it may be silly but going through so much trouble for a lower Rating maybe?
Does Monster Hunter have red blood?
Couldn't imagine them adopting a more gritty/realistic look only to then remove blood. Though Xenoblade had blood...
xenoblade did have blood,
one image that i remember is metal face claws with fiora's blood on it