Doesn't he refer to himself as minority whip in the first episode?
I don't think so. He's definitely the majority whip.
Doesn't he refer to himself as minority whip in the first episode?
I don't think so. He's definitely the majority whip.
Man, everything makes so much more sense now....
Ep. 3 spoilerExcept Russo's girl getting that job offer... Junior rep's staff assistant getting a Deputy LD gig in the Speaker's office? Not believable at all.
Man, everything makes so much more sense now....
Ep. 3 spoilerExcept Russo's girl getting that job offer... Junior rep's staff assistant getting a Deputy LD gig in the Speaker's office? Not believable at all.
I don't think so. He's definitely the majority whip.
She doesn't add much to the show but she is just too cute <3How could you refuse those eyes, though?
Could have swore he said Minority Whip as well.
Frank is majority whip. Dems control the house in this universe.
Here's how I read the Origami symbolism: (basically the whole season, but nothing specific)I took it to represent Claire's arc and the dillema she faces. She can choose the immediate (the $20 bill, Adam) or she can choose something that will last (the origami, her marriage with Frank, children perhaps?). Same thing with her non-profit; is she just throwing money at a problem for the sake of immediate gratification or is she seeking to build a legacy? And if she is, then... does that legacy have any actual utility or is it a legacy for the sake of a legacy? (since origami is useless) I think at its core, it's function vs. form, it's immediacy vs. legacy. All revolving around that idea of what will she choose to leave behind.
Here's how I read the Origami symbolism: (basically the whole season, but nothing specific)I took it to represent Claire's arc and the dillema she faces. She can choose the immediate (the $20 bill, Adam) or she can choose something that will last (the origami, her marriage with Frank, children perhaps?). Same thing with her non-profit; is she just throwing money at a problem for the sake of immediate gratification or is she seeking to build a legacy? And if she is, then... does that legacy have any actual utility or is it a legacy for the sake of a legacy? (since origami is useless) I think at its core, it's function vs. form, it's immediacy vs. legacy. All revolving around that idea of what will she choose to leave behind.
I'm rewatching House of cards (1990) and I don't think I'll ever get tired of the whole
"You might well think that, Mattie. I couldn't possibly comment." *fade to theme song*
I also forgot how closely the events in the new one match the original
duuuude, wtf!? How did you pass me?![]()
So I had a crazy experience with the run to the end of the season. Basically, I missed episode 11 on accident and it's a fascinating exercise:
Just watched episode 4 and the product placement in this show is pretty blatant. Well, actually all I see are Apple products, but out of the blue Frank notices a PS Vita...that made me lol.
Not a spoiler but whatever:
It's sort of annoying the way they make the issues so simplistic. [/spoiler]
Someone please tell me it won't take a year for the next season due to not being on a network... Please?
That's actually pretty cool and respect to Fincher for that. Though I will say, I wish they didn't do away with the pop up texting. I'd much rather have that than the over the shoulder camera view they've used.
That do away with that? Shame, I've only watched the first three eps, it was used in all three eps and I really liked the technique.
It's going to take a year for the next season.
I work for the government and they distribute Macs and iPads, along with Dells and Vaios. We're also in the process of moving from Blackberry to iPhones.Frank Underwood wants a PS Vita.
Vita is no longer doomed, confirmed.
Long live PS Vita.
Also, there's no way government IT people would allow congressmen and senators to use Macs like they do in this show. IT people hate Macs.
About Zoe:Totally forgot that Frank took naked pics of her. I wonder will that come in play in season 2
As Ratsky pointed out, next year is a pretty safe bet. However, we're in somewhat uncharted territory here, so who knows. I can't imagine we'd see it any earlier than late 2013, but the smart money is on early 2014.When is season 2 coming? Same timeframe roughly?
As Ratsky pointed out, next year is a pretty safe bet. However, we're in somewhat uncharted territory here, so who knows. I can't imagine we'd see it any earlier than late 2013, but the smart money is on early 2014.
I doubt they'd have any problem meeting that from a production standpoint, but I don't know if there are additional commercial reasons why they'd want to wait (or not wait) until the new calendar year.Considering 26 episodes were commissioned I will say later this year is a good bet.
Finished the series today. Frank Underwood is truly a disgusting and repulsive individual. Kevin Spacey plays the role so well.
Spacey really has a knack for "scum of the earth"-type roles XD
Finished it the other day myself. Interesting series, not groundbreaking, not the rollercoaster ride like Mad Men, Breaking Bad, or other non-network dramas, but compelling. Looking forward to season 2. I admit though, the giant season breaks in the Netflix model are gonna be tough to swallow, though I guess that's more a lack of self-control![]()
Lol. I've never heard anyone call Mad Men a rollercoaster before.
I love Mad Men, don't get me wrong, but it moves at a very deliberate pace.
Spacey really has a knack for "scum of the earth"-type roles XD
Finished it the other day myself. Interesting series, not groundbreaking, not the rollercoaster ride like Mad Men, Breaking Bad, or other non-network dramas, but compelling. Looking forward to season 2. I admit though, the giant season breaks in the Netflix model are gonna be tough to swallow, though I guess that's more a lack of self-control![]()
I'm sure Netflix will release season 2 in increments now that everyone's hooked.
That's not going to happen. Netflix is committed to releasing all the episodes at once.