TheKaeptain
Banned
russia is a cold place.
It's represented in the art too.
russia is a cold place.
Thanks, I shall go see Amour tomorrow.Easily, Amour.
ANNA KARENINA.A lot has been said of the film's production design, and it deserves every bit of praise. Stunning. But more than that, Seamus McGarvey's cinematography hasn't gotten nearly enough due - which is a shame as I felt it was equally impressive and among his very best work.
The Story of Film: An Odyssey - finally finished this 15-hour doc. It's a great overview and a must-watch for anyone just getting into film.
Saw Thunderball. Not as fun as Goldfinger, but still very entertaining. Watching these first Bond movies gives a whole new meaning to the Austin Powers movies.
People with taste.Who knew australian chicks were so fucking hot.
^comments like that make me afraid to watch the movie and keep me postponing it. I've had it in my to-watch list for so long now it's getting pathetic.
Pulp Fiction - 5 Stars
I rated it five stars out of peer pressure. It's extremely well made, it's very well written, it's a lot of fun, but it's not even close to my favorite Tarantino film. I must be mad. I know...KNOW I'm wrong somehow....that I shouldn't feel this way and I should be jumping onto the ground on my knees to praise this movie like everyone else does....but I just can't.
For one...the dialogue doesn't feel real to me at all. Some of the actors feel natural, and then others just don't. It feels like I'm watching a play, actually. Not a movie. I feel like I'm watching actors perform stories. And that fits with the theme, sure, but it's jarring to me, especially since I tend to feel like the actors Tarantino picks are natural. I know I must be wrong on this...SOMEHOW....but this is a first impression.
I'm not out to try to pull this movie down a peg or any shit like that....this is just how I ultimately felt. Really, the movie is so well made and so iconic that my saying this is meaningless....but this is a topic for discussion....so...I guess I'll discuss.![]()
...why are people rating stuff five stars out of peer pressure? Is that a thing now? Are people in here beating others up? I'll call the superintendent.Alien DC - *****
Aliens EE - *****
Both five stars because of peer pressure. I played (the incredible crappy) Aliens: Colonial Marines and was put in the mood for some Alien(s) so yeah.
gah and don't do this! I myself don't really get quitting a movie once you're already into it, but it makes way more sense to do that than to skip to the end. that's just vandalistic viewingTried, repeat, tried to watch Hobo With a Shotgun.
But the whole movie was super grating to me and I just fast forwarded to the end.
I don't feel like I missed much.
...why are people rating stuff five stars out of peer pressure? Is that a thing now? Are people in here beating others up? I'll call the superintendent.
gah and don't do this! I myself don't really get quitting a movie once you're already into it, but it makes way more sense to do that than to skip to the end. that's just vandalistic viewing
If i'm never going to sit down and watch it again, I don't see what the harm is.
Notice I didn't give it a "proper" rating either.
the harm is that you didn't just not watch it, which again is whatever, but you intentionally watched parts of it "wrong".
Then they should have made the movie "right"
heh, see and now you are passing judgement! when you haven't really seen the film. which is what your one post said you wouldn't do. Like I said I'm whatever about people getting halfway and saying "this isn't for me" but skipping to the end and then saying "this is bad" is bonkers
I enjoyed a lot of aspects of Hobo, but it started to make me feel physically ill after a while.
I'd say a rating is different from impressions in that impressions mean a hell of a lot more than a couple stars on a screen. they're actual opinions and not quantities.No, the parts that I saw were bad which lead me to skipping to the end. I was fine with the ending and what not in theory, but the movie just tried too damn hard (yes, I know it was a b-movie, but it wasn't an enjoyable experience, nor was it shocking and disturbing for the sake of a good story or art like I Saw the Devil) it just went out of its way to make me not like the movie for the first hour and 10 min. I literally skipped maybe 20 min, if that.
But, I'm not giving it a rating, just my impressions and explanation for why I skipped to the end, which is quite different to my mind.
this can be the point of a film. this is the point of many films.I enjoyed a lot of aspects of Hobo, but it started to make me feel physically ill after a while.
I'd say a rating is different from impressions in that impressions mean a hell of a lot more than a couple stars on a screen. they're actual opinions and not quantities.
You're not going to convince me that skipping around in a movie is fine, a film is a singular experience and all that.
this can be the point of a film. this is the point of many films.
the best movie, you mean. it don't worry me, it don't worry me...135)Nashville 1975
Netflix needs better copies of this movie, my first was a spider nest of cracks and this one had a decent scratch mark ffs. Decent movie though.
those are both bad lolAnd you're not going to convince me it isn't ok to do so on occasion. What is worse, me stopping the movie and googling the end on wikipedia or skipping just a few short min to see the ending?
Again, this was Hobo With a Shotgun we're talking about here. It wasn't exactly master-class film-making (which, to be clear, doesn't make it a bad movie).
the best movie, you mean. it don't worry me, it don't worry me...
those are both bad lol
and I already addressed that: holding different films to different standards based solely on external factors is pre-judging
Dancer in the Dark is still like watching someone drown a puppy (A BLIND PUPPY) in front of you in order to torture you for their amusement, Bjork is still freaking amazing, and Lars von Trier can still go fuck himself.
I should probably listen to some Bjork. Before this movie I only knew of her as the Icelandic chick who wore that weird ass swan dress to the Oscars. After, basically the same, but damn can that girl act and sing up some emotionally wrenching shit.
this can be the point of a film. this is the point of many films.
I don't think you're wrong on this, but for me the movie has become more enjoyable on repeat viewings. The first time I saw it I wasn't blown away by Pulp Fiction, whereas I really liked Jackie Brown and Kill Bill Vol. 1. I haven't rewatched the former, but Kill Bill isn't quite as enjoyable for me now, whereas Pulp Fiction gets better each time. Some of the awkward scenes aren't as bothersome now as they were the first time, especially the early scenes with Jules and Vincent.Pulp Fiction - 5 Stars
For one...the dialogue doesn't feel real to me at all. Some of the actors feel natural, and then others just don't. It feels like I'm watching a play, actually. Not a movie. I feel like I'm watching actors perform stories. And that fits with the theme, sure, but it's jarring to me, especially since I tend to feel like the actors Tarantino picks are natural. I know I must be wrong on this...SOMEHOW....but this is a first impression.
I thought the band was really overplayed. The wedding presentation felt unorthodox to coincide with the unusual state of Hathaway's character instead of being instrumental (bad pun) to the plot if that makes sense. It's hard to describe what I mean but I look at how weddings are portrayed in something like Wedding Crashers in relation to the story and don't think it fits in RGM.Rachel Getting Married: Incredible. Hathaway deserved the Oscar, even after seeing Les Mis I wouldn't have expected her to be able to give a performance like she gave in this. Sometimes it was uncomfortable how real it got, but everything worked. Loved the band.
While this true I still think it's bad.this can be the point of a film. this is the point of many films.
I thought the band was really overplayed. The wedding presentation felt unorthodox to coincide with the unusual state of Hathaway's character instead of being instrumental (bad pun) to the plot if that makes sense. It's hard to describe what I mean but I look at how weddings are portrayed in something like Wedding Crashers in relation to the story and don't think it fits in RGM.
While this true I still think it's bad.![]()
The Dark Knight Returns Parts 1 & 2
Great adaption and probably the best animated superhero movie(s).
I thought the 1st part was good and the 2nd part was awesome...but overall, I'd say Under the Red Hood is the best. The Hulk vs. mini-movies for shear entertainment value are up there.