I'd only be running a one monitor setup, but the biggest concern is that I'm probably going to nab a bigger display with a higher res than 1080p sometime in the next year.
Eh, but then, I suppose I can always upgrade when the real new shit comes out, cuz I'll be out of school, and a baller.
Agree completely. You definitely don't need this card for playing Call of Duty/Assassin's Creed/League of Legends/Dota2/Batman. That's for damn sure.And even then I'd argue for the 670 over the 680 for most people![]()
Real newshit is expected to be Fall 2014 at the earliest, and even then the Titan will outperform all but whatever they price at $700+. You'll enjoy 2 years on the top of the performance hill for single-gpu cards, and near the top for another 2 years.
BUT...if you don't have the setup to take advantage of it, it may be better to get a 670 or 680 which are almost overkill for ~1080p as it is.
Agree completely. You definitely don't need this card for playing Call of Duty/Assassin's Creed/League of Legends/Dota2/Batman. That's for damn sure.
I know people don't like SLI because of the sometimes microstutter (or I guess the perceived always microstutter, as we have now determined that some people can't see it, whereas others can?) - but in terms of the price/performance ratio, if the Titan rumors end up being true, it just kills me how you could possibly pay the same price, and beat the titan if you only SLId.
This is how it always is, though. The option to have a single card with a single GPU will always be a value unto itself and typically preferable. It gives you the best options for future expansion.
It's like...think about it like memory. Hypothetical: you have a laptop with 2 ram slots. Sure, you could buy 2 8GB memory sticks for less than one 16GB stick and get the same performance as that 16GB stick would have offered, but there are distinct advantages to a single 16GB stick. The ability to add another 16GB stick later without any wasted money, for example.
In the case of the Titan, we're also getting a faster interface, considerably more memory, and a much lower power draw than an SLI or dual-gpu setup would give.
Great post. I liked the way you put it.
My only issue with the whole "future expansion" w/ Titan - is that it seems to be a VERY limited run. So if you don't get two now, your chances of getting one later down the line is slim.
So if you only get one, your just kind of stuck with it.
There will always be an aftermarket for these products. By the time graphics are being pushed hard enough for you to need TWO of these...you'll be able to get one off of eBay for a reasonable price.
True, I suppose. I guess my point is (personally, and I know this is just my own preference) - I'm weary of getting a limited run of something, because it would be harder to expand it in the future (unlike a flagship series/model).
That's why for me, if a single Titan was better than what I have now, I would have been happy getting one - and just riding it out until the next series, or whenever I felt I needed to upgrade. In order to beat what I have now (if again, the rumors are true) - then it would mean getting two. But given my money situation, it would mean getting ONE Titan now - and trying to get a second on later. So the risk seems a lot higher.
But even outside myself, I think, if you were always going to just get one of these, it kind of stinks that you would have to look to the aftermarket to expand further on it in the future. Just me though.
Oh well yea, if you have something really good now, it's a non-issue. Just pass. If I had an SLI 680 or 690 right now, I wouldn't even look at this thread. I don't, so it's interesting to me.
*glances at SLI GTX 670s...*
Switch out for Titans? Do I dare?
If yields are bad at this size, and heat is an issue when concentrated in one spot, why not go super-SLI? Have like 16 or more lower powered GPUs on a card?
Does this have 24 GDDR5 chips on-board? Damn.......
4Gb chips.Does this have 24 GDDR5 chips on-board? Damn.......
I've counted twelve.
If yields are bad at this size, and heat is an issue when concentrated in one spot, why not go super-SLI? Have like 16 or more lower powered GPUs on a card?
I was going by these two pictures:
Back side
![]()
Front
![]()
Unless I'm missing something?
If yields are bad at this size, and heat is an issue when concentrated in one spot, why not go super-SLI? Have like 16 or more lower powered GPUs on a card?
Sarcasm?I shall propose this design to our engineers.
Sarcasm?
4Gb chips.
No.
24 2Gb GDDR5 chips in clamshell.
lol, which is it! 12 or 24? The reason I'm interested is because the PS4 is said to need the 4Gb chips around about now....... unfortunately, I could never afford this GPU for my PC![]()
24, didn't see the under side of the PCB.
This is me soon, hopefully.
( Yeah, I'm that bored )
![]()
They're only making 10000 of these. I'm sure they'll go for 4Gb chips for the 700 series next year.Thanks. Got to be some kind of record that. If 4Gb chips aren't available even for a $1000 GPU...
You apparently know sod all about computers and your eMachine suits you well.
So when can we expect reviews for this monster?
Tomorrow when the NDA is up I believe.
Very true. Unfortunately I have a sickness with this hobby and like torturing myself.![]()
They're only making 10000 of these. I'm sure they'll go for 4Gb chips for the 700 series next year.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Asus-Nvid...248?pt=PCC_Video_TV_Cards&hash=item2ec6649190
Someone go for it, seems legit.
Whelp. Reviews will either be up in 2.5 hours or 11.5.
Still no word on exacts.
Whelp. Reviews will either be up in 2.5 hours or 11.5.
Still no word on exacts.
2K, good lawd.
*edit*
Looks like it'll be at 9AM EST.