It's a safety concern.
?
It's a safety concern.
You could play in sandbox mode...
There is a sandbox mode with infinite cash/disasters.
I feel like people are being purposefully ignorant
That was supposed to be a joke about the curtailing of rights and the feeling of safety people gain from it.
There is a sandbox mode with infinite cash/disasters.
I feel like people are being purposefully ignorant
You still cannot save. Its still all saved to the server so you have to sync there is no rollback.You could play in sandbox mode...
I'm not purposefully ignorant, that's why I am asking questions! Can you save your city in sandbox mode?
You still cannot save. Its still all saved to the server so you have to sync there is no rollback.
no
If you want to experiment you still cannot. Having money is good but it may take a while to get back to where you were.Why do u need to rollback? Delete what you messed up and build something new. It's not like anything is perminant
Why do u need to rollback? Delete what you messed up and build something new. It's not like anything is perminant
That was supposed to be a joke about the curtailing of rights and the feeling of safety people gain from it.
Wait wait wait! So if I spend 5 hours building a city and before I goto bed I feel like unleashing all the disasters on it for lulz it essentially destroys my city where I can't restore it pre disasters? Oh dear Maxis
Also, when not in sandbox mode you have no control over when a disaster will pop up and randomly destroy half your city? Oh dear Maxis![]()
You're missing the concept of "my city". I don't want to wreck some potemkim village (heh, works better than it should here), I want to screw around with my city. I have a mega city on SC4 that I built and continue to tweak over the last 8 years for example. That is what I want to wreck, and oh are there neighborhoods I would love to see Bowser trample. Given many others refer to wrekcing their city for fun I imagine it is the same for them. Also, you're saying I should spend hours building a city anytime I get the urge to wreck something?
The game is built to have multiple cities. I plan on having at least 3 going simultaneously. You need to so they can share resources and stuff. I don't see why you can't have a sandbox city you are doing at the same time with as much love and affection as your other cities
it's not like you can control natural disasters in real life except zombie outbreak we all know how to stop that.
The game is built to have multiple cities. I plan on having at least 3 going simultaneously. You need to so they can share resources and stuff. I don't see why you can't have a sandbox city you are doing at the same time with as much love and affection as your other cities
There is nothing realistic about Sim City.
Right, I'm going to put just as much love and effort into a city that is there just to be destroyed and which will require both hours construction to wreck and then hours of reconstruction before I can do it again. Given the city limit size if I played it I'd probably have all zones going at once but then that adds the problem that I wouldn't really care about any of the towns, unlike my mega core city in SC4.
This pretty much shows that all the issues in this game from the beta are still there. They have pretty much turned Simcity into every other puzzle like city sim like Anno.
This pretty much shows that all the issues in this game from the beta are still there. They have pretty much turned Simcity into every other puzzle like city sim like Anno.
so I should not go in expecting SimCity 2000? if that's what I want, should I just skip this entirely?
If you have a group of friends that are also buying it, then it's probably worth it.
If you are playing by yourself, then don't bother.
If you have a group of friends that are also buying it, then it's probably worth it.
If you are playing by yourself, then don't bother.
Does this look like SimCITY to you?
![]()
So you want to care about the city you are destroying but you don't want to build it?
Watch the "lets be the mayor" disaster city.
The city recovers pretty quickly. It's certainly not hours at the cheetah speed. Not when the land already has value.
Uh yeah, on my Super Nintendo.
Uh yeah, on my Super Nintendo.Does this look like SimCITY to you?
![]()
Uhhh. Ive seen many many videos showing cities much larger than that... not sure what the he'll this screen is.
I want to build my city, which I care about, and then destroy it or screw around with it (my mayor rating dropped? no water simbitchez, how you like that bone), reload and go about my game. I'm not going to care about or be interested in wrecking some potemkim village with a "destroy me" sign on its back.
Ugggh, rewrote that sentence, didn't mean the hours to go with rebuilding just the initial building.
Anyways, it's not like the destroy your city, or town as the case may be, problem isn't the only one with no save/reload. Several reviews have noted that mistakes can be extremely expensive since they can't be reversed, and that given the game design it's easier to do. That is actually the bigger issue for me since it ruins experimentation and is a simple drag to lose an hour because of a misplaced building in normal play.
Does this look like SimCITY to you?
![]()
Uhhh. Ive seen many many videos showing cities much larger than that... not sure what the he'll this screen is.
Notice the houses on the edge of the region. That region consist mostly of higher density zones, therefore giving the impression that the region is even tinier.
Regardless, the region is still tiny.
I think you are exaggerating/simply making up how long it takes to recover from things. "Lose an hour?" I really don't think there is anything that takes an hour to recover from. It's really not that hardcore. Yes it's expensive if u drop down an airport and delete it 30 seconds later. But put into cheetah for a little bit and you're right back where you were
@jeffgerstmann
I guess I'd feel a lot better about the SimCity always-online thing if I felt like the multiplayer/multiregion aspects of it were positives.
@jeffgerstmann
Instead they feel like a series of limitations that have me thinking more and more about reinstalling SC2K.
That is smaller city plot.
![]()
after reading some reviews i've got some questions about the game.
if i cannot save and load a game and the game is indeed multiplayer what happens to my city while i'm sleeping/at work?
after reading some reviews i've got some questions about the game.
if i cannot save and load a game and the game is indeed multiplayer what happens to my city while i'm sleeping/at work?
Nothing, multiplayer is asynchronous
No one else can directly affect your city except for you. you can have friends in other regions but that is it. When you wake up your city is the same as when you went to bed
No one else can directly affect your city except for you. you can have friends in other regions but that is it. When you wake up your city is the same as when you went to bed
ok that's good!
so if my neighbor city pollution skyrockets when i start playing again i'll have all of a sudden a lot of pollution coming from it's side?
I don't know if that's exactly true. They can harm you indirectly. If you imported your power/water/etc from them, and they decide to have fun and destroy their city or just decide to get rid of stuff it can negatively impact your city. One of the impressions posted explained how annoying that was.