Hellsing321
Member
Well there you go EA, this is where my money will go instead.
Keep in mind Sim City 4 was designed to work with much older PCs and you may need to do some modding to get the game to run acceptably on your machine.
Well there you go EA, this is where my money will go instead.
Would "casuals" enjoy this oh-so-wonderful server downtime too? If no, they aren't the problem either.
Blame the right entity/entities.
There is a simple solution, don't review games that have always-on DRM. Then explain to your user base what it is and what games use it.
Also features bigger cities.
It gets better.
Arthur Gies
@aegies
no. RT @jiacobellis Is the 8 for SimCity final?
@aegies
it's being discussed. RT @Mesoian If the downtime continues/server queues get worse, will the score drop further?
I need a hug you guys
You just can't win.
If you don't buy SimCity you may not get a SimCity game for another 10 years, or never again, as EA will cite low sales to justify not bothering with the series in the future.
If you buy SimCity you can't play it because of awful infrastructure and choices made by EA/Maxis, on top of that you get berated by fellow gamers as if your inability to play the game is your fault.
They were worthless before, but they are marketable.Single-handedly making review scores worthless.
It gets better.
Arthur Gies
@aegies
no. RT @jiacobellis Is the 8 for SimCity final?
@aegies
it's being discussed. RT @Mesoian If the downtime continues/server queues get worse, will the score drop further?
I need a hug you guys
And formable terrain which is HUUUUUGE for me. But don't worry I'm sure EA will let you buy that "feature DLC" later.
And formable terrain which is HUUUUUGE for me. But don't worry I'm sure EA will let you buy that "feature DLC" later.
I don't see what they are 'simulating' that is so complicated they can only handle cities a fraction of the size of earlier games which ran on ancient PCs. It's basically just the stupid fucking graphics, right? Because they want you to see each ndividual stupid person, they're breaking a fundamental part of the game. Idiots
I don't see what they are 'simulating' that is so complicated they can only handle cities a fraction of the size of earlier games which ran on ancient PCs. It's basically just the stupid fucking graphics, right? Because they want you to see each ndividual stupid person, they're breaking a fundamental part of the game. Idiots
Strike one.
Strike two.
Ask yourselves, before strike three plops into the catchers mitt of history, why are these like this? Why is it inevitable? What do YOU get out of this?
Strike one.
Strike two.
Ask yourselves, before strike three plops into the catchers mitt of history, why are these like this? Why is it inevitable? What do YOU get out of this?
I don't see what they are 'simulating' that is so complicated they can only handle cities a fraction of the size of earlier games which ran on ancient PCs. It's basically just the stupid fucking graphics, right? Because they want you to see each ndividual stupid person, they're breaking a fundamental part of the game. Idiots
What's the "reason", or should I say excuse, for EA to do this? avoid piracy?
The simulation part runs on a single CPU core. They must rewrite the core of the game to get bigger cities to work
What's the "reason", or should I say excuse, for EA to do this? avoid piracy?
Seriously? That's terrible. But also perhaps relatively simple to patch in down the line.
Isnt it that the older game used an approximation of the citizens behaviour while the new one actually simulates each individual citizen in order to generate emergent gameplay or some such?
Isnt it that the older game used an approximation of the citizens behaviour while the new one actually simulates each individual citizen in order to generate emergent gameplay or some such?
I bought this based on Polygon's review...I thought they were one of the good guys? Damn. I've been traveling for work...but if I can't play this weekend I will try to get my money back from EA (bought on Origin). Thankfully I used my AMEX so they'll back me...
The first Settlers game on my Amiga limited the map size to 3 out of 8 options because my Amiga did not have enough RAM to use bigger (randomized!) maps. Sometimes, when some more sound effects could be loaded on startup it was even limited to 2 out of 8. Why not do something like this as well? My CPU is sleeping while playing the game. Gimme the simulationI am sure as hell they will make the regions bigger but it might have more of an inpact on lower spec machines.
EA is just a corporation trying to be profitable and this kind of stuff is the best way for them to be profitable. You know, this is basic stuff and only unserious dreamers can fault EA for trying to be profitable.
Is it just me or does the wording of his comment suggest it wasn't a large issue until it affected him personally?
I bought this based on Polygon's review...I thought they were one of the good guys? Damn. I've been traveling for work...but if I can't play this weekend I will try to get my money back from EA (bought on Origin). Thankfully I used my AMEX so they'll back me...
Im surprised all the people defending always online arent here to do damage control.
I'd be careful doing a chargeback. IIRC, Steam will lock you out of your account if you file a chargeback against them. I don't know if Origin will do the same. So consider that possibility if you have other games tied to that Origin account that you wouldn't want to lose.
Hysterical - Kotaku article from June of last year about EA not repeating Diablo III's mistakes with SimCity
Sure, like Diablo III, everyone was pumped, ready to play. Everyone was connected and online. Except Blizzard.