Nintendo to meet UK retailers after unofficial Wii U price cuts fail

It's basically a 360/PS3 console launched 6 years later, with the same old 1st party lineups and lousy online infrastructure. And 3rd party ports that are as far as 2 years ago. Such an appalling proposition.
 
It's funny isn't it. No one is expecting Microsoft or Sony to start putting their exclusives on competing systems. I just wish people would stop asking if Nintendo will go third party.

If they had the same amount of 3rd party support as Nintendo I would.

Its seems sony and MS buy devs to make exclusives to support there platform.

Where Nintendo makes a platform to support there games
 
I agree, but I get this, sentimental feeling if you want to call it that, of a company that makes fantastic games and systems, but don't cater to the new generation of games as much as they used to. They still make bank and Nintendo games are still the best selling ones out there, but I feel like the expectations are way to high. I mean the sky is the limit for Nintendo, but past console sales don't match the insanity of the Wii's.

If Nintendo had stayed the same size the Wiiu would have even less games and so would the 3ds. Nintendo actually needs to massively expand if they want to be competitive making 2 systems

It's not that crazy an idea when you consider that Nintendo's third party relations have only gotten worse and their sales moved down with relations.

false, nintendo's jpn relations have continued to improve. The Wiiu is just not a good investment right now if you want to make a lot of money
 
If Nintendo had stayed the same size the Wiiu would have even less games and so would the 3ds. Nintendo actually needs to massively expand if they want to be competitive making 2 systems



false, nintendo's jpn relations have continued to improve. The Wiiu is just not a good investment right now if you want to make a lot of money


I've said this so many fucking times its ridiculous.

That war chest needs to be used to expand the company. In a big way.

Nintendo today, have made it abundantly clear they cannot sufficiently support two platforms at their respective performance levels. Expansion would go a looooong way towards rectifying software issues whether from 1st or 3rd party.
 
Irrelevant. Nintendo relies on Nintendo published games, clearly. Microsoft doesn't.

And Microsoft is devoting pretty much all of its major resources to the Durango November launch. No sense in new 1st-party Xbox retail games when a new console is coming out in 8 months.
 
Fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me.........sorry Nintendo I'm not buying your overpriced outdated hardware anymore.


Their idea of "stimulation" is probably releasing colors....gimme a break.


99.99$ if you want to move that thing, no amount of Mario's, cart games or pokemon is gonna move this thing.
 
The next Wii U direct better have firm release dates for the games that got pushed out of launch window. Also, perhaps a megaton being saved for E3 should get dropped. This is long overdue and this drought is terrible. Usually I use VC for droughts but Wii U's VC isn't up yet.
 
Irrelevant. Nintendo relies on Nintendo published games, clearly. Microsoft doesn't.

No, they rely on Xbox Live subscriptions and other such levies in order to make up for the cash they lose by selling high tech consoles at a considerable loss, something Nintendo can't do.

Look at Sony, since the PS3 started making money 2 years ago, they've nowhere near made up for the deficit from the loss of dozens of millions of consoles sold at a loss.

People continually forget this. Sony and Microsoft are screwing the industry by selling consoles at a loss. They're screwing developers which is why so many have folded in the last 5 years due to development costs, and it's just going to get worse.

People need to stop demanding Nintendo follow suit
 
If they had the same amount of 3rd party support as Nintendo I would.

Its seems sony and MS buy devs to make exclusives to support there platform.

Where Nintendo makes a platform to support there games

That is how it seems to me too so why would you expect them to ever go third party?
 
I have no problem with the price of the console really, it's the price of the games that is preventing me from putting down the money for one.

They just put ZombiU and AC3 for sale at £29.99 on the eshop, but they were £54.99 before, there is just no way I'm ever going to pay that when I want to go digital only. £29.99 maybe £35.00 should be the standard price for these games.
 
Honestly I hope Nintendo learns a hard lesson and some damn humility from all of this. Stop treating your market like we are obligated to buy your product just because it's Nintendo, just because the Wii succeeded, without adapting to modern gaming standards and trends (is Monster Hunter the first online multiplayer WiiU game? ffs), without releasing the games you promised, without fixing your crappy UI that you didn't want to show off much until we found out about it at launch, and without coming up with elegant solutions to real problems like an irreplaceable gamepad and irreplaceable game saves.
 
Irrelevant. Nintendo relies on Nintendo published games, clearly. Microsoft doesn't.

This.

Nintendo built a model to rely heavily only on their own published games and they don't have enough studios and partnerships to fill the gap of release dates, specially because they need to do this for two systems and they treat the portable market as main priority. That's why GameCube and Wii became wastelands. Nintendo gave full priority for the portable market, which always was Iwata's main priority, and both GCN and Wii needed to be hauled in order to give the portable market special treatment.

That's why snobbing third-parties is very bad for Nintendo, they can't support two platforms at once without sacrificing one of them and if there's something they'll sacrifice and treat as secondary platform, it'll be their home console.

This is a reason why I don't buy Nintendo home consoles anymore because there's no guarantee Nintendo will support it before abandoning it in order to support their portable system.
 
That is how it seems to me too so why would you expect them to ever go third party?

It may be irrational but some people dont like dropping money to buy a whole separate system to play a 1st party box.

Honestly I hope Nintendo learns a hard lesson and some damn humility from all of this. Stop treating your market like we are obligated to buy your product just because it's Nintendo, just because the Wii succeeded, without adapting to modern trends, without releasing the games you promised, without fixing your crappy UI that you didn't want to show off much until we found out about it at launch, and without coming up with elegant solutions to real problems like an irreplaceable gamepad and irreplaceable game saves.

we thought they learned from the 3ds. the current management is just inept
 
No, they rely on Xbox Live subscriptions and other such levies in order to make up for the cash they lose by selling high tech consoles at a considerable loss, something Nintendo can't do.

Look at Sony, since the PS3 started making money 2 years ago, they've nowhere near made up for the deficit from the loss of dozens of millions of consoles sold at a loss.

People continually forget this. Sony and Microsoft are screwing the industry by selling consoles at a loss. They're screwing developers which is why so many have folded in the last 5 years due to development costs, and it's just going to get worse.

People need to stop demanding Nintendo follow suit

Sony and Microsoft are being successful. Nintendo got lucky this generation by being a fad product that was adopted by other markets not specifically made up of gamers.

They're trying this method again, and clearly its tanking.

Its MS and Sonys fault games sell on their systems so devs develop for them?

Give me a break.

That is how it seems to me too so why would you expect them to ever go third party?

Because they could make more money publishing games third party then they will supporting this disaster of a console?
 
No, they rely on Xbox Live subscriptions and other such levies in order to make up for the cash they lose by selling high tech consoles at a considerable loss, something Nintendo can't do.

Look at Sony, since the PS3 started making money 2 years ago, they've nowhere near made up for the deficit from the loss of dozens of millions of consoles sold at a loss.

People continually forget this. Sony and Microsoft are screwing the industry by selling consoles at a loss. They're screwing developers which is why so many have folded in the last 5 years due to development costs, and it's just going to get worse.

People need to stop demanding Nintendo follow suit

But the Wii U is selling at a loss.
 
People continually forget this. Sony and Microsoft are screwing the industry by selling consoles at a loss. They're screwing developers which is why so many have folded in the last 5 years due to development costs, and it's just going to get worse.

Aren't Nintendo selling the Wii U at a loss? Doesn't the Wii U have roughly the same level of power (if not more) as the "developer screwing" PS3 and 360?
 
It may be irrational but some people dont like dropping money to buy a whole separate system to play a 1st party box.

The thing about Nintendo's consoles is that now there's a unique hook. The GamePad is actually amazing for games and I can't imagine gaming without it. I've shifted all my third party pre-orders to the Wii U because I'm so impressed with it.

This way, people can, if they have the money, have a "normal" console, and then the Wii U

Aren't Nintendo selling the Wii U at a loss? Doesn't the Wii U have roughly the same level of power (if not more) as the "developer screwing" PS3 and 360?

Yes they are, but not a considerable loss at all, unlike MS and Sony who were losing over $200 per console at launch. The Wii U is more powerful than the PS3 and 360, yes, but that's a standard now and has been for years
 
I think Nintendo should go 3rd party because what there offering is poor value, who wants to buy a video games platform that only gets 1st party titles and scraps.

thats like EA having a console for just there games

having a Nintendo console just for Nintendo games is ridiculous because people buy a video games system as a platform for games, buying a console for a select few titles from one developer is very poor value.

Notsureifserious.gif

NeoGAF is on an absolute roll today. WOW.

What was so crazy about his post? He's got a point, especially the last paragraph. Nothing "WOW" or .gif worthy about that.
 
What was the last first party game Microsoft published?

The WiiU just came out. Microsoft is already looking ahead to their next console and can't really be blamed for not supporting first-party games on an 8 year old console. Nintendo needs to support the console they released less than six months ago.
 
No, they rely on Xbox Live subscriptions and other such levies in order to make up for the cash they lose by selling high tech consoles at a considerable loss, something Nintendo can't do.

Look at Sony, since the PS3 started making money 2 years ago, they've nowhere near made up for the deficit from the loss of dozens of millions of consoles sold at a loss.

People continually forget this. Sony and Microsoft are screwing the industry by selling consoles at a loss. They're screwing developers which is why so many have folded in the last 5 years due to development costs, and it's just going to get worse.

People need to stop demanding Nintendo follow suit

Well People hate variety and love standards.
 
The thing about Nintendo's consoles is that now there's a unique hook. The GamePad is actually amazing for games and I can't imagine gaming without it. I've shifted all my third party pre-orders to the Wii U because I'm so impressed with it.

This way, people can, if they have the money, have a "normal" console, and then the Wii U



Yes they are, but not a considerable loss at all, unlike MS and Sony who were losing over $200 per console at launch. The Wii U is more powerful than the PS3 and 360, yes, but that's a standard now and has been for years

So basically nintendo should be thankful the ps3360 screwed developers because if they didnt make it standard the wiiu would be screwing them?
 
Yes i agree. Nintendo is still sub 5000 employees. Its crazy if you think about other publshers like ea, activision etc.

Which is the main reason of why the games are delayed. Nintendo is very understaffed and unprepared for HD development. Hiring 50-100 won´t do much if Nintendo wants constant release of high quality games. Nintendo would need 500-1000 more people if they don´t want drought on every other game they release. Remember that a size of those 5000 work on the 3DS as well. Let´s also not forget hardware engineering.
 
I've said this so many fucking times its ridiculous.

That war chest needs to be used to expand the company. In a big way.

Nintendo today, have made it abundantly clear they cannot sufficiently support two platforms at their respective performance levels. Expansion would go a looooong way towards rectifying software issues whether from 1st or 3rd party.

They have already done that. The problem is that the restructuring/expansion was complete fairly recently so we won't see the effects of this until later this year post-E3.
 
What was so crazy about his post? He's got a point, especially the last paragraph. Nothing "WOW" or .gif worthy about that.

Value is a personal thing. If nintendo games only are value enough for enough people enough will buy nintendo consoles.
 
No, they rely on Xbox Live subscriptions and other such levies in order to make up for the cash they lose by selling high tech consoles at a considerable loss, something Nintendo can't do.

Look at Sony, since the PS3 started making money 2 years ago, they've nowhere near made up for the deficit from the loss of dozens of millions of consoles sold at a loss.

People continually forget this. Sony and Microsoft are screwing the industry by selling consoles at a loss. They're screwing developers which is why so many have folded in the last 5 years due to development costs, and it's just going to get worse.

People need to stop demanding Nintendo follow suit


Correct xbox live is one of MS revenue streams, buts its not the only one from there xbox division they get a cut on all games sales and make profit on the console itself and accessories.

The reason why some devs went bust is becuase there games didnt sell well enough how is this MS or sony's fault?

and next gen game engines creators and devs have said they can make a game expensive or as inexpensive as they like

a $10,000,000 or a $100,000,000 game next gen is going to look better then a game made this gen for the same cost.
 
Which is the main reason of why the games are delayed. Nintendo is very understaffed and unprepared for HD development. Hiring 50-100 won´t do much if Nintendo wants constant release of high quality games. Nintendo would need 500-1000 more people if they don´t want drought on every other game they release. Remember that a size of those 5000 work on the 3DS as well. Let´s also not forget hardware engineering.

Thats why its amazing how they missed out on midway, thq, eidos etc.
 
Many corporations offer smartphones and tablets as standard equipment.

They do. It would be interesting to know what the split between professional and consumer sales are. Taking a look at the front page of any given appstore suggests to me that it isn't the professionals which drive tablet sales, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
 
The WiiU just came out. Microsoft is already looking ahead to their next console and can't really be blamed for not supporting first-party games on an 8 year old console. Nintendo needs to support the console they released less than six months ago.

It goes without saying, the Wii U has totally desensitized me of the term "launch window". As stupid as it is expecting any console to have a definitive killer app on launch to last these days, Nintendo admitted that the 3DS launch was a disaster they wouldn't repeat again, and that launch window document looked really appealing. Pikmin 3, Rayman Legends, Lego City Undercover, The Wonderful 101, I mean hell I don't think anyone can look at me straight faced and say that if these games could have been offered in January/February as exclusives then the Wii U would have had one damn good prospect.

Wii U lacking games as of now on account of developer struggles is damn unfortunate. Them not managing to maintain the market, properly advertising the thing and losing exclusives is a travesty.
 
Correct xbox live is one of MS revenue streams, buts its not the only one from there xbox division they get a cut on all games sales and make profit on the console itself and accessories.

The reason why some devs went bust is becuase there games didnt sell well enough how is this MS or sony's fault?

and next gen game engines creators and devs have said they can make a game expensive or as inexpensive as they like

a $10,000,000 or a $100,000,000 game next gen is going to look better then a game made this gen for the same cost.

They went bust because development costs were high so that required they had to sell really high amounts which usually isn't feasible.

Yes, MS are making profit on the console NOW, that's my point. When it came out, it didn't, and it didn't for years especially considering the amount of repairs and replacement consoles they had to issue to the RRoD issue.

It's amazing how people seem to forget how things went
 
99.99$ if you want to move that thing, no amount of Mario's, cart games or pokemon is gonna move this thing.

Let's meet back here after E3 for a nice chat.

Also, it's going to be very difficult, if impossible, for Nintendo to reduce the price of Wii U, considering it's already selling at a loss. Their predicament is that the console is actually very, very good value technically, with nothing to show it off. Near-lagless, near-artifactless, 60fps streaming tech obviously isn't cheap, and the console is pretty powerful, in addition to hosting Wii hardware. But none of that matters to a consumer who, as of this moment, has very, very little reason to pull the trigger in terms of software incentives.

They have already done that. The problem is that the restructuring/expansion was complete fairly recently so we won't see the effects of this until later this year post-E3.

Indeed. Nintendo currently has more busy bees than it has ever had, but it's all still behind closed doors.
 
Because those developers lose a massive amount of value as exclusive developers.

With THQ they could have just picked up a couple of cheap IPs like Darksiders and got some kind of western development started.

Nintendo's non-Japanese development is worse than Sony's Japanese development. That is pretty telling.
 
It goes without saying, the Wii U has totally desensitized me of the term "launch window". As stupid as it is expecting any console to have a definitive killer app these days Nintendo admitted that the 3DS launch was a disaster they wouldn't repeat again, and that launch window document looked really appealing. Pikmin 3, Rayman Legends, Lego City Undercover, The Wonderful 101, I mean hell I don't think anyone can look at me straight faced and say that if these games could have been offered in January/February as exclusives then the Wii U would have had one damn good prospect.

Wii U lacking games as of now on account of developer struggles is damn unfortunate. Them not managing to maintain the market, properly advertising the thing and losing exclusives is a travesty.

All those games are nice, but only Pikmin 3 is a decent seller there.
With THQ they could have just picked up a couple of cheap IPs like Darksiders and got some kind of western development started.

Nintendo's non-Japanese development is worse than Sony's Japanese development. That is pretty telling.

Sure, but Nintendo has had years to get western development started which is why its not surprising they wouldnt even try. I never said i was a good idea.
 
They went bust because development costs were high so that required they had to sell really high amounts which usually isn't feasible.

Yes, MS are making profit on the console NOW, that's my point. When it came out, it didn't, and it didn't for years especially considering the amount of repairs and replacement consoles they had to issue to the RRoD issue.

It's amazing how people seem to forget how things went

so whats your point?
 
Between the latter half of the Wii and the beginning of the WiiUs life, its pretty clear that Nintendo is either going to go out of business or eventually go third party.

They need a radical strategy change to stay in the console market. They already fucked up the chance they had with the WiiU.
 
Because those developers lose a massive amount of value as exclusive developers.

There are people with HD development knowhow that can work instantly on nintendo ips (or their own ips). Nintendo needs to increase their workforce massively so M&A is a good way to do this.
 
They went bust because development costs were high so that required they had to sell really high amounts which usually isn't feasible.

Yes, MS are making profit on the console NOW, that's my point. When it came out, it didn't, and it didn't for years especially considering the amount of repairs and replacement consoles they had to issue to the RRoD issue.

It's amazing how people seem to forget how things went
How did things go?

I'm failing to see how Microsofts RRoD repair costs factors into where their revenue streams come from.
 
Still planning on buying one cheap when Bayonetta arrives. :p

I am endlessly excited at just what level of cheapness it'll be at by the time Bayo hits. I kinda hope Bayo 2 is 2014 just for this reason alone.

And anyway lads, I've solved all of Nintendo's WiiU woes in my new topic.
 
Top Bottom