• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Final Fantasy X | X-2 HD Remaster - PS3/Vita, 2013 [Amazon: $40, Trailer in OP]

Status
Not open for further replies.
The graphical changes are significant, particularly to the character models. This is certainly somewhere between a remaster and a remake, I would just consider it closer to the former than the latter. For all we know, some (definitely not all) of the improvements could have been lifted from X-2.

The treatment is pretty similar to what Ocarina of Time 3D got. Improved, revamped models, new textures, some improved geometry and a different lighting system.
 
Maybe I'm remembering it wrong, but X-2 didn't seem as polished.

No, you're right. It was even reflected in reviews at the time:

GameSpy said:
Ever wonder what's down those back stairs where Yunalesca was hanging out in FFX? Apparently it's a nearly featureless hallway -- a stark contrast from the stunning ruins of Zanarkand you'll have to make your way through again to get to that point. You can expect something this dull just about anywhere FFX-2 calls on you to go somewhere that you didn't read with Tidus and co. in FFX.
Source: http://ps2.gamespy.com/playstation-2/final-fantasy-x-2/6368p2.html
 
Look at this and tell me all they did was up the res
They rounded off some rough edges, its still at PS2 levels of quality in everything but resolution. Its an incredibly simplistic upgrade. If you didn't have the two versions of the game right next to each other you wouldn't even realise there was a difference


It's near remake level of improvement.
Haha get real. This is nowhere near a remake. Not even close.
 
no way where?

https://vine.co/v/bDhi21275j1

They rounded off some rough edges, its still at PS2 levels of quality in everything but resolution. Its an incredibly simplistic upgrade. If you didn't have the two versions of the game right next to each other you wouldn't even realise there was a difference

I think it looks fantastic, from Wakka's headband to the stonework and pretty much everything about Lulu. The PCSX2 shot is the same resolution actually (with black bars)
 
They rounded off some rough edges, its still at PS2 levels of quality in everything but resolution. Its an incredibly simplistic upgrade. If you didn't have the two versions of the game right next to each other you wouldn't even realise there was a difference



Haha get real. This is nowhere near a remake. Not even close.

No it's not... look at the textures in the PS3 screen.
 
anyone have the seymour comparison?

This is the best I could do though (top-PS2, bottom-HD):

GvuCLyR.jpg

55yJC3s.jpg

His hair is lighter colored now.

Er... X-2 was a graphical downgrade...

90% of the new dungeons looked boring and were repetitive looking (especially the
Thunder Plains hidden cave which was one of the longest and worst dungeons I've ever been through
).
 
I wonder how much I'll enjoy X-2 because I skipped that. Musically, I already know that game doesn't touch X.

Also, a Final Fantasy XII remaster would be incredible
 
They rounded off some rough edges, its still at PS2 levels of quality in everything but resolution. Its an incredibly simplistic upgrade. If you didn't have the two versions of the game right next to each other you wouldn't even realise there was a difference

No it's not... look at the textures in the PS3 screen.

Particularly Lulu's dress and button necklace, as well as the wall that's to the lower left of Auron.

I'm not saying it looks amazing, but it's above PS2 level. And you have to remember the two screens in that comparison are between the PS3 version, and the PCSX2 running at 720p. In comparison to the actual PS2 version, it would be even more notable
 
I wonder how much I'll enjoy X-2 because I skipped that. Musically, I already know that game doesn't touch X.

Also, a Final Fantasy XII remaster would be incredible

X-2 has more or less the best gameplay in the entire series. You gotta be able to stomach a lot of pretty girl dress up and nonsensical plot (though some of the side missions are actually hilarious) but man is it fun to play if you can.
 
They rounded off some rough edges, its still at PS2 levels of quality in everything but resolution. Its an incredibly simplistic upgrade. If you didn't have the two versions of the game right next to each other you wouldn't even realise there was a difference
Look more closely. Auron's hair looks completely different, for one. The added textures on Lulu's clothing also make the fur coat look like an almost entirely new model.
 
No it's not... look at the textures in the PS3 screen.
They now look like a 2005 PS2 game in HD rather than a 2001 PS2 game in HD

it just seems very limited the changes they have made, especially considering how long its been in development. To call it a remake at the very least you'd want a superior lighting system, but to me it looks worse. It looks flatter. Is it wrong to have expected improvements like HDR, a superior shadowing and self shadowing system etc. Things that are native to current gen.
 
Looks like the HD remake is a lot more advanced than I thought it was. Now i'm torn. I really want this on both PS3 and Vita now but don't want to pay twice.
 
Particularly Lulu's dress and button necklace, as well as the wall that's to the lower left of Auron.

I'm not saying it looks amazing, but it's above PS2 level. And you have to remember the two screens in that comparison are between the PS3 version, and the PCSX2 running at 720p. In comparison to the actual PS2 version, it would be even more notable

They are definitely going to put EXTRA effort into Lulu's upper body since they know full well that's where everyone's looking.
 
Man that looks great. Hope we'll get FFXII next.

Guess that full remake for FFV onwards gonna have to take a backsit.

Looks like the HD remake is a lot more advanced than I thought it was. Now i'm torn. I really want this on both PS3 and Vita now but don't want to pay twice.

More like thrice considering vita X & X-2 will be sold separately.
 
This is the best I could do though (top-PS2, bottom-HD):



His hair is lighter colored now.



90% of the new dungeons looked boring and were repetitive looking (especially the
Thunder Plains hidden cave which was one of the longest and worst dungeons I've ever been through
).

oh thanks!

I also hope the menu gets a nice upgrade to give it a glossy crystal like look similar to FFXIII or something modern look. And that dreadful mini map.
 
They now look like a 2005 PS2 game in HD rather than a 2001 PS2 game in HD

it just seems very limited the changes they have made, especially considering how long its been in development. To call it a remake at the very least you'd want a superior lighting system, but to me it looks worse. It looks flatter. Is it wrong to have expected improvements like HDR, a superior shadowing and self shadowing system etc. Things that are native to current gen.

I'd like to see a PS2 game with that high of polygon count.
 
I really can't get over how excited I am for this and the kh hd masters over practically anything else on the horizon. It says so much for where we were and are now in game releases...

I really hope they do cross save as well as I'm headed to vita for this primarily.
 
The improvement does seem to be grossly exaggerated by many people in this thread. It looks similar besides the fact it now has razor sharp IQ and textures which are redone so they don't look glaringly terrible. In other words the bare minimum from what I expect of a decent HD remake.
 
They are definitely going to put EXTRA effort into Lulu's upper body since they know full well that's where everyone's looking.

Obviously I know where a lot of people will be looking at, but personally I really like the hair, the fact the necklace no longer looks painted on and the fur
 
I will agree that if anything is disappointing, it is that lighting.

That stuff doesn't bother me though; when i'm playing the game I don't even notice it.
 
Wow, some people have a pretty revisionist idea of what the PS2 was capable of. If all "HD Remasters" had this much effort put into them I really wouldn't mind paying for them again.
 
They are definitely going to put EXTRA effort into Lulu's upper body since they know full well that's where everyone's looking.

Even discounting the two most obvious reasons, Lulu is mostly pictured from the waist up in FFX because it saved them the trouble of having to animate her belt dress--this is especially the case with her good cutscene model; I have a hard time thinking of more than two occasions where it is seen below the waist and even then I don't think she's seen moving. In fact, thinking back, I think it's the good cutscene model used the least; which was a shame considering I always thought her regular field model was easily the worst in comparison.

But this update seems to be rectifying that, so, good on them.

The improvement does seem to be grossly exaggerated by many people in this thread. It looks similar besides the fact it now has razor sharp IQ and textures which are redone so they don't look glaringly terrible. In other words the bare minimum from what I expect of a decent HD remake.

No, the character models are definitely redone. See here and compare Auron's hair, Lulu's chest, Wakka's hands and wristguard, their faces, etc.
 
Everything looks sharper, which is good enough for me. Always loved FFX's art design. The lighting model seems to have changed though. Not sure I like that.
 
Considering how much gel/spray you'd need to keep the hair in that shape, there's bound to be some side effects.

(I agree, looks a little weird)
 
X-2 has smoother animations and slightly more detailed high poly models. Yuna's hair certainly looked more detailed than anyone's hair in X and it had movement. also the shadows in battle were not just a circle, but instead the shape of the model. Its not much but its a little improvement.....Im actually looking forward to seeing some X-2 remaster screens.
 
The improvement does seem to be grossly exaggerated by many people in this thread. It looks similar besides the fact it now has razor sharp IQ and textures which are redone so they don't look glaringly terrible. In other words the bare minimum from what I expect of a decent HD remake.

But it's not an HD remake. Bionic Commando Rearmed is an HD remake.

Heck, why would you even want a remake of such a pretty game? The game still looks very nice for the most part, and sounds great, voice-acting aside. Apart from upping the resolution, widescreen, and better textures, what more do you want? A blowjob? How do you expect that to happen?

Now, FF7...there's a game that could use a remake.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom