I'm really not making a judgment call on the movie by saying it's dumb. The content presented to us in the movie is extremely fucking dumb. It's dub step drops to spring break debauchery, it's taking every opportunity at a male gaze camera angle, it's a ridiculous rap game James Franco, it's Gucci Mane, it's 'innocent' TV starlets giving stilted dialogue about wanting cock and wanting to shoot people. It's extreeeeeeeeemely dumb.
Now whether or not that meant anything to us, watching as the movie sort of obsessively retraces its own outlines of the subject matter for 90 minutes, that's what I'm asking (and not rhetorically). There's so much dumb in it that I can't deny that it was designed that way, on purpose, for a reason...but I don't know what the reason is.
But I'm thinking- Simply putting a creative filter on dumb shit (if that's what you meant by "arthouse") doesn't actually change much. I still come away thinking it was dumb. And while I acknowledge that yeah, a lot of stuff like this actually happens in real life, there is no real take-away or resolution. It's more of a exaggerated picture of something that we look at and react to, rather than follow like a story.
It's not like a typical movie where a conflict happens and then get resolved. In this case, it would be dumb things happening that then get unmade, either by laughing it off as a comedy (which it wasn't, though it had a few funny moments) or by just having some really sobering moments in-movie where everyone realizes how dumb it all is. I think there was maybe only one thing sort of like that
, and I'm not quite sure if that's what the movie intended the take-away to be.
So I dunno, man. I watched what felt like a very long 90 minutes of something that felt very deliberate and yet perhaps not entirely under control, but I'm not mad or disappointed by it. Just kind of bored by it. I'm just wondering if it was dumb purely for the hell of being dumb.