Not to bring up a tired comment, but publishers were more than happy to ignore the Wii.
Don't put anything past publishers.
And I am more than happy to abandon any company who does shit like this. I have other hobbies as well.
Not to bring up a tired comment, but publishers were more than happy to ignore the Wii.
Don't put anything past publishers.
I think Sony can also pitch this to publishers in a way to keep their business.
Sony allowing used sales, and MS not, allows publishers to do some nice A:B comparisons based on new Vs used sales, maybe actually allowing them to figure out whether used sales really do impact revenues.
MS' approach is good for Publisher 'A' of the game being traded in, but removes money from the consumer which may be spent on other games, so may negatively impact Publisher B of the game the consumer may otherwise have bought. Having two systems live in the market allows some data to be gathered on that.
If retail cut was as little as 10%...I doubt Gamestop would be very happy about this and tweeting that everything was OK, and promoting preorders on the system. I think they'd at least have cause to hesitate on it.
So what? Who lends £40 discs to get scratched to fuck anyway?
True, but a pub could use an activation system that requires the buyer to go online for a once off activation anyway, treat the game like an online game. I mean, this was even technically possible on PS3.
I don't think Sony can mandate a universal system though, if the system 'can be enjoyed with an internet connection at all'. That supposes there will be some chunk of games that don't need the net at least.
No fucking way. MS and the publisher deserve none of it. It's been sold. Do you really think movies, books, clothes and houses should be subject to the sane.Seems fair.
How is this supposed to work for rental outfits like Gamefly?
And I am more than happy to abandon any co pant who does shit like this. I have other hobbies as well.
That's how gamestop trading works today minus the publisher kick backIf there's no competition for second hand sales even with this procedure, shit is going to be worthless
Say Gamestop buys in
You buy your $70 BF4, play it, get tired 1-2 months in return it to GS and they offer only $25-$30 for tops
They turn around sell it for say $60-$65 "Pre-Owned"
So MS and Pub get a cut from your resell say $5-$10, then when that new used copy sells get another $10-$20
They just made close to $100 off one copy of BF4, repeat
This may look great, but if there is no competition from other retailers, Gamestop can force any TIV (trade-in-value) MS/Pub asks it to be
Pub knows people are trading in their shitacular title and ask MS to force the resell to be $10-$20, even though title is less than a month old and still selling $70 new
Forcing GS to lower it and any other retailers using the program/service
GS had competition in the form of Best Buy and their 100% Trade-In's, really started eating into GS monopoly/cash cow, GS challenged and rose TIV's across the board, started adding those same deals with twist that still benefited them
So MS + Pubs + GS/Retailers that want to get in on this will literally hold hostage the market, the users will be at the mercy of their prices
There's a reason second hand sales have checks and balances, and so many avenues to sell your item, competition breeds good prices, deals, etc.
Collusion on the other hand will stagnant the market, less purchases, might even detract newer purchases
No fucking way. MS and the publisher deserve none of it. It's been sold. Do you really think movies, books, clothes and houses should be subject to the same. What about loaning or selling yourself?Seems fair.
And I am more than happy to abandon any co pant who does shit like this. I have other hobbies as well.
That's not true for any of the western publishers (47% or higher).47% of revenue made on consoles by third party publishers was made on Sony's platforms. According to data compiled by my bank.
But that does sound like I can't sell games privately. That is still shitty.
Also lending a game to a friend is still impossible.
Absolute bullshit.
How can a movie, music and book industry survive with ubiquitous pre-owned sales, if gaming can't?
I really fucking hope XBone fails. Hard. Even worse than Vita.
With all those ppl taking a cut, the prices paid to gamers for used games will have to go down a lot. ALOT.
That's how gamestop trading works today minus the publisher kick back
I feel like Sony is going to get pressured into this too
god damn i hope Sony isn't part of this system
wow, so no more selling on eBay? Instead of killing gamestop they strengthen gamestop?
So the greedy gamestops of the world get their second hand sales but consumer lending/selling/giving game to friend is screwed ?
That's how gamestop trading works today minus the publisher kick back
How are these games being tracked as to which one is which though? Surely they aren't printing a unique disc for every single game.
So would the company who made my car but that's not the way it has worked. This shit needs to be nipped in the bud now. Sadly people will suck it up and keep on trucking.The movie, music and book industries would love to stop content being sold on eBay - or at least getting a cut of the sale - hence their use of more digital markets to move people to those new digital platforms with the excuse of convenience.
Who cares if it is wiped from your account? You no longer have the fucking game.
god damn i hope Sony isn't part of this system
The question a lot of folks have is this:
If the system needs to check every 24 hours to see if you own games, will those servers still be running 10-20 years from now? And, if not, do you now own a bunch of coasters?
Again, I'm talking about games you supposedly "own".
May not be a big deal for some people, but others like playing old games. I still play Genesis and PS1 games.
revenue from this could be significant enough that Sony might be left with no choice but to do the same thing, or be left out from significant revenues.
Blurays never get scratched.
Games are not cars is a dumb argument. You might as well impose this Microsoft DRM on DVD movies, music CDs, college textbooks, second handbooks and might as well throw cars in the mix so car manufacturers can get a cut of the second hand market as well. If I sell my laptop or smartphone or watch shouldn't the same be applied to those sales too?This controversy bothered me the least out of all of it. Devs deserve their money. Games aren't cars. It would have been nice to actually have an answer planned though when someone asks it 10 minutes after your show.