Outside of his affair with Melisandre, which is complicated by the fact that he views as a war effort almost and his wife even approves of it, he hasn't really broken any rules.
The very first thing he says to his wife is how he broke his sacred vows and was very wrong to do so. The only reason she overlooked it was because she's even DEEPER into the religion and thinks it's part of a greater plan. He even looks shocked and creeped out at this forgiveness.
Yeah, I've been seriously contemplating reading the books since the first season aired. After tonight, I don't think waiting for the next season to find out what happens will be remotely possible.
Stellar episode, stellar acting and some of the best tv I've seen in a long time! I definitely need some payback for the Starks at some point.
I don't get why everyone is going on about Stannis, really what's to like? Bedding with an evil witch who births demons while locking up the only sane friend the guy has. I'm sure there is more in store for his character, but for now he gets a hell no from me.
I think Jon Snuh is kinda terrible. I love Book Jon. Show Jon is such a dull dude. Casting director knows nothing.
If you are going to start reading, I HIGHLY suggest you begin by reading "A Clash of Kings"...The TV show does a good job of covering the first book but skips a lot of material that become bigger stories down the line.
If you try to pick up after the RW, you will be completely lost...
As for Stannis...he grows on you...like an uncle with an extremely dry sense of humor.
not a book reader, but i spoiled myself alot during the s1 times so i know about what's gonna happen
tbh when i was watching it i didn't really feel anything, no sadness no nothing
in fact i was quite disappointed, i was expecting a more dramatic moment or something i guess
Um, maybe it's because you knew what was going to happen?
well i know what's going to happen, but only generally, as in not in great detail
i dunno, the scene just wasn't as powerful as i always thought it would be
She isn't exactly known for making the best decisions.
This is true. The first book has a lot of details about the previous Targaryen's reign and how it was ended (including some rather blatant hints aboutThere's a lot of backstory in A Game of Thrones that doesn't get covered in the show. I would highly recommend starting with book 1; A Song of Ice and Fire is not the same thing as the TV adaptation.
This i
Maybe the tv show will have a flashback season about the Ruby Ford after it catches up to Martin.
Not sure it counts as a spoiler, but I marked it anyway. Just more proof that the first book is worth reading and that the tv show skips important details.Sqorgar some of that should probably have spoiler tags dude.
Don't be a douche. All the book readers coming to the show thread seem to literally get off by dropping spoilers just to fuck with people who didn't read the books. It's sad and borderline pathetic.Embrace the superior art form.
I suppose you don't want us to spoil the Great Gatsby movie either?
It reminded me of
Fuck this, team Tully for the revenge of the pissing Blackfish.
I think once GRRM kills enough characters you'll be desensitized, kinda like the "Eden: it's an endless world" manga, relevant characters die almost every chapter and you would just give up when enough's enough.
The first book was Stark heavy - there are POV chapters for Bran, Arya, Sansa, Jon, Catelyn, and Ned. The only non-Stark POVs are Daenerys and Tyrion. As of the third book, the only other POV chapters are Davos, Jaime, and Samwell. So, at this point, the story is still told almost entirely through Stark characters.I think the one thing I don't like about the show is how it's so focused on the Starks compared to how the books handle all the characters. The show conditions you to an even greater extent than the books to see the Starks, and only the Starks, as the good guys who you're supposed to cheer on. The books spreads out the focus more evenly among the various families and characters in my opinion.
Seriously. Wtf is wrong with some people?![]()
What a bizarre phenomenon this has been. The sheer...righteousness at seeing people miserable?
Love the first one, even with the sloppy camera angle shift. If there are any more of that caliber I'd love to see them.
Love the first one, even with the sloppy camera angle shift. If there are any more of that caliber I'd love to see them.
Well, this is a thread about the tv show. I'm sure that if someone posted about something that would happen next season without a spoiler tag, they'd get jumped on. It was my fault for not erring on the side of caution. I do sort of feel like because the first book was made into a tv show, nothing in the first book could be considered a spoiler (if it was that important, it would've been in the first season) - but it's not my call on what others would consider spoilers.And something I'm just wondering about... How long does something have to be in the public space before open "spoilers" become something people stop worrying about? The first book has been out for 17 years now, and this isn't the *NO BOOK SPOILER* thread, so someone posting a small detail the first book contains shouldn't be yelled at to spoiler their post, just like we don't yell at someone for spoiling The Empire Strikes Back or other things.
Pretty much.
He's stated that he only kills characters people like.
He's worse than Joss Whedon, another writer who just kills for shock value.
![]()
What a bizarre phenomenon this has been. The sheer...righteousness at seeing people miserable?
As someone who has read the books: MUAHAHAHAHAHA GIVE ME YOUR TEARS
I've been waiting for this since the season started.![]()
There's a word for that. It's called Schadenfreude. Basically, it means to take pleasure in the misfortune of others. It is derived from the feeling that someone deserves their misfortune and it is generally a self esteem boost with maybe a tinge of euphoria.![]()
What a bizarre phenomenon this has been. The sheer...righteousness at seeing people miserable?
There's a word for that. It's called Schadenfreude. Basically, it means to take pleasure in the misfortune of others. It is derived from the feeling that someone deserves their misfortune and it is generally a self esteem boost with maybe a tinge of euphoria.
In this case, I believe it is a case of book people feeling, perhaps subconsciously, like the tv show fandom has eclipsed them. That maybe they don't deserve to be fans because they are only just now discovering the series - which, as books, has been around for almost two decades. The naivete on display is almost cute, and reminds us of simpler times when we thought things were going to turn out well for the characters too.
You guys are new fans, and while that's okay, you aren't true fans until you have met the red wedding. If anything, it's not a feeling of righteousness, but more a "welcome to the club". Now we accept you. Also, book fans have been forced to keep this secret for years, and you have to understand how relieved they are to finally be able to talk about it with new fans.
I'M SO ANGRY RAAGHHHRHRHRGH
![]()
There's a word for that. It's called Schadenfreude. Basically, it means to take pleasure in the misfortune of others. It is derived from the feeling that someone deserves their misfortune and it is generally a self esteem boost with maybe a tinge of euphoria.
In this case, I believe it is a case of book people feeling, perhaps subconsciously, like the tv show fandom has eclipsed them. That maybe they don't deserve to be fans because they are only just now discovering the series - which, as books, has been around for almost two decades. The naivete on display is almost cute, and reminds us of simpler times when we thought things were going to turn out well for the characters too.
You guys are new fans, and while that's okay, you aren't true fans until you have met the red wedding. If anything, it's not a feeling of righteousness, but more a "welcome to the club". Now we accept you. Also, book fans have been forced to keep this secret for years, and you have to understand how relieved they are to finally be able to talk about it with new fans.
There's a word for that. It's called Schadenfreude. Basically, it means to take pleasure in the misfortune of others. It is derived from the feeling that someone deserves their misfortune and it is generally a self esteem boost with maybe a tinge of euphoria.
In this case, I believe it is a case of book people feeling, perhaps subconsciously, like the tv show fandom has eclipsed them. That maybe they don't deserve to be fans because they are only just now discovering the series - which, as books, has been around for almost two decades. The naivete on display is almost cute, and reminds us of simpler times when we thought things were going to turn out well for the characters too.
You guys are new fans, and while that's okay, you aren't true fans until you have met the red wedding. If anything, it's not a feeling of righteousness, but more a "welcome to the club". Now we accept you. Also, book fans have been forced to keep this secret for years, and you have to understand how relieved they are to finally be able to talk about it with new fans.
There is a right and a wrong way to do this. Taking some degree of vicarious pleasure in the sheer entertainment others have just experienced as you did is fine, great even, and only natural; killing the moment by acting completely out of tone, rubbing it in, and laughing in their face AS THE SCENE IS FUCKING HAPPENING (as some of those reactions vids have) is ridiculously uncalled for and begs us to question what kind of social deficiencies the person acting in such a way has.
Greywind was howling and trying to get out of the pen he was in to warn Robb, but he couldn't escape.