GribbleGrunger
Dreams in Digital
They're busy rehearsing the cheers from the back of the conference so that Spike TV picks it up nice and clearly.
Why not? lolLmao really? So you really believe they will avoid all of the unanswered questions until launch?
Mortimer, can publishers say they have PS4 versions at all or just not show them? One is not too atypical but maybe taken to an extreme, the other is lulzy.
I don't know why people champion and cheer this obvious payola. It distorts the market and creates deadweight loss.
What the what? There is no way I can believe MS execs decided to schedule something else on the day of their E3 presentation. That's like scheduling a round of golf on the day your child is born.
Publishers wouldn't have that problem.
There's also the possibility that the PS4 isn't noticeably better looking than the Xbone version (we are talking about launch games, after all).
Microsoft goes first, so that isn't the case.I am guessing they are stalling to see what Sony has to say at their conference
What the what? There is no way I can believe MS execs decided to schedule something else on the day of their E3 presentation. That's like scheduling a round of golf on the day your child is born.
I would assume they can but I don't know for sure. I actually just talked to the same dude today and he has backed off a bit saying "I think some publishers just aren't comfortable with their builds." But he is certain that EA was supposed to show stuff on stage and be in their booth and now neither is happening. Other games, which he won't get specific about, were supposed to be in the booth and now aren't. According to him they are so, so, so thankful to the indies who are now jumping at the chance to get their games in the booth.
So it's hard to suss out who is pulling out because they don't like where their game is and who is moneyhats, if any. But it's definitely worth keeping an eye on. If there's a lot of MS multiplats and not Sony versions... I wouldn't assume that ps4 development is behind... i would assume that MS is the reason the ps4 version isn't there. But even that assumption might be wrong. That's why i posted that in here instead of making a new post about it because there's so much shit going on now that Im starting to think even my sources *think* they know more than they actually know. So many moving pieces...
I missed this, but this is some shady stuff right here. I thought Microsoft had 15 Microsoft published exclusives for the first year. Why do they need to do this? The only explanation I have is that if running side by side the PS4 version of games will look and play far superior to the Xbox. This is just a band aid on a festering wound that will one day be exposed for what it is.
Delay the new Xbox MS. Fucking do it.
Then come back with a vengeance.
LOL.. a change in exec's schedule is such a bullshit answer.
oh, E3 has only been booked for oh, i don't know.. a year.. and all of a sudden change in schedule? How about the exec's meet 'external' folks later in the day.
one thing right after another.
I mentioned the other day that I was hearing rumors of Microsoft throwing around a considerable amount of money to have publishers only show games on the Xbox One during E3. Most people dismissed my admittedly flakey news as 'that's what always happens.'
I've talked to more people since then though and this isn't the usual jostling for publishers on stage that happens at E3. Microsoft is throwing BIG money around to reverse course on idea that they aren't a games console. The rumors are that PS4 versions of multiplats, by those who do take the money, won't be shown AT ALL. Not on stage and not on the show floor.
I don't feel bad for Sony because business is business. I'm sure they will find a way to have a decent show... or they will have to recover afterwards. That's not really my concern.
Now, there's no need to take my word on this if you don't want to. But do keep an eye on E3 next week. With them buying up everything in sight and now potentially cutting an open roundtable out(to assumedly talk one on one with friendly press) and word that finding multiplat games on the ps4 on the show floor will be much harder than anticipated.... just keep an eye on it. Maybe my sources are wrong. But I feel confident enough in this info to share it.
I'm not saying to jump to conclusions. I'm just saying it may be something to keep an eye on.
it's Bullshit.What the what? There is no way I can believe MS execs decided to schedule something else on the day of their E3 presentation. That's like scheduling a round of golf on the day your child is born.
but that would mean that they actually care about the core and gaming....they don't.
So at what point does the gaming press put 2 and 2 together and start asking questions?
And? It doesn't mean that the content they present won't generate questions worthy of asking.It means you accept whatever they present, no questions asked.
LOL.. a change in exec's schedule is such a bullshit answer.
oh, E3 has only been booked for oh, i don't know.. a year.. and all of a sudden change in schedule? How about the exec's meet 'external' folks later in the day.
one thing right after another.
If you look up "hard facts" in the Microsoft dictionary, this is the first example given:Pathetic. Running away from telling the hard facts.
I think I get what they're doing, it's just gross. Control the message at all costs, no more speaking off the cuff, leave details "up in the air" for as long as possible.Very confused as to what MS are doing.
The people who will learn about these cancelled meetings and talk about it are the exact people who talk loudest about these things, just as it was with the Xbox Reveal.
I am guessing they are stalling to see what Sony has to say at their conference. it is pretty obvious they will both have some kind of bad policies(compared to now), not sure what yet though.
Was this discussed as well? I haven't read everything in this thread yet.
![]()
but that would mean that they actually care about the core and gaming....they don't.
So at what point does the gaming press put 2 and 2 together and start asking questions?
You don't think they will be showing BF4 at the Sony conference?
I don't see how they could be uncomfortable with their PS4 builds. PS4 is just a souped up Xbone.
Cancelling two similar events because of execs' scheduling issues? Yeah something's fishy here.
I would assume they can but I don't know for sure. I actually just talked to the same dude today and he has backed off a bit saying "I think some publishers just aren't comfortable with their builds." But he is certain that EA was supposed to show stuff on stage and be in their booth and now neither is happening. Other games, which he won't get specific about, were supposed to be in the booth and now aren't. According to him they are so, so, so thankful to the indies who are now jumping at the chance to get their games in the booth.
So it's hard to suss out who is pulling out because they don't like where their game is and who is moneyhats, if any. But it's definitely worth keeping an eye on. If there's a lot of MS multiplats and not Sony versions... I wouldn't assume that ps4 development is behind... i would assume that MS is the reason the ps4 version isn't there. But even that assumption might be wrong. That's why i posted that in here instead of making a new post about it because there's so much shit going on now that Im starting to think even my sources *think* they know more than they actually know. So many moving pieces...
I mean they mighy not talk drm etc at their conference and wait until Sony's show to see what they sayMicrosoft goes first, so that isn't the case.
If you look up "hard facts" in the Microsoft dictionary, this is the first example given:
![]()
Xbox One E3 Conference [OT] Microsoft am become death, destroyer of games.
Xbox One E3 Conference [OT] Enjoy The Silence
Cancelling two similar events because of execs' scheduling issues? Yeah something's fishy here.
MS can't seem to catch a break lately...even with this people are still gonna suspect something is up
MS can't seem to catch a break lately...even with this people are still gonna suspect something is up
Because it's completely unethical?Why not? lol
I think I get what they're doing, it's just gross. Control the message at all costs, no more speaking off the cuff, leave details "up in the air" for as long as possible.
Keep the mainstream audience they're targeting relatively in the dark so they just see it as the next CoD box and not something with negative connotations. The enthusiasts may freak but a good percentage will buy one at launch anyway. Dig into the war chest when possible to shape perception, ie. the cash for Xbox One E3 demo only rumor in this thread. Damage control in lieu of good news, fun for everyone. Maybe I'm being too cynical, but they haven't given us much else to go on between the rumors and announcements.