The Reddit post isn't the only reason this is known to be going on.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=60276093&postcount=352
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=61485185&postcount=2844
It's almost like you didn't read my post...
The Reddit post isn't the only reason this is known to be going on.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=60276093&postcount=352
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=61485185&postcount=2844
Microsoft has a history of astroturfing (for everything) back to the late 90s. Your proposition is far less believable.It's almost like you didn't read my post...
someone please read this guys posting history, lol
Microsoft has a history of astroturfing (for everything) back to the late 90s. Your proposition is far less believable.
someone please read this guys posting history, lol
![]()
Okay that killed me. :lol
Corporate shills nothing new, wait until they get on GAF.
hahahaha, fucking pathetic. Thank God for the great mod team here, that's been able to root out the astro-turfers.
We're through the looking glass here, people.... I'm sure gamers are as excited as I am to see the future of the Xbox One©.
I think it's silly to believe that a company as successful as Microsoft would stoop to posting random, positive comments on popular internet message boards. Besides, the XBox One© and the new Kinect 2 are such a great pieces of hardware that they doesn't need help from viral marketers to sell. And with games like Halo 5, Call of Duty: Ghosts and Forza 5 already on the way, I'm sure gamers are as excited as I am to see the future of the Xbox One©.
I think it's silly to believe that a company as successful as Microsoft would stoop to posting random, positive comments on popular internet message boards. Besides, the XBox One© and the new Kinect 2 are such a great pieces of hardware that they doesn't need help from viral marketers to sell. And with games like Halo 5, Call of Duty: Ghosts and Forza 5 already on the way, I'm sure gamers are as excited as I am to see the future of the Xbox One©.
Would be hilarious, had the mods on GAF been montoring the astroturfers here for like 2 years, building up a case. Then boom, drops it. 500 pages .PDF detailing everything. My biggest fear now, is that they know, they are being watched and therefore comes up with smarter measures.
Did not Bish hint at them using obvious email adresses. Well, next time, they wont do that.
I think it's silly to believe that a company as successful as Microsoft would stoop to posting random, positive comments on popular internet message boards. Besides, the XBox One© and the new Kinect 2 are such a great pieces of hardware that they don't need help from viral marketers to sell. And with games like Halo 5, Call of Duty: Ghosts and Forza 5 already on the way, I'm sure gamers are as excited as I am to see the future of the Xbox One©.
We've had people aggressively arguing for the superiority of (For example) Forza over GT who have signed up for the site with email accounts like spy@microsoft.net.
Given we don't know who this "source" is and the claim can't be proven or bebunked unless that person came forward it got me thinking. Would this not be a very damaging blow that a competitor of Microsoft would most certainly want at this paricular time? How do we know this isn't some Sony plant from their new PR firm trying to sink the knife deeper? Just saying the conspiracy we all assume could be something very different.
We've had people aggressively arguing for the superiority of (For example) Forza over GT who have signed up for the site with email accounts like spy@microsoft.net.
Of topic but what episode is this from? Not sure if it's the compression but it looks like its from somewhere between season 3-9 and I can't place it at all.
We've had people aggressively arguing for the superiority of (For example) Forza over GT who have signed up for the site with email accounts like spy@microsoft.net.
We've had people aggressively arguing for the superiority of (For example) Forza over GT who have signed up for the site with email accounts like spy@microsoft.net.
How much do you think this social blitz campaign pays the average joe poster? $300 a week?
Microsoft has a history of astroturfing (for everything) back to the late 90s. Your proposition is far less believable.
How much do you think this social blitz campaign pays the average joe poster? $300 a week?
Mainstream media journalists should add a paragraph on such evidences when they explain their audience what is wrong with DRM. So that they can be extra cautious when they read good things about it elsewhere on the internet.A Darling of mine, and probably many more, Mr.Jim Sterling has had a guy "battling" him every time, the past days, he has said something negative about Microsoft.
Well a CEX employee found out that he is actually working for Microsoft.
https://twitter.com/Zabant/status/342990976203251712
And if you read more of the guys tweet it's all in the same tone, Microsoft is good, it's like steam, it's awesome etc. etc. well for me It's things like this that makes me pissed, Microsoft already lost my respect back in 2001 and gained my hate with Secure boot and now my anger.
I would want $400, my time is precious (lots to do on GAF).I'd be a shill for $300 a week
any amount is too much, when you consider how many are willing to do it for free.
is that bannable? (serious question)
Great! That changes nothing I've said, though. This thread is about Microsoft -- and they have a more notorious reputation.I wonder if people realize that the 90s ended 13 years ago. How much has Microsoft changed since then? It's barely even the same company. Even the Anti-Trust suit against Microsoft practices, that the government drove, was closed in 2001. I'm not saying they're trustworthy. They are a corporation, and must be monitored and held accountable. Singling them out, however, is inaccurate. There are a lot of companies, like Sony, Apple, Google, etc in the tech industry that astroturfing/social networking manipulation with abandon. More if you consider any corporation where public image matters and it's was rifle in Politics. But suddenly MS invented it, judging by some posts lately. Since 2009 there are stricter rules about it, and penalties, although the effectiveness of these limitations are unknown really.
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtm
Then there is that Google commercial in theaters that people are paying to see...
We've had people aggressively arguing for the superiority of (For example) Forza over GT who have signed up for the site with email accounts like spy@microsoft.net.
Yes it is. Having a Microsoft email account is not itself bannable; that's fine. The problem is when it is evident that you are simply there to shill for your corporate overlords.
In case any Microsoft reputation managers are reading this thread (oh, and you are), whatever you are paying Opiate I will take half. I have a great reputation on these forums for level-headed and impartial posts.If ms can buy opiate out what hope is there for the rest of us?
How many of these accounts have you banned so far do you think? I'm still finding it hard to believe what seems to be happening
We've had people aggressively arguing for the superiority of (For example) Forza over GT who have signed up for the site with email accounts like spy@microsoft.net.
I think it's silly to believe that a company as successful as Microsoft would stoop to posting random, positive comments on popular internet message boards. Besides, the XBox One© and the new Kinect 2 are such a great pieces of hardware that they don't need help from viral marketers to sell. And with games like Halo 5, Call of Duty: Ghosts and Forza 5 already on the way, I'm sure gamers are as excited as I am to see the future of the Xbox One©.
Recently? Not many that I happen to personally know of, but I'm not necessarily there when every ban happens. Over the course of the last several years? Dozens.
I really hate when web sites and people use the © symbol in place of the ® symbol. I have no idea why.
That's what really gets me. You'd think they would have more sense than to sign up with an email address like that.
I think it's silly to believe that a company as successful as Microsoft would stoop to posting random, positive comments on popular internet message boards. Besides, the XBox One© and the new Kinect 2 are such a great pieces of hardware that they don't need help from viral marketers to sell. And with games like Halo 5, Call of Duty: Ghosts and Forza 5 already on the way, I'm sure gamers are as excited as I am to see the future of the Xbox One©.
Does the reverse ever happen or is it pretty much just a Microsoft thing?