George Zimmerman (killer of unarmed Florida teen Trayvon Martin) found not guilty

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, she isn't going to last on the stand much longer. She was getting mad yesterday. Today she is one aggressive comment or question from snapping. Her voice keeps raising and raising. "YES SIR!"
 
She's made it possible to have sassy sarcasm on a 2 word statement.

The Court Reporter's Short hand keys for "Yes Sir" are getting worn down.
 
I don't think it does them any favors though. She looks embarrassed and he seems like a jerk.

Oh, it's a total dick move. Especially when he slows down the delivery to emphasize her shitty grammar. But I think it's an interesting rhetorical technique that, along with her demeanor on the stand, depicts her as being dumb and unreliable.

edit: I also think it's brilliant how he has her read because it makes it seem like she's illiterate.
 
Oh, it's a total dick move. Especially when he slows down the delivery to emphasize her shitty grammar. But I think it's an interesting rhetorical technique that, along with her demeanor on the stand, depicts her as being dumb and unreliable.

edit: I also think it's brilliant how he has her read because it makes it seem like she's illiterate.

Well, if they try to translate it into something legible, then they might get the context/meaning behind it wrong.
 
If she does not back down from this that will hurt the defense. It is easy to believe that she is misunderstood enough to make "coulda" sould like "could". If anything the defense just took a few hours to make sure and illustrate that.
 
I feel pretty bad for the girl. She doesn't seem like she's all that awesome of a person, but she's being raked across the coals by the internet. I don't think being questioned for hours on end while having your every... idiosyncrasy used against you is an easy thing.

When I think about her two lies (about her age, and about why she skipped the wake - only one of which was under oath if I remember correctly) it just kind of adds into this image of someone who is not ready, wanting or able to be on the stand. And as much as it might be relevant (I don't know if it is, but it doesn't feel like it is to me) using those two lies for character assassination, along with her dumb-teen tweets, feels wrong to me.
 
I feel pretty bad for the girl. She doesn't seem like she's all that awesome of a person, but she's being raked across the coals by the internet. I don't think being questioned for hours on end while having your every... idiosyncrasy used against you is an easy thing.

When I think about her two lies (about her age, and about why she skipped the wake - only one of which was under oath if I remember correctly) it just kind of adds into this image of someone who is not ready, wanting or able to be on the stand. And as much as it might be relevant (I don't know if it is, but it doesn't feel like it is to me) using those two lies for character assassination, along with her dumb-teen tweets, feels wrong to me.

Because it IS wrong. It has nothing to do with the relevant details of the case. The point is to attack her character, and, by association, Trayvon's by basically mocking her intelligence and taking advantage of a cultural gap.
 
it was clear from the playback that it was "coulda"
which in many broken english dialects can definitely mean Can or rather "Able"
 
Oh, it's a total dick move. Especially when he slows down the delivery to emphasize her shitty grammar. But I think it's an interesting rhetorical technique that, along with her demeanor on the stand, depicts her as being dumb and unreliable.

edit: I also think it's brilliant how he has her read because it makes it seem like she's illiterate.

Was she able to read it?
 
I'd have to hear it again, but I'm pretty sure she said "coulda" then corrected it to "could". I agree with the prosecutor that this shouldn't be entered in as evidence.
 
I'd have to hear it again, but I'm pretty sure she said "coulda" then corrected it to "could". I agree with the prosecutor that this shouldn't be entered in as evidence.

It's a deposition, it's already there as evidence. Right?
 
Please stay out of my neighborhood. If I had kids, you'd be a threat to them.

So following someone represents a threat to you? Seeing where a suspicious person goes is dangerous?

If this happened to your family and you knew the outcome could have been different because a person followed suspicious people, you would be fine?
 
I'd have to hear it again, but I'm pretty sure she said "coulda" then corrected it to "could". I agree with the prosecutor that this shouldn't be entered in as evidence.

I agree. He wants the jury to make up their own mind about what she said. It was mumbled and unclear. He asked her what she said and she told him. End of story.
 
So following someone represents a threat to you? Seeing where a suspicious person goes is dangerous?

If this happened to your family and you knew the outcome could have been different because a followed suspicious people, you would be fine?

Vigilantism is dangerous, following around people you suspect is absolutely unnecessary - call the cops and they'll be there in two minutes.
 
Defense trying to use her broken english as a weapon. I think it backfired. If only she was a little more fucking smarter, her testimony could have wrapped this whole thing up. Clearly one of them is lying and i doubt it's her.
 
Because it IS wrong. It has nothing to do with the relevant details of the case. The point is to attack her character, and, by association, Trayvon's by basically mocking her intelligence and taking advantage of a cultural gap.

I wonder if they would be using this same tactic if there were different people in the Jury. *hmm*
 
Vigilantism is dangerous, following around people you suspect is absolutely unnecessary - call the cops and they'll be there in two minutes.

This. As cynical as it may sound, people need to stay the fuck out of other peoples business. Especially when there's a higher authority in place to handle certain things such as "suspicious" beings. It's sad bad shit happens and that there's fucked up people in the world, but that doesn't mean you should put yourself in a position to potentially cause harm to yourself or another party. Being the hero isn't guaranteed.
 
So following someone represents a threat to you? Seeing where a suspicious person goes is dangerous?

Yes, and obviously so.

If this happened to your family and you knew the outcome could have been different because a person followed suspicious people, you would be fine?

Let's put it this way: I wouldn't blame you for not preventing it. And I'd prefer you not try, lest you wind up stupidly killing an innocent person.

You aren't a hero. Nobody needs you to be a hero. Innocent people die when stupid people play hero.

In case it's not perfectly clear, I am absolutely opposed to vigilantes.
 
So following someone represents a threat to you? Seeing where a suspicious person goes is dangerous?

If this happened to your family and you knew the outcome could have been different because a person followed suspicious people, you would be fine?

Is it really that hard for you to imagine what it would be like to be followed by a hostile stranger at night for no good reason?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom