Pacific Rim |OT| Apocalypse Never

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think he meant agile and fast. The Jaegers seem to have a real sense of weight behind them which Del Toro really wanted to portray.

http://www.theledger.com/article/20...ector-s-Pacific-Rim-Resurrects-the-Kaiju-Film

"We sort of know how to make things look really big: You slow them down, there are other visual cues you can give it to say this thing is 250 feet tall," says animation director Hal Hickel. "But if everything is moving very slowly, that could potentially be boring. You don't want everything to look like it's in a slow-motion. The trick for us was to move things in a way that suggested their gigantic size and felt kind of realistic-ish, but at the same time was exciting to watch."
 
The robots in Transformers were floaty?

I think he meant agile and fast. The Jaegers seem to have a real sense of weight behind them which Del Toro really wanted to portray.

Like, the robots in Transformers are supposed to be huge and heavy, yet they're able to flit about the environment as if they weigh nothing. It's like they're operating in zero grav or something. Like this
IFWnF7r.gif
 
Like, the robots in Transformers are supposed to be huge and heavy, yet they're able to flit about the environment as if they weigh nothing. It's like they're operating in zero grav or something. Like this
IFnF7r.gif

You want a realistic giant robot/monster movie?
I think you best leave your brain at the door and just enjoy the moving pictures.
 
Now I'm imagining Count Dookkake as a 250 foot tall Kaiju telling me to go fuck myself.

I'm wondering how professional critics will treat this movie. I mean, critics like the Avengers, and that was a stupid action movie that handled the action part pretty damn well.
 
Now I'm imagining Count Dookkake as a 250 foot tall Kaiju telling me to go fuck myself.

I'm wondering how professional critics will treat this movie. I mean, critics like the Avengers, and that was a stupid action movie that handled the action part pretty damn well.

I can imagine the Count standing on a wrecked Jaeger telling a Kaiju to go fuck itself.
 
Variety absolutely trashed it, not shocked at all. Seems like they want the movie to fail. 3 articles explaining how big of a bomb it's going to be and now this review. I know I know conspiracy theories lulz, but it's just... too obvious IMO.
 
glad to hear it's good fun. reviews on blockbusters i don't really care about anymore after they trashed lone ranger and i had so much fun with it. (and the opposite effect with star trek 2). gaf impressions seem cool.

if this succeeds i wish him well but i hope to god they don't give him any lovecraft properties.
 
So basically what I'm getting the feeling that if you hated or disliked the trailers at all, seeing the movie probably isn't going to change your mind. Meanwhile, if you liked the trailers, then the movie will totally deliver.

Good enough for me.
 
So basically what I'm getting the feeling that if you hated or disliked the trailers at all, seeing the movie probably isn't going to change your mind. Meanwhile, if you liked the trailers, then the movie will totally deliver.

Good enough for me.

Pretty much, the movie has been sincere about itself from the start.
 

Pacific Rim is entirely in keeping with much expensively-made effects-heavy cinema of the present time: it's put together with such artistry and such devotion that it can't help but be impressive as a visual spectacle. (Del Toro's devotion to Japanese monster movies is particularly evident.) But, like Man of Steel or The Dark Knight Returns, it can't quite bring itself to believe in its own pop-culture disposability and ends up paying the price.

Did he mean The Dark Knight Rises?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom