Super Smash Bros Wii U and 3DS: Info Collection - Dojo, Mega Man and Trailer! 2014!

And yet, it already has, given Pokémon choices in the past, or the inclusion of Roy in Melee.
That's why I said a couple characters here and there is alright.

Though I'm not entirely sure you could consider any of the playable Pokemon thus far as Marvel-esque promotions. All of them have had definite prior popularity. Pokemon Trainer himself was reaching into the series' past instead of what was currently hot.

Roy is like the one character in the entire series who's entire purpose was promotional.
 
Roy is like the one character in the entire series who's entire purpose was promotional.
And even then, he was a last minute clone to pad out the roster. That kind of careless urgency was absent with Brawl -- each newcomer pick really seemed to matter. I suspect even more care will be put into selecting newcomers for SSB4 since the roster is already pretty packed.
 
Yay victini...except it'll be even more rare than manaphy lol.

I do hope sakurai won't make legendary Pokemon have a 1/649(or higher since x and y are coming) chance of appearing. 1/493 was bad enough in brawl.

Haha, I never knew this.

I must be one lucky bastard then. Lol
 
Yay victini...except it'll be even more rare than manaphy lol.

I do hope sakurai won't make legendary Pokemon have a 1/649(or higher since x and y are coming) chance of appearing. 1/493 was bad enough in brawl.
Oh yes, this... I think that I've encountered Manaphy less than 10 times. And it has such a fun ability. :/
 
Define "everyone."

The company has more things to sell, and profit from.

We have more things to enjoy and a more varied roster.

Example: due to the marvel method, marvel can now make money from more than spidey, the FF. and the xmen, and now can make money from the avengers, and soon marvel cosmic. We get to experiences more than the usual spidey the FF and the xmen, and get to be introduced to new experiences. We get variation, they get money. And If we do not like the variation, we can voice it, it wont sell and then they can try again some other time.

We all win.

" hey new pokemans"

" we like them"

" we will put them in more things and sell more things with their face on and put them in the show"

Marketing.
 
The company has more things to sell, and profit from.

We have more things to enjoy and a more varied roster.

Example: due to the marvel method, marvel can now make money from more than spidey, the FF. and the xmen, and now can make money from the avengers, and soon marvel cosmic. We get to experiences more than the usual spidey the FF and the xmen, and get to be introduced to new experiences. We get variation, they get money. And If we do not like the variation, we can voice it, it wont sell and then they can try again some other time.

Smash Bros. comes out far too infrequently for your final point to work. We get a shitty "please buy these games please" roster and we're stuck with it for around half a decade.

Quite simply, you want Smash Bros. to be something it never has been. It's a fanservice game and living museum and tribute to everything Nintendo has done up to the game's release. It is not a singular snapshot in time of what Nintendo wanted to push at that one point in time with a couple of bones thrown to older series' fans.

I would argue what you want is in fact the antithesis of what Smash Bros. is and is, quite frankly, a terrible and short-sighted idea.
 
From day 1, Wario has always been larger than Mario.

c199JGY.gif
 
Smash Bros. comes out far too infrequently for your final point to work. We get a shitty "please buy these games please" roster and we're stuck with it for around half a decade.

Quite simply, you want Smash Bros. to be something it never has been. It's a fanservice game and living museum and tribute to everything Nintendo has done up to the game's release. It is not a singular snapshot in time of what Nintendo wanted to push at that one point in time with a couple of bones thrown to older series' fans.

I would argue what you want is in fact the antithesis of what Smash Bros. is and is, quite frankly, a terrible and short-sighted idea.

Lets address this in order.
Not at all, pokemon trainer could help to sell gen 6, better yet rumor is its about time for a gen 3 remake. Put gen 3 pokemon trainer, have New mew rep gen 6. Bam.

Next.

Super_Smash_Bros_Brawl_Marth_01.jpg


LucarioBrawl.jpg


:O

You mean that thing I am arguing has already been done, and nothing happened to the roster. And smash bros isn't some sacred cow that should not be touched, and can be a nintendo museum as well as a means of advertising. And you seem to be over reacting , thinking that I mean change the entire roster when I mean change one guy.

Oh me oh my
 
Wario is one of the best characters in this game, and he would absolutely dominate if his matchup vs wasn't so bad. (Keep in mind, he was considered the 3rd best character in the game at one point) The waft was just an unnecessarily good trump card given to a character who already had a ton of great tools.


The charge up time is completely irrelevant. You wait for 55 seconds a free kill move... how is that balanced?

Newsflash, games are going to have characters better than others. Wario has little range on any of his attacks, his frame data is merely average, and he gets horribly raped by grab releases by most of the cast. Even characters like Sheik can kill him around 90%.

Fart, weight, recovery, and his aerial movement are the incentives to play him. Hes a very hard character to win with in Brawl...in fact there's only a couple Warios who place well with him in the WORLD. He WAS considered 3rd best in the game a long time ago but so what? So was DDD.

And lol at 55 seconds and being a "free" kill move. Fart is most dangerous at 90 seconds 55 seconds will hardly kill anyone and how exactly is something "free" you have to land the move, if your opponent shields the move there goes 2 minutes of charge time wasted and you have to wait again.

Fart is a unique move and was well implemented its not "broken" or anything.
 
Not to butt into somebody else's argument, but how is Marth even remotely a promotional character?

SSBM was many westerner's introduction to marth.

The plan originally was to keep him out of the Western versions, they decided not to , turns out he got popular and they springboarded off of that.
 
SSBM was many westerner's introduction to marth.
Marth was included in Melee because Fire Emblem was big in Japan and because he scored highly on Sakurai's character survey. His most recent game was seven years before Melee came out. Whatever happened in the West as a result of that was merely coincidental -- the Fire Emblem characters weren't even going to be in the English version of Melee at all initially.
 
Marth was included in Melee because Fire Emblem was big in Japan and because he scored highly on Sakurai's character survey. His most recent game was seven years before Melee came out. Whatever happened in the West as a result of that was merely coincidental -- the Fire Emblem characters weren't even going to be in the English version of Melee at all initially.

" oh hey these guys like this guy, ... Lets market that shit to them"

And they did, and it worked. Sometimes accidents happen, My point is that the game can be used as a vehicle to introduce people to new characters.

And it was, and it is.

This is like saying that Ness was a promotional character in SSB for those of us in Europe.
And he finally arrived this week!

Not at all.

He could have been however the introduction to EB and got them interested in the series. They did it several years to late, but he could have been.

A cross over is many things.

One of those things is a marketing tool.
 
A rep from every gen of Pokemon is probably asking for WAY too much.

But I honestly wouldn't mind at all. Especially if someone like PT counts as 1 rep. Then again, it'd be cool to have a PT like trainer that is multi-gen (perhaps having 3 Pokemon from 3 different generations lol).
 
" oh hey these guys like this guy, ... Lets market that shit to them"

And they did, and it worked. Sometimes accidents happen, My point is that the game can be used as a vehicle to introduce people to new characters.

And it was, and it is.
Marth was included because Fire Emblem has a huge following in Japan, so it made sense for them to make that franchise to have a rep. He's iconic of the franchise, therefore he was there to rep the franchise, he's not a promotional character, Roy is.
 
Of the 45 or so characters to appear in Smash Bros., Roy is the only one that I would concede to being "promotional." His only game wasn't even out by the time of Melee's release.
 
Marth was included because Fire Emblem had a huge following in Japan, so it made sense for them to make that franchise to have a rep. He's iconic of the franchise, therefore he was there to rep the franchise, he's not a promotional character, Roy is.

Marth and Roy for a lot of people in the west got them interested in the series. And that is my point, a cross over gets you interested individual characters and their series. Crossovers are often marketing vehicles intentionally or not. And Smash bros is an intentional one , espically with things like trophies that give you insight on the series they come from and even tell you the game they are. So if you want to pick it up you can. Smash bros can be , and has been used as a marketing. And that is fine,

And that is my point, you can use smash to promote new Pokemon and still keep it smash, it isn't magically gonna turn into PSAS, no. The pokemon trainer is different that is it. Its not like Bayonetta or something ( many of you were frothing at the mouth for) its first party nintendo characters, in a installment of a classic series. How is smash bros tainted? How is it tarnished, I do not see how?
 
Marth and Roy for a lot of people in the west got them interested in the series. And that is my point, a cross over gets you interested individual characters and their series. Crossovers are often marketing vehicles intentionally or not. And Smash bros is an intentional one , epically with things like trophies that give you insight on the series they come from and even tell you the game. So if you want to pick it up you can. Smash bros can be , and has been used as a marketing. And that is fine,

Okay, this is the problem. You're not understanding what we're actually talking about. We're talking about character inclusions that are purely for promotional purposes, which is likely Roy's case. Marth is NOT there for purely promotion, he was there because of the fans.
 
Marth was not included in Smash Bros. for promotional purposes. He was not included to increase awareness of Fire Emblem--he may have had that effect in the West, but that was not his inclusions intent.

Intent is the argument here that you don't seem to be getting.
 
Pokémon doesn't need "promoting" through Smash Bros. It has a much bigger audience than this game does.
This. SSB is good to show some small, old or obscure series but not something that big. I think 5 slots are enough for Pokemon. Pikachu, Mewtwo(both forms), Red, Jigglypuff and Lucario/something new.
 
Out of curiosity, how does Mewtwo's new form(s) work? Can he change between them at will or are they completely separate from each other? I'm trying to get a feel for how it would be implemented in Smash Bros.
 
Pokémon doesn't need "promoting" through Smash Bros. It has a much bigger audience than this game does.

And they could get a bigger one.

Okay, this is the problem. You're not understanding what we're actually talking about. We're talking about character inclusions that are purely for promotional purposes, which is likely Roy's case. Marth is NOT there for purely promotion, he was there because of the fans.

Marth was not included in Smash Bros. for promotional purposes. He was not included to increase awareness of Fire Emblem--he may have had that effect in the West, but that was not his inclusions intent.

Intent is the argument here that you don't seem to be getting.

I understand the difference. My point it for many westerners, there wasn't any difference they were two new dudes from some game they had never heard of. And they investigated, and found something new to enjoy. Everyone included in the smash bros roster, is representing something/ marketing for it. Aside from obvious big wigs, and even then Link's appearance changes to match whatever game he is from.

To go back to the beginning of all this

Pokemon as of right now have 4 reps ( unless someone is added/cut ect.)

Pikachu
Jiggs
Pokemon Trainer
Lucario

They have 2 gen 1 reps

Why not use one of those slots to rep something that would be relevant to the future, so when it comes out, interests will already be sparked. Or if it is already out, get people to buy the game.

Like Ike, or if he is replaced, Chrom.

Smash bros can be used to celebrate the old and the new.
 
When in 2014 do you all think the game will be out? I think the Wii U version is looking pretty good so far, I could see it beating the 3DS version to the market. Going to predict Wii U Smash in late spring of 2014, with Smash 3DS making it out in the fall.
 
When in 2014 do you all think the game will be out? I think the Wii U version is looking pretty good so far, I could see it beating the 3DS version to the market. Going to predict Wii U Smash in late spring of 2014, with Smash 3DS making it out in the fall.
October 2014 for the Wii U version, and either the same or before Christmas for the 3DS.
 
I understand the difference. My point it for many westerners, there wasn't any difference they were two new dudes from some game they had never heard of. And they investigated, and found something new to enjoy. Everyone included in the smash bros roster, is representing something/ marketing for it. Aside from obvious big wigs, and even then Link's appearance changes to match whatever game he is from.
No one is arguing about the character inclusions having an affect on popularity. We're talking about the original intent of the characters' inclusions. That's all.
 
No one is arguing about the character inclusions having an affect on popularity. We're talking about the original intent of the characters' inclusions. That's all.

I am arguing that the intent of all the characters included is to pay reverence and to market.

That is the point of every cross over ever made ever. And What I am suggesting is nothing new. It wouldn't be tainting smash bros, because its just marketing and paying reverence, like everyone and everything in smash bros. Its very well put together.

Smash bros is one of those eastbay catalogs but instead of shoes its nintendo stuff , and sometimes sanic.
 
I am arguing that the intent of all the characters included is to pay reverence and to market.

That is the point of every cross over ever made ever. And What I am suggesting is nothing new. It wouldn't be tainting smash bros, because its just marketing and paying reverence, like everyone and everything in smash bros. Its very well put together.

Smash bros is one of those eastbay catalogs but instead of shoes is nintendo stuff , and sometimes sanic.
Oh ffs...

The difference between Smash Bros' inclusions and PASBR's inclusions is that the latter's half of the roster was really just there for the sake of promotion and nothing else. This isn't Smash Bros's case. They were added for more than just promotion. Yes, the characters in Smash Bros does promote the characters and their franchise but that's not the main reason they're in the roster.

You.are.not.getting.the.point.at.all.
 
Crazy theory time.

The WIi Fit Trainer's Final Smash looks a lot like one of Tabuu's attack.

Wii Fit Trainer is Tabuu.
 
Oh ffs...

The difference between Smash Bros' inclusions and PASBR's inclusions is that the latter's half of the roster was really just there for the sake of promotion and nothing else. This isn't Smash Bros's case. They were added for more than just promotion.

You.are.not.getting.the.point.at.all.

That is what I just said

My old post

I am arguing that the intent of all the characters included is to pay reverence and to market.

That is the point of every cross over ever made ever. And What I am suggesting is nothing new. It wouldn't be tainting smash bros, because its just marketing and paying reverence, like everyone and everything in smash bros. Its very well put together.

Smash bros is one of those eastbay catalogs but instead of shoes its nintendo stuff , and sometimes sanic.


It is more than just marketing, frigging ROB . However its still marketing.

You do not seem to be reading.

Things can have two purposes.
 
That is what I just said

My old post

I am arguing that the intent of all the characters included is to pay reverence and to market.

That is the point of every cross over ever made ever. And What I am suggesting is nothing new. It wouldn't be tainting smash bros, because its just marketing and paying reverence, like everyone and everything in smash bros. Its very well put together.

Smash bros is one of those eastbay catalogs but instead of shoes its nintendo stuff , and sometimes sanic.


It is more than just marketing, frigging ROB . However its still marketing.

You do not seem to be reading.
Once again, no one is arguing that the characters aren't being promoted. We're talking about the main intention of character inclusions. You're the one who isn't reading.
 
Once again, no one is arguing that the characters aren't being promoted. We're talking about the intention of character inclusions. You're the one who isn't reading.

Ok, let me break it down.

Blow ya mind real quick, Things can have more than one intention and purpose.

And each smash bros characters purpose for being included is to pay reverence and to market.

that was the point

Can't wait to buy a new ROB for my Wii U!

Pay reverence.

Reading is good yo.
 
Ok, let me break it down.

Blow ya mind real quick, Things can have more than one intention and purpose.

And each smash bros characters purpose for being included is to pay reverence and to market.
Could've sworn that's what I've said that some posts ago:

Okay, this is the problem. You're not understanding what we're actually talking about. We're talking about character inclusions that are purely for promotional purposes, which is likely Roy's case. Marth is NOT there for purely promotion, he was there because of the fans.

Pretty sure I've implied that there's such thing as multiple purposes.

Besides, the argument in the first place is about not wanting characters that are just there for promotional purposes and nothing more. Which was PASBR's problem.
 
Could've sworn that's what I've said that some posts ago:



Pretty sure I've implied that there's such thing as multiple purposes.

That is what I have been arguing in the first place, that you can do both those things.

So , qq more, koopah, sometime evee, formerly a small black pokemon child

What the fuck are we arguing about. Because that was my point from the fucking get go.
 
Read my edit. Your argument was pointless from the beginning

My argument was they should include gen 6 pokemon trainer, to market. And pay some respect to the Pokemon series, where its going.

And I have held that ground, and you agree with me.

Who's argument is pointless? We wasted time because you didn't agree how point was formulated basically.
 
Top Bottom