Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn - Beta Phase 3 Impression: Phase 4 August

Status
Not open for further replies.
I installed the new Nvidia beta drivers and my benchmark score went up over 200 points and average framerate went up 5 fps higher. Excellent!

iJLqNOEBRsmwl.png
 
I'd listen to it if I didn't think Gary Gannon wasn't so annoying (with a very punchable face to boot). Someone he was with was so spineless that it made what they were talking about worse and that guy is probably on that podcast. "Mr. Happy" seems like an alright guy though.
 
It seems to me that they will have a podcast dedicated to the game, which is very cool, although I have no idea how big is that site (first time I've been on it) nor how many people watch them. They might have footage of them interviewing Yoshida from E3 or something tho.

They were pretty big around the time I believe when SWTOR was approaching launch. So who knows.
 
Thank you for contacting the Square Enix Support Centre.


We are sorry to hear you are having an issue with registering your code.

It seems you have got an EU code as this code can not be register on your US account.

We advise you to contact US support in order to exchange your code with a US one.









Here's the thing. I don't know why when I put in the support ticket it didn't go to a us support. I signed up for the beta and it gave me a eu beta code. I put in a ticket it went to eu support. I'm using us links.
 
I installed the new Nvidia beta drivers and my benchmark score went up over 200 points and average framerate went up 5 fps higher. Excellent!

iJLqNOEBRsmwl.png

Too bad that any driver higher than 314.22 isnt reliable for me. I get the "driver has stopped working error" (using a GTX 460 1GB, it seems like its a common issue for some folks using this card). I would like those 5 extra fps.
 
Ran the same benchmark earlier today, after installing a Radeon HD 7870 OC.

My score went from 4100 on my 6850, to 5551 on the new card. I'm going to see how hot it runs and then try overclocking it a bit. Its probably unrealistic, but it'd be nice to get the score to 6000.

Heh, probably not possible, unless I installed water cooling, or something like that.
 
It's back for me.

edit: Looks like Nvidia dominates the top of the charts. As expected of Nvidia.

Given how much more nVidia charges, I'd expect to get a little extra performance per CU. To be fair though, they're going like things like, "7800 series, 7900 series" for Radeon cards, and there can actually be quite a bit of vary in those lines. nVidia's cards are being listed a bit closer to the actual precise models. This means that there will both by more nVidia cards to list, and that their averages will be less skewed downward.
 
Wow, the new 326.41 driver increased my score by over 200 points too! Dat Nvidia driver magic. Seems like they have been working to optimize their drivers for FFXIV before launch. As expected of Nvidia.





Nice. I'm on an i7-950 and GTX 680 myself. Dat Nehalem has lasted me over 3 years now and it's still cooking along nicely.

All this has me very excited. I know what I am doing once I get my son down!
 
Given how much more nVidia charges, I'd expect to get a little extra performance per CU. To be fair though, they're going like things like, "7800 series, 7900 series" for Radeon cards, and there can actually be quite a bit of vary in those lines. nVidia's cards are being listed a bit closer to the actual precise models. This means that there will both by more nVidia cards to list, and that their averages will be less skewed downward.

The site accounts for this by showing percentiles if you hover the mouse cursor over the bars. There's also a thin black bar overlaid on the green bar showing the score ranges. And yes as you say, because 7800 and 7900 are reported by family, not by individual model, the range is huge for those thin black bars. It's safe to guess the fastest 7800 and 7900 cards are represented by the extreme high scores (>90% percentile). Note they still lose to Nvidia's cards, the best 7900 is at best as good as the best GTX 680. All the Nvidia cards above GTX 680 are untouchable by AMD anything.
 
As long as my game doesn't lag, and my computer isn't huffing fumes just trying to run it I'm happy. Also, gimme monies for a good 1920x1080 monitor then you can make fun >:O

1920x1200 is the way to go for monitors, ideally 2560x1600 but those are far from priced decently.
 
The site accounts for this by showing percentiles if you hover the mouse cursor over the bars. There's also a thin black bar overlaid on the green bar showing the score ranges. And yes as you say, because 7800 and 7900 are reported by family, not by individual model, the range is huge for those thin black bars. It's safe to guess the fastest 7800 and 7900 cards are represented by the extreme high scores (>90% percentile). Note they still lose to Nvidia's cards, the best 7900 is at best as good as the best GTX 680. All the Nvidia cards above GTX 680 are untouchable by AMD anything.

Oh, I know, but like I said, there's a certain, premium for nVidia cards. For me, the extra performance wasn't worth that premium so. *shrug*

I was just pointing out that there'd be a slightly more, diverse list, up until they hit the top handful of cards, if they went by specific card instead of family.
 
Why is it I haven't gotten a mail about Phase 4 starting up next month?

I'm starting to get worried that I might not get in on Phase 4, even though I were part of Phase 3. =/
 
Why is it I haven't gotten a mail about Phase 4 starting up next month?

I'm starting to get worried that I might not get in on Phase 4, even though I were part of Phase 3. =/

It doesn't matter if you get an email or not, you just go into the beta forums and download your client.
 
Take into account that the game seems very CPU dependant, so you may want to look to the CPU too if you want extra frames on XIV.
Not to mention that benchmark doesn't take advantage of multiple GPUs. Doesn't utilize SLI/Crossfire or dual-chip GPUs. Game should soon, like on the OB/retail client, but that benchmark doesn't (neither did phase 3 client).

The day the benchmark was released I got a score of 7400 with a GTX 670 and an i5 3750k (1080 with max settings) but I haven't tried it since the 320+ drivers. I should try that again next time I turn my PC on.
 
Getting a benchmark score of 8600 with maximum settings (at 1920x1080) is going to be food for fps, right? I'm not sure how it compares with others.

The game does look pretty, if the benchmark is anything to go by!
 
But I'm on PS3. I guess I'll just let the client stay on my HDD and then enter as normal when Phase 4 starts up?

Hmm, I don't know then. The current phase 3 client won't work anymore. But it's not like people are receiving emails with new codes or something at the moment.
 
Upgraded drivers and got a better score


Any idea how to improve more? Or should I play on High instead?

There's really something wrong with your system. Is it because the 690 was never optimized for the game, while all the other ones did?

Here's mine:

Score:6403
Average Framerate:52.954
Performance:Very High
Screen Size: 1920x1200
Graphics Presets: Maximum

System:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
8168.973MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.2049
Driver: 320.49
 
The benchmark is less optimized than beta 3's client and I am assuming beta 4 will bring more optimization as well so you'll get better performance in the real game!
 
This is with my new vid card (760).
QXV3pjJ.png


Reran it with vsync and triple buffering and it took a 1k hit too.. but hey no tearing.

The framerate was only slightly higher than my previous card, so I think the benchmark isn't like a lot shittier than phase 3 was.
 
There's really something wrong with your system. Is it because the 690 was never optimized for the game, while all the other ones did?

Here's mine:

Score:6403
Average Framerate:52.954
Performance:Very High
Screen Size: 1920x1200
Graphics Presets: Maximum

System:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
8168.973MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.2049
Driver: 320.49

The GTX 690 is a dual-GPU card, dude. It has 2x GK104 (Kepler) GPUs with similar configuration to single GTX 670s on a single board. Because it's got 2 GPUs, it runs in SLI continuously. The benchmark doesn't support SLI, so his score reflects just a single GPU working while the other is idle. His score is correct, the final game client will properly support SLI and his 690 will actually run at full performance.
 
The GTX 690 is a dual-GPU card, dude. It has 2x GK104 (Kepler) GPUs with similar configuration to single GTX 670s on a single board. Because it's got 2 GPUs, it runs in SLI continuously. The benchmark doesn't support SLI, so his score reflects just a single GPU working while the other is idle. His score is correct, the final game client will properly support SLI and his 690 will actually run at full performance.

Right, that explains it. So the 690 is basically two 670s in one card, what a beast.

Btw, I updated my drivers to the new 326.41, and the score increased from 6403 to 6640 and the average framerate from 52.954 to 54.720.

And as Emitan says, since that benchmark is not very optimized, the new one tomorrow should be even better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom